P

Plymouth Industrial REIT Inc
NYSE:PLYM

Watchlist Manager
Plymouth Industrial REIT Inc
NYSE:PLYM
Watchlist
Price: 21.98 USD Market Closed
Market Cap: $979.2m

Q1-2025 Earnings Call

AI Summary
Earnings Call on May 2, 2025

Record Leasing: Plymouth reported record leasing activity in Q1 2025, supporting a strong start to the year.

Acquisitions: The company has $205 million in acquisitions under agreement and sees additional deals likely mid-year.

Guidance Affirmed: Management reaffirmed full-year 2025 core FFO guidance, expecting a stronger second half as vacancies stabilize and new acquisitions contribute.

Occupancy Growth: Same-store occupancy is projected to reach about 97.3% by year-end, driven by lease-up of large spaces.

Capital Position: The balance sheet remains strong, with over 88% fixed-rate debt and $415 million in credit facility availability.

Buybacks vs. Growth: While share repurchases are considered attractive, expanding the portfolio remains the main capital deployment priority.

Tenant Stability: No material collection issues, with a low watch list and minimal bad debt in Q1.

Leasing Activity

Plymouth achieved record leasing activity in the first quarter, with significant progress in backfilling vacancies, particularly in larger assets like St. Louis and Columbus. About 70% of 1.6 million square feet of speculative space included in guidance has now been leased, contributing to improved occupancy.

Acquisition Strategy

The company remains focused on acquiring smaller, infill industrial properties in supply-constrained markets. As of the call, approximately $205 million of acquisitions are under agreement, covering about 2 million square feet at targeted initial NOI yields of 6.5% to 6.75%. Additional acquisitions could be announced mid-year, backed by strong liquidity and capital from the Sixth Street transaction.

Occupancy Trends

Same-store occupancy is expected to increase throughout the year, driven by successful lease-up of large-format spaces and minimal downtime on turnovers. Year-end same-store occupancy is projected at about 97.3%, with only a small portion of that number tied to short-term leases likely to be replaced by longer-term tenants.

Capital & Liquidity

Plymouth maintains a strong capital position, with more than 88% of its debt fixed and no maturities in 2025. The company has $415 million available on its credit facility and plans to draw the remaining $79 million from its Series C preferred in May, accepting a higher interest expense. Further acquisition capacity remains before needing new equity.

Guidance & Outlook

Management reaffirmed its full-year 2025 core FFO guidance, citing confidence in achieving the targeted range given current leasing momentum and acquisition contributions. The start of the year was muted, but a stronger second half is expected as temporary vacancies stabilize.

Tenant & Market Dynamics

Management noted an uptick in short-term tenant space requirements related to broader supply chain shifts, though no significant interruptions have affected the portfolio. Most lease extensions are short-term as tenants adjust to supply chain reorganizations rather than specific tariff risks.

Collections & Bad Debt

Collections remained stable in Q1, with only 35 basis points of bad debt embedded in guidance (none utilized in Q1). The watch list is small and mostly current, with high confidence in tenants' ongoing payments. The prior year’s higher bad debt was due to one-off bankruptcies.

Capital Allocation Priorities

While share buybacks are seen as compelling due to current market valuation, management prioritizes portfolio expansion through acquisitions. Any buybacks would be executed in a balance sheet-neutral manner, reallocating existing capital rather than adding leverage.

Same-store occupancy (projected year-end)
97.3%
Change: Up from 92.2% in Q4 2024.
Guidance: Expected to reach 97.3% by year-end.
Debt fixed rate portion
88%
No Additional Information
Credit facility availability
$415 million
No Additional Information
Acquisitions under agreement
$205 million
No Additional Information
Acquisition yield (initial NOI)
6.5% to 6.75%
No Additional Information
Preferred drawdown remaining
$79 million
Guidance: To be drawn in May.
Bad debt (guidance)
35 bps
Guidance: 35 bps embedded in 2025 guidance.
Bad debt (Q1 actual)
0 bps
No Additional Information
Same-store occupancy (projected year-end)
97.3%
Change: Up from 92.2% in Q4 2024.
Guidance: Expected to reach 97.3% by year-end.
Debt fixed rate portion
88%
No Additional Information
Credit facility availability
$415 million
No Additional Information
Acquisitions under agreement
$205 million
No Additional Information
Acquisition yield (initial NOI)
6.5% to 6.75%
No Additional Information
Preferred drawdown remaining
$79 million
Guidance: To be drawn in May.
Bad debt (guidance)
35 bps
Guidance: 35 bps embedded in 2025 guidance.
Bad debt (Q1 actual)
0 bps
No Additional Information

