© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, we would like to welcome everyone to Braskem's Third Quarter of 2019 Earnings Conference Call. Today with us, we have Fernando Musa, CEO; and Rosana Avolio, Head of Investor Relations. We would like to inform that this event is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] We have simultaneous webcast that may be accessed through the Braskem IR website at www.braskem-ri.com.br and the MZiQ platform where the slide presentation is available for download. Please feel free to flip through the slides during the conference call. There will be a replay facility for this call on the website. We remind you that the questions which will be answered during the Q&A session may be posted in advance on the website. Before proceeding, let me mention that forward-looking statements are being made under the safe harbor of Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the Braskem management and on information currently available to the company. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to the future events and, therefore, depend on the circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Investors should understand that general economic conditions, industry conditions and other operating factors could also affect the future results of Braskem and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Now I will turn the conference over to Rosana Avolio, Head of Investors Relations. Rosana Avolio, you may begin your conference.
Hi. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for participating in Braskem earnings conference call. Today, we will present third quarter of 2019 results. So we're starting our presentation. Let's go to Slide 3, which will present the highlights in the period. First one. In the third quarter, Braskem posted a consolidated recurring EBITDA of $389 million, in line with the second quarter of 2019 due to lower spreads in the international market, which were partially offset by higher sales volume arising from Brazil and higher PP sales in Europe. Free cash flow generation of the company was $101 million. And considering that the financial leverage measured by the ratio of net debt-to-EBITDA stood at 2.8x in U.S. dollars. Other highlights is in the Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting held on October 3, it was approved the distribution of BRL 667 million of the minimum mandatory dividend for the fiscal year of 2018 to be paid by the end of 2019. One of the highlights, which was very important for the company was with the filing of the 20-F forms for fiscal year of 2017 and '18 also with SEC. The trading of Braskem American Depositary Shares was resumed on NYSE. Also in October, Braskem placed $2.25 billion in bonds in the international market, making the largest bond issuing in Braskem's history. In November, including the liability management strategy of the company, Braskem also issued BRL 550 million in commercial papers due in up to 5 years. Those proceeds are being used primarily to repay other shorter-term, medium-term debt and higher-cost debt as well. In terms of value creation, the construction of the new PP plant in the United States reached 78% in the end of September, with investment to date of $523 million. To conduct the premarket activities for the new PP plant, in 2019, Braskem U.S. imported already more than 110 kt of PP from Braskem Brazil. This start-up is estimated for the end of first half of 2020. Other initiatives of value creation. Braskem Idesa is investing $2.4 million in infrastructure for the fast track solution that we are calling which consists of importing ethane from U.S. in order to allow the cracker to run at higher utilization rates. The beginning of the import is expected before the end of 2019, and this project will increase the reliability of our supply. Moving on Slide 4. We will comment on the operations in Brazil. In the quarter, the operations in Brazil continued to be affected by the downside of the petrochemical industry, with the petrochemical complex operating at 85% of average utilization rate. On the other hand, resin demand in Brazil market grew by 7% over the second quarter due to seasonality. In the same period, resin sales increased 6% with a market share of 65%. EBITDA was 38% higher than the second quarter to $231 million as a consequence of higher spreads of base petrochemicals and also PVC and lower prices of key feedstocks of the company. Moving to Slide 5. We will comment on the situation in Alagoas. We have been dividing the subject in fronts. The first one is the operational front. The company is now temporarily operating into a non-integrated business model. The average PVC utilization rate stood in the quarter at 57%, an increase over second quarter due to the normalization of EDC imports with the feedstock to produce PVC. And as a result of that, PVC sales also increased amounting 123 kt in the quarter. On the technical side, we are conducting 2 fronts. The first one is to identify the causes of the geological phenomenon. And for that, the company's hiring several studies by specialized and industrial experts, and those studies are still ongoing. And second front is right now is in discussion with the authorities is related to measures for the definitive shutdown of salt mining activities. Moving to the legal front. We have, right now, BRL 100 million frozen and BRL 6.4 billion in insurance bonds. We have, as well, BRL 2.7 billion frozen. But for that, we are waiting for the release because we already replaced that for insurance bonds. In terms of the labor court injunction, on October, the judge file actually denied the freeze of BRL 2.5 billion. And right now, we still have a pending