MAS Financial Services Ltd
NSE:MASFIN
Decide at what price you'd be comfortable buying and we'll help you stay ready.
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
|
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US |
|
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US |
|
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
Q1-2026 Earnings Call
AI Summary
Earnings Call on Jul 24, 2025
AUM Growth: MAS Financial Services reported 20.43% year-on-year growth in assets under management, reaching INR 12,504 crores as of June 2025.
Profitability: Profit after tax rose 19% year-on-year to INR 84 crores, with ROA at 2.84% and ROE close to 14%.
Asset Quality: Asset quality remained stable, with gross stage 3 assets at 2.49% and net stage 3 at 1.63%.
Loan Mix: MSME and SME loans remain the main growth drivers, while salaried personal loans grew sharply (91% YoY) but are capped at around 10% of AUM.
Branch Expansion: Geographical expansion has slowed, but management plans to resume branch network growth in the coming quarters.
Cost Pressures: Operating expenses rose 46% YoY, driven by upfront investments in expanding retail infrastructure.
Funding & Liquidity: The company is well-capitalized (CAR 25.22%) and expects a 25–35 bps reduction in borrowing costs over the year.
Outlook: Management maintains 20–25% annual growth guidance, expects gradual improvement in operating environment, and sees asset quality holding steady.
MAS Financial delivered 20.43% year-on-year growth in assets under management, with MSME and SME products accounting for the majority of new business. The company aims to maintain growth between 20% and 25% annually, targeting a doubling of AUM within three years. While salaried personal loans posted the highest growth rate, management reiterated this segment will remain below 10% of AUM, keeping focus on core MSME and SME lending.
Asset quality was stable, with gross stage 3 assets at 2.49% and net stage 3 assets at 1.63%, both largely unchanged from the previous quarter. Management overlays remain in place for both the main book and the housing finance subsidiary. The company noted some slight improvement in borrower behavior but expects broad improvement in asset quality across segments to take another quarter or two.
Profit after tax increased 19% year-on-year, and return on assets (ROA) held at 2.84%. Margins improved due to an increasing share of higher-yielding retail assets, but management emphasized that operational costs are also rising as they invest in retail expansion. Management expects to maintain NIM in the 7–8% range and ROA between 2.75% and 3%.
Operating expenses rose 46% year-on-year, mainly because of upfront investments in expanding the retail branch network and adding staff. Management views these costs as necessary to support future growth in direct lending, with retail expected to reach 70–75% of the business mix over the next 6–12 quarters.
The company maintains a strong funding position, with capital adequacy at 25.22% and ample liquidity (INR 1,000 crores in cash and equivalents). Most borrowings are MCLR-linked, so reductions in systemic rates are expected to yield a 25–35 basis point reduction in borrowing costs over the year. Management also continues to diversify funding sources, including more NCDs and exploring ECB borrowings.
Branch expansion and geographic penetration slowed due to market conditions, but management plans to accelerate branch openings in existing geographies over the next three quarters. No new major product segments are planned, though there are small pilots in used cars. The focus remains on deeper penetration within current regions and segments.
Management welcomed recent RBI draft guidelines on NBFC partnerships, viewing them as a positive step that will bring clarity to co-lending and FLDG arrangements. MAS has already been following the expected provisioning norms and expects no material impact from final guidelines.
MSME and SME lending remain the most important segments for growth and stable asset quality. Commercial vehicle loans have seen some stress and slower disbursement, with gross stage 3 in this segment at 4%. Salaried personal loans are growing but will be managed to remain a small part of the portfolio. Management expects loan growth to pick up in the second half of the year across core segments.
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to MAS Financial Services Q1 FY '26 Conference Call hosted by Equirus Securities. [Operator Instructions]
This conference call may contain forward-looking statements about the company, which are based on the beliefs, opinion and expectation of the company as on the date of this call. These statements are not the guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict.
I now hand the conference over to Mr. Shreepal Doshi from Equirus Securities. Thank you. And over to you, Mr. Shreepal.
Thank you, Govind. Good afternoon, everyone. I welcome you all to the Q1 FY '26 earnings call of MAS Financial Services.
Today, we have the senior management team of MAS Financial Services represented by Mr. Kamlesh Gandhi, Chairman and Managing Director; Mrs. Darshana Pandya, Director and CEO; Mr. Dhvanil Gandhi, Executive Director; and Mr. Ankit Jain, Chief Financial Officer. Along with these people, we also have some senior management team on the call.
