MKS Instruments Inc
NASDAQ:MKSI

Watchlist Manager
MKS Instruments Inc Logo
MKS Instruments Inc
NASDAQ:MKSI
Watchlist
Price: 164.4 USD 0.9% Market Closed
Market Cap: 11B USD

Q3-2025 Earnings Call

AI Summary
Earnings Call on Nov 6, 2025

Strong Q3 Results: Revenue of $988 million was up 10% year-over-year and near the top end of guidance, driven by robust demand in semiconductor and electronics & packaging markets.

EPS & Margins: Net earnings per diluted share reached $1.93, above the midpoint of guidance; gross margin was 46.6%, stable with last quarter.

Guidance: Q4 revenue is expected at $990 million (±$40 million), with electronics & packaging forecasted to grow 16% year-over-year at the midpoint.

Deleveraging Progress: $400 million in voluntary debt repayments in 2025, with net leverage ratio reduced to 3.9x.

AI-Driven Demand: Continued strength in advanced packaging and chemistry solutions, benefiting from AI-related infrastructure buildout.

Free Cash Flow: Q3 free cash flow was $147 million, exceeding net earnings and making 2025 cumulative free cash flow nearly equal to all of 2024.

Demand Trends

MKS saw strong year-over-year growth in both the semiconductor and electronics & packaging (E&P) markets, driven by robust demand for advanced solutions—especially those enabling AI applications. The specialty industrial market remained steady, and management expects continued momentum in Q4. PC and smartphone markets are stable, with potential upside if new form factors or AI adoption in devices materializes.

AI Influence

AI is a major growth driver, leading to increased device complexity and higher demand for MKS products across both semiconductor and E&P markets. High attach rates of chemistry sales to equipment for AI applications are providing a sustainable and growing revenue stream. AI is also expanding demand beyond high-end servers to more widespread applications, which could further fuel growth.

Equipment and Chemistry Revenue

Equipment sales in the E&P segment were exceptionally strong, likely at the high end or even above historical averages, and typically precede chemistry revenue by 6 to 12 months. Chemistry revenue is up high single digits, with equipment sales expected to support future chemistry growth. Management expects equipment revenue to be lumpy but sees a solid backlog for the coming quarters.

Margins and Tariffs

Gross margin was stable at 46.6%, with slight dilution from tariffs and a higher mix of equipment sales, which are margin-dilutive compared to chemistry. Tariff impacts are now largely offset, though they continue to reduce gross margins by roughly 50 basis points. The company remains confident in achieving its long-term gross margin goal of over 47% as the sales mix normalizes.

Deleveraging & Cash Flow

MKS generated strong free cash flow, exceeding $147 million in Q3 and nearly matching all of 2024's total over the first three quarters of 2025. The company reduced gross debt with $400 million in voluntary prepayments in 2025 and brought its net leverage ratio down to 3.9x. Management is committed to further deleveraging as a top priority.

Geographic Trends

Growth in Asia remains significant, but there is an ongoing trend of onshoring chip and packaging fabs to the US, Japan, and Europe, as well as expansion into Southeast Asia. MKS is building capacity in Southeast Asia to align with customer moves driven by the China+1 strategy.

Semiconductor Market Outlook

Memory pricing and supply constraints are expected to drive future demand, with MKS anticipating that increases in customer equipment purchases will precede market upturns by about a quarter. The company holds strong positions in deposition, etch, and power delivery businesses and expects to benefit from any forthcoming NAND upgrade cycles.

Product & Technology Positioning

MKS's broad portfolio across vacuum, photonics, power, advanced chemistries, and laser drilling positions it well to capture opportunities in complex, multi-layer advanced packaging, and foundational technologies for both current and future semiconductor and electronics needs.

