© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Greetings, and welcome to the Penn National Gaming First Quarter Conference Call. During the presentation all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Thanks, Sylvana. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Penn National Gaming's 2019 first quarter conference call. We'll get to management's presentation and comments momentarily as well as your questions and answers, but first I'll review the Safe Harbor disclosure. In addition to historical facts or statements of current conditions, today's conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve risks and uncertainties.
These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as expects, believes, estimates, projects, intends, plans, seeks, may, will, should or anticipates or the negative or other variations of these or similar words or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties, including future plans, strategies, performance, developments, acquisitions, capital expenditures and operating results.
Such forward-looking statements reflect the Company's current expectations and beliefs, but are not guarantees of future performance. As such, actual results may vary materially from expectations. The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements are described in today's news announcement and in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q.
Penn National Gaming assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Today's call and webcast will include non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of SEC Regulation G. And when required, a reconciliation of all non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP can be found in today's press release as well as on the Company's website.
Thank you for your patience with that, and it's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Penn National's CEO, Tim Wilmott. Tim?
Thank you, Joe. And good morning to Penn National's first quarter 2018 conference call. After I provide some introductory comments, I'll be followed by Jay Snowden, our President and Chief Operating Officer. And then following Jay will be B. J. Fair, our Chief Financial Officer.
Let's begin to talk about our first quarter results. Despite softer volumes in the first couple of months due to whether primarily in the Midwest, a little bit in the Northeast. I really have to acknowledge our operations team who managed our cost structure very, very well.
And as we looked at the results after you back out the one-time prior period adjustment for the marketing loyalty program, we were able to meet our adjusted EBITDA guidance of $394.5 million. Our results demonstrated a year-over-year improvement in EBITDA margin by 80 basis points. And I do want to comment that after the weather cleared, the month of March, finished very strong for the quarter and help facilitate these results.
Moving on to an update on where we are with the Pinnacle integration. We did announce today that we're increasing by 15% our estimate of cost synergies from a $100 million to $115 million. And we believe $55 million of that run rate will be achieved by the end of 2019 and the other $60 million will be achieved by the end of 2020.
At the end of the first quarter, we've now realized about $40 million of run rate cost synergies. We're still at revenue synergies at $15 million to $20 million. Most of that coming in 2020 and 2021, and the catalyst for that will be the completion of the implementation of our mychoice loyalty program, which will be in place at all of our properties by the end of this July.
Turning to an update on development in M&A activity, we closed as we announced our Margaritaville in Bossier City acquisition in early January of 2019. We are working with them Michigan regulators and pending their approval. We expect to close on our $300 million purchase of the Greektown operating assets in Detroit by the end of May, in partnership with VICI as our landlord.
And then update on the category four casinos in Pennsylvania, specifically in New York and in Morgantown. We continue to work through the approval process and we expect both to open and the second half of 2020 and just to reiterate, including cannibalization at Penn National, the Hollywood Casino there in Central Pennsylvania. This combined $230 million investment we believe will generate north of a 15% cash on cash return.
And finally, utilizing our free cash flow in the first quarter, we remain focused on deleveraging our balance sheet and we're able to reduce our traditional debt by just under $40 million in the first quarter and we remain on target to reduce lease adjusted net leverage to under 5.5x by the end of 2020.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Jay Snowden to provide a little bit more color of what's going on in the operating segments of our business. Jay?
Thanks, Tim. Good morning to everyone on the call. Well, harsh winter weather in January, February aside. We were very pleased with our first quarter performance across the portfolio. March, as Tim mentioned, was particularly strong as nine of our properties posted all-time record monthly EBITDAR results, which definitely speaks to the general health of the consumer.
Also, as Tim mentioned, we were able to identify another $15 million in costs energies from the Pinnacle Transaction, bring in the current total to $115 million, $5 million of that to be realized in 2019 and $10 million in 2020. The incremental $5 million in 2019 was pulled forward into Q1 and helped offset the weather impacts and brings our current run rate as of March 31 of $40 million.