federal action in the company, which is still being analyzed by the judge. And it's important to mention that the company has been also collaborating with the authorities in the region, implementing several actions, such as soil monitoring using GPS, installation of meteorological station to forecast weather variations, including rainfall and other actions that the company has been doing since the beginning of this year. So moving on to Slide 8 (sic) [ Slide 6 ]. We will talk about U.S. and Europe business units' results. In the U.S., PP demand was 1% weaker than in the second quarter, reflecting the economic slowdown in the country in all categories. Because of that, almost decrease, that's why 1% increased by schedule shutdown of PP plants. In Europe, the demand has fallen 4% over the second quarter due to seasonality with the European summer. In the other hand, Braskem sales grew by 20% due to higher availability of products, influenced by the resumption of propylene supply which were impacting last quarter. And in this quarter, U.S. and Europe EBITDA declined almost 15%, and over the second quarter, impacted by the decline in PP spreads in U.S. towards the softening decline. We saw softening decline, explained by the higher propylene prices in the region due to schedule and unscheduled shutdowns in U.S. Moving to Slide 7. We will present results of Mexico, our JV. The PE demand in Mexico was 3% higher than second quarter due to seasonality as well. The average utilization rate of the plant was 72%, same level of the past quarter. Total volumes was 1% lower than second quarter due to the strategy of the company to prioritize sales to more profitable regions such as the U.S. and Europe, combined with the reduction in exports to Asia. And as a result of that strategy, EBITDA for the third quarter in Mexico was 9% higher than the third quarter.
Moving to Slide 8, where we show the accumulated cash flow, free cash flow of the company. In the 9 months of 2019, Braskem posted unconsolidated EBITDA of BRL 6.5 billion. From this EBITDA, BRL 2.2 billion were related to nonrecurring events as the vast majority of such nonrecurring event happened in the first quarter and are related to PIS/COFINS taxes revenue, as explained before. Therefore, there has been such no recurring event, the 9 months EBITDA of the company was BRL 4.3 billion. Braskem had a positive impact of working capital of BRL 2.2 billion mainly in the second quarter of 2019. Maintenance CapEx of Braskem was BRL 1.1 billion. And then interest paid accumulated to BRL 1.6 billion since the beginning of the year, and we paid as well BRL 0.4 billion of income tax. Strategic investments, here, the best part is related to the new PP plant in U.S. amounted BRL 0.7 billion. Adding all these numbers, Braskem had a positive free cash flow before debt of BRL 2.8 billion, a very strong free cash flow that would represent a 14% return for all the investors. Moving to Slide 9. Corporate debt of the company. Braskem ended the quarter with a cash position of $2.3 billion. Summing up the revolving credit facility of $1 billion that the company has, the cash position of Braskem reached $3.3 billion. So this is the liquidity available for the company. Such amount of $3.3 billion is sufficient to cover the debt service of the company during the next [ 43 ] months of EBITDA without considering any cash generation of the company. And then, moving to the next slide, where we showed the picture of our debt profile considering our issue of our bond of $2.25 billion plus the BRL 550 million in commercial papers, we show the picture considering those 2 issuances of the company. The proceeds from that will be used mainly to repay shorter-term and higher-cost liabilities, including the '20 and '20 bonds -- '21 bonds, as you can see, the reduction on the bars here, and to partially tender the '22 and '23 bonds. As a result of that, the average debt maturity terms was around 18 years, and the company cash balance increased by $680 million (sic) [ $608 million ]. With that picture, the new liquidity position is sufficient to cover the payment of all liabilities of Braskem coming due in almost 100 months. Moving on, we're going to talk about petrochemical scenario. We will bring the resin's utilization rate, which is a good proxy for the petrochemical scenario and spreads. Usually, when the utilization rate is higher than 87%, we face a tight petrochemical market. And in the other hand, when it's lower than 84%, we face a low market -- lower spreads. We're going to start talking about PP global utilization rate. That utilization rate affect our operations in U.S. and also in Europe and partially in Brazil. The scenario is still positive. Although new CapEx are expecting to come online operations, we remain strong. And as a consequence of that, spreads will be staying very stable health spread. For PVC, which affect operations in Brazil, we produced 0.7 million tons of PVC in Brazil. The scenarios -- the trend is positive since PVC capacity rationalization continues to be positively impacted by the resin utilization rates in spreads. We are not seeing new capacity coming. Actually, since, I would say, the past 5 years, we have seen utilization rate growth. And that means very good spreads. The concern for the company and also for the scenario -- for the global scenario is the polythene business. We have been seen capacity coming west in the last years. We do expect new capacity coming in China in the coming years combined with slower global demand. It is a concern to us. We have been seeing very weak spreads. We do think that 2020 probably the spread will be at the same level and a recovery of -- gradual recovery starting in '21.