Revenue
$988 million
Change: Up 10% year-over-year, up 2% sequentially.
Guidance: $990 million, plus or minus $40 million for Q4 2025.
Semiconductor Revenue
$415 million
Change: Down 4% sequentially, up 10% year-over-year.
Guidance: $415 million, plus or minus $15 million for Q4 2025.
Electronics & Packaging Revenue
$289 million
Change: Up 9% sequentially, up 25% year-over-year.
Guidance: $295 million, plus or minus $10 million for Q4 2025.
Specialty Industrial Revenue
$284 million
Change: Up 3% sequentially, down 1% year-over-year.
Guidance: $280 million, plus or minus $15 million for Q4 2025.
Gross Margin
46.6%
Change: Just above midpoint of guidance, stable quarter-over-quarter.
Guidance: 44% to 46%, plus or minus 100 basis points for Q4 2025.
Operating Expenses
$256 million
Change: Higher sequentially.
Guidance: $255 million, plus or minus $5 million for Q4 2025.
Operating Income
$205 million
No Additional Information
Operating Margin
20.8%
No Additional Information
Adjusted EBITDA
$240 million
Change: Above the midpoint of expectations.
Guidance: $235 million, plus or minus $24 million for Q4 2025.
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
24.3%
No Additional Information
Net Interest Expense
$45 million
Change: In line with guidance.
Tax Rate
17.9%
Change: Just below guidance midpoint.
Guidance: approximately 2% for Q4 2025; FY rate just over 14%.
Net Earnings
$130 million
No Additional Information
EPS
$1.93
Change: Above midpoint of guidance.
Guidance: $2.27, plus or minus $0.34 for Q4 2025.
Free Cash Flow
$147 million
No Additional Information
Cumulative Free Cash Flow (first three quarters 2025)
$405 million
Change: Nearly as much as all of 2024.
Capital Expenditure
$50 million
Guidance: Q4 CapEx to sequentially increase but remain at low end of annual guidance of 4% to 5% of revenue.
Liquidity
$1.4 billion
No Additional Information
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$697 million
No Additional Information
Gross Debt
$4.4 billion
No Additional Information
Net Leverage Ratio
3.9x
Change: Brought down as of quarter end.
Trailing 12-month Adjusted EBITDA
$953 million
No Additional Information
Dividend per Share
$0.22
No Additional Information
Dividend Payout
$15 million
No Additional Information
Revenue
$988 million
Change: Up 10% year-over-year, up 2% sequentially.
Guidance: $990 million, plus or minus $40 million for Q4 2025.
Semiconductor Revenue
$415 million
Change: Down 4% sequentially, up 10% year-over-year.
Guidance: $415 million, plus or minus $15 million for Q4 2025.
Electronics & Packaging Revenue
$289 million
Change: Up 9% sequentially, up 25% year-over-year.
Guidance: $295 million, plus or minus $10 million for Q4 2025.
Specialty Industrial Revenue
$284 million
Change: Up 3% sequentially, down 1% year-over-year.
Guidance: $280 million, plus or minus $15 million for Q4 2025.
Gross Margin
46.6%
Change: Just above midpoint of guidance, stable quarter-over-quarter.
Guidance: 44% to 46%, plus or minus 100 basis points for Q4 2025.
Operating Expenses
$256 million
Change: Higher sequentially.
Guidance: $255 million, plus or minus $5 million for Q4 2025.
Operating Income
$205 million
No Additional Information
Operating Margin
20.8%
No Additional Information
Adjusted EBITDA
$240 million
Change: Above the midpoint of expectations.
Guidance: $235 million, plus or minus $24 million for Q4 2025.
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
24.3%
No Additional Information
Net Interest Expense
$45 million
Change: In line with guidance.
Tax Rate
17.9%
Change: Just below guidance midpoint.
Guidance: approximately 2% for Q4 2025; FY rate just over 14%.
Net Earnings
$130 million
No Additional Information
EPS
$1.93
Change: Above midpoint of guidance.
Guidance: $2.27, plus or minus $0.34 for Q4 2025.
Free Cash Flow
$147 million
No Additional Information
Cumulative Free Cash Flow (first three quarters 2025)
$405 million
Change: Nearly as much as all of 2024.
Capital Expenditure
$50 million
Guidance: Q4 CapEx to sequentially increase but remain at low end of annual guidance of 4% to 5% of revenue.
Liquidity
$1.4 billion
No Additional Information
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$697 million
No Additional Information
Gross Debt
$4.4 billion
No Additional Information
Net Leverage Ratio
3.9x
Change: Brought down as of quarter end.
Trailing 12-month Adjusted EBITDA
$953 million
No Additional Information
Dividend per Share
$0.22
No Additional Information
Dividend Payout
$15 million
No Additional Information

Earnings Call Transcript

Transcript
from 0
Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the MKS Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Paretosh Misra. Please go ahead.

P
Paretosh Misra
executive

Good morning, everyone. I'm Paretosh Misra, Vice President of Investor Relations, and I'm joined this morning by John Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Ram Mayampurath, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Yesterday, after market close, we released our financial results for the third quarter of 2025 which are posted to our investor website at investor.mkscom.

As a reminder, various remarks about future expectations, plans and prospects for MKS comprise forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in yesterday's press release, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. These statements represent the company's expectations only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing the company's estimates or views as of any date subsequent to today, and the company disclaims any obligation to update these statements.

During the call, we will be discussing various non-GAAP financial measures. Unless otherwise noted, all income statement-related financial measures will be non-GAAP other than revenue and gross margin. Please refer to our press release and the presentation materials posted to the Investor Relations section of our website for information regarding our non-GAAP financial results and a reconciliation to our GAAP measures. Our investor website also provides a detailed breakout of revenues by end market and division.

Now I'll turn the call over to John.

J
John Lee
executive

Thanks, Paretosh, and good morning, everyone. MKS delivered a solid third quarter with revenue and EPS in the upper half of our guided ranges and healthy results across each of our 3 end markets. Third quarter revenue of $988 million was up 10% year-over-year, driven by strong demand in our semiconductor and electronics and packaging end markets.

We continue to demonstrate strong execution in delivering value to our customers' most critical needs. Net earnings per diluted share totaled $1.93. We also continue to take advantage of our improved cash flow to reduce our leverage with another voluntary prepayment of $100 million on our term loan completed in October. MKS is uniquely positioned at the forefront of accelerating innovation and enabling the advanced technologies that power the AI era.

