Novem Group SA
XETRA:NVM

Watchlist Manager
Novem Group SA Logo
Novem Group SA
XETRA:NVM
Watchlist
Price: 2.64 EUR Market Closed
Market Cap: €113.6m

Earnings Call Transcript

Transcript
from 0
Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Q3 2023-'24 results of Novem Group, which will be presented by the CEO, Markus Wittmann; and CFO, Dr. Johannes Burtscher. I'm [indiscernible], the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Markus Wittmann. Please go ahead.

M
Markus Wittmann
executive

Yes. Thank you. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to Novem's Quarter 3 results presentation. In quarter 3, we generated a revenue of EUR 138.7 million. And compared to last year's quarter 3, we are falling short by minus 16.9 percentage. As in previous quarters, the market and trading conditions remaining challenging across all regions, especially in Europe.

European customer extended their plant holidays during the Christmas season. And in addition to that several OEMs deploying short-time work and cutting their production by reducing shifts. Besides these trading conditions, we achieved an adjusted EBIT of EUR 16.6 million, resulting in a margin of exactly 12.0 percentage.

Yes. In meanwhile, we closed our Italian facility in Bergamo successfully without any noises or interruptions to our customers. The production is completely relocated to our plant in Czech Republic and Slovenia. We are also affected from the crisis in the Red Sea, what means longer sea transport and it ends finally in higher safety stock.

We are very glad to announce that we got the second nomination from the Asian premium carmaker Avatr, after their sports car E12, where we deliver the wireless charging console in real wood, we've won also in the midsized SUV E15. In a forward view, we can inform you about a solid order intake, which will bring us to a midterm growth of 5 to 6 percentage.

Yes. So with this going ahead with the financial highlights. As already mentioned, revenue for quarter 3, EUR 138.7 million compared to last year's EUR 166.9 million, which ends for this year in EUR 16.6 million EBIT. That means a margin from 12 percentage compared to last year's 11.4 percentage. Free cash flow became shortly negative with minus EUR 3.9 million compared to last year's EUR 24.6 million and net leverage increased also from 1.3 to 1.7 points (sic) [ 1.7x ]. Coming to the year-to-date figures, revenue wise, we are at EUR 485.8 million with an adjusted EBIT of EUR 45 million -- sorry, EUR 54.6 million and an adjusted EBIT of 11.2%, which is more or less in line with last year's 11.5 percentage. Free cash flow, EUR 29.6 million and net leverage, as already mentioned, 1.7 percentage (sic) [ 1.7x ] compared to last year's 1.3x.

That's about the overview. And with that, I would like to hand over to Johannes, who will explain the result in details.

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

Thank you, Markus. And also from my side, a very warm welcome to everyone. Starting with our top line, as was already mentioned, revenue was badly hit by the weak market demand driven by, as already said, extended customer plant holidays during the festive season. Now this is not exceptional but what was exceptional is the magnitude.

So we had platforms being down for 3 to 3.5 weeks and that is clearly also in comparison with historical patterns, very different. And this, in particular, occurred in Europe. That's why the European business and when we talk later about the segments, you will see that negative impact specifically focused on Europe. Now as in the previous quarters, we faced a negative ForEx impact. So in other words, if the ForEx rates had remained stable, we would have seen a higher revenue by EUR 3.4 million, the main driver being the U.S. dollar with EUR 2.5 million and the Chinese renminbi with EUR 0.9 million, combining to EUR 3.4 million revenue impact.

Now as I said, Series revenue was sluggish in this quarter with EUR 138.7 million. We saw this across the board, particularly in Europe and also with most of our platforms. Now if someone looks at the market development overall in the automotive sector, we see actually the opposite, increasing car sales, light vehicle production grew quite nicely in the specific quarter by 10.8%, according to LMC. But here, once again and this is our read and interpretation of our market intelligence is that this is, to a large extent, driven by the volume sector and to a far lesser extent by the premium sector we are operating in.