So to finalize our presentation. Moving on to Slide 13. We show some of Braskem actions showing how the company is well prepared to face the challenging petrochemical scenario, ensuring a comfortable liquidity position without financial constraints. So given that what the company already announced in terms of cost discipline, we already announced a reduction by $100 million maintenance CapEx for 2019, natural next year because we're going to start the facility in the middle of next year, we will have a natural reduction on the strategic investment for 2020. We have [ taken charge of ] this new facility. In terms of liability management, we just did our homework. We -- since the $2.25 billion, as I was explaining plus BRL 550 million in commercial papers for that, considering that we have a very strong liquid position that the company can cover the payment of all liabilities coming due in almost 100 months without any cash generation. And the third is regarding dividends, the company has a dividend policy that have several restrictions for the company to pay additional dividends on top of the minimum mandatory distribution, which is 25% of last year, previous year net income. For that, considering the movement of the cycle, the company just approved the distribution of 2018 dividend, which is the 25% minimum. So the company, it is prepared for the down cycle of resins. That concludes our today's presentation.
Now we move to the question-and-answer session. Thank you so much.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Gabriel Barra from UBS.
The first one is regarding the PVC operation in Alagoas. How do you see the operations in Alagoas going forward? And are you maintaining [ partial ] PVC? Or is there any other possibility, for example, [indiscernible] instead of PVC? Again Alagoas, regarding the measure you proposed to [ AIN ] by the company, another 400 constructions, is there any forecast on how much is cost for Braskem? And if I may, I have another one on the Braskem Idesa. How has been the project of the important terminal in Mexico? And what are the next steps for the project after the fast track step?
Gabriel, this is Fernando Musa. Thank you very much for joining us, all of you. So I'll start with the Alagoas situation. The current operational plan is for us to find a way sometime in the first half of next year to restart the chlor-alkali plant with salt that we are going to bring from Rio Grande do Norte another state in the northeast of the Brazilian country. With that, we will recover part of our integration. Today, we are importing EDC. With salt from Rio Grande do Norte that, as I said, we expect to finalize the small investment that needs to be done at the plants and figuring out the logistics sometime in the first half of next year, we expect to have the chlor-alkali plant back and therefore the EDC production back in Alagoas to serve both the PVC plant in Alagoas and the PVC plant in Bahia. We are also working in parallel to identify an area in a rural setting outside of the Maceió City to go back to extracting the salt from the current reserve that exists in Alagoas state. This is going to take a little bit longer as we need to identify the right location and develop the projects to start the new mine and build the pipeline to remove the brine from this new location to the plant. As far as the costs for the process of shutting down the current mine, we're still working on that. This decision was made late last week. Based on some reports that we got earlier last week, we're still discussing with the authorities the detailed work plan and activities for the shutdown of the mine. And if -- whenever we have the -- an estimate for time line and cost, we'll share that with the market in the future. The last question is on Braskem Idesa. We're starting the fast track project until the end of the year. With that, we expect to have enough feedstock to run the cracker closer to its full capacity, which would lead to us, therefore, running the PE plant also close to full capacity. It's important to highlight that this feedstock will be imported from Texas. Therefore, priced at Mont Belvieu reference. And as I said, we expect to have it up and running by the end of the year here.
Our next question is from Petr from Barclays.
Petr Grishchenko from Barclays. I just wanted to follow-up on what you're just discussing on Braskem Idesa. In terms of this temporary solution, I didn't fully understand when do you expect to come up with a permanent solution? And basically, you're saying that starting late this year, you'll run the cracker and PE plant at full capacity, is that right? And then, I guess, as a follow-up, obviously, there's a -- Braskem Idesa entity is in the market trying to deal that, I think, is the point, I guess, is to release dividends from the entity. Why, I guess, do you need to do the deal, then if you operate the full capacity and will be able to take dividends?