Earnings Call Transcript

Transcript
from 0
Operator

Good morning, and welcome to the Plymouth Industrial REIT First Quarter 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note today's event is also being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference call over to John Wilfong, Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.

J
John Wilfong

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to the Plymouth Industrial REIT conference call to review the company's results for the first quarter of 2025. Yesterday afternoon, we issued our earnings release and posted a copy of our prepared commentary and a supplemental deck on the Quarterly Results section of our Investor Relations page.

In addition to these earnings documents, a copy of our 10-Q can be found on the SEC filings of our IR site. Our supplemental deck includes our full year 2025 guidance assumptions, detailed information on our operations, portfolio and balance sheet and definitions of non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.

We will reference this information in our remarks. With me today is Jeff Witherell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Anthony Saladino, President and Chief Financial Officer; Jim Connolly, Executive Vice President of Asset Management; and Anne Hayward, General Counsel.

I would like to point everyone to our forward-looking statements on Page 3 of our supplemental presentation and encourage you to read them carefully. They apply to statements made in this call, our press release, our prepared commentary and in our supplemental financial information.

I'll now turn the call over to Jeff.

J
Jeffrey Witherell
executive

Thanks, John. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. I hope that everyone had a chance to review the commentary and supplemental information we posted last night. First, I will hit a few highlights, and then we'll go to Q&A.

The first quarter of 2025 marked a strong start to the year, highlighted by record leasing activity, positive acquisition momentum, and stable core financial performance. We continue to be well positioned to scale our platform with ample strategic capital and nearly 30% of annual rents rolling in 2025 and 2026 in markets benefiting from sequential rent growth, limited Class B supply, and favorable reshoring dynamics. We see a path for sustained internal growth and long-term value creation.

On a macro level, as global supply chains adjust to the shifting geopolitical and trade landscape, we will continue to actively monitor the impact across our tenant base in target markets. We have yet to see any material interruptions across our portfolio, but we have observed an increase in short-term space requirements, primarily driven by tenants responding to inventory adjustments and shifting trade flows.

Our strategic focus continues to be on acquiring and operating smaller footprint infill industrial properties in dense supply-constrained submarkets, areas where speculative development has primarily targeted large-scale bulk assets. In contrast to larger warehouses, which often face longer lease-up periods and a narrower tenant base, our properties feature modular layouts and multi-tenant configurations that help mitigate binary vacancy risk and support more resilient cash flows. This flexibility enables us to adapt quickly to evolving tenant demands, including those driven by reshoring, inventory realignment and supply chain diversification.

Our acquisition strategy remains focused on expanding within our existing markets. Our deal activity in the first quarter and at the end of 2024 was funded largely by the proceeds of the Sixth Street transaction. These acquisitions were located in key distribution hubs within our target markets located across the Golden Triangle. As of today, we have approximately $205 million of acquisitions under agreement, representing roughly 2 million square feet at a targeted initial NOI yield of 6.5% to 6.75%.

Since our June 2017 IPO, we have acquired over 32 million square feet at an average cost under $50 per square foot, well below replacement cost, which not only provides a meaningful margin of safety, but also enhances cash flow returns and highlights our disciplined approach to capital deployment and value creation.

Moving to our balance sheet. We continue to have strong liquidity with over 88% of our debt being fixed no debt maturities in 2025 and expect to operate in the 6x range for the balance of the year. With the upsizing of our credit facility in last year's fourth quarter, we have $415 million of availability there. And with the capital secured through the Sixth Street transaction, we are well positioned and have the critical financial flexibility to scale our platform and support long-term value creation for our shareholders.