These incremental cost synergies are the results of our best-in-class property and corporate leaders accelerating the sharing of best demonstrated practices across the organization and continuing to challenge the long held industry orthodoxies.
The $115 million cost energy target is still separate and unique from the $15 million to $20 million in revenue synergies we announced last quarter. Those efforts are beginning to gain momentum as we prepare to launch our consolidated enterprise wide player affinity program mychoice later this summer.
Moving to first quarter regional results, despite the aforementioned bounce back in March, the severe weather that played our Pennsylvania, Chicago and Council Bluffs markets in January and February was too much to overcome and cause topline softness that ultimately negatively impacted EBITDA results in our Midwest and Northeast regions in the first quarter.
Moving to the West region, weather with less of an issue year-over-year and we experienced a solid quarter on both the top and bottom line, highlighted by a record quarter in revenue, EBITDA and margins that are Black Hawk property in Colorado.
Finally in the south region, which experience no significant weather issues year-over-year. Our property is produced EBITDA growth of over 5% inclusive of the smoking ban impact in Baton Rouge and the I-210 bridge work in Lake Charles. Of note in the south, half of our properties including the recently acquired Margaritaville in Bossier City grew EBITDA by double-digit percentages versus Q1 of 2018.
Now shifting to some high level database and sports betting trends, spend per visit remains a good story across all work statements, while visitation is more of a mixed bag with year-over-year declines at the lower work statements as we continue to refine our profitability filters to maximize EBITDA.
VIP results were robust and we posted our strongest year-over-year table games growth quarter on record, partly due to the introduction of retail sports books in West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Mississippi. These trends have us very excited about the continued state by state legalization and rollout across the country.
As we prepare to close on the Greektown transaction at the end of May, we will soon be operating in 19 states by far the most of any casino company in the U.S., presenting significant sports betting, iCasino and mobile gaming, value creating opportunities for Penn in the near future.
With regard to April, results have been mixed in the regional markets predominantly due to the year-over-year Easter shift as well as some tax refund noise. That said, the economic indicators of employment, wage growth, stock market performance, home values and consumer confidence remain at or near all-time highs and have us feeling good about the remainder of the year.
With that, I'll hand it off to B. J.
Thanks, Jay, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to provide an update to our 2019 guidance. I'll remind everyone that although we are projecting to close Greektown by the end of May, our guidance does not include any provision or assumptions for Greektown performance. In addition, the guidance only includes $5 million or the incremental $15 million cost synergies identified in our release.
The 2019 guidance and underlying assumptions are found on Pages 4 and 5 of the press release. We've provided detailed line item guidance in the release for the second quarter and an update to our full-year guidance.
On a high level, the updated revenue guidance for the full-year is $5.173 billion. The reduction in revenue guidance is primarily attributable to the flow through of the first quarter operating results plus a reduction of the revenue associated with the previously announced closing of our resorts property in Tunica.
Our adjusted EBITDAR for the full-year is estimated to be $1.538 billion, which reflects the flow through of the first quarter operating results, but otherwise maintains our EBITDAR guidance for the remainder of the year.
Our total lease payments for the year including the Penn Master lease, the amended Pinnacle lease, the Meadows lease, and the Margaritaville lease are forecasted to be $836 million. Our trailing 12 months rent coverages as of 3/31/2019 for each lease are as follows; Penn Master lease was 1.88, the amended Pinnacle lease was 1.83, and the Meadows lease was 1.99.
We do expect to incur full escalation in November under the Penn Master lease. We did not expect to incur escalators under the amended Pinnacle lease or the Meadows lease at the end of their respective lease years. Free cash flow generation for the year is estimated at $374 million and net free cash flow after mandatory debt payments and other obligations is expected at $299 million.
