Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc
F:RN3N
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc
Inventory
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc
Inventory Peer Comparison
Competitors Analysis
Latest Figures & CAGR of Competitors
| Company | Inventory | CAGR 3Y | CAGR 5Y | CAGR 10Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A
|
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc
F:RN3N
|
Inventory
N/A
|
CAGR 3-Years
N/A
|
CAGR 5-Years
N/A
|
CAGR 10-Years
N/A
|
|
|
Abbvie Inc
NYSE:ABBV
|
Inventory
$4.9B
|
CAGR 3-Years
16%
|
CAGR 5-Years
7%
|
CAGR 10-Years
10%
|
|
|
Gilead Sciences Inc
NASDAQ:GILD
|
Inventory
$4.4B
|
CAGR 3-Years
44%
|
CAGR 5-Years
34%
|
CAGR 10-Years
8%
|
|
|
Amgen Inc
NASDAQ:AMGN
|
Inventory
$6.2B
|
CAGR 3-Years
8%
|
CAGR 5-Years
10%
|
CAGR 10-Years
10%
|
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc
NASDAQ:VRTX
|
Inventory
$1.6B
|
CAGR 3-Years
61%
|
CAGR 5-Years
46%
|
CAGR 10-Years
42%
|
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc
NASDAQ:REGN
|
Inventory
$3.2B
|
CAGR 3-Years
10%
|
CAGR 5-Years
11%
|
CAGR 10-Years
30%
|
|
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc
Glance View
Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc., once a promising player in the biotechnology space, carved out a niche in developing novel therapies aimed at addressing unmet needs in various therapeutic areas. The company focused heavily on its proprietary drug discovery and development platform, which centered around designing and creating small molecules to activate specific receptor subtypes. This mechanism allows them to produce targeted treatments with fewer side effects, thus appealing to a market in search of more specialized therapies. At the core of Arena's portfolio was its work in the fields of cardiology, gastroenterology, and dermatology, where the company ambitiously advanced its drug candidates through meticulous research and clinical trials, hoping to bring these innovations to patients worldwide. Arena's revenue-generating strategy primarily revolved around developing these new pharmaceuticals to the point where they became attractive for partnerships or acquisitions. The company often engaged in strategic collaborations with larger pharmaceutical players, licensing its products under development, which provided crucial funding for ongoing research while retaining some rights to future revenues. This model allowed Arena to leverage the market reach and financial muscle of its partners without bearing the full brunt of commercializing a drug. This symbiotic relationship was critical for Arena’s financial stability, offering a combination of upfront payments, milestone achievements, and eventual royalties. In a constantly evolving and competitive biopharmaceutical landscape, Arena’s approach aimed to balance innovative breakthroughs with practical business acumen.