Hello, Petr. On the fast track, we do expect it to start by the end of the year. We are working on the engineering alternatives for a long-term solution. We still don't have a time line for that. It is a priority for the Braskem Idesa team. As soon as we have the fast track operational, the team will dedicate their time to the long-term solution. As far as the current offering, because there is a current offering going on, I'm not at liberty to discuss any of those details that you asked, unfortunately, given the process that is going on. I have restrictions on answering your questions.
Got it. And I guess, maybe just generally then you mentioned, I think in the interview came out this morning, about certain sector in Brazil that you're seeing stronger demand. I'm just trying to, in the sense, if you can discuss specifically where do you see kind of stronger versus softer demand next year? I think one of the things you mentioned was automotive. But we saw about a month ago where the cessation came out very bearish on auto production, I think, the weakest increase like since 2016. So I'm just curious like what sectors will be the drivers of demand next year in your opinion?
I think the relevant aspect for the Brazilian demand next year is the expected improvement in GDP growth given all the reforms that's happened. My comment on automotive was probably -- should be taken probably more in comparison to other regions where we're seeing declining production for automotives in the U.S., Europe, even China, and Brazil still has positive growth. Yes, it's a little bit less than what was running at the beginning of the year, but still, let's call it, a bright spot, given the reduction in industrial production in general in Brazil. Agriculture and agri business continues to be quite strong, and it's a competitive and comparative advantage of the Brazilian economy. And there's more and more plastics being used to support multiple aspects of the agricultural business in the country. And we start to see some positive signals coming from consumer-based businesses where, I mean, we start to see some of the retail sales improving. And there's good expectation when we talk to our clients about the impact that higher growth next year should have for several of the value chains. The one challenging aspect continues to be civil construction. There is a good expectation for infrastructure and also for residential. But when -- those tend to have a big lag between any big decision/announcement and concrete increase and pickup in plastics demand. So we continue to see positive announcements in the residential sector. There's been a lot of activity recently, but then this usually takes several months until you start construction and then impact demand. So for that sector, I'm more conservative. It's probably back end of '20, beginning of '21, where we start to see a stronger demand coming.
Great. That's very helpful. And then maybe can I touch quickly on dividends. I'm just trying to understand a little bit better, what's your take, let's say, for next year? I mean you approved the minimum dividends of, call it, BRL 670 million. And for next year, what numbers you anticipate? And also, just wanted to clarify the complementary dividend policy, I think, it referenced to net leverage not exceeding 2.5%. And I was just wondering, is that -- is that like net leverage that you report? Or is based on the -- like total EBITDA or recurring EBITDA?
So by Brazilian law, we have to pay 25% of net profit every year as dividends. And after that, the company has discretionary part, that's what you mentioned, complementary dividends. For that portion, we published a dividend policy over a year ago. The logic of the dividend policy is to look at the current year plus 2 years forward. And based on the expected results of the company maintain a leverage -- maximum leverage of 2.5 net debt over EBITDA.
The policy also says that if there is an interesting project and/or acquisition that is forecast for the period, that it would be okay to go above the 2.5 as long as the expectation is to come back to the 2.5. The decision on dividend will be done sometime earlier next year after the close of the year. And with the business plan for the future years taken into consideration, this decision will be made by the March, April time frame. As of today, at the end of the third quarter, we have a net profit of BRL 124 million after the large loss in the third quarter. That was directly a direct consequence of the exchange rate variation impact on our liabilities that are dollar-denominated.
Great. And maybe can I ask one more question? On -- in the item that you report on the kind of adjusted leverage for judicial deposits, that was already, like, technically, like released or Supreme Court announced that's supposed to be released. But as the third quarter was still frozen, is that how we should think about it this $906 million that you showed?
Yes. The...
So $908 million.