I would now like to hand over the call to Mr. Kamlesh for his opening remarks, post which we can open the forum for question-and-answer. Over to you, sir.
Thank you, Shreepal, and good afternoon, everyone.
I'm very delighted to connect to all of you once again in order to discuss the Q1 results for the financial year 2025-'26. Friends, you are aware that we have been going through some tough time and both on the demand side and on the asset quality side as far as the lending to the particular sector whom we belong to is concerned. But I'm very happy to share with you the performance of the company.
Before that, I just want to share with you that we just completed 30 years on 25th May 2025. And this 30 years marks the years of resilience and the years of consistency that we have done over all these years. To share with you, we have done all the hard work first. We have laid a very strong foundation for making this company a very formidable company based on very strong fundamentals and in such a manner that it can withstand the cycles, which is the characteristics or which is the part and parcel of the lending business. And if action speaks louder than words, over 30 years, we have proved the consistency time and again. And friends, this quarter was no different. The numbers are well in front of you.
We could grow on a consolidated -- on a stand-alone basis close to 20% in AUM, 20.82%, 21% approximately in AUM and close to 20% in profitability, that is 19.34% rather in consolidated profitability. This is in consistent to our stated objective and stated intent, which has been communicated and shared with all of you from time to time that company targets a growth anywhere between 20% to 25% with a belief that we prioritize quality of the portfolio, profitability and the operations is guided by discovering the growth at the marketplace rather than just determining it.
So when the things are favorable in terms of risk and profitability, we'll grow at a higher side of the spectrum. And if the situation is what we currently face, we'll grow at the lower side of the spectrum. But the priority remains on the asset quality and profitability as we have been doing since last -- more than 3 decades. And as I told you, this has laid a very strong foundation going forward to grow this company into a very formidable size. It took us around 30 years for this INR 13,000 crores. Next INR 13,000 crores should come within next 3 years.
In terms of net worth, we are close to INR 2,700 crores in net worth. Next INR 2,700 crores should come within the next 5 years or 6 years. So, this is the power what the company will derive based on the strong fundamentals and the foundations of the hard work done by team MAS over all these 30 years.
In terms of performance, if I start with -- in terms of working, if I start with the assets, we continue to focus on MSME. Close to 75% of our assets are from MSME, which combines about MEL, which are products less than INR 10 lakhs; SME, which is from INR 10 lakhs to INR 5 crores that contributes close to around 75% of the business and the rest 25% comes from our wheels business and personal loan business. So, this gives us a well-diversified product range. And across the product, we could register a good asset quality besides a Y-on-Y growth.
In terms of the asset quality, we could maintain the asset at a net stage 3 asset at around 1.63% and the gross at around 2.49%, well within the control and well within the stated objective and the intentions of the company. The assets are created through a robust distribution network. We have now close to 206 branches. While because of the current situation, the branch expansion has not been done very vigorously. But I think during Q3 and Q4, we will be once again on track for branch expansion in order to have the retail business as per planned as compared to our NBFC distribution.
Currently, in terms of asset configuration, in terms of distribution, around 65% to 66% of the business is through our 206 branches spread across 14,000 -- more than 14,500 pin codes and the rest comes through our very robust NBFC partnership, which is now 12 years old module and has shown an exemplary result across cycles. But as we go forward, as I've shared a number of times, the retail distribution will grow at a faster pace depending upon the opportunity and the macro environment. And going forward, what looks at around 65%, 35% should look anywhere between 70% to 75% in favor of our retail distribution, while we hold our NBFC distribution in very high esteem and regard of what it has contributed to the overall growth of the company.
On the distribution side, we continue to pursue the strategy of extending credit where it is due. We are quite circumspect as to how we land. And more precisely, we lend to the borrowers who, in a sense, are dependent on our financial prudence to extend them credit. So as we customary feel -- as our customary, what we have been doing that we don't want to just create borrowers, but we are in the business of creating successful entrepreneurs. And that ideology continues to drive us as far as the asset creation is concerned.
In terms of profitability, we could maintain our ROAs of around 2.84%. And this was reflected and this is derived by the fact that our yields have also inched up because of our retail distribution increasing and also the operational cost increasing in the same way. But as I have shared a number of times that even though with the rise in operational expenditure, we will be in a position to maintain our ROAs and that stated objective has already been met this quarter with around 2.8% at ROAs. And on an expanded capital base, that is we raised INR 500 crores last June, on an expanded capital base, we are close to 14% on ROEs. So, on the profitability and on the NIM side, we are well on track and the traction will continue on the positive side as we go ahead and as we gain on volumes.
