© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the TORM First Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's call is being recorded.
I will now hand today's call over to Mikael Larsen. Please go ahead.
Thank you for joining us today, and welcome to the TORM First Quarter of 2024 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today are, as usual, Jacob Meldgaard, our CEO and Executive Director; and Kim Balle, our CFO.
This morning, we released our company announcement for our results for the first quarter of the year. Information discussed on this call is based on information as of today and may include forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. Thus, as always, I would like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement on Slide 2.
Today's call will be recorded and available for replay later at our website, torm.com. As usual, we will start with a short presentation followed by a Q&A session, where we will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for us.
And now I would like to introduce our CEO, Jacob Meldgaard, who will kick off on Slide 4.
Well, thank you, Mikael. And of course, thank you, everybody, for joining us on our call today. I am pleased to report that, again, this quarter, TORM achieved a strong financial performance with TCE of USD 331 million and EBITDA of USD 266 million. The fundamentals that have been supporting the positive rate environment for some time now does remain intact. And thus, we continue to see increased global demand for transportation of refined oil products and similarly only limited fleet growth. In addition, attacks in the Red Sea have led to rerouting of vessels and thereby added further to the ton-mile demand. Over the course of the previous quarters, we have both acquired additional secondhand vessels and divested some of our oldest vessels and thereby both renewing and adding to our total fleet capacity. In the first quarter, we had divested one of our older MR vessels and after delivering this to the new owners, we will have a fleet size of 89 vessels. Thus, we have increased the size of our fleet compared to the same quarter last year. And on top of this, we have increased our exposure to the long-haul segment. Further on a separate note, I would like to draw your attention to the strength of the current market. Here in April, we have obtained a 3-year time charter at most USD 30,000 for a 2012 build MR. And we have divested a 2006 built MR for USD 22 million. Both transactions underline that there is a strong demand in the market. Ultimately, we believe this will put us in a strong position for further adding to our value creation over the coming years. And not forgetting our shareholders based on the profit and the very strong cash generation from our business, we have to stay -- declared a dividend for the quarter of USD 1.50 per share, thus adding to the positive dividend flow seen over the recent quarters. Again, I believe that we have found the right balance between investing in growth and rewarding our shareholders. So here, kindly turn to Slide 5. So in the past 2 years, the product tanker market has seen great volatility mainly driven by geopolitical tensions in Europe and the Middle East. On top of supporting fundamental market drivers, these skill political factors have increased product tanker rates to new higher average levels. Please turn to Slide 6. And in essence, the geopolitical tensions that we have seen in the past 2 years, first in Europe and lately in the Middle East, have reshaped product tanker trade flows towards longer distances. All while overall trade volumes have risen supported by increasing oil demand and changes in refinery landscape. The sanctions against Russia that were officially introduced in early 2023, led to a trade rerouting towards longer haul trade for both European imports, but also for Russian exports. And lately, we have witnessed an increased willingness in the EU to up the game on sanctions in Russia, including on Russian oil and potentially gas exports.
This year, the product tanker market has been strongly affected by the Houthi attacks against commercial vessels at the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. The effects have similarly led to trade being redirected towards longer trading distances.
Recent geopolitical events have shown that the disruptions in the product tanker market can be longer lived than initially thought and it may take a longer time before the Red Sea is deemed safe for transit. While the Red Sea situation is very dynamic, the escalation of the conflict between Iran and Israel suggests that the timeline for disruption continues to be drawn out. Now please turn to Slide 7 for a closer look at the market developments here in the first quarter of 2024. In the first quarter of this year, trade volumes with refined oil products have increased by 4% compared to the same quarter last year, supported by strong market fundamentals. On top of generally higher trade volumes, also trading distances have become longer.
The share of global clean petroleum products trade transiting the Suez Canal has declined from 12% to only 4%, meaning 8% of the global trade has been redirected with majority of this growing a longer route around Cape of Good Hope instead. This has led to an overall increase in ton-mile demand for product tankers.
So for year end, the second quarter of the year, trade volumes have followed a seasonally weaker trend, yet volumes continue to travel longer. For the rest of this year, TORM expects both seasonality and volatility with continued market disruption, keeping trade distances longer. And now here, I'll kindly ask you to turn to the next slide to Slide 8, please. Let me also touch upon the more fundamental market drivers. In recent years, new refining capacity has been added in net exporting regions such as the Middle East. On the other hand, a number of refineries have been closed in net importing regions. This has led to higher trade volumes and higher demand for product tankers.