Cash taxes and cash interest are identified in the release and there's no change to our maintenance CapEx guidance. Cash on hand as of 3/31/2019 was $400 million. Our lease adjusted gross and net leverage ratios as of 3/31/2019 was 6.09 and 5.79 respectively. Our cash flow generation remains on pace to return to our target leverage ratio of 5.0x to 5.5x EBITDAR within 12 to 18 months following the close of Greektown. All of our debt covenants will be comfortably met.
So just one final note regarding an explanation of the one-time point liability accrual adjustment that was related to prior periods that we took in the quarter. During the migration of our customer database to our new upgraded system, we incorporated discrepancy in our accounting reports related to prior years for the customer loyalty point liability accrual.
The discrepancy was only related to the accounting accrual and had no impact to the individual customer accounts. The amount of the discrepancy is not material to our financial reporting, but we believe it was important to identify since absent the adjustment, the operating performance of the Company was consistent with our adjusted EBITDAR guidance. It's also worth noting that the $3 million charge was a contra revenue account. So it also has the impact of depressing our first quarter revenues by $3 million.
And with that, I'll turn it back to Tim.
Thank you, B. J. Operator, we're now ready to take questions from our audience.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Harry Curtis with Instinet. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, everyone. I've got a two part question. Tim, when you look at the map of the U.S., are there holes in your locations that you'd like to fill? Or are you satisfied with your distribution? And then if you're satisfied, then if you could talk about the strategies that going forward you're going to be using to drive shareholder value from here? Thanks.
Well, there are certainly Harry certain markets one-off that we don't have representation in that could be an opportunistic play for Penn National. But as Jay said in his commentary, we're going to be in 19 different jurisdictions. So we certainly like our current geographic footprint.
And with that, as I've said in prior calls, as we think about the remainder of 2019 into 2020, we've got a lot on our plate to execute against and to realize the synergies of the Pinnacle transaction, the Margaritaville transaction, and as soon hopefully to be completed Greektown transaction, that if we just execute on those integrations and realize the synergies in those transactions were going to be generating a lot of free cash flow that'll give us the opportunity as we set to delever to continue if appropriate to return capital to shareholders and to continue to do tuck-in M&A acquisitions that are accretive to our shareholders.
So absent nothing else, we have a lot to execute on for the balance of this year into next year that I think is going to generate value to our shareholders over the years to come.
Thanks and maybe a quick follow-up on that. Based on where multiples are today on the strip? Is it just unrealistic to think that at this point in the cycle it makes sense to the aggressive on looking for an asset on the strip at this point?
I mean, certainly the multiples at points where we certainly couldn't do it alone. We need a landlord that has the ability to use their multiples to do some kind of acquisition. But I certainly think as I said before, Harry, that we've got enough on our plate to focus our team on to execute and given where things are on the strip right now. It would be challenging in the near-term for us to focus on that.
Okay. Very good. Appreciate it. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Steve Wieczynski with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.
Yes. Hi, guys. Good morning. So Jay you administering comment about you're seeing, I guess you said weakness and your low tier customer level, which is expected given the change in marketing spend around those customers. But I guess, the question is have you seen that lower tiered customer gravitate to competitors properties or in general, you really just don't care about that customer. And I guess what I'm getting at here is the overall promotional environment pretty rational around most of the country?
Sure. Steve. It is rational right now. And even some of the flare up we saw last year at points last year in Chicago and in parts of Northern Mississippi have [indiscernible]. And really the way we look at it on the low worth statements is there's a number of those customers that given the level of reinvestment typically in the industry or just on profitable. And so you have to be really thoughtful around what inducements you're providing those customers. And what we've seen is that there are a number of them that come less frequently. That's why frequency is down. But when they visit, those trips are profitable.
And then we've seen a shift, a migration from low worth rated customers in the database. Many times to are unrated segment where they're not receiving offers any more, but they're still coming to the property, which is why we'd seen unrated growth for the last several years.