If I take you through liabilities, while Ankit will take you through in detail, we are well capitalized and we are well funded. And if you ask me, we are almost funded for the year right now, but we will draw our sanctions depending upon the rates we get from time to time and the institutions we would like to align.
In terms of operations, we still believe that technology plays a very important role. The technology team is going stronger and stronger. The LOS are now BRE enabled. But having said that, this is a task to be worked upon, can be worked out. There's a continuous improvement changes for the good, for better efficiencies being undertaken. And we are very confident that technology will play a very important role in enhancing efficiencies and delivering [Technical Difficult]
Dear Participants, the management line has been disconnected. Please stay connected while we try to reconnect them.
Yes. Participants, management has been joined and we will start with the call.
From where I got disconnected? Any idea?
You got disconnected just a minute back.
So just -- sorry for the inconvenience. I'm told that I was disconnected. So coming back to -- and if I think that I'm picking up from where I left, I was talking about the operations part that technology plays a very important role and we continue to pursue that. We have a very strong in-house team. And with BRE-enabled LOS, we will gain on more efficiencies and hence, that should reflect in the better profitability going forward.
In terms of HR, we have a very strong team with very less attrition at the middle and the top level, with no attrition at the top level. And the middle level, the attrition is very less. We recently celebrated, as I shared in my opening remarks, 30 years of endeavors, whereby there are more than 600 people working with us for more than 3 years. That is the testimony to the fact that we have robust HR policies and with our policy of succeeding and failing together. So, that was on the operation, distribution, assets, liability.
And if I take you briefly through the working of our housing finance company, housing finance company, we are at a striking distance from INR 1,000 crores now. We were around INR 795 crores. We are confident to touch INR 1,000 crores this year, with once again very robust figures in terms of profitability, in terms of the asset quality. The asset quality has been around less than 1 percentage in gross net stage 3 assets. And if I share with you, even in housing finance company, there is so much of commonalities as far as the borrowers are concerned in terms of the middle income and the lower-income group borrowers. But with our strong credit due diligence, we are in a position to maintain the quality of the assets.
I agree that we have taken a long time to reach to this level. But I personally believe that as a lender, we add value when we create quality assets and not just the top line. And in consistent to that belief, housing finance company will also keep on growing. The growth in housing finance company was at a rate of 28% in AUM and 25% in profitability.
So with this, I will hand over to Darshanaben to take you very quickly through the numbers so that you have sufficient time for Q&A, followed by Ankit, who will quickly take you through the liability numbers for your better understanding.
Over to you, Darshanaben.
Thank you, sir. Good afternoon, everyone.
Once again, I'm happy to share the key numbers of our 120 first quarter. I'll give you the comparative numbers as well for better understanding of the performance of the quarter. So to start with, as Kamlesh sir shared, our AUM as on June '25 is INR 12,504 crores as compared to INR 10,303 crores, which is 20.43% growth in AUM. Total income grew by around 28% from INR 347 crores to INR 444 crores. Profit before tax grew by 19% from INR 94 crores to INR 112 crores. Profit after tax grew by 19% from INR 70 crores to INR 84 crores.
Now, coming to the configuration of the portfolio. Out of INR 12,504 crores, INR 508 crores is micro enterprise loans, which is -- that is a growth of 10.73% from INR 4,523 crores to INR 5,008 crores. SME loan, there is a growth of 19.61% from INR 3,783 crores to INR 4,525 crores. 2-wheeler growth is around 30.37% from INR 668 crores to INR 871 crores. Commercial vehicle loan grew by 18.33% from INR 817 crores to INR 967 crores and salaried personal loans grew by 91% from INR 590 crores to INR 1,131 crores, which is -- yes, so this is Y-on-Y growth. And this is in the confidence with our planning to have 10% share of this product in our total AUM, which is still below 10% of our total AUM. So, majority of the growth is coming from our MSME segment, which is 60%.
Now coming to the quality of the portfolio, as shared that, we could maintain the quality. Our gross stage 3 asset as on June '25 is 2.49% and net stage 3 is 1.63% as compared to 2.44% gross stage 3 and 1.62% net stage 3 as on March '25. We still hold on to INR 17,60,00,000 of management overlay, which is 0.17% of our on-book as such.