Apart from the Series revenue, we saw also compared to last year, a reduction in revenue tooling. Now as you know, this is aperiodic in terms of recognition of revenue. But here, particularly driven by Americas, we saw a lower revenue recognition in Q3 compared to last year and this resulted in the overall turnover of EUR 138.7 million. With regards to bottom line, needless to say that the lower revenue had a clear impact on the bottom line and this once again, especially in Europe.

And the first point we have to mention is the weak utilization of our operations in Europe, primarily Bergamo, this is for the last time, as we heard, the operation ceased now in this quarter but also the main plants in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. We are talking about utilization rates of between 50% to 60%. And yes, this is the main driver for inefficiencies and the low deployment rates of our operations, especially in Europe. As already said, to some extent, this will be mitigated by the closure of Bergamo. But once again, in the scheme of things, this is a small operation for our Italian customer base. And therefore, this production capacity has now been absorbed by the main plants in the Czech Republic and in Slovenia.

In terms of the KPIs, the number that stands out if one also looks at the P&L and the cost ratios, it's clearly the personnel expenses, where we are at a personnel cost to revenue or operating performance ratio of 28.6%. Now compared to last year, this is almost 4 percentage points higher, where we stood at 24.7%. So again, you can see this is the impact of this lower utilization of our operations. And having said this, we have a number of other elements that also influenced the result, most importantly, product mix and also model changes. We will come to this later as I will assign this also to the different segments. But this is one of the other drivers for the lower profitability.

On the other hand, we made good progress in terms of material cost savings, purchasing savings, as well as freight expenses, both inbound and outbound freight expenses and obviously also in view of the low utilization, reducing the leased workers across our operations. At the same time, we have very good quality performance ratios, scrap and rework is at a very low level but nonetheless, the overwhelming issue that we see is the utilization driven by the low call-offs from our customers.

One impact that is important to mention is our efforts on the pricing side, which is still ongoing. So this has not changed. We are still in regular constant discussions with basically all our OEMs in terms of compensation for higher costs. And in this quarter, as you know, this is a aperiodic phenomenon. Once again, it's not a regular issue that we see in our prices is that we got a compensation in Q3. And we could also, in this context, release a significant sales accrual that is relating to Americas. I will come to this later as this stands out when we look into the Americas region, in particular. All in all, this resulted in a still solid adjusted EBIT margin of 12% in terms of revenue.

Free cash flow for similar reasons was affected by the lower business. We had a negative free cash flow of EUR 3.9 million. The 2 most important drivers being reduced provisions. This comes actually from the release of this sales provision in Americas which is reflected in the profitability but obviously not as a cash relevant number. So it's negative reflected here. The lower profits compared to last year and then also the development in our other liabilities, which is, to a large extent, driven by lower payments for tooling from our customers to Novem.

So this is, in both cases aperiodic that affected the free cash flow, which came down to EUR 3.9 million negative in this particular quarter. Capital expenditure remained fairly stable compared to last year, EUR 4.6 million. And here again, as in previous quarters, the majority of our investments is relating to new products and to expansion. So projects that are in the launch phase and being prepared for SOP. But otherwise, it's a relatively stable sideways development of capital expenditure.

Working capital increased to EUR 149.2 million, quite a considerable increase to last year same quarter, the 2 most important items being the increase in tooling net. Once again, this is a positive signal. It signals that new business is to come and building up capitalized costs in projects that are in the preparation and engineering phase to be brought to the market at a later point in time. The movement that we see here from last year's quarter is EUR 62.7 million to EUR 75 million, so a increase of EUR 12.3 million of capital bound -- capitalized in our working capital.

The other second most important element is payables that reduced, that came down and obviously also increased working capital for that reason from EUR 50 million to EUR 35.8 million. And yes, this is a function of the volume. So there is less payables in that sense, also regarding to the lower trading volume of the business in this particular quarter.

In terms of the ratio total working capital at 22.6%, being slightly higher compared to last year on 31st December, where we recorded 20% total working capital in percent of revenue. We look, obviously, from an operating point of view on the days outstanding to steer and control the business. And yes, also here, we saw some movements, DIO being 4 days higher at 47 days. Here, we have some impacts also from the Red Sea situation here but also in regards to some of the relocations that we currently do to optimize the utilization in and within our footprint, DPO of 45. So this came down, deteriorated from 53, as I said, to a large extent, volume related and DSO being relatively stable.