So we're comfortable with the migration. I think you're seeing it across not just the Penn database, but also within regional gaming in general. Our competitors I think are making a lot of the same movement and these are trends that I think you're going to continue to see for probably quarters, if not years to come.
Okay. Gotcha. And then, Jay, another question for you I guess. I think you talked about April being, I think you used the word choppy maybe or something along those lines. Do you think that's a function of and I know you talked about tax receipts and stuff like that, but if you looked at something, I think you said the south was kind of a market where there was no impact of weather is, it's something like the south is still choppy or is it just those markets where March was so strong, maybe you've seen some visitation levels kind of fall off a little bit because of that. And I guess, as you look to your guidance specifically for the second quarter, is it more kind of around what you saw in April or is it kind of more just, what you saw in March or maybe help us think about that.
Yes. I think most of the - what we're seeing in April and why I mentioned it was mixed chop it use your term is largely due to the Easter shift. It was an entirely or almost entirely in the month of March last year, it was entirely in the month of April. So you have a last weekend, I've only four weekend. You have five Mondays and five Tuesdays. So April was set up to not have great year-over-year comps.
And we anticipate that the remainder of the year we'll be strong. You have more favorable calendar set up for May and June and then you did for April in Q2. The only other thing that I think is worth mentioning that is a little bit specific to us is that we're going through, as Tim mentioned and consolidating our player loyalty card program.
It's a lot of hard work and some disruption that takes place in the second quarter and we're going to be 100% on the same system, same platform, and aggressively starting to market that mychoice, play a loyalty program the second half of the year. And so we anticipate the second half the year, it'd be stronger than the first half of the year.
Okay, great. Thanks guys. Appreciate it.
Our next question comes from the line of Felicia Hendrix with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, good morning and thanks. Jay, we'll keep you on that hot seat here. So of the $5 million in incremental synergies you realized in the first quarter. I just wanted to confirm that that was entirely incremental to your initial guidance and then it was wondering if you could just help us understand mechanically, what you were able to do to pull that forward and realize that in the quarter. And then I'm wondering if there's any way you could help us understand on a go forward basis by quarter, how we should think about this energies?
Sure, Felicia. So yes, the $5 million that we pulled forward into Q1 and into - 2019 was incremental to what we had previously stated. So before today, we had communicated $50 million of run rate synergies in 2019 and $50 million of run rate synergies in 2020, and we're now at $55 million in 2019 and $60 in 2020. So there's $15 million of incremental cost synergies.
Look, there's a lot going on and we have a number of initiatives at the corporate level, at the property level, and so some of what was brought forward into Q1 is just an acceleration of what we had planned to happen in Q2 or Q3. And then in that process, throughout the last six months, we've also identified incremental synergies.
It's not as though we've come up with new categories, but we've just gotten a little bit better in the areas of labor management and marketing efficiencies and procurement that lead us to feel comfortable that we can hit a minimum of $115 million on the cost side as we move forward.
And so when we think about second quarter, are you willing to kind of quantify how much of that guidance is coming from synergies?
I think it's probably safe to assume Felicia for modeling purposes that you've got $15 million run rate remaining in 2019, so 5 million per quarter is probably the easiest way to think about it.
Okay. That's super helpful. And then maybe have you just - a couple of things, just regionally, one is just wondering what [indiscernible] opening of the Monarch Casino. I was just wondering if there's any way that you could use that to your advantage as you're positioning your property for the initial impact of that opening.
And then also just, in terms of Plainridge or some - you listed in the release a lot of assumptions that you had from some well-known headwinds. But on Plainridge, how are you thinking about that in terms of your guidance in light of the wind opening in June?
Sure. So hitting Monarch first, we did read the earnings release from Monarch that there's going to be a delay by the time the hotel and casino expansion open to end up Q3. I think previously the headset end of Q2. We have not adjusted any of our modeling with regards to Black Hawk as we're just not close enough to it understand. Is that a phase opening throughout Q3? So look we're very happy with the results at our Black Hawk property.
