` 438 (IRICO Group New Energy Co Ltd) vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong) Comparison - Alpha Spread

I
438
vs
H
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Over the past 12 months, IRICO Group New Energy Co Ltd has underperformed Hang Seng (Hong Kong), delivering a return of -18% compared to the Hang Seng (Hong Kong)'s +13% growth.

Stocks Performance
438 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Loading
438
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
Add Stock
www.alphaspread.com
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Performance Gap
438 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Loading
438
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
Difference
www.alphaspread.com

Performance By Year
438 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Loading
438
Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
Add Stock
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Competitors Performance
IRICO Group New Energy Co Ltd vs Peers

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)
438
CVEO
FPI
Add Stock
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

IRICO Group New Energy Co Ltd
Glance View

Market Cap
345.6m HKD
Industry
Electrical Equipment

IRICO Group New Energy Co. Ltd. engages in the business of solar photovoltaic, new materials, and trading. The company is headquartered in Xianyang, Shaanxi. The company went IPO on 2004-12-20. The firm operates through four segments. Luminous Materials Production and Sales segment is engaged in the production and sales of luminous materials. Liquid Crystal Related Products Production and Sales segment is engaged in the production and trading of liquid crystal display (LCD) televisions and LCD glass substrates. Solar Photovoltaic Glass Production and Sales segment is engaged in the production and sales of solar photovoltaic glass. Others segment is engaged in other trading.

Intrinsic Value
21.87 HKD
Undervaluation 91%
Intrinsic Value
Price
I
Back to Top