Nonetheless, working capital, as always, is a key focal point of our attention. And this is also that we drive forward also towards the end of this financial year. The capital structure shows an increase of our net leverage position to 1.7x LTM EBITDA. When we look at the gross financial debt, that increased to EUR 307.4 million, within we have a special item. And this is an increase of our lease liabilities.

And this is relating to a renewal option that we recognized now according to IFRS 16 that this extension of the lease contracts of our buildings in Queretaro being our largest plant within our group, is now recognized. So it's obviously a noncash element but it increased the lease liabilities quite significantly due to this extension option that is now recognized.

If we had not this element, the net leverage ratio would actually be down by 0.2x adjusted EBITDA, so actually at 1.5x. So that needs to be considered and taken into account when looking at the development of our net leverage situation. Also as a function of the lower volume, we saw also the factoring come down in terms of volume. So this is another element that is to some extent driven by the trading developments.

And with this, I'd like to dig a little bit deeper into our operating results by segment. First, with regards to revenue, we mentioned already a couple of points here and starting with Europe at a relatively weak note with a reduction of EUR 23.3 million compared to last year. And here, we saw the biggest extent of the customer plant holidays, also short-time work at customer end and weak call-offs being very poor. If you look at the platforms and we also wanted to give you a flavor that this is relating to almost all platforms here in Europe and also affecting some of the larger platforms like the BMW 5 Series, which is in the EOP, they contributed around EUR 10 million reduction.

Mercedes-Benz E-Class with EUR 4.4 million, S-Class EUR 3.5 million and GLC with EUR 1.8 million.

So only these selection of obviously very significant premium platforms, they make almost up the whole deviation of EUR 23.3 million. And it also tells you that this is affecting also the higher end and actually the flagship models like an S-Class Mercedes being driven by these weak call-offs. Of course, I don't want to -- not to forget that we had also some platforms doing very well also in Europe, like the Volvo XC90, also SUV car or the Mercedes-Benz G class being manufactured in -- at Magna, in Austria. So there is obviously always a plus and minus, to a large extent, we see weak call-offs from our customers in Europe across the board.

Americas almost flat with a strong business almost at EUR 60 million and you see equally with Europe. And the small decline versus last year was only driven by tooling because we had a large tooling revenue position last year. Excluding the tooling portion, Americas again continued to outperform and to grow and even despite the weaker U.S. dollar, which we heard before, amounting EUR 2.5 million as a ForEx impact. And once again, very strongly, heavily driven by BMW X5, X6, X7, GLE, Audi Q5.

So the major SUV platforms. And like what we said the previous quarters, we see this 2-world system, Europe being at a weak note and even weaker this time and Americas very buoyant, very strong and being the pillar of our current business development. In Asia, we saw also a decline EUR 3 million versus last year. And in Asia, as we reported also the last time, this was again strongly driven by model changes, SOP, EOP situations, in particular, regarding the old and now the new Mercedes-Benz E-Class and also the Chinese -- local Chinese premium vehicles coming up but not yet as strong as we and our customers expected.

Nonetheless, as Markus already mentioned, we have some very good news of making further inroads into China and into this growing upcoming premium customer base that we see in China. LGT, we are now at EUR 659.9 million as an LTM revenue number over and across the 3 segments of our 3 regions.

In terms of EBIT and profitability, we see here a reflection of the underlying business development and the revenue line. And with this very weak turnover in Europe, this actually put the EBIT performance underlying into negative in Europe with EUR 3.9 million. And this is clearly driven by the volume, which is the key driver and the resulting inefficiencies in our operations, most importantly, in the Czech Republic and Slovenia but actually also with the S-Class in Germany also here leading to a relatively weak utilization. So that is the key driver. And in terms of cost or the cost performance, while we see a good trend with material costs, it's to a very large extent relating to labor costs being in negative ratio development.