The court have frozen BRL 3.7 billion to $900 million plus that you mentioned. This amount, that is a decision by the [Foreign Language], which is the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil, saying that we should get the money back. We are dealing with the "bureaucracy" of the legal system to get the money back. So we have a Superior Court order to have the funds released. So as of today, we still don't have the money back into our accounts. But I mean, we are constantly discussing this with the court given the [Foreign Language] decision that the insurance bonds would provide protection that the courts require, and there's no need for assets froze.
Our next question is from Hassan Ahmed from Alembic Global.
First question, on the ethylene, polyethylene side of things, and a 2-part question, if I may. As I took a look at Q3 earnings across a variety of sort of producers within the Americas, I think one thing that became quite clear was there was a fair degree of divergence in terms of the profitability reported by earnings based on flexibility of feedstock. And it seems to be a recurring theme nowadays that you see extreme feedstock movements, a lot of volatility within even NGLs themselves. And obviously, that continues to have an impact on the overall profitability within the ethylene polyethylene chain within the Americas. So how are you guys thinking about adjusting to that, maybe importing more flexibility into the system, maybe more rapid sort of switching between feedstocks and the like? So that's part one of the question.
And part two of the question is, it seems that 80% of the ethylene polyethylene capacity that was supposed to come online in the Americas has already come online. And I know you flagged incremental capacity in China as a potential threat, 2020 and beyond. But China has a long history of sort of underwhelming in terms of bringing online capacity on dates on which consultants say that they bring that capacity online. So could it be that maybe we are a bit too paranoid about the near term?
Hassan, nice talking to you. On the first question around flexibility, this is certainly a key point in our industry as volatility increases and different sources of feedstock appear around the world. If a company has the flexibility, it will navigate this challenging and volatile moments with better results. As -- so all of you're aware, we made an investment in our Bahia cracker to create flexibility so that we can crack ethane up to 15% of the ethylene production. The challenge we've been facing in the recent past is the problem in Alagoas, which is forcing us to run the cracker at a slightly lower rate because there's no ethylene being consumed for the EDC plant. And under that logic, it makes it very hard to import the ethane to benefit from that flexibility, given our needs for the other streams, especially propylene that if we flip to ethane just as our availability in the cluster there in Bahia and for the system here in Brazil. So unfortunately, this investment in profitability, we have not been able to use it in the short term. Having said that, we continue to look at the possibility since we do plan to have chlor-alkali plant and EDC plant back online pretty soon. We do have -- we do continue to look at the opportunity to increasing the flexibility in Bahia. This is a project that we've been looking at from an engineering point of view for a while. As it would be the second tranche, it is compared to the first one more expensive. That's why they got a little bit longer to find the right engineering solution so that it is competitive and, therefore, implemented. We are looking at other alternatives for the other crackers. Those probably take a little bit longer to implement. What we have been doing is improving and diversifying our portfolio of contracts for naphtha, so that we can use some flexibility around the contracts. We have different price points, price formulas for naphtha. In the propylene, we do the same thing. We have multiple suppliers in the U.S. with different pricing formulas, so we can optimize based on those difference in feedstock. As you all are aware, we have a large contract with Enterprise that is propane based, which provides us with, I mean, a very strong indirect exposure to propane. So the challenge with flexibility is that the investment to justify itself is very tricky if you are adapting a current plant. If the plant is built to start with, with the embedded flexibility, things are easier. And the other challenge we have, especially in Brazil, is the distance to the sources of different feedstock, which creates the logistics challenge. So we've been working on -- at the plants, we've been working at the contract portfolio, and we've been working at the logistics alternatives to increase flexibility for our system. As far as the China capacity, I agree with you that China had a history of underwhelming as far as capacity increase. Our observation is that in the recent past, they have been pretty much on track with most of the investments they have set. So I agree that a lot of the capacity that is published by some of the consultants will probably not see the light of the day. But even if you discount that, there's quite a lot of investments happening there, especially integrated projects with refineries that are under construction. And in the recent past, as I said, if you look at everything that's going on in the aromatics and P-Xylene. They've been pretty much on time with their announcements. So I hope I'm wrong. And therefore, they all are late or never built. It would be great news for the supply balance of the industry. But in the recent past, they've been a little bit better at delivering on what they say on average.