Finally, we have affirmed our previously issued full year 2025 guidance for core FFO. We anticipated a bit of a muted start to the year with a stronger second half driven by the stabilization of transitory vacancies in Cleveland and St. Louis, along with the full contribution from acquisitions expected to close in the second and third quarters. I look forward to providing further updates in the coming months as we execute on our leasing and capital deployment strategies.

I would now like to turn it over to the operator for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Todd Thomas from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

T
Todd Thomas
analyst

First question, in the prepared commentary, you noted the potential 3-year renewal at the 624,000 square foot asset in St. Louis and the backfill prospects you're negotiating with at ODW, the 772,000 square footer in Columbus. Just in light of the current environment, how confident are you that those deals get done? And have conversations changed at all over the last few weeks in light of the current environment here?

J
James Connolly
executive

Yes. Regarding St. Louis, that's -- we've come to terms with on the renewal. It's being signed right now. So any day, 3-year deal. And in ODW, they've agreed to take anywhere from 280,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet back for a period of time. And that 265,000 of it is out for signature right now.

T
Todd Thomas
analyst

Okay. And then in terms of the acceleration in growth in the back half of the year, so really strong second half in terms of increase in total NOI and portfolio occupancy. The larger St. Louis asset, I guess, is a contributor of that. You backfilled and signed a lease there, the 769,000 square foot facility, but that was removed from the same store. Can you just walk through the key drivers behind the acceleration in the same-store growth rate later in the year, what the primary drivers are there?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

Yes, happily. And Todd, as a point of correction, that St. Louis asset is in same-store. So that is a key contributor to the growth. But as Jeff mentioned, we experienced a fairly moderate start to the year in the pool. That said, about 70% of 1.6 million square feet of speculative space greater than 100,000 square feet included in our guidance has now been leased. So the cadence of occupancy is the best way to illustrate the path to the full year growth starting back to Q4 2024 for this pool, occupancy was 92.2%. The lease-up of this larger format space, which we just discussed, adds approximately 640 basis points of occupancy. This is going to be partially offset by a temporary 130 basis point vacancy expected in Q4, which results in a projected year-end same-store occupancy of about 97.3%.

T
Todd Thomas
analyst

Okay. That's really helpful. And sorry about that. I appreciate the clarification on St. Louis. And then last question, just in terms of the $205 million of acquisitions under agreement, can you just remind us and run through the funding sources for those investments from here, the timing of the remaining drawdown of the $79 million preferred, what you're anticipating there? And I guess, in terms of funding the balance, how we should think about that?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

Sure. So the funding mechanism is the line of credit. To your point, we have another $79 million to draw from the Series C preferred, which we will do so in May. Thinking about the impact of that drawdown, compared to current rates, there's about 125 basis point premium relative to our line. So there'll be an uptick in interest expense post draw.

With respect to cadence of deployment, we identified the $200-plus million. There's probably another $150 million right behind that. So there could be some chunky deployment in the middle of the year with tapering as we arrive at year-end.

Operator

Our next question comes from Rich Anderson from Wedbush.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

Where does a buyback stack up with you on your priorities from a capital deployment standpoint today?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

To be clear, we did not repurchase shares during Q1. Our view is that a balanced approach deploying capital into both acquisitions and opportunistic repurchases is the best way to optimize long-term shareholder value. The repurchase math is compelling given the current market dislocation, but expanding the platform remains our priority.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

Right. So -- and the buyback also can just be disruptive from a balance sheet perspective. I assume if you did go that direction, it would be on a balance sheet neutral way? Is that taking -- again, taking capital from the Sixth Street transaction and just instead of portfolio expansion buyback and it would still be a balance sheet neutral transaction in your mind. Is that correct?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

It would be. And that's in part the motivation for a balanced approach to the deployment of the remaining capital.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

Okay. On ODW, you said 280,000 to 400,000 and some amount is being signed now or sort of it's sort of -- what was that? Was that 280,000 that's being close to being signed? Is that what you said? I missed that, I apologize.

J
James Connolly
executive

Yes.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

280,000. And you said period of time, is that like another 1 of those short-term 6-month type situations or longer or shorter? How could you provide that?

J
James Connolly
executive

Yes. It's through the end of the year plus into '26 with an undefined end date at this point.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

And's the mentality there generally and maybe specifically for that is just we don't know what's going on in front of us with tariffs, et cetera, in the economy. And so we're just -- don't want to make an overcommitment. Is that basically the commentary from your tenants?