In terms of Americas, also here, we see a sharp contrast, a very strong performance, exceptional with EUR 19.1 million. This is more than the overall group that we see as a contribution from Americas. If one calculates the adjusted EBIT margin, it's at 31.8%. And yes, on this occasion, I have to point out that there is an exceptional impact from this release of a sales accrual. It's also mentioned here as a part of the customer pricing discussion. And we are not guiding on this number but just to give you a flavor and a certain indication, as we talk about the mid-single-digit million number that we could recognize here. And yes, from a segmental perspective, if one looks Americas, it stands out very clearly and this is the reason why the profitability is such outstanding in the Americas region.

And in Asia, it's a relatively stable profit situation from EUR 1.8 million to EUR 1.4 million. But also here, we have a good contribution from tooling and also improved input costs that we could recognize in Asia. But again, this is the situation with Europe and Americas being in so different situations and Asia relatively stable. And that summarizes the outline on the results for the group and for the regions or segments.

And with that, we would like to hand over to you and take your questions. Thank you.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Alexandre Raverdy from Kepler Cheuvreux.

A
Alexandre Raverdy
analyst

I have 3 main questions, please. The first one is on the order intake. So it's good to see that you keep on winning orders from Chinese automakers. Could you please remind us the share of your revenues and order intake that are now with the Chinese automakers specifically? So that's the first question. The second one is on the midterm targets. You reiterated the 5% to 6% top line growth for the midterm on the back of a good order momentum but you did not mention anything regarding the margin targets. So is there any message here, notably as you mentioned that volumes were sometimes not as high as expected on EVs. So I just wanted to know whether you confirm as well the midterm targets and for margins, I mean.

And the final question is on European margins, specifically. They were quite disappointing in the previous quarter. Could you please confirm that Q3 was the low point for European margins and that it should be back to positive margin again in the next quarter or for any reasons because of the flattening volumes plus sustained headwinds, it will remain difficult.

M
Markus Wittmann
executive

Okay. So I will answer the first question to the order intake. So yes, I said we have a strong order intake in general but we do not share it between Asia and the rest of world or U.S. and Europe.

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

Well, Alexandre, with regards to the midterm targets and guidance, we confirm both. So it's 5% to 6% revenue line and this is also the mention -- the message we want to get across, while the current trading is challenging, this is our headline, as we already mentioned quite in detail the prospect, we see quite positive. And therefore, we can -- and we do stand by with the midterm target 5% to 6% growth and this goes hand-in-hand with the 14% to 15% adjusted EBIT margin.

So the guidance -- the midterm guidance is confirmed and unchanged. With regards to your question whether we have bottomed out our performance in Europe. I'm a little careful here because we do actually not give a forecast. But obviously, as always, I'd like to give you some flavor. And the point is, the Q3 was very weak in terms of the top line. And yes, we had at the turn of the year, we had the festive season and this is a particular point of time of lower and fewer working days at the customer. And this was, to some extent, also clearly used and levered on by the OEMs.

So with regards to Q4 and the orders to come, we would assume that this is changing. But of course, the overall situation that we have also today is still weak. We have call-offs that show the same pattern. But again, more working days. We have noticed specific phenomenon of the year-end turn with the extended customer plant holidays. And therefore, I would cautiously look positively into the next quarters to come. I think just from the mere numbers, you see top line development.

It is a quite important and major impact that we saw in a comparison to last year, which was from that point of view, quite extraordinary. So that is of what we see with the EU margin but also sales development as still being a challenging environment. I hope that answers your 3 questions, Alexandre.

A
Alexandre Raverdy
analyst

It does.

Operator

And the next question comes from Christian Glowa from Hauck Aufhuser Investment Bank.

C
Christian Glowa
analyst

A couple of questions from my side. Let's do them one on one. My first question would be on current trading. We understand that Q3 was challenging. So calendar Q4 because of seasonality on extended Christmas break. But how about current trading, how was Q4 doing so far? Are you about to return to growth in Q4? That will be my first question and then I continue thereafter.