Increasing device complexity is creating significant challenges and opportunities in both the semiconductor and advanced packaging markets. We are differentiated in our ability to serve many critical applications with our comprehensive portfolio of semiconductor capital equipment subsystems advanced packaging chemistries and advanced packaging equipment systems. Our C3 performance in our end market demonstrates how we are benefiting in this dynamic environment.

Starting with our semiconductor market, we reported solid revenue growth year-over-year, driven by continued strength in our products supporting deposition and etching applications which are increasingly critical for advanced memory and logic manufacturing. Our dissolved gas systems for advanced logic applications were also a solid contributor to our performance, and our services business continues to contribute steady year-over-year growth.

Lower NAND upgrade activity, which was expected after a very strong second quarter, drove the sequential decline in semiconductor sales. However, our leadership in power delivery remains as strong as ever in this space. We expect fourth quarter semiconductor revenue to remain flat on a sequential basis, which would translate into a healthy double-digit year-over-year growth for 2025. This underscores how well positioned we are with the broadest portfolio of products and technologies to drive our industry's increasingly challenging technology road maps.

In Electronics & Packaging, revenue exceeded the midpoint of our expectations, growing 25% year-over-year. This strong performance reflects continued momentum across our portfolio, driven by robust demand for our chemistry solutions and, in particular, our chemistry equipment. The investments we have made over the past several years to position MKS to optimize the interconnect in advanced electronics are now paying off as we gain momentum in AI-related applications.

Today, our chemistry revenue growth reflects our position as a leader of the most advanced package technologies used in high-performance computing applications. Longer term, our chemistry equipment business highlights how critical we are to our customers as they rapidly build their next-generation infrastructure. The high attach rates from our equipment sales are a leading indicator of sustainable longer-term revenue from our proprietary chemistries. It's important to keep in mind that once we build and install the equipment, it can take 6 to 12 months for customers to qualify it and then put it into production.

Once in production, chemistry provides a long tail, steady consumable revenue generally for the life of that equipment. With high single-digit growth in chemistry revenues and strong equipment sales through Q3, we have confidence our proprietary chemistry will be a key revenue generator for us in the years ahead. In Q4, we expect revenue from our electronics and packaging market to be up on a sequential basis and up double digits on a year-over-year basis. Our strong performance reflects our ability to capture emerging AI-driven demand. even as broader industry demand trends remain stable in markets such as smartphones and PCs.

We anticipate continued strength in our chemistry equipment business, supported by AI offset by modest sequential declines in chemistry due to seasonal factors consistent with prior years. Assuming the midpoint of our Q4 guidance, our electronics and packaging business is on track to deliver robust full year growth of approximately 20%. Our specialty industrial market revenue was consistent with the stable trends we've seen over the past several quarters. Within this market, the industrial category showed sequential improvement. In life and health sciences and research and defense end markets remain steady.

We had a healthy quarter of design wins, particularly in research and defense. This success highlights how MKS leverages its semi and electronics R&D investments to unlock new opportunities in specialty industrial markets that generate attractive incremental margins and cash flow. Looking ahead to Q4, we expect specialty industrial revenue to remain relatively flat sequentially.

Overall, MKS is continuing to perform at a high level in 2025, with year-over-year growth powered by our semiconductor in electronics and packaging markets. Our broad portfolio of differentiated products and technologies in areas such as Baku, power, photonics, laser drilling and advanced chemistries positions us favorably to win new opportunities in applications critical to enabling the AI transformation.

Against this exciting backdrop, we are executing with financial discipline, aligning our business to win in our key markets and reducing our leverage. I'll close, I extend my thanks to our MKS team for their tireless work driving the great results we are reporting today and also to our customers and our suppliers across the globe for their collaboration and support.

With that, let me turn it over to Ram to run through the financial results and fourth quarter guidance in more detail.

Ram?

R
Ramakumar Mayampurath
executive

Thank you, John, and good morning, everyone. We delivered strong results in the third quarter, driven by healthy demand in our semiconductor and electronics and packaging end markets and continued stability in our specialty industrial end market. As in prior quarters, our execution remains strong with healthy margins, robust free cash flow and continued progress on our deleveraging goals. Third quarter revenue was $988 million, up 2% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year.

The result was at the high end of our guidance and reflected better-than-expected trends in key end markets. Third quarter semiconductor revenue was $415 million, down 4% sequentially but up 10% year-over-year. This result was at the high end of our expectations. The sequential decline was driven by lower RF power sales due to the timing of NAND upgrade activity as expected. The year-over-year growth was driven by strength in many product categories, including our vacuum products and plasma and reactive gas businesses.