Regarding the performance of housing finance, our AUM stands at INR 794 crores as compared to INR 623 crores, which is 27.40% growth. Total income grew by 23.41% from INR 19 crores to INR 23 crores. Profit before tax grew by 26% from INR 2,80,00,000 to INR [3.53 crores ]. Profit after tax grew by 27% from INR 2,17,00,000 to INR 2,76,00,000. Here also, the quality of the portfolio is excellent. So, our gross stage 3 asset is 0.92% as compared to 0.94% as on March '25 and net stage 3 is 0.64% as compared to 0.65% as on March '25. Here also, we carry a management overlay of INR 3,29,00,000, which is 0.57% of our on-book as such. So, this was regarding the performance of both the companies.
Now, I'll hand over to Ankit for liability management update.
Thank you, ma'am. Good afternoon to all.
On the liability -- capital and liability management, this quarter, through our effective liability management, we have maintained an average cash and cash equivalents of approximately INR 1,000 crores, along with an unutilized cash-based facility of INR 250 crores. As on June 30, the company also holds sanction facilities totaling to INR 2,200 crores, comprising of term loan, direct SME, co-lending and other facilities.
During the last quarter, the company executed direct SME transaction amounting to more than INR 700 crores. Furthermore, we currently have sanctions of approximately more than INR 1,500 crores in the form of direct SME and co-lending, which we plan to utilize over the next 2 quarters. Our strategic goal is to maintain 20% to 25% of assets under management as of book through direct SME and co-lending transactions. We have cashless facility of approximately INR 1,400 crores, of which we maintain utilization levels at 70% to 75%, keeping the remaining portion as a liquidity buffer.
In terms of long-term borrowings, company raised INR 835 crores in term loans during the quarter with an average maturity of 3 to 5 years. We also have sanctioned term loan pipeline of approximately INR 680 crores. Additionally, we raised INR 175 crores through non-convertible debentures, and we further plan to raise around INR 400 crores to INR 500 crores this quarter. We are strongly positioned in terms of structured liquidity as on June 30. Our liquidity position remains adequate with positive cash flows across all cumulative time buckets. Our capital adequacy ratio remains strong at 25.22%, with Tier 1 capital at 23.19% and a debt-to-equity ratio at 3.36x. On the cost of borrowing for the quarter, which stood at around 9.80% with an incremental borrowing cost of 9.25%. In light of the multiple repo rate cuts and as communicated in the last quarter call, we anticipate a reduction in borrowing cost by 25 basis points to 35 basis points during the year. So, this is on the liability management.
And now we are open for Q&A.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Hardik from White Whale.
So on the OpEx side, that was up about 46% year-over-year. I know over the last few years, we were moving towards more direct lending versus NBFC. But if I look year-on-year, now that ratio has stabilized. So, can you just talk about what is driving this high growth and our OpEx to asset ratio is now probably at an all-time high? I just want to understand where this investment is.
So as I shared earlier that we are moving aggressively to build up our retail infrastructure and when you build up a retail infrastructure, the OpEx is a little upfronted. But in our case, if you see that we have been doing it in a very planned manner so as not to disturb our ROAs and ROEs on an overall basis. So, this is the result of the upfront expenditure that we incur to build our retail base because anywhere where we build up the team, they take around a quarter or 2 to get the business desired. So initially, there will be more expenditure incurred on the branch setup and also the manpower cost. So as we increase our retail infrastructure, this will happen.
So then is it fair to assume that like as we go forward, the mix of direct lending will increase even further? Or will it remain in the same ratio?
It will increase further gradually. As I shared in the opening remarks that the stated objective is to bring it anywhere between 70% to 75% over next 6 to 12 quarters, and that should happen. Because when we do retail business, we need to be very circumspect on the quality of the assets also. It's not only just building up the top line. But this is in line of that stated objective that the configuration between our NBFC distribution and data distribution may be around 70-30.
Okay. Got it. The second question I have is in terms of the salaried personal loans, I think in the past, you stated that we want to cap this at about 10%. We are getting close to the 10% level. This has been a major driver of this overall loan book growth at 20%. So what I understand, as this kind of slows down, which are the areas, will it mainly the SMEs that will be driving the growth faster?