J
Jeffrey Witherell
executive

On that particular one, Rich, that's not the case. So they occupy the entire building. They have built out a newer campus. And so they're going through a flux of new contracts, expiring contracts and moving to other space. So that's not a tariff issue.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

As I recall, they have some presence in that area. But generally speaking, is that the sort of the mentality that you're hearing?

J
Jeffrey Witherell
executive

So yes. So in our remarks and in the commentary here, we have mentioned that, that there is some short-term thought process going on from tenants to secure additional space, additional stocking of material. So there is some dislocation. Again, we've said in here, we haven't really seen it in a significant manner across our portfolio yet.

R
Richard Anderson
analyst

Yes. Okay. And last for me. You got some acquisitions coming, maybe some more after that. What some of your peers are saying we would have raised guidance had it not been for some of these uncertainties ahead. Do you -- would you make the same comment? Or would you say guidance is good sort of -- it sort of captures whatever might happen in the future as stands. So it's not something that you would have raised if not for some of the questions that are out there right now, broadly speaking.

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

I mean I think our view is that that's a good range. And to Jeff's point, there hasn't been a lot of static and just given the momentum around leasing and the success in pursuing and ultimately deploying this capital. I think we're in a good position to achieve within the range that we previously reported and recently affirmed.

Operator

Our next question comes from Nick Thillman from Baird.

N
Nicholas Thillman
analyst

I appreciate all the commentary on some of the larger tenant. Anthony, I think you mentioned 140 basis points of occupancy loss in fourth quarter. Is that related to any specific tenants? Or I know like as we look through the schedule, that's like the next tenant that we didn't touch on was like communications test design. Any updates there?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

I'll let Jim fill you in on that, but it is not that tenant. It is a single tenant that we anticipate is more likely than not to vacate now in November.

J
James Connolly
executive

For our CTDI, we have reached out to them about extending their lease. They -- as you know, they only did a 1-year renewal last time because they had a buyout in their contract, which just passed. So we're looking for them to extend longer this time. The plant is very busy, and they're a very good tenant.

N
Nicholas Thillman
analyst

And maybe following up, Jeff, you kind of talked a lot about sort of the smaller tenant or smaller building, multi-tenant assets and kind of the focus there on the acquisition standpoint. Is there any appetite from like a disposition side to maybe derisk on some of these individual tenants and sell some of those assets, given where the stock is trading today?

J
Jeffrey Witherell
executive

I mean, Nick, we look at that all the time. But I don't think there's a situation of derisking. I think we've been very clear that if you look at the St. Louis property, I mean, if you look at our basis, we bought a Class A building at $72 a square foot. That Unilever probably should have renewed there. They did a global reorganization of their supply chain. You can see that we've backfilled it with a Fortune 500 global tenant, and they may take some more space in there. And what we're going through right now is, again, is a lot of like 1-year extensions or 6-month extensions until they figure out their supply lines.

I don't really think it's -- a lot of the stuff that we've talked about is tariff related. It's really just an inflection point of groups like Unilever, you see Amazon has just made some major changes. FedEx is making some major changes. Again, I don't think a lot of that is tariff related, quite frankly. It just seems to be that now is the time that a lot of these groups are starting to reorganize. So we always look at assets that we believe if we can sell them and reposition them into something better, we're always looking at that. So we'll see how it goes.

N
Nicholas Thillman
analyst

No. That's very helpful. And then maybe just one last question quickly for Anthony. Any changes to sort of what you're seeing on collections or bad debt within the portfolio or changes to the watch list?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

No. The composition in terms of count on the watch list hasn't really changed. We have 35 bps of bad debt embedded in our guidance, none of which was utilized in Q1. This compares favorably to our historical run of about 10 bps. For context, 2024 was an anomaly due to the Cleveland bankruptcies, which pushed bad debt above 100 bps. But excluding those events, bad debt for 2024 would have been approximately 20 basis points.