The fundamentals of our semiconductor business remains strong. Third quarter Electronics & Packaging revenue was $289 million, up 9% sequentially and driven by growth in our chemistry and Equipment businesses. On a year-over-year basis, sales were up 25% and driven by growth in chemistry, chemistry equipment and flexible PCB drilling equipment sales. These strong results underscore the strength of our electronics and packaging business as we deliver enabling technologies for high-growth emerging AI applications and today's advanced consumer electronics. Chemistry revenue was up 10% year-over-year, excluding the impact of FX and palladium pass-through, continuing the strong growth trend over the last year.

In our specialty industrial market, third quarter revenue was $284 million, an increase of 3% sequentially mainly due to the improvement in the industrial market. Revenue was down 1% on a year-over-year basis. Overall, our specialty industrial business has remained steady for well over a year. Third quarter gross margin was 46.6%, just above the midpoint of our guidance. Gross margin was stable relative to the prior quarter, with tariff impact of about 80 basis points, 35 basis points better than last quarter, offset by a higher mix of chemistry equipment sales.

As we have stated before, the strong equipment sales we have seen throughout 2025 are a good indicator of future high-margin chemistry revenues. Third quarter operating expenses were $256 million at the high end of our guidance and higher sequentially, primarily as a result of an increase in variable costs, mostly related to employee incentive compensation tied to stronger business performance. Third quarter operating income was $205 million with an operating margin of 20.8%. Third quarter adjusted EBITDA was $240 million and above the midpoint of our expectations with adjusted EBITDA margin of 24.3%.

Net interest expenses was $45 million, in line with our guidance. Third quarter effective tax rate was 17.9% and just below the midpoint of our guidance. Third quarter net earnings were $130 million or $1.93 per diluted share and above the midpoint of our guidance. Free cash flow generation was very strong at $147 million, representing over 100% of our net earnings and 15% of our revenue. Through the first 3 quarters of 2025, we generated cumulative free cash flow of $405 million, nearly as much as we did in all of 2024. We invested $50 million in capital expenditure in the quarter. We expect CapEx to sequentially increase in Q4 but fall within the low end of our annual CapEx guidance of 4% to 5% of revenue.

We closed the quarter with approximately $1.4 billion of liquidity compared to cash and cash equivalents of $697 million and our undrawn revolving credit facility of [ $675 ] million. As John highlighted, we made a voluntary principal prepayment of $100 million in October. In total, we have made $400 million in voluntary payments thus far in 2025. We remain focused on executing our long-term capital allocation priorities of investing in organic growth opportunities while reducing our leverage through principal prepayments and working with our vacuum partners to reduce our interest expenses as market opportunities arise.

We exited the quarter with a gross debt of $4.4 billion and net leverage ratio of 3.9x based on our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA of $953 million. We continue to bring down our net leverage ratio as we generate strong free cash flow, make proactive principal prepayments and deliver high year-over-year adjusted EBITDA. Finally, during the quarter, we paid a dividend of $0.22 per share or $15 million. Let me now turn to our fourth quarter outlook. The guidance we are providing represents our best estimate based on the dynamic trade environment in which we are operating. We expect revenue of $990 million, plus or minus $40 million. By end market, we expect semiconductor revenue to be $415 million, plus or minus $15 million, reflecting the continued strong fundamentals of our business.

Revenue from electronics and packaging market is expected to be $295 million, plus or minus $10 million, which would be up 16% year-over-year at midpoint. As we look to model 2026, we would remind you that chemistry equipment revenue is poised to have a record year in 2025 and has historically varied significantly from year-to-year. Chemistry revenue which is the majority of our E&P revenue is much steadier and more predictable. Revenue from our specialty industrial market is expected to remain relatively steady at $280 million, plus or minus $15 million. We are guiding gross margin of 4% to 6%, plus or minus 100 basis points. The sequential decline is due to higher chemistry equipment sales in the mix and lower chemistry sales due to seasonality, partially offset by lower tariff-related impacts.

We anticipate our mitigation actions will nearly offset tariff cost dollar for dollar beginning in Q4. However, these costs are passed through 0 margins, and we anticipate tariff will continue to dilute our gross margin in Q4 and moving forward by approximately 50 basis points. With our mitigation initiatives in place, we remain confident and our plan to deliver our long-term gross margin objective of 47% plus. We expect fourth quarter operating expense of $255 million, plus or minus $5 million. As a reminder, OpEx is typically higher in Q1 as a result of higher stock-based compensation and fringe benefits consistent with prior years.

We expect fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA of $235 million plus or minus $24 million. We expect tax rate of approximately 2% in the fourth quarter benefiting from certain favorable discrete tax items in the quarter and bringing our full year tax rate to just over 14%. We expect fourth quarter net earnings per diluted share of $2.27 plus or minus $0.34. Wrapping up, MKS is executed at a high level through the third quarter, and we are expecting this momentum to continue in Q4.

We are winning exciting opportunities across our semiconductor and electronics and packaging end markets, and we are focused on managing our business with discipline to drive profitability and free cash flow. We remain focused on reducing our leverage. With our broad portfolio of products, strong secular tailwinds and an improving balance sheet, MKS is in a great position as we look to 2026.

With that, operator, please open the call for Q&A.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Melissa Weathers with Deutsche Bank.