So, what I would like to state here is that SPL cannot be the major driver. It is one of the drivers because it's on a lower base. So if you see our increase in AUM over last year, 60% of the increase is coming from our MSME business, that is the main business and the rest from wheels and then from SPL. So with increasing AUM and maintaining SPL at around 10% plus contribution from our main business that is MSME and SME, presuming that the economic conditions will improve and we'll get more chance to cater the eligible demand, I think we will be -- we are well placed for a 20%, 25% growth depending upon the macro situation from time to time. Maybe a percentage here or there on a quarter-to-quarter basis. But as you know that we don't measure our growth and measure our success on a quarter-to-quarter basis. But on a yearly basis, we are very confident that we'll be in a position to achieve the stated objective.
Got it. Got it. And the RBI came up with these new norms regarding provisioning for the FLDG loans. Can you just talk a bit about any change that, that has had or impacted us and our partners in our business?
These are still draft guidelines. The final guidelines are yet to be out. But the good thing is that, that what all the NBFC to NBFC partnerships were there and there were no guidelines at all. With RBI coming with guidelines, there will be a lot of clarity. I'm happy to share that, that majority of the suggestions given by the industry has been well taken by the regulator. So, I think that this is a positive development for the industry and the step in the right direction to get this partnership business -- to give this fillip to the partnership business.
And I would like to share with you that recently, we had a meeting with Finance Minister of all the NBFCs, and that is where -- the statement is in the public domain that she is very optimistic that the share of NBFCs in the overall credit will increase. And there was more stress on partnership and creating value chain that every lending institute is not in a position to do all the work. So the people closest to the ground are the strongest is what was discussed there also. I'm happy to share that we had identified this way before. All these things are well known. So, happy to share that we are on the right lines fundamentally.
Got it. I was actually referring to the sourcing from fintech companies, right, because we do that sourcing for the salaried personal loans, where now there is a change in the provisioning. So, any change in the way we are dealing with them?
So as such, we were following that norms right from the beginning. We were -- the recent norms which have been implemented, we are following that right from the bidding in the same manner that it has to be built up in ECL irrespective of the guarantees given by them. And on the write-off basis, it will be profitability neutral because we have the FLDG.
Okay. Congrats on the 30 years completion.
Thank you so much.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Madhuchanda Dey from Mcpro.
Congratulations on very steady and profitable 30 years. I have 3 questions. The first question is there is a sequential improvement in net interest margin this quarter as well. So, my question is, in light of this 100 basis points cumulative rate cut that has happened, have you passed on any of the rate cut to your borrowers as Ankit pointed out that you are expecting a further 25 basis points to 35 basis points lowering of borrowing cost? Where do you see the margin headed from here on? That's my first question.
So to answer that, the increase in the NIM, as I shared earlier, is because of the shift in the asset configuration. And within the retail assets also, we are doing good on wheels. We have introduced a product where we give loans to SMEs, which are collateralized based. So, all these things are helping us to improve our NIMs. And at the same time, our operational cost is also increasing. So the net ROAs are maintained in the trajectory what we intend to. So, this has no impact of any reduction in cost, so to say, because that is just to kick in.
Majority of our borrowing is MCLR based. So now the MCLR rates has been slashed by, say, anywhere from 0.5 bps to 10 basis points fortnight or a month ago, and the MCLR triggers will set in anywhere between 3 to 6 months. So, we are yet to experience the reduction in costs. And hence, there has not been any passing of the cost reduction to the borrowers. So, this is because of the internal realignment of the portfolio within the retail assets and increasing of retail assets from time to time.
So, do you expect further upside to the NIM once this MCLR benefit kicks in?
It should because there is always a time lag at the ground level by the time we get and by the time we pass on, and it stabilizes over a period of time later on. But on a steady-state basis, we stick to our guidance that we'll maintain NIMs anywhere between 7% to 8% and ROAs anywhere between 2.75% to 3%. Rest will be balancing each other.
Okay. I also wanted to understand from you, if there is a change in the ground that you have seen in the past 3 months compared to the, say, the previous 6 months in terms of borrower behavior, asset quality, particular segment, where there's still stress, any segment where there is a little easing of the stress situation, if you could take us through those details?
We can see slight improvement, not that cognizable yet because of 2 facts that the borrowers are yet to come out of their financial and liquidity stress given the overleverage that they have done in the past. That is not going to be whisked away soon. And secondly, still the steady state consistent economic growth is yet to achieve and yet to reach to the borrowers whom we serve. But having said that, there is slight improvement over what it was 6 months back, if you talk about last 3 months, but not that cognizable. And we foresee that still it will take a quarter or 2 for us to see a marked difference, whereby the eligible demand picks up and overall, the portfolio quality improves and there is sufficient liquidity for the borrowers to fund their businesses. We still see that to be a quarter or 2 away.