As of quarter end, our watch list includes 5 tenants. They occupy a combined 290 square feet. Their total ABR is less than 1% -- and all but one of those tenants is current on rent. And so when we zoom back and make these assessments in terms of our watch list, today, we think there's a 90-plus percent likelihood that those tenants will stay current or make full term payments over the remaining life of their lease, which across those 5 tenants is about 1.5 years.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Mike Mueller from JPMorgan.

M
Michael Mueller
analyst

So I think you said you expect at year-end about 97.3% occupancy. And I guess how much of that 97.3% is this short-term leasing, like 170,000 in St. Louis or something that could be 30, 60, 90 days or something, they could go away pretty quickly. So how much of that 97.3% could kind of go away within a couple of months or something?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

Mike, I would say about 25 bps of that. But here's the caveat. With respect to the temp fill, there's prospects that will likely absorb that space on a longer-term basis. And so we're not thinking about that space as being all that disruptive to the occupancy ramp.

J
James Connolly
executive

The 90-day out was actually added for benefit for us because we do have interest in the space longer term. So it's for us to be able to replace them with a longer-term tenant.

M
Michael Mueller
analyst

Got it. Okay. And then just to clarify, the 97.3%, that does reflect 140 basis points of recapture, I think that you were talking about in November?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

It does. It's 130 bps, just for clarification sake.

M
Michael Mueller
analyst

Okay. Sounds good. And then one other question. I guess how much capacity -- I know you talked about $200 million under contract, I think another $150 million behind it. I guess what's the capacity for acquisitions after that before you get to the point where you need to start thinking about the next round of equity as being critical to fund the acquisitions? And I guess if the stock doesn't rerate, what -- how do you approach the next batch of acquisitions once you need to start thinking about equity?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

Yes. I think beyond those tranches, there remains ample capacity. That -- to fund that kind of next iteration, there could be an uptick in recycling. We'll evaluate that as we deploy through the balance of this year. But we do think post that deployment, specifically as it relates to the articulation of deployment and guidance, there's still a couple of hundred million of capacity before we'd have to go back to the market.

Operator

Our next question comes from Eric Borden from BMO Capital Markets.

E
Eric Borden
analyst

Just going back to ODW. On the space that is being leased about the 1/3, can you talk about any frictional vacancy? Is there any downtime associated? And do you plan or intend to split up the box and if there's any CapEx involved there?

J
James Connolly
executive

There may be depending on the term of the tenancy, some cost that demise, but we've had agreements with the prospects that we have in hand, where it's going to fence off the different areas.

E
Eric Borden
analyst

Okay. So it would be a minimal downtime in terms of occupancy and them paying rent? Or would they immediately just pay rent and the fence would go up rather quickly?

J
James Connolly
executive

The latter. We would demise it very quickly and they pay rent immediately.

E
Eric Borden
analyst

Okay. That's helpful. And then just following up on that, when would ODW be added back to the same-store pool?

A
Anthony Saladino
executive

Once the space is restabilized. So it's more likely than not that they'd be added back in '26.

E
Eric Borden
analyst

Okay. Okay. You talked about acquisitions being our priority focus, maybe with some stock buybacks, but just curious where new development starts fit into the capital outlay. I understand that you started a smaller investment during the quarter. Just curious on your thoughts going forward for the development pool.

J
Jeffrey Witherell
executive

Yes, Eric. So we did start the last remaining parcel in our -- one of our parks in Jacksonville. So it's 42,000 square feet. There's a lot of demand down there. So we feel that, that was a build it and they'll come situation, and it's not a lot of money. So it's not a big issue for us. But we had this deal contracted. It just made a lot of sense to finalize construction in that park and stabilize it. So that's what we're doing.

Aside from there, I mean, we've mentioned in the past that we have 200,000 square feet ready to go in Cincinnati. We have, I think, 115,000 square feet ready to go in the new acquisition in Memphis, that portfolio. They're being set up as build-to-suits right now. So unless someone comes today and wants us to build them a building at a high single-digit yield to us, we're not going to build spec I don't think you're going to see us build spec in the next couple of quarters.

Operator

And ladies and gentlemen, I'm showing no additional questions, we'll conclude today's question-and-answer session as well as today's conference call. We do thank everyone for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

Earnings Call Recording
Other Earnings Calls
Get AI-powered insights for any company or topic.
Open AI Assistant

Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.

Warren Buffett