M
Melissa Weathers
analyst

I think first, I want to touch on the E&P side. You said a couple of times in your commentary that equipment orders generally precede chemistry orders, and that can take about 6 to 12 months. You also mentioned that chemistries were at, I think, a record year in 2025. But I was quite clear on how you were guiding 2026, whether or not that should maybe come down or be stable. So any color on how we should be thinking about the chemistries flow through into 2026 after all the strong equipment sales?

J
John Lee
executive

Melissa, it's John. Thanks for the question. So we're not really guiding 2026, obviously, or chemistry or for the company. But I would say this, the equipment that we are building and installing now puts us in a very good position for additional chemistry revenue starting in 2016 and forward. I would say this, we really look at the whole market and its growth, and we've kind of said in our E&P market, we would grow 300 basis points above GDP. And that was made up of -- that was what we said at the Analyst Day, and that was made up of higher growth substrate business, single -- mid-single-digit HDI business and GDP-type MLB business. .

And those numbers are what we're staying with for now. But obviously, when we gave those numbers, [indiscernible] in the mix, right? And so I think, generally, things are better -- and I would say our ability to hit the 390 basis points above GDP, our longer-term target, is that we're very confident in that fundamentally because we are shipping a lot of that equipment and a lot of chemistry that goes with it. will help us get to those longer-term targets.

M
Melissa Weathers
analyst

Okay. And then maybe on the semiconductor side. It seems we've seen some really positive pricing data points in memory in the last couple of weeks or months. And I think a lot of people are expecting a shortage situation in memory in 2026. So can you talk about like the order patterns that you guys saw in the quarter? Have you seen an acceleration in orders ahead of maybe potential capacity additions in the memory space?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. We read the same reports as you do Melissa. So I think in general, we're happy that memory is recovering. Pricing is recovering and that the industry is moving towards a more constrained supply constrained environment. And I think our customer is probably better to answer whether they're going to be ordering more equipment from us. But certainly, in general, I think everything is positive in the trend towards memory equipment. .

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company.

J
James Ricchiuti
analyst

Wondering if you could give us a little bit of a better sense within the E&P business, and you can comment on Q3 or 9 months? How much of that growth is actually coming from equipment, which admittedly has been strong, and we know it can be a little bit lumpy?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. Thanks for the question, Jim. I think we've said historically, when we looked at the MSD business, equipment can be anywhere from 5% of total revenue to 15%. And I would say because of the last 4 quarters of really strong revenues, orders and therefore, revenues were towards the higher end of that range and maybe a little higher than that. So it's really going to be probably the historic 4 quarters of a year for the equipment business.

J
James Ricchiuti
analyst

Then, John, the -- also curious, there's another element of equipment in the PCB area. Are you seeing -- any signs of a cyclical pickup in the flex PCB drilling equipment business, just given somewhat improving smartphone shipments and I guess, the potential that there may be some form factor changes coming in the market next year?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, we are actually seeing a pickup in flex the business there, as you know, we're a market share leader in flex laser drilling. And so we have seen that pick up. And this is actually the second year where we've seen a healthy business there. It's not at the historic rates that were kind of in the 2000 time frame, 2021 time frame, but it has recovered to a very healthy level.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Shane Brett with Morgan Stanley.

S
Shane Brett
analyst

I want to follow up on the E&P question earlier, but considering that your chemistry sales for this year up high single digits, some back-of-envelope math indicates that your tooling business could be almost doubling this year? One, is that kind of the right way to think about it is that in the right ballpark? And just how much visibility do you have on equipment sales on a go-forward basis?

J
John Lee
executive

I think your math is roughly right with respect to the equipment business for chemistry equipment. And then I think what we could say is that we've had 4 strong quarters of bookings for that chemistry -- and we can look out, certainly, the lead times of our equipment are 4 to 12 months. And so we have added some capacity even to some of our equipment factories not new buildings, but just expanding within the space that we have. And so we look forward to a couple more quarters at least of large equipment bills. We know that we have the backlog for that. .

S
Shane Brett
analyst

Got it. And for my follow-up, so your semi customers have spoken about a pickup in equipment shipments from the second half of next year. And I think your peers have been kind of cautiously optimistic towards the pickup from Q2. Just -- where are you guys in terms of your expectations towards semi revenue cadence through 2026? And if there's sort of any idiosyncratic tailwinds for MKS that should drive your shipments above WFE in 2026, they are very helpful.

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, certainly, we read the same things, and yes, a lot of folks are saying kind of second half 26 is where WFE really picks up. I think we're just focused on this quarter, next quarter and the next 6 months, I would say this. our semi revenue has improved double digits year-over-year on a quarterly basis as well as year-over-year. And this is really not with a lot of NAND upgrade, yes, right? We had a good NAND upgrade in Q2, not so much in Q3. And so that's still yet to come. Certainly, our customers think that's going to happen.

