` 1234 (China Lilang Ltd) vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong) Comparison - Alpha Spread

1234
vs
H
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Over the past 12 months, China Lilang Ltd has underperformed Hang Seng (Hong Kong), delivering a return of +4% compared to the Hang Seng (Hong Kong)'s +7% growth.

Stocks Performance
1234 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Loading
1234
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
Add Stock
www.alphaspread.com
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Performance Gap
1234 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance Gap Between 1234 and HSI
LOCKED
Unlock

Performance By Year
1234 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Loading
1234
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
Add Stock
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Competitors Performance
China Lilang Ltd vs Peers

No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

China Lilang Ltd
Glance View

China Lilang Ltd. engages in the manufacture and wholesale of menswear and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Quanzhou, Fujian and currently employs 3,942 full-time employees. The company went IPO on 2009-09-25. The firm designs, sources and manufactures business and casual apparels for men and sells them under the core brand of LILANZ and sub-brand of L2. The firm is also engaged in the investment holding business, as well as the provision of management services through its subsidiaries. The Company’s principal subsidiaries include Lilang Holdings Limited, Lilang (Hong Kong) International Co., Limited and Lilang (Fujian) Garment Co., Ltd.

China Lilang Ltd Intrinsic Value
LOCKED
Unlock
Back to Top
Get AI-powered insights for any company or topic.
Open AI Assistant

Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.

Warren Buffett