As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we had our best quarter ever, topline, bottom line and margins and we've got a lot of momentum there. VIP business is extremely strong. I think we picked up some business while competitors are going through expansion or renovation and we plan to give those customers reasons to stay with us as we move forward. So I would anticipate a solid remainder of the year, certainly Q3 for the Black Hawk property. But we did not build that into our modeling.
With regards to Plainridge, now that there was certainty around the June 23 opening date. That's what we had always modeled. That date has been out there now for about six, nine months. And so as we forecasted and guided for the year, for the second quarter, we always knew that date and anticipated them opening on that date. So it did not impact our guidance moving forward.
Okay, thanks. And then just a quick housekeeping question for B. J. that your full-year guidance, that is that before or inclusive of the 3.1 million add back from the first quarter?
It's inclusive of the $3.1 million. That's all rolled forward.
Okay, great. All right, super. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Barry Jonas with SunTrust. Please proceed with your question.
Hi guys. I just wanted to dig in a little bit to the full-year guidance composition. I see the flow - as you said, you float through the $3.1 million accounting true up in Q1. But then you've got the $5 million synergies and then I believe also that the rent - as part of your rent assumption, it's about $3.5 million lower than before.
$0.9 million of that relates to the escalators and then I guess there's another $2.6 million, which maybe as Ohio or something else. I'm just trying to understand compositionally how with all those things changing, how the guidance really just flowed through the Q1 miss? Thanks.
Yes, Barry. This is B. J. You're right in that with the $3 million myths on the $3 million reduction has resolved the point liability. We did have a positive $3 million on the rent side, which ended up, again primarily from the percentage rent associated with Ohio as well as some of the change in the escalators as well.
And so in addition, we also had the cash interest, which ended up with some positive on the cash flow through as a result of a change in LIBOR as well as, we were fortunate enough to be able to - we were being conservative in our first quarter of a tier level of our interest rates associated for our revolver. And so we actually were a little bit lower in that tier.
So we ended up a positive side there. There were also some additional noise, and as we go through in guidance as we talked about some of the closing costs and other items that we have for the resorts property in Tunica, created some severance and other items that they ended up with a negative cash flow to run the cash flow. So hopefully that clears it up for you.
Got it. And then just a question on Lake Charles. Our understanding of construction on the 210 could finish up a little bit early. Just curious what the latest is there from your perspective and if that potentially could cause some upside to guidance?
Yes. Barry, the latest from our perspective, what we're hearing is that, we're still anticipating in end of year completion. There is an incentive for the contractor to finish early by 60 days, which would have that project complete in October, excuse me versus December. For now we're trying to stay focused on anticipated impact through the remainder of the year. And if it moves up to October that would obviously be good news for us.
Great. And then just last one for me for sports betting. I think you've done one or two state specific deals with third parties, but how are you thinking about just larger JVs or partnerships at this point?
I would anticipate Barry, that by our next earnings call we'll be able to - we'll be ready to articulate our sports betting and casino strategy as we move forward. We're getting a lot closer both with regards to our primary strategy. And then we've got some pretty exciting secondary strategies given the number of states and licenses that we have across the country. So more to come on that.
The other thing, Barry, we're also watching it in states right now, we're in session. How they're going to be enabling legislation for sports betting, whether it's going to be retail only or retail and online, and whether or not there's going to be additional skins per licensee or not. So there's a lot of moving parts right now and as Jay said, I think in the next 90 to 120 days, we'll be able to articulate a more clear strategy of how we're going to take advantage of this opportunity.
Fantastic. Thanks so much guys.
Our next question comes from the line of Carlo Santarelli with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.