I think we know and we're very confident in our position in our power for the high aspect [indiscernible] we're very confident that when those upgrades occur, that will be us -- and then certainly, even without the NAND upgrade, you can see the broad portfolio of semiconductor critical subsystems we have continued to outgrow WFE even this year. And so we look forward to 2026, where WC follows the trend that people are expecting, another maybe high single-digit increase. We're going to enjoy some of that as well.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar with TD Cowen. .

S
Sreekrishnan Sankarnarayanan
analyst

John, just to follow up on the previous question. If you do assume that in the second half of next year, let's just pick a time frame and say, in Q3 of next year's inflection in theory, should you not start seeing it 1 quarter earlier? Or do you think there's something else different in this cycle?

J
John Lee
executive

No, in general, I think that's still true, Chris. We -- if our customers are shipping in Q3, for instance, to your assumption, then we would certainly see that at least a quarter ahead of time. Our lead times have come back to historically low lead times anywhere from 4 to 8 weeks, sometimes 4 weeks depending on how complex the system is. But in that 4-week time frame and 8-week time frame, we do see a lot of in-quarter turns, as we've talked about in the last couple of quarters. So yes, I don't see any changes to that assumption, Krish. .

S
Sreekrishnan Sankarnarayanan
analyst

Got it. And then I just had a 2-part question. One is, how much of your E&P sales was advanced packaging chemistry? And how much you think that was AI? And then on the PCB drilling side, are drill bits a constraint? And is that impacting your business? Or you're not seeing any of that?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. Maybe I'll talk about chemistry and how AI has played a part in that. In the past, we have talked about AI servers driving the top 1/3 of the PCB industry. The Pine calls that the substrate right? And that top third was the AI part of that top third was going from 5% to 10% to 15% of that top 1/3 of the piece of the industry. Since then, though, as we now know, AI is also driving the equipment for HDI and MLD. This is the next third and the last 1/3 of the PCB industry.

And of course, the chemistry that goes with those. So in general, our AI revenue has gone from -- for the chemistry, kind of that 5% of the total PC business, not just the opt to double that. over the last year. So the kind of 10%. If you had equipment to that, of course, we're pushing the mid-teen percentage of the MSD business due to AI.

I think your second question about maybe clarify your second question, it...

S
Sreekrishnan Sankarnarayanan
analyst

I was just wondering on the PCB drilling side, is dilbit drill bits are constraint -- and is it impacting your PCB drilling business?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, I don't know if I can comment on that, Bill, is we don't do that. That's a mechanical drilling, I think, what you're referring to. We're really doing laser drilling. But I have not heard that, that mechanical drilling is constrained in the industry. .

Operator

Your next question comes to the line of Michael Mani with BofA Securities.

M
Michael Mani
analyst

On E&P, could you help us parse through when you look at your growth drivers, what is exactly secular versus more idiosyncratic to MKS. So I mean, it seems like a lot of the HCI MLB momentum reflects some of this secular uptake in the AI. But Obviously, without a tech, you're able to go into many of these opportunities in both equipment and chemistry. So is there a share gain overlay aspect to it that you're seeing? Can you attribute these wins to that deal? Or is it mainly just broad-based secular growth?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, I think it's both, Mike. So the regular growth is we're industry leader in it. And so more square meters of boards on the chemistry can not just enjoy that. But I would say the thing that is different this time and that's beneficial for Encasis the AI is driving these incredibly thick boards, many, many layers of HDI boards, substrate boards as well as MLB boards. And as we talked about, a lot of the equipment orders that we have gotten tied to AI for HDI and MLB are because our equipment is uniquely qualified to process much thicker boards.

We had to make modifications to the equipment. We did and then we got those orders. Now as we said, we have very high attach rates of chemistry to our equipment. So if we are unique in being able to supply that equipment versus our competitors, we're also going to get that chemistry as we talked about in the call. So I think that's unique this time around.

M
Michael Mani
analyst

Great.

And maybe a question on gross margins. Given this flow-through from potentially higher chemistry revenues over the next couple of quarters, -- how should we be thinking about as a good baseline for gross margins through next year? It seems like volumes are training the right way you're getting -- you're having seen a little more of this margin accretive business. But -- just any way to think about auto model margins through 2016? .

R
Ramakumar Mayampurath
executive

Michael, this is Rom. I'll take that. So if you look at the progress we have made in gross margin in 2024, all the way to Q1 of 2025, we were well over 47% in gross margin. Since then, a couple of things have happened. One is the impact of the mix that you talked about of very high fast growing equipment sales and the impact of tariffs. As we said in our prepared remarks, we have offset the impact of tariffs dollar per dollar, but we'll see ongoing 50 basis points impact on our gross margin because we are not marking up the tariffs that we pass through, right?

So in time, we'll offset that with efficiency and ongoing operational excellence programs. And in the long term, with a normalized mix, we are very confident we can get back to that 47-plus percent that we were having before.

Operator

Your next call comes to the line of Matthew Prisco with Cantor.