I mean, I'm asking this question more because I just observed this data point that on a sequential loan growth basis, you were kind of a little sluggish on the micro enterprise loan in the previous quarters. But this quarter, I see a pickup in micro enterprise loan. Is it because of some improvement on the ground situation or nothing much can be read from here?
No, we got a good opportunity within our scopes of credit parameters, given the fact that so many other borrowers -- so when the other lenders slow down, they not only slow down funding risky assets, but even they slow down on funding good assets. So, that is where we find good opportunity to serve our existing borrowers and other borrowers and hence, we could register that this quarter.
Okay. And my last question is on your geographical expansion beyond your core markets. Any update on that? I think that has taken a little bit of a backseat in light of the difficult environment. Are you on track? Or what is the thought process there?
See, we are -- because of a very torrid time that we had last year, the number of branches are less than what we would have liked to have. I would have been close to -- I would have liked to be at close to around 235 to 240 branches. We are around 206. So the geographical expansion has taken a little backstage -- backstep because of the situation. But I think we will -- with another 3 quarters and if we take another 2 quarters of working from Q3 and Q4, we'll be in a position to expand our branches in our areas of operation that is West, North and South. And it will be penetrating on those areas rather than taking up more territories. So, we'll be working in the geographies where we are working, but we'll have some deeper penetration in all those geographies.
Okay. So, no new market is being contemplated at this point in time?
No, we'll penetrate deep. We would like to have a critical mass within the existing geographies. We'll penetrate deep there, and then we'll explore new markets.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Mr. Shreepal Doshi.
I just had a few questions. So firstly, on the data keeping side. So, we started giving the stand-alone disbursement number. I wanted to get this number for 4Q FY '25 and 1Q FY '25, if you could provide that?
Stand-alone for 4Q, March quarter.
That was INR 2,994 crores. In Q4, it was INR 2,994 crores.
Okay. And for 1Q '25?
1Q '25 was INR 2,725 crores.
Got it, ma'am. The second question was on the liability side. So on the bank borrowing, what percentage of our bank borrowing is linked to T-Bills, repo and MCLR for like, [ as I said ], 1Q?
So, around 15% of the loan is linked to T-Bills repo rate and other external benchmarks. If I divide all 10% is fixed, this is majorly capital markets, around 15% is linked to immediate rates like MEL, like this repo rate or T-Bills. And apart from that, rest are MCLR, which can be 3 months, 6 months or 12 months.
Okay. So basically for us, 75% is MCLR linked.
Yes, yes. But that can be 6 or 12.
Okay. Okay. Got it. Got it. And basically for us, in the cost of fund, we have not seen any material benefit of the rate cut at systemic level coming in so far. So probably in 2Q, we should expect? Or will it be more in the 3Q on a full-fledged basis?
Yes. So now it will kick in, yes.
Sorry?
We expect from this quarter, it will start. So for the whole year, we expect this to be between 25 basis points to 35 basis points. So, we will start from this quarter.
Okay. So, 25 basis point to 35 basis point of benefit is what we are expecting on the cost of funds side?
For the whole year. For the whole year. Yes.
Okay. Okay. And so are we seeing any benefit of the rating change? So basically, the RBI has also changed the risk weights, right? So, have we seen any benefit of that flowing in or there was not much benefit of the same?
So that kicked in last year only. If you see despite of MCLR increase last year from various banks, our cost of borrowing remained at the same level. So, that has kicked in last year also and this has also helped in this year, apart from rating increase, risk weightage has also reduced further this year from 1st April. So, that will help. In terms of bank borrowing, our majority of the loans are PSL. So they are not affected.
Fair. Got it. Sir, the next question was to Kamlesh sir. Sir, so as you highlighted to the earlier participants that in the next couple of quarters, we should see stability sort of coming back. So, what is it that is giving us this comfort? Like are we -- like what sort of data points or trends are we sort of getting to understand, which is giving us this comfort? Because if I recall last quarter, we had highlighted that some of the segments is FMCG, textile in some of the geographies were still creating issues. So, just an update on that as to how these segments are doing? And also with respect to like what data points or trends we are tracking that is giving us the comfort?
