© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Good day. Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Patterson-UTI Energy Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions].
I would now like to hand the call over to your host, Mike Drickamer, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Felita. Good morning. And on behalf of Patterson-UTI Energy, I'd like to welcome you to today's conference call to discuss the results of the 3 and 6 months ended June 30, 2021. Participating in today's call will be Andy Hendricks, Chief Executive Officer; and Andy Smith, Chief Financial Officer.
A quick reminder that statements made in this conference call that state the company's or management's plans, intentions, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties as disclosed in the company's annual report and on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC.
These risks and uncertainties could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those suggested in such forward-looking statements or what the company expects. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement. The company's SEC filings may be obtained by contacting the company or the SEC and are available through the company's website and through the SEC's EDGAR system.
Statements made in this conference call include non-GAAP financial measures. The required reconciliations to GAAP financial measures are included on our website, www.patenergy.com, and in the company's press release issued prior to this conference call.
In addition, you will find important information for stockholders and cautionary statements included at the end of the company's press release issued prior to this conference call. And now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Andy Hendricks for some opening remarks. Andy?
Thanks, Mike. Good morning, and welcome to Patterson-UTI's second quarter conference call. We are pleased that you can join us today. For the second quarter, revenues and adjusted EBITDA increased sequentially as drilling and completion activity has steadily improved from the lows of last summer. Based on conversations with customers about the remainder of this year and into early 2022, we expect increasing activity and increasing pricing.
In Contract Drilling, since the beginning of the second quarter, our rig count has increased by 8 rigs. In addition to the overall increase in our industry, we continue to see increasing customer interest in reducing emissions through the use of alternative power sources, and we believe these lower emissions technologies, where we have a leadership position, are a differentiator. As an example, we were recently notified by a major international E&P that we will be increasing our activity within their drilling program and activating multiple rigs over the next year. This major customer intends to use a combination of our natural gas powered and our high-line utility powered rigs.
In Pressure Pumping, we took advantage of opportunities with customers to accelerate our reactivation plans, and we activated 2 spreads late in the quarter. I'm very pleased with the performance of our team this quarter as they met margin expectations while also incurring reactivation costs for these 2 spreads at the end of the quarter. These 2 spreads are expected to be accretive to our average adjusted EBITDA per spread and will help improve our fixed cost coverage going forward. We continue to see opportunities to economically reactivate additional spreads, and as such, we expect to reactivate another spread early in the fourth quarter.
Our Pressure Pumping team has done a great job in controlling costs through greater operational efficiency and has also successfully achieved higher pricing to improve margins. With the improved pricing, we expect a meaningful improvement in our third quarter Pressure Pumping margins. As well with the increasing demand for lower emissions technologies and consistent with our disciplined approach to capital spending, we plan to continue to upgrade engines on existing pump trailers to Tier 4 dual fuel.
We continue to believe that Tier 4 dual fuel has many advantages, especially over electric frac spreads, which, in reality, also burn natural gas. We believe this premium technology generates savings and offers operational flexibility for the customer and better economics for Patterson-UTI. We've also started to gain considerable experience performing simul fracs, and I believe we are one of the very few companies to have completed simul fracs in both the Northeast and in the Permian.
In Directional Drilling, the reliability and performance of our Mercury Measurement While Drilling system and our impact directional drilling motors have allowed us to continue gaining market share. During the second quarter, we saw a 70% increase in the number of rigs on which we provided directional drilling services, which led to better-than-expected revenues, but margins were impacted by the higher reactivation costs as we grew.
With that, I will now turn the call over to Andy Smith, who will review the financial results for the second quarter.
Thanks, Andy, and good morning. For the second quarter, we reported a net loss of $103 million or $0.55 per share, while consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $35.4 million. Before I get into the segments, as a general comment, due to improving activity levels and increasing tightness in the overall labor market, we are starting to see general oilfield cost inflation across our segments. This inflation, combined with the increasing challenge of attracting employees to the industry, is increasing the complexity of reactivating equipment. We believe this challenge, combined with the increasing demand for premium drilling and completion services, will support higher pricing going forward.