M
Matthew Prisco
analyst

I guess to start, -- how do you see the NAND lumpiness playing out over the next handful of quarters? Kind of what are the primary moving parts you are focused on here as determinants for the linearity of that upgrade cycle?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, Matt, I wish I knew. But I would say this, we have plenty of capacity, manufacturing capacity to meet any kind of uptick in either upgrades or greenfield. And I think 1 of our key customers has said, there is a large opportunity still of upgrades just in the '26 and maybe beyond time frame. But they have said it's lumpy. But then I think overlay on top of that, the industry discussion of NAND pricing that I think Melissa asked earlier, that's just a tailwind, the discussion by many of the chip makers that NAND is now constrained.

And then what's exciting is potentially a new application for NAND, driven by AI again, of course, which is in the cell -- replacing solar, solid state drives using more NAND for AI. and that would drive another layer of growth. So I think we're ready. It's lumpy, can be lumpy. We will certainly try to guide you guys as best we can in terms of when we see that coming -- and -- but things can change and things probably will change rapidly.

M
Matthew Prisco
analyst

And then maybe you can talk about progress you've made in the litho inspection and metrology part of your business, maybe remind us of kind of year-to-date highlights and what success would look like to the team from a share gain perspective through next year?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, Matt, we have talked about world-class optics. This is our effort to gain more presence obviously in litho metrology inspection. And we talked about in the past, revenue from that sector kind of going from the $150 million to $300 million because we invested in it. And as you know, litho metrology inspection is a little flatter this past year. And so we're not immune to the cycles, but the cycles are more muted than in debt etch. But we're really happy with some of the really difficult things that we have been asked to do and delivered on that are now integral to some of the most advanced Lepage machines in the world. .

So we will continue to invest there and continue to try to grow that share. I don't think anybody would say litho metrology and specing won't be important to semi, right? It will always be important to semi, always be a key component of semi -- and I think maybe stepping back a little bit, the strategy for MKS is to be a foundational technology supplier to the entire industry. So in 1 decade, Det etch is more important because it's multi-patterning. In the next decade, EUV takes over and the filmetrology inspection become a little more important.

And from an MKS standpoint, we kind of hope that all the markets grow. But if something shifts, then we can -- we don't have to worry about it shifting away from what we're doing.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Barger with KeyBanc Capital Markets. .

U
Unknown Analyst

John, you alluded to some of this already, I think, but we've been reading that CoWoS or other packaging formats are evolving from organic interposer to -- from your perspective, is that just switching from 1 format you enable to another? Or is that evolution good for you due to more layers or smaller features?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. I think the industry is certainly working hard on various configurations for this redistribution layer, the RDL layer using Koos, CoSaraclel, and then even coat, right, on TV. So I would say this, that RDL layer is more complex as we move to organic layers. That's good for us. That's our traditional strength, organic layers versus silicon. And when you go to organic layers, the RDL layers increased a little bit, maybe from 1 layer to 2 or 3 -- so that's good for us. But I think the bigger picture the 40 layers beneath that, that are all the substrates and PCBs. And that's really the largest growth factor for us -- and that used to be 20 layers, now it's 40%.

As we visit customers as we work with our customers, they're already looking at 80 layers. So think about that. It's gone from 20 to 40 just in the last couple of years. and we're working on 80. And the 1 after that is 3 digits. Let's put it that way in terms of number of layers of these layers made 1 at a time. you can imagine the challenges of yield, making sure that when you put 100 layers on top of each other that it still yields the same as if you had 4.

So those are great challenges for the industry and opportunities for us. So that's the bigger picture. At the same time, to your point, there's a lot of [indiscernible] and all that going on. We're involved in all of that. If it goes more towards organic that's a tailwind for us. But the bigger picture is 40 layers going to 80 going 100.

U
Unknown Analyst

Right. That's good detail. And -- and just listening to some of the OS, this is being driven by compute right now, which is high growth, but smaller unit volume maybe -- but at some point, this likely transitions to like PC or mobile, higher-volume applications. Is that your understanding? And any view on like time line of when that could happen?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. I think our view is consistent with the industry is that as inferencing goes out to PCs and phones and whatnot, The checks will be bigger and more complicated. There will be more chips that need to be integrated together. And therefore, there will be more layers of PCBs or substrates underneath. So that still has not really happened much yet, Steve. And so that's a huge potential growth driver for us. And I think everybody is working hard to make sure that things that AI drives this inferencing need. So think TBD, but we're optimistic that, that will happen or some form of that will happen. .

Operator

Our next call -- our next question comes from the line of David Lu with Mizuho.

U
Unknown Analyst

On for Vijay. Maybe the first 1 on revenue by GE. Can you just highlight what types of trends you're looking at split by geo? I know your customers mentioned some write-offs, but there's also maybe some tailwinds in the U.S.

J
John Lee
executive

Dave, just to me to understand your question, you wanted some color on revenue by geography?

U
Unknown Analyst

Just what you're seeing in terms of the demand trends yes.