See, for us, we draw the comfort from the log-ins and the disbursements we do from time to time. So, when we see our log-ins and disbursement and the rate of sanctions, while it has not improved substantially, but we don't see that deteriorating. So the cycle starts that once the things are going bad, the deterioration stops. And after the deterioration stops, the things starts improving. So, we draw the comfort from the fact that the deterioration has stopped. Say, for example, among FMCG and textile, we are seeing some stability in textile. FMCG, we are yet to see stability in FMCG. So, these are all good signs, so to say.
So, that is why I told that it is not cognizable at all. But from the experience of the data what we collect from the ground level across our products, we see that the deterioration has stopped. First, it used to happen that month-on-month, there was deterioration in terms of repayments and month-on-month deterioration in terms of log-in to disbursements and the quality of the borrowers you get, the eligibility of the borrowers. Now that has stabilized. So deterioration has stabilized and now we should see some uptick from here. That is what my assumption is.
Got it. Sir, last question was on our key segment, which is SME and MEL. So in that segment, are you seeing any particular customer profile or let's say, industry profile wherein the credit demand is pretty good and even the credit asset quality is pretty good and some of the industries where it is not so? Like if you could just -- if you could just give us some color on that part.
Difficult to tell that in MEL because they are all very small enterprises run by proprietors and also difficult to mark that industry-wise. But as far as SME is concerned, as I shared with you, textile is stabilizing. FMCG is yet to stabilize. We have been doing reasonably well on engineering and all. Once again, we are seeing not that great result in agri. So it's a match and mix between a few of the things stabilized, a few of them yet to stabilize, but yet to see a clear winner among all these things. And these are the sectors, which can be funded the way they need or they can -- or there is an eligible demand. Yet to see that's all from any of the sector.
The next question is from the line of [ Pawan ] from Edelweiss.
Sir, on the CV side, how are you seeing the income of the borrowers and ability to repay, number one? Number two, can you also give the composition of your book on CVs? Is it more used or more of --
Sorry to interrupt, sir. Sorry to interrupt, sir. Can you please use the handset?
Basically, question is about the CV portfolio. Can you give the composition of the portfolio? What part of it is used and what part of it is new and fleet versus independent operators, et cetera, color on the book?
Second thing is, how are you seeing the incomes of the operators, number one? Number two, the credit stress in the portfolio? These are my questions.
So as far as our product line is concerned, we are into used commercial vehicle typically with a ticket size ranging from INR 3 lakhs to INR 6 lakhs. That is MCVs, what you call it, MCVs and LCVs that are into last-mile delivery of logistics. There also, if you see on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we have kept the AUM stable because there also, we witnessed some stress in terms of their eligibility, not really in the portfolio, but in the eligibility calculations and on their credit score track records, we were not very comfortable. So there, the disbursement was a little slow in this Q1. Difficult to predict about the coming quarters. But as in Q1, we were not very -- rather we were not very comfortable picking up numbers there. And in terms of the quality of the portfolio, it has maintained. The stage 3 as far as our CV portfolio is concerned is around 4%.
Sir, how much would be stage 2 plus stage 3?
Stage 2 plus stage 3?
How much is the stage 2 plus stage 3? Stage 3, you mentioned is 4%, right? Stage 2 would be how much?
Stage 2 would be 9%.
And is there any geographical concentration in this portfolio? Or is it across the entire portfolio -- entire geography that you are present in North, West and South?
We are more present on the Western side and Rajasthan in the North.
The next question is from the line of Sanket Chheda from DAM Capital.
So, my question was mainly on PL. Now that PL accounts for about 9% of your on-book and about 11% of AUM, just wanted to understand how much of it would be DA?
How much would be?
So, around 20%, 25% of the total to PL book is -- or total AUM is DA, which we have done to DA, to various banks and NBFCs or PL book.
Okay. Okay. And this has been constant in last few quarters?
Yes. Yes, yes. So, we have been continuously doing DA of PL book also. So it's not PL. It is salaried personal loan, where there's a good demand for that.
Okay. And sir, we had earlier suggested that maybe 9% to 10% is max that will go on PL. Now, that we have reached that, how should we see growth going ahead in your guidance of [ 20% ] to 25% on the overall AUM? Incremental growth will be mainly from which segments that you see?
I think that should come from our other 2 segments, MSME and wheels. While we have -- as we grow our AUM, we'll have some room for PL to contribute. But if you see the overall growth contributor, 65% to 70% is coming from our MEL and wheels business. And still with an increase in our book, PL can contribute to the extent it could within the parameters of 10% on AUM. But the rest will come from our flagship product that is MSME and also a part from wheels.