Some of this effect is yet to come. A good example here is new refineries in the Middle East, where full impact on the region's refinery runs is first expected in the second half of this year. This will boost the region's export with a portion of this likely to travel around the Cape of Good Hope supporting further ton-mile development. An exception to this positive refinery dislocation story is the Dangote refinery in Nigeria, which will potentially replace the [indiscernible] gasoline import with domestic supply. After some delays, the refinery has started initial ones. And to the contrary of expectations, we have seen in this ramp-up phase, emerging exports of naphtha and gas oil from the refinery going to Europe, Far East and Brazil.
We nevertheless export -- expect sometime before the refinery reaches full capacity. Its future gasoline production is set to stay in the domestic market, while a fair share of its distillate supply may CAGR for the shortages in the wider West African region. If we look further into the future, we believe that the refinery dislocation story might not be over yet. The risk of refinery closures in some of the main imports and regions is still quite high. Already mentioned, Dangote refinery, for example, is likely to put further pressure on the European refinery sector as West Africa is today one of the main markets for European gasoline. Any potential capacity rationalization in Europe could, in turn, increase the need for diesel imports.
Please turn to Slide 9 for an update on the supply drivers. And here, after years of subdued newbuilding activity, product tanker ordering at shipyards has picked up and currently, the order book stands at 15% of the fleet. This is up 3 percentage points since last quarter. However, what's important to mention here is that the current order book is spread across 4 years translate again to 3% to 4% growth rate on an annualized basis.
Despite increased ordering, our long-term view on tonnage supply remains unchanged. If we look at the share of fleet at above 20 years old, which are the candidates for scrapping within the next 5 years, we see that the fee growth will be relatively balanced. The 18% increase means that the net fleet growth could even turn negative in the second half of this decade. [indiscernible] from freight market result in less-than-expected scrapping activity we still expect older vessels to leave the mainstream market and go into sanctioned or into cabotage trade. As we have pointed to earlier, newbuilding activity has largely concentrated around the LR2 segment. But given the versatility of the LR2 fleet, we can trade both clean and dirty products, the LR2s order book should be seen in connection with the dirty Aframax order book. The combined order book is currently at 14%, which compares with 16% of the combined fleet being candidates through recycling. And now please turn to the next slide. Please turn to Slide 10. And to conclude these remarks on the product tanker market, we expect the main demand and supply drivers on the product tanker market to continue to be supportive. The global product tanker demand in terms of ton-mile increased last year by 8%, mainly driven by trade recalibration due to sanctions against Russia. We estimate that the Red Sea disruption can add a further 5% to ton-mile with an additional upside from potentially longer balanced patterns were via the Cape route.
On the other hand, net fleet growth is much more limited. Last year, we saw a large number of LR2 vessels moving into the dirty market. So far this year, we've seen an increased number of LR2s cleaning up, but even in case of a potential large-scale net migration back to the clean state, our calculations show that the product center demand supply balance will remain at a much firmer footing than before the geopolitical tension start. Now with these comments, I'll now conclude my part of the presentation. Now I'll hand it over to my colleague, Kim, who will walk us through the financials.
Thank you, Jacob. Please turn to Slide 11 for the financial highlights. In the first quarter of the year, our TCE increased to USD 331 million, and based on this, we generated $266 million in EBITDA and $209 million in net profit, subtracting profit from sale of vessels of USD 17 million, we derived an satisfactory adjusted net profit of USD 192 million, i.e., up 25% relative to last year, driven by both the strong rating environment and our increased fleet that have added to our earning days. TORM achieved TCE rates of more than $43,000 per day with LR2s above $54,000 and day 1 about $48,000 a day and MRs around $39,000 day, driven by a very high level of rates in the first part of the quarter, followed by summary, tracking towards the end of the quarter. Our fleet had a total of 7,698 earning days, i.e., markedly higher than the 6,732 days we had in the same quarter last year as we took delivery of more vessels. We believe these are strong numbers and added together, they reflect a very strong performance, enabling us to increase TCE rates per day by $1,400 compared to Q1 2023, while maintaining operating expenses unchanged just below $7,300 per day.
