
Ranger Energy Services Inc
NYSE:RNGR

Profitability Summary
Ranger Energy Services Inc's profitability score is 43/100. We take all the information about a company's profitability (such as its margins, capital efficiency, free cash flow generating ability, and more) and consolidate it into one single number - the profitability score. The higher the profitability score, the more profitable the company is.

Score
We take all the information about a company's profitability (such as its margins, capital efficiency, free cash flow generating ability, and more) and consolidate it into one single number - the profitability score. The higher the profitability score, the more profitable the company is.
We take all the information about a company's profitability (such as its margins, capital efficiency, free cash flow generating ability, and more) and consolidate it into one single number - the profitability score. The higher the profitability score, the more profitable the company is.

Score

Score
Margins
Profit margins represent what percentage of sales has turned into profits. Simply put, the percentage figure indicates how many cents of profit the company has generated for each dollar of sale.
Profit margins help investors assess if a company's management is generating enough profit from its sales and whether operating costs and overhead costs are being contained.
Earnings Waterfall
Ranger Energy Services Inc
Revenue
|
569.4m
USD
|
Cost of Revenue
|
-467.4m
USD
|
Gross Profit
|
102m
USD
|
Operating Expenses
|
-71.7m
USD
|
Operating Income
|
30.3m
USD
|
Other Expenses
|
-10.5m
USD
|
Net Income
|
19.8m
USD
|
Margins Comparison
Ranger Energy Services Inc Competitors
Country | Company | Market Cap |
Gross Margin |
Operating Margin |
Net Margin |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
US |
![]() |
Ranger Energy Services Inc
NYSE:RNGR
|
288.9m USD |
18%
|
5%
|
3%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Schlumberger NV
NYSE:SLB
|
48.8B USD |
21%
|
18%
|
12%
|
|
US |
B
|
Baker Hughes Co
NASDAQ:BKR
|
38.6B USD |
22%
|
11%
|
11%
|
|
LU |
![]() |
Tenaris SA
MIL:TEN
|
16.8B EUR |
34%
|
18%
|
15%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Halliburton Co
NYSE:HAL
|
19.2B USD |
18%
|
17%
|
9%
|
|
UK |
![]() |
TechnipFMC PLC
NYSE:FTI
|
14.8B USD |
20%
|
12%
|
9%
|
|
FR |
![]() |
Technip Energies NV
PAR:TE
|
6.1B EUR |
14%
|
7%
|
6%
|
|
CN |
![]() |
CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Ltd
SSE:600968
|
42.5B CNY |
14%
|
9%
|
7%
|
|
UK |
![]() |
Subsea 7 SA
OSE:SUBC
|
56.8B NOK |
11%
|
7%
|
3%
|
|
IT |
![]() |
Saipem SpA
MIL:SPM
|
4.7B EUR |
30%
|
4%
|
2%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Nov Inc
NYSE:NOV
|
5.2B USD |
23%
|
10%
|
7%
|
Return on Capital
Return on capital ratios give a sense of how well a company is using its capital (equity, assets, capital employed, etc.) to generate profits (operating income, net income, etc.). In simple words, these ratios show how much income is generated for each dollar of capital invested.




Return on Capital Comparison
Ranger Energy Services Inc Competitors
Country | Company | Market Cap | ROE | ROA | ROCE | ROIC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
US |
![]() |
Ranger Energy Services Inc
NYSE:RNGR
|
288.9m USD |
7%
|
5%
|
10%
|
7%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Schlumberger NV
NYSE:SLB
|
48.8B USD |
21%
|
9%
|
18%
|
15%
|
|
US |
B
|
Baker Hughes Co
NASDAQ:BKR
|
38.6B USD |
18%
|
8%
|
13%
|
10%
|
|
LU |
![]() |
Tenaris SA
MIL:TEN
|
16.8B EUR |
11%
|
9%
|
12%
|
10%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Halliburton Co
NYSE:HAL
|
19.2B USD |
21%
|
8%
|
19%
|
14%
|
|
UK |
![]() |
TechnipFMC PLC
NYSE:FTI
|
14.8B USD |
27%
|
9%
|
22%
|
13%
|
|
FR |
![]() |
Technip Energies NV
PAR:TE
|
6.1B EUR |
28%
|
7%
|
22%
|
12%
|
|
CN |
![]() |
CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Ltd
SSE:600968
|
42.5B CNY |
14%
|
8%
|
16%
|
16%
|
|
UK |
![]() |
Subsea 7 SA
OSE:SUBC
|
56.8B NOK |
4%
|
2%
|
9%
|
5%
|
|
IT |
![]() |
Saipem SpA
MIL:SPM
|
4.7B EUR |
16%
|
3%
|
13%
|
5%
|
|
US |
![]() |
Nov Inc
NYSE:NOV
|
5.2B USD |
9%
|
5%
|
10%
|
7%
|
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow (FCF) is the money a company has left over after paying its operating expenses and capital expenditures. The more free cash flow a company has, the more it can allocate to dividends, paying down debt, and growth opportunities.
If a company has a decreasing free cash flow, that is not necessarily bad if the company is investing in its growth.