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. Well, certainly, a lot of Asia is driving a lot of the growth, for sure. But as you know, -- some of that's coming back to the United States as well as the Japan and Europe as people start onshoring chip fabs and packaging fabs to that matter. But I think the other larger geographic trend is China plus 1 trend as things move to Southeast Asia. As you know, we are building some factories in Southeast Asia to meet that demand because our customers are moving there.

So I think there is a lot of geographic movements in the industry today, especially the packaging industry, but also the chip industry, as you see fabs coming up in the United States, Europe, Japan and potentially India as well.

U
Unknown Analyst

Okay. And then I don't know any comment on the recent rumors of potentially selling the specialty coating divestiture.

J
John Lee
executive

Well, we're aware of those articles, but we really don't comment on market speculation, Dave?

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Quatrochi with Wells Fargo.

J
Joseph Quatrochi
analyst

Yes. Maybe 1 on the semi side. Given the entity list affiliate rule, it looks like it's delayed. Have you seen any change in order patterns or discussions with your customers?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. Thanks for the question, Joe. Not really because I think when that rule came out, we didn't have -- I don't think the industry had time to react, but some of our customers have said the impact is and on late. So as you know, the tariff environment is kind of wake up every day and changes. So we really haven't had any kind of different discussions with our customers based on that specific role.

J
Joseph Quatrochi
analyst

Got it. And then just your, I guess, conservative comments in terms of looking at like chemical growth into 2026. Is there a particular end market that you're maybe a little bit more conservative in the outlook for the smartphones or PCs, something like that?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. I would say the PC and smartphone markets have been stable, if you will, go, but there are some things that could drive it higher in the future. We're just not sure if they will 1 of which is new form factors for phones, multiples, for instance, more foldables. And the other ones that we talked about earlier, I think what Steve asked a question about inferencing cut out to phones and PCs, that certainly would be would change the outlook in terms of more of a growth outlook for PCs rather than kind of more stable, which is kind of our assumption. .

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Miller with the Benchmark Company. .

M
Mark Miller
analyst

Thank you for the question. You noted strength in dep and etch. Are you getting getting share in those areas?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. I think we've had a traditional strength there in deposition that's kind of a legacy MKS business. I would say this, we gained share in multiple areas. We talked a little bit about even dissolved gas. And as the industry moves towards more advanced nodes like 2-nanometer, the ability to clean wafers, the ability to do soft etching and soft cleaning. These are all things that are driving some of our subsystems in the reactive gas part of our business. .

So we've got a lot of good opportunities there that we've been capitalizing on. And of course, power for NAND is something that we are very confident we will hold that share and as that grows, into higher aspect ratio edging for things like DRAM. And then we're working hard on conductor etch. And we have some great solutions there that our customers have told us are industry leading.

M
Mark Miller
analyst

I was wondering if you can give us some color on lasers and your outlook for next year from the laser business.

J
John Lee
executive

Yes, lasers has been a little muted because, as you know, lasers are used in industrial applications and industrial applications have been more muted than the last couple of years. PMI is still kind of hovering around that 50% or a little below. So I think we really have to see a change in that, Mark, before we would kind of see the lasers part of our business grow. .

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Jim Schneider with Goldman Sachs.

J
James Schneider
analyst

I was wondering if you could maybe kind of comment on -- given all the things we covered earlier with respect to tariffs, how you expect your direct China business to trend directionally heading into next year? What do you expect it to be sort of up, down or flat-ish?

J
John Lee
executive

Yes. Well, in China, we have 2 markets that go to China. The semiconductor equipment to rent to China. That's out of our numbers. We still sell a little bit there, what's allowed. So that's not -- that's been out of our numbers for a while. So we do have an indirect exposure in China based through our OEM customers, and that's well known. But then we also sell obviously advanced electronics packaging to customers in China. And that still remains a good portion of our business, but many of those customers are also building new capacity in Southeast Asia, as we talked about earlier. So we see that trend probably China will be a big part of our business. from a packaging standpoint, not so much from the semi direct standpoint. And then things start moving, I think, outside of China from the packaging standpoint.

J
James Schneider
analyst

And then maybe relative to your leverage target, you've talked consistently about 2x in 2027. Maybe talk about sort of the level of urgency to get there. Could you achieve it perhaps a little bit earlier than that? And maybe talk about some of the levers you might pull to sort of achieve it.

R
Ramakumar Mayampurath
executive

Jim, this is Rom. I'll take that. So we've made great progress in keeping our focus on deleveraging. We paid down $400 million in prepayment this year that's following $426 million of prepayment we did last year. And that remains our focus. Our capital allocation strategy has not changed, investing in our business and then paying our debt down. That's been our focus. In terms of accelerating that, the best way to do that will be with our current cost structures when we see the top line come back to more normal levels, we will be able to generate more cash and accelerate our debt payment. -- you're right is the net leverage target we want to get to, and that's our goal. I don't want to speculate on a time when we'll get there, but 2.5% is our net leverage target.

Operator

I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn it back to ParatasMisra.

P
Paretosh Misra
executive

Thank you all for joining us today and for your interest in MKS. [indiscernible] you may close the call, please.

Earnings Call Recording
Other Earnings Calls