Also, our continuous focus on capital management and balance sheet structure is reflected in a stable loan-to-value ratio in the range of 25% to 30%. As seen in previous quarters, we have achieved a stable level whilst increasing our operational level as we are using our shares as part of the consideration in connection with acquisition of vessels and at the same time, allowing us to return a significant part of our earnings to our shareholders. Please turn to Slide 12. The chart in the upper left illustrates how vessel values have developed over the previous quarters, leading to a total value of USD 3.5 billion at the end of Q1 2021 and with net asset value showing a similar progression. On the chart in the lower left, we have adjusted net interest-bearing debt for the dividend for Q4 2023, i.e., the dividend distributed in this April, and thus getting to USD 885 million. In total, we have like-for-like increased the net interest-bearing debt by $238 million over the course of the year, [indiscernible] vessels base have increased around USD 600 million. This gets us to the net loan-to-value ratio of 25.6%. Now please turn to Slide 13. I have already touched upon our strong cash return to shareholders. So this slide is just to sum it up. Our net profit for the quarter amounted to USD 209 million, whereof USD 17 million stems from the profit from sale of vessels, i.e. Adjusted profit for the quarter amounts to USD 192 million. Based on our distribution policy, let's face our intention to pay out excess liquidity above attritional cash level that Board of Directors have declared dividend for Q1 2024 of $11.5 per share, i.e., adding to the string of attractive cash distributions we have made in the previous quarters. This adds up to just around USD 141 million, corresponding to 73% of our adjusted profit. And as such, it reflects the transparent cash flow from operations, less installments on debt.
And now please turn to Slide 15 for the outlook. Based on the various satisfactory results we have published today and our coverage we have for the second quarter of 2020 update our guidance range to TCE earnings in the range of USD 1.1 billion to USD 1.35 billion and EBITDA in the range of USD 800 million to USD 1,050 million. Thus, we have increased the lower end of our range by USD 100 million and thereby narrowed the guidance range compared to 2 months ago, thus adding further comfort to our full year guidance. As you might expect, we have planned for standard maintenance to be done over the summer months, thus dry dock -- and therefore, the number of off-high days will be a little higher in Q2 and Q3 compared to Q1. Thus, in the second quarter of 2024, we expect to have 7,763 earning days. And for the full year, we would expect to have 31,225 days. Based on our rates and our coverage as of 6 May, 2024, we have fixed a total of 42% of our earning days at $43,189 per day for the full year across the fleet. And this concludes my part of the presentation. So I will now hand it back to the operator who will cater the Q&A session. Thank you very much.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Jon Chappell with Evercore.
Thank you. Good afternoon. Just want to ask 2 questions as it relates to strategy and basically just quarterly updates on things you've spoken about in the past. First, as it relates to the fleet, obviously, you've absorbed a fair amount of secondhand vessels over the last 12 to 18 months and asset values keep pushing higher. You've also been divesting some of your older vessels. Where do you kind of see yourself on additions versus subtractions going forward in the current not just rate backdrop but asset value backdrop?
Yes. So it's, of course, thanks, Jon, Jacob here. It's a dynamic world. I mean, so as you point to, we were relatively active last year. We saw quite a number of opportunities that we felt were compelling to enter into, especially for larger ships, LR2s, LR1s. Prices have kept pushing up even after those transactions. So I think we've been a little in a past moment, to be honest. You can also see you this year so far, we've added 1 vessel to our fleet, and we will take 1 off. So it's been relatively stable.
Having said that, we are constantly scouting for what we would deem as a capital employment with a good risk reward. But I don't have anything on the table right now, generally, where I could say that's compelling. But surely, with I would say, an organization that is keen to still deliver even more value and not rest on the laurels, we are certainly chopping away on the opportunities, but there's nothing where I could say that makes sense. But I'm hopeful that we will do something -- but we had to be honest.
Great. That's good to hear. You noted in your initial comments, which I didn't see in print anywhere, you did a 3-year contract. As we think about this order book as it continues to build and a lot of the wind at your back from a demand and geopolitical perspective, have you thought now with that fleet of 89 vessels that you're comfortable with maybe getting a little bit more coverage, some duration of 3 years. And I guess the follow-up to that would also be, was this that you were able to sign somewhat of a one-off? Or is there increasing liquidity in that market?
So let's start from the back end. I do think that given that we are now, in effect, if we look at our own numbers, we are 2 years into strong earnings I think it's also clear that the geopolitical environment that I discussed before, obviously, we don't know the future, but it looks as if it is supportive of longer ton model for transportation, we'll find all. I think they are starting to be signs that some of our clients also think that maybe they should have themselves against continued very, very strong market. And obviously, if we do longer-dated contracts, I mean, I just mentioned, USD 30,000 an MR that's also when we are doing more than USD 40,000 on a quarterly basis right now. So I think my answer to the latter part of your question would be, I do think there is more people looking at would it make sense now to start to derisk if you are long on freight and not long on ships. And we will constantly, of course, look out for that type of opportunity with the right clients. And yes, we are seeing -- we are in a more dialogue on that today than what I experienced, let's say, a couple of quarters ago.
[Operator Instructions] At this time there are no further audio questions. I'll now hand the call back over to presenters for any closing remarks.
Thank you very much for joining us today, and have a great day.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.