There's always, given the size and the long list of investment announcements that are done there, there's some that will not be built, but still relevant chunks of capacity coming online at a moment where -- and there's still a lack of clarity on the global economic growth, especially because of the trade war between U.S. and China that every other week, we are either very happy or very sad that they're going to sort it out. So this uncertainty adds to the challenge potentially quite a lot of capacity coming online in China.
Understood. Very, very helpful. And as a follow-up, just moving to the chlorovinyl side of things, you mentioned that in the near term, you'll be able to start your chlor-alkali facility, EDC facility and the like. On the chlor-alkali side, we -- at least the industry was getting a bit more positive about the prospects of caustic pricing for the back half of the year, but it seems that never really materialized. And I think potentially the culprit maybe industrial production or more specifically, the production of aluminum. So first question on that is how do you see 2020 shaping up from a caustic perspective? And part and parcel with that, how do you see 2020 shaping up for the PVC side of things as well? Because it just seems to me that EDC profitability obviously depends to a high degree on the ebbs and flows of ethylene margins because -- particularly for the integrated guys, it seems the bulk of the PVC profitability lies in the sort of margins you attain within ethylene. So in a nutshell what I'm asking for is prospects for caustic pricing for 2020 and prospects for PVC margins in 2020?
Hassan, I think the vinyls chain is one where we see compared to C2 PE or C3 PP way less investment in general. I agree with you that the caustic pricing uptick that everybody was expecting it's frustrating that it didn't come. I -- it's probably driven by some of the challenges, as you mentioned, in industrial production, where a lot of the caustic soda ends up and a direct consequence of the global economic slowdown. And so having said that, I mean, we do believe that different than PE and even PP, which PE is clearly in the down cycle, PP is still very healthy, but quite a lot of capacity coming online in the Americas. We're going to see the new wave of construction, starting with our plant next year. So we should expect a small reduction in margins in the PP. The vinyls chain should have healthier margins going forward, even though they've got a lot of growth in caustic, they're limited to 0 capacity addition. So any growth will increase utilization rates. The same applies to PVC. And PVC, there's a lot of need for infrastructure around the world, and this should drive the PVC demand pretty positively. And in Brazil, we should see an uptick with the improvement in economics for the overall country. We should see a healthier PVC demand that would contribute to improving our margins. We do expect sort of better margins for the vinyl chain going forward.
Our next question is from [ Gustavo Alessandro ]. He's an investor.
First one regarding the Alagoas issue. Can you help us to contract your analysis on the utilization rates going forward? So it has increased between third and second quarter. So for first quarter for 2020, what's the utilization rate targets the company is pursuing? Second question is regarding fast track project. So who is paying for the investments? And who pays for the logistics to transport a tank from Texas to Mexico going forward? And is that once the utilization rate can we expect for 2020 for Mexico project? And third and last question for also the environment of lower spreads. How could be the investments for 2020 considering the company already increased investments for 2019?
Hello, [ Gustavo ]. On the vinyls utilization rate here in Brazil, as I said, we do expect to have the chlor-alkali plant back up and running sometime in the first half of next year. This will help us have a local EDC production that we will combine with imported EDC as we ramp up the chlor-alkali plant. So we do expect to have increased utilization rates by mid, late next year as we ramp up this process. In the short term, we don't expect any relevant change until we start bringing salt from Rio Grande do Norte to restart the plant. On the Braskem Idesa fast track project, the investment is being done by Braskem Idesa. The molecule, the ethane will be bought by Braskem Idesa and imported from Texas to Mexico, with all the cost paid for by Braskem Idesa. This will provide us with additional flexibility to bring a relevant amount of ethane that should help us run the cracker and, therefore, the PE plants very close or at full capacity next year after we ramp up this fast track facility. The expectation is that the fast track could bring in anywhere between 20% and 40% roughly of complex needs. So as today, PEMEX has been delivering -- in the third quarter, they delivered 72. If we max out the fast track, we could be at full capacity in the complex. As far as the investments in general for the company, given the down cycle, we've been revisiting the portfolio and many of those small projects that we're adding on a recovery of the cycle, sometime late '19 and during '20. Now that we have a scenario where we still don't see that recovery, many of those projects have been either postponed or canceled. We do expect 2020 to have a lower CapEx spend this year. Simply by the termination of construction of the new plant, the new polypropylene plant in the U.S. In 2019, this plant took around $240 million of CapEx and the expectation is that for 2020, it will take only $100 million for its completion. So in that movement alone, we should see a reduction of around $140 million in the CapEx. We've been managing the portfolio of investments very carefully. Recognizing the challenges of the cycle, but also very much attuned to the safety needs and reliability needs of all plants around the world. Safety is our first priority, and we will continue to invest in the proper maintenance for all the plants as we should be doing.