The next question is from the line of Sarvesh Gupta from Maximal Capital.
Congratulations on a steady set of numbers. Sir, just one question on the growth part. So, I think last 3, 4 quarters, we have been trending at around 20-odd percent on the lower side of our guided range. So now with the conditions slightly improving, do we expect to move in to a slightly higher number on the growth? Do we see that the environment is enabling us to do that?
And secondly, are there some new products or new segments that we would want to open? Because as some of the participants have asked that SPL has already reached all the limits, so that may not be the major driver.
Dhvanil here. So on the second question -- so we are not expecting to open any new product segments as of now. We want to consolidate on these segments that we have currently that is -- those are enough in our view to grow the book up to least INR 20,000 crores, INR 25,000 crores. And maybe after that, we can take a fresh cut to see that if we want to add any other segment or not. But for now, we think the segments are enough. MEL, MSME have good opportunities. So even though SPL has grown faster on a lower base and has reached the 9%, 10% kind of a number on the overall AUM, we think that other products can also contribute.
We are piloting with used cars in some time. We have done some business, which we are classifying it under the CV portfolio right now. We have not [ hide it ] off because the numbers are small over there. But in the wheel segment, 2-wheeler, commercial vehicle and used car, these could be the 3 good products to have and we already started tinkering with used cars. So, this is on the product side.
On the growth side, I think Q2, looking at the market situation, we'll be careful in Q2 to achieve the overall '22, '23 kind of an average number. I think Q3, Q4 can be the contributor where it will be slightly higher than the Q1, Q2 average. That is what we anticipate as of now, difficult to predict beyond the point, but what we anticipate now is that Q3, Q4 can be better. And hopefully, Q2, because of some early festival seasons also, hopefully, we see some good traction in September maybe. But Q3, Q4 can be expected to be much better than Q1, what we have seen in Q1.
And on the product-wise stress, so is there any particular segment where we have seen higher slippages than the ratio of that in terms of the overall AUM and what may be the reasons behind it?
So, I think CV is the only one where slightly higher than the book average slippages we might have seen. Other than that, more or less, everything has been online. MEL, SME, PL, we have been pretty tight in terms of the underwriting since quite some time now. So, that has stayed steady. CV, because of the nature of the business, there is some volatility from time to time. Currently, it is slightly volatile. That is why, as earlier also shared that sequential, if you look at Q-on-Q disbursement AUM numbers on CV, it has been steady. It has not increased, and that is the reason for that. So, CV can be slightly volatile. But other than that, all the other segments have been okay.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Sambit Roy from INRBonds.
Congratulations on the quarter. I would have some questions on your resource profile. Moving forward, how your resource diversification would look and any plans for NCDs in the coming few quarters?
Yes. So, we are already in thrive of further diversifying our resource mix. So already, if you see around 18%, 19% is our capital market, which is NCD. We see that this number in next 2, 3 years will be around 25%. Also, we will be adding up to the ECB borrowing, which can be DFIs and even foreign commercial banks. That will add up around 10% in next 2, 3 years. Apart from that, we will also commence this PTC transaction, because majorly we have been doing DA and co-lending. So, that will also add up. So the mix will further change, and we will further diversify the resource mix going forward, which will help us to maintain a good diversified resource mix.
The next question is from the line of Mr. Shreepal Doshi.
Just a doubt, I think there is some change in the reporting of co-lending-led expenses during the quarter. So, could you just throw some light as to that reporting for the benefit of the larger investor pool on the same?
So for better control, we are -- in terms of co-lending, we are taking the entire cash flow first on our books and then the cash flow is distributed to the partner as per the agreed terms as against the formal norms where each partner would take their share. So, that has changed slightly because -- and this is stemming out of the fact for better control on the partners.
So, we are paying and that payment gets reflected in the OpEx, while we are booking the entire fee on the other income?
Yes, Yes.
Got it. While the net basis, we will be making the same money, but the reporting has changed a lot.
Yes. Reporting has changed in consonance to the business model because we firmly believe that the numbers should reflect the business model we follow. So, that is been done that way.
Got it. And this is basically the co-lending that we have wherein we will be working with other partners.
Yes, yes.
I think this was the last question as well. So, thank you for giving us the opportunity to host this call and thanks to all the participants for being there on the call. Thank you.
Thank you. On behalf of Equirus Securities, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.