Hey, great. Jay, you provided some color. I just wanted to see if I could just follow-up a little bit on kind of the revenue outlook. When you look at the delta in the quarter and then lop off the second half Resorts Tunica, the revenue outlook is very modestly changed. If anything, I think it was like $3 million or so is what I calculated. But you know, you had obviously a difficult January and February, April was mixed. It's been some time since we've kind of seen well December I guess since we've seen some real strength. So my sense is the confidence that you guys see in kind of the topline guidance from now stems more from what you're seeing on non-weather impacted, non-calendar impacted periods. Is that largely fair?
I think that's fair Carlo. And as I mentioned before, we're also a little bit more bullish on the second half of the year for Penn because we're going to have our new loyalty program fully launched and consolidated and we've got some strong topline drivers that should fuel some growth in the second half of the year.
Great, thanks. And then just B. J., just quickly, your free cash flow guidance for the year is up about $3 million and that includes a $3 million, I'm assuming that includes the $3 million net debt EBITDA misguidance by for the first quarter so up about 2% or so overall, is that a shift in cash taxes I imagine?
No our cash taxes remain the same, Carlo, it was a cash interest that we had to change in. So basically the first quarter operating results and the improvement in rent expense kind of washed and $3 million up really was ended if they change in our cash interest assumptions.
Great. Thank you, both.
Our next question comes from the line of Chad Beynon with Macquarie. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. First on capital allocation, I believe in the first quarter you replaced a retiring repurchase plan with a bigger one and the stock has obviously had a little bit of dislocation as we've kind of worked through the quarter. I believe in that earlier release, you mentioned that you could be implementing a 10b5-1 kind of automatic programmatic plan. Can you just remind us on kind of what the situation is from share purchases and then if the 10b5-1 will be implemented? Thank you.
Chad, this is B. J. In our last release we said what we left it open that we could implement a purchase plan as well as do open market purchases. We did not repurchase any shares in the first quarter. I think that we really focused and as we've been seeing previously, we've been focusing on our debt reduction. And that's primarily the focus that we had in the first quarter going forward.
As we look, I mean, obviously we think our share price is extremely well right price right now. But in our overall capital occasion, as we looked at it, I think we were determining that the delivering is really where our focus is right now.
In the short-term and we'll get to a point, like I said before, Chad, that will delever and then that'll give us other options to consider tuck-in M&A and also returning capital back to shareholders. But right now has B. J. mentioned are our short-term focus is to deliver.
Okay, thanks. Makes sense. And then regarding the higher $15 million in cost synergies? Was that kind of spread geographically across the Board or is there any one particular geography that could have higher flow through then? What you had anticipated before?
I think for modeling purposes, Chad, I would just spread it evenly across the regions. There might be a little bit incremental at the corporate level as well, but it's not pronouncing any particular part of the country.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Greff with J.P. Morgan. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, good morning, guys. Two questions Jay, you may have addressed this in somewhat. But you talked in your prepared remarks that spend per visit was great and visitation more of a mixed bag. Can you talk about that visitation comments? How much of that is, is weather related? How much of it is outside of the scope of bad weather?
And then my second question relates to the 2Q guidance. I know the full years it's fine and that's great. But the seasonality of the 2Q, I would have expected a sequential growth just for seasonality reasons in the 2Q versus the 1Q. What do you have baked in there that's different from historical seasonality, whether it's one-time issues like the Lake Charles Bridge work? And that's all for me. Thank you.
Yes. Joe. Yes, spend per visit across all the tiers; the database showed growth on a year-over-year basis and visitation at the VIP level was also strong. We did see declines as I mentioned in my prepared remarks at the lower work statements and look at, I don't know exactly how much of that is due to weather. I would tell you that it's a really confluence of weather factor in the first quarter.
And then this continued migration of customers that are receiving different levels of incentives and the reader visiting last but more profitably when they visit or they're shifting over to unrated play. So there's some weather impact there and there's some continued strategic impact to that visitation trends as well that we're very comfortable with.