Very clear, Fernando. So if I may have another question, so regarding the operational issues in the U.S., can you -- I don't know you already explained what happened in the third quarter, but is it totally solved or should continue in the fourth quarter also in 2020.
Sorry, [ Gustavo ]. Could you repeat the question? It was hard to understand what you said.
Sure. Regarding the operational issues that the company had in the third quarter in the U.S. operation has been totally solved or should persist in the fourth quarter, also in 2020? And also, what happened, I don't know if you've already told about it.
So we had several smaller issues in some of the plants in the U.S., all of them have been solved. We should be back at our full availability. We are facing a market in the U.S., especially because of the reduction in the production of cars that has been more challenging. Inventories in the industry have increased significantly in the last few months. Having said that, we continue to have very strong sales and continue with the pre-marketing activities for a new plant. So there was no major events at the plants. It was smaller events at some of the 5 plants we have in the U.S.
Our next question is from Lilyanna Yang from HSBC.
I just have 2 questions. One is on the PEMEX ethane contract. So they had not been fully fulfilling the contract. So I wonder if the receivables from PEMEX have been stable or have been mounting. We know about the nonfulfillment of the contract, but we wonder if they have made -- PEMEX has made any kind of cash payments in terms of penalties for the nonfulfillment of the contract? The second question, if I may, is I wonder what would be -- how can we think about the Alagoas dispute is the end game of the strategy of the company. Would you be considering at this point an out-of-court settlement? Or you think it's too early for now.
Hello, Lilyanna. On the PEMEX contracts, they delivered 72% of the contract in the third quarter. They have been paying all the deliver or pay penalties pursuant to the contract. So I would say they have been fulfilling the contractual obligations. Whenever they don't deliver, they are paying for the delivery pace. As far as the Alagoas situation, I mean, we made a relevant step in announcing the formal shutdown of the mine. Last week. We are working with the authorities on the detailed plan for that shutdown. There's still a lot of work being done to better understand what's happening in the different neighborhoods. It's a different topic. And I mean, we are conducting a series of additional studies. And concluding by the end of the year, the sonars in all 35 wells, these sonars plus the additional studies are crucial to have a better understanding of what's happening from a geological point of view and from a geomechanical point of view in the region. I would say we need to see how those 2 activities progress, the understanding of what's happening in neighborhood and the progress of the discussion with the authorities on the shutdown of the mine to have any discussions from a legal system point of view. So this is something for the future.
[Operator Instructions] As there are no questions, I will turn the floor over to the speakers. You may proceed.
Thank you very much for participating in our third quarter 2019 results call. As we discussed in the presentation by Rosana and some of the questions, it has been a challenging time for the industry in general, but the company has have a very disciplined approach to capital allocation and cost management with adjustments of its CapEx plan for 2019. The bond issuance has had a very relevant impact on our short-term debt payments, which with the new bonds and the commercial papers, you should hear in Brazil basically have reduced significantly our debt repayments for the next 4 years period for which we do expect to be out of the down cycle in the next 4 years. And I think the relevant aspect I would like to let all of you with is that despite the challenges that we face, both from a cycle from a Brazil economy from a Mexico economy challenges, we have been generating positive cash flow. Even in the third quarter, we generated BRL 400 million adding up to BRL 2.8 billion up to now. And I think this is a direct consequence of the discipline of the company to pursue its strategy around improving its productivity and competitiveness, continue to look for opportunities to create flexibility and diversification in its feedstock matrix and pursue a better diversification from a geographic point of view to assess different markets where the new PP plant is a key driver for increasing our presence in North America, for example. So thank you very much for your participation and looking forward to talking to you, all of you early next year when we will be announcing the fourth quarter results. Thank you. Bye-bye.
Thank you. This concludes today's Braskem's earnings conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time.