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

Christian, this is more or less the same question that we heard from Alexandre, just in other words. Yes, it was special in Q3 but the trading environment is no different today. So it has not changed, especially not in such short term. The headlines we also see in the automotive industry are not that positive. And therefore, the call-offs will stay weak for the time being, especially here in Europe. At the same time, we can confirm that we see the same very buoyant situation in Americas. So this 2-worlds perspective is unchanged.

But as I said before, we do not have this specific situation with the year-end turn. We have more working days. That is decisive also for revenue at the customer end but call-offs are structurally lower in Europe with the platforms I also mentioned. So if, as an example, we take again a platform like the Mercedes S-Class, it is not trading and called off by Mercedes-Benz as a year ago. And for the time being and this is not a thing that changes overnight, we still see this ongoing as a pattern for at least the next month to come.

C
Christian Glowa
analyst

All right. And then my second question is, you talked about utilization and understood that you talked about the utilization rate of 50% to 60%. I guess that was meant to be on the plans in Europe, right? Or was that on group level?

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

No, no, that is absolutely good allocated to Europe. We have very -- also very different utilization rates in Americas with Queretaro being our main plant, very well utilized as we have buoyant demand there. So also here again, we have to differentiate very clearly regional -- regionally, we see this low utilization rate here in Europe. And yes, not to forget, we have a Bergamo plant still in the air, now, not longer anymore and some of the plants that have a particular impact also from platforms that are exceptionally weak in terms of market demand. And if I may give you some flavor also here, then we talk also about e-vehicles, the electric vehicle architecture from Mercedes, as an example. So also here, we do have specific situations in specific plants depending also on the allocation of models and platforms to those plants. So that is driving the situation. And this is allocated and directed to Europe.

C
Christian Glowa
analyst

Okay. And then 2 further questions, if I may. My next one would be on your personnel cost, which seem to be quite inflated at the moment to remain flexible in your production set up mainly in Europe. Is there any chance you can pass on also these personnel cost to customers? So in other words, should we expect some compensation payments looking forward on personnel expenses to maintain your flexibility. As, of course, as you said, basically, customer call-offs seem to remain volatile. Is there a chance to pass that to customers?

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

The answer is yes, Christian. We do and it's always a question of magnitude. We cannot get a compensation in full. But as you said, I think you used the write words. It's inflated because we cannot actually adjust the personnel expenses and cost so well because of the volatility in the call-offs. So we actually carry a certain inefficiency in our operations because of these changes.

And that makes it difficult and that's exactly the point where we come in and talk and negotiate and bargain with our customers that because of those fluctuations and volatilities, we want to have a compensation. But again, as we focused on material cost, material inflation in the past, it's now heavily focused on labor cost and this is, to some extent, attainable but we don't get a full coverage. There's not anything like a pass-through mechanism or a possibility for us. But yes, it's part of these compensations that we also mentioned. And it's an important part also to -- well, to protect the profit line that we also report to you.

C
Christian Glowa
analyst

Okay. That's very clear. And then my last question would be on the new order win from the Chinese Avatr platform. Can you please provide roughly an indication what the content is per car for this new customer? Because I think on average, you said the content should be around EUR 120 per vehicle, is that slightly more or less than the average?

M
Markus Wittmann
executive

Yes. This is -- yes, it's a low content. It's a single digit here. And as you know, Avatr is a start-up customer. He started already -- still -- and yes, it's not too much herein. But nevertheless, we see growth at Avatr and there will come even more cars from them.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] So there are no further questions at this time. And I would like to turn the conference back over to Markus Wittmann and Dr. Johannes Burtscher for any closing remarks.

J
Johannes Burtscher
executive

Well, we have to say thank you for listening. Thanks for joining this call. And looking forward to our next results presentation when we then present the preliminary results for the full year. Thank you.

M
Markus Wittmann
executive

Yes. Thank you also from my side for joining and see you, hopefully, in the next presentation. Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now concluded and you may disconnect. Thank you for joining and have a pleasant day. Goodbye.

Other Earnings Calls
Get AI-powered insights for any company or topic.
Open AI Assistant

Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.

Warren Buffett