Within our segments. In Contract Drilling, our average rig count improved for the third consecutive quarter and averaged 73 rigs in the second quarter, up from 69 rigs in the first quarter. Average rig margin per day during the second quarter was $6,250. Average rig operating cost per day increased relative to the first quarter due primarily to fewer rigs on low-cost standby, higher rig reactivation expenses, and the sales and use tax refund in the first quarter that did not recur in the second quarter.
At June 30, 2021, we had term contracts for drilling rigs providing for approximately $210 million of future day rate drilling revenue. Based on contracts currently in place, we expect an average of 37 rigs operating under term contracts during the third quarter at an average of 24 rigs operating under term contracts during the 4 quarters ending June 30, 2022. For the third quarter, we expect our rig count to improve to an average of 81 rigs, ending the quarter at 83 rigs. Contract Drilling gross profit is expected to improve to approximately $46 million. Average rig margin per day is expected to be approximately flat with the second quarter level.
In Pressure Pumping, we averaged 8 active spreads during the second quarter, ahead of our expectation for 7 spreads as we reactivated 2 spreads during the month of June. Even after costs associated with the reactivation of the extra spread, Pressure Pumping gross margin improved to $9.7 million for the second quarter. Pressure Pumping revenues increased almost 50% sequentially to $112 million. For the third quarter, we expect to average 9 active spreads. Pressure Pumping revenues are expected to improve from second quarter levels by more than 30% to approximately $150 million and gross margin is expected to be approximately $18 million.
Turning now to Directional Drilling. Revenues for the second quarter increased 26% to $24.9 million from $19.7 million in the first quarter, as the number of rigs on which we provided directional drilling services increased by 70% during the second quarter. However, with the increase in reactivation costs, gross margin for the second quarter decreased slightly to $2.5 million. For the third quarter, we expect to further benefit from higher activity levels with revenues increasing approximately 35% sequentially to $34 million. Gross profit for the third quarter is expected to be $4 million.
Turning now to our other operations, which includes our rental, technology and E&P businesses. Revenues for the second quarter improved to $13.2 million and gross margin improved to $2.8 million. For the third quarter, we expect revenues to improve to $14 million with a gross margin of $4.5 million. On a consolidated basis for the third quarter, we expect total depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment expense of approximately $141 million. Selling, general and administrative expense is expected to be approximately $23 million for the third quarter. And for the full year 2021, we expect an effective tax rate of approximately 17%.
Based on conversations with customers about increasing activity levels into 2022, we are increasing our 2021 CapEx forecast to $165 million, including $105 million for Contract Drilling, $35 million for Pressure Pumping and $25 million for Directional Drilling, other and general corporate. The increase in our CapEx budget primarily consists of investments in high-demand items that generate ancillary revenue, including specialty drill pipe and ESG-related technologies as well as higher maintenance CapEx due to increasing activity. Also, we will be paying a quarterly cash dividend of $0.02 per share on September 16, 2021, to holders of record as of September 2, 2021.
With that, I'll now turn the call back to Andy Hendricks.
Thanks, Andy. It's been a while since we've had this level of visibility into future quarters, and I'm very encouraged by the continuing increase in E&P demand that we are seeing for our services in drilling and completions. While this was primarily driven by the trading ranges of commodities over the last 6 months, it is also driven by Patterson-UTI's overall high level of well site performance and efficiency as well as our ESG-related technologies. I expect this demand continues at least into 2022. For Patterson-UTI, as we've discussed, this means both increasing activity and increasing pricing in our businesses.
Finally, let me provide a short update on our pending acquisition of Pioneer Energy Services. Subject to regulatory approvals, customary closing conditions and the approval of Pioneer Energy Services stockholders, we continue to expect this acquisition will close in the fourth quarter. Pioneer's experienced people, high-quality assets and efficient operations in the United States and Colombia will be a valuable addition to our business.
With that, we would like to thank all of our employees for their hard work, efforts and successes both in our industry and in general, and we look forward to a stronger second half of the year. Felita, we would now like to open the call to questions.
[Operator Instructions]. And your first question comes from the line of Mike Sabella with Bank of America