And then with regards to our guidance for the year. Look there's the April shift or excuse me the Easter shift in the month of April. And as I mentioned, the only other real significant noise for us that is might be unique to Penn is that we were going to have some disruption in the second quarter that we anticipated as we put our guidance out for the year, we knew we would be back half heavy given that we're not going to have any disruption once we have mychoice live in all of our properties by the end of July.
So there'll be a little bit of noise throughout the second quarter on the topline will manage margins as we always do to get to the forecast is levels and we think the second half of the year is going to be pretty strong for us.
Great. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Thomas Allen with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.
Hey, thank you. Good morning. So just on the first quarter results, the south region really stood out as meaningfully outperforming expectations. And I assume it didn't have much weather impact anything other broadly happening that's really supporting that strength? Thank you.
Yes, Thomas, we were very pleased with the results in the south. It's a combination of factors. Margaritaville had their best quarter ever timing of that acquisition was terrific. Property has got tremendous momentum right now. Baton Rouge that we still have the headwind of the smoking ban year-over-year we will anniversary that on June 1.
But we did invest about $4 million in a smoking terrace, at the property that went live and early March. And that has been a real shot in the arm for us the last couple of months. Customer it's been very well received by our customer base in Baton Rouge and we've gotten back from that loss of business on the flat side.
And then just generally, we have more of the new Penn properties, the legacy Pinnacle properties. We have more concentration in the south region and there's a lot of good synergy work being pursued and implemented in that region, which is why I think we saw outsize gains. But generally certainly helps when you don't have the weather impacts year-over-year and we anticipate having a strong full-year in the south region.
Thanks. And then just a follow-up on the second quarter guidance there has been some freak bad weather in the Midwest quarter to-date. Has that impacted you at all?
A little bit. We had snow last Saturday in Chicago land, just when you're getting ready for spring. You get hit with a snowstorm in Chicago. It doesn't help. All that is baked into our Q2 guidance has been some weather noise. There's some Easter noise. We feel comfortable with the guidance that we put out for the second quarter.
Any way to quantify that weather hood in the second quarter?
I don't think so. We're just looking at April results and what we anticipate for May and June at this point Thomas.
Okay, perfect. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Shaun Kelley with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.
Hi. Good morning everyone. Just one for me, you since a lot of ground already have been covered, but I thought that the comment in the opening remarks about what you guys are seeing on activity levels and table games volumes are sort of a derivative of sports betting activity was interesting. I was just wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on traffic patterns in those markets. What are you seeing on the casino floor? Just going to - how is that behavior training? What more precisely are you seeing? I just thought it was interesting.
Yes. Look, I think the best properties for us. The best proxies would be our Charles Town property in West Virginia and then our Penn National Race Course property where the retail sports books have driven pretty significant volumes on a relative basis.
And where you see the bump as a - and it's well documented, you see a bump and table game as well as in your food and beverage volumes. And we've seen properties that were flattish to down slightly in table games or food and beverage are now seeing growth of between 5% and 10% at those properties.
So tough to say exactly, what it's going to be across the country, especially some markets you're going to have retail, only others are going to have retail and mobile, but I will tell you that the retail sports books certainly are helpful, particularly during the large events, March Madness, we saw a great volumes, not just in the sports book, but our table game results and our food and beverage results at the properties that have retail sports books were very strong.
Perfect. Thanks, Jay. And then maybe as a follow-up, it's been a little while since we've sort of done just an overview or kind of prognosis now a little bit more and a few states have open, I mean what are you guys thinking or what's the current thinking about sort of overall profitability impact for sports betting on both the retail side where I think traditionally we've thought about it more in this, big traffic driver type environment, but not a huge standalone P&L.
And then what are do you seeing on the marketing side or the early reviews on the places that do have online? Is the marketing environment more competitive than you would have thought or in line with what you would have thought and sort of how could that end up impacting profit in the medium or long-term. Again, not hard numbers just thinking theoretically.
Yes. Look, the only market that has a significant online sports betting business is New Jersey and we don't operate there. So it's hard for me to give you any real color on what that impact has meant to the brick and mortar retail sports books. I would tell you that we're running healthy margins on a standalone basis with the sports book in West Virginia and in Mississippi because the tax rate is an appropriate.
Pennsylvania, it's more of a volume driver for us and we have to monetize those guests elsewhere in the casino because the tax rate is extraordinarily high and that makes it very difficult to drive any level of profit whatsoever.
So we're using it more as an acquisition tool and Pennsylvania, but we are on a standalone basis driving profit and the other markets, Charlestown is our, significant, sports book operation and, it's not immaterial and on a property level basis, it's certainly in the low single-digit millions of profit for us. But I wouldn't use that and extrapolate across the rest of the country because every state is going to rollout a bit differently.
The good news is that most states have not followed Pennsylvania's mistake with this tax rate and are we believe are going to be in the 10% to 15% range, which is good for us. We can certainly drive a margin there where as Jay said, in Pennsylvania with the 35% tax rate. The margins are very slim and that's the reason we didn't invest a lot of capital in Pennsylvania because there were no returns to be realized.
Thank you for all the color.
And our final question comes from the line of David Katz with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, everyone. I just wanted to - you've covered a lot of ground, I appreciate that. I just wanted to go back to M&A announcement one more time. And could you just make sure that we understand where the boundaries are. Tim, some of our commentaries suggested that there is a bit more of drift into harvest mode. But I wanted to make sure I heard that correctly on what would you consider another probability with some other large acquisition that are out there during the next 12 months or so. Obviously, we'll be looking more towards capital returns to delever at this point?
What I said David was specifically we have a lot on our plate to execute against on it for the balance of 2019 and 2020. I think that was the first question or so Harry Curtis had raised. There are opportunities for us to take a look at and obviously we don't comment on any specific M&A activity book. We continue to look at opportunities and we'll continue to do so. And if it makes sense, we'll certainly take advantage of like we have post the Pinnacle deal with both Margaritaville and Greektown.
If it fits into our distribution strategy and it makes sense - the math makes sense for us for our shareholder accretion, we'll take a look at it. But I would say there's no increase or no decrease in M&A opportunities as we look at it. Really the normal course of business as we've looked at in years past, it's not heightened if not lessened. But as I said, our focus operationally is to execute against what's already on our plate.
Got it. And if I can just follow-up with one detail, just looking back at the Tunica circumstance and the property that close, have you told us whether there's some specific financial impact or benefits for that matter that's factored into the current guidance?
We haven't communicated anything at this point, David, other than the impact for the second half of the year to our overall revenues. We anticipate in the short-term being able to move the very small levels of EBITDA and profitable customers in Tunica to our two other properties in that market. Time will tell as we get into 2020 and beyond if we can drive incremental EBITDA from this.
But look, we knew when we acquired the two properties, valleys and resorts in Tunica, that 95% of the EBITDA came from valleys, which has been rebranded to 1st Jackpot. And we stayed very close to the Mississippi regulators and obviously you never want to close a property that impacts people's lives and that we put a lot of time and a lot of thought into how we went about doing that and think that we have a good plan to hire most of those folks elsewhere in Tunica, and we're working with our competitors in Tunica to place them if we can't place them at our two properties. But at this point, we view it as a revenue impact and neutral to EBITDA.
And just to be clear, David, all of the costs associated with the closure as well as the impact on the revenue of being closed for the second half of the year, that is all running in our guidance, so everything is included in there.
Got it. Perfect. Thank you very much.
Thanks, David.
And there are no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back to you.
Thank you, operator. Well, thanks for your time and attention this morning. We will continue to provide updates as things materialize. And we should, as I said, expect to close Greektown to occur, pending regulatory approval at the end of May. And with that, we will be also back on a call in another 90 days or so to talk about our second quarter results. Again, thanks for your attention this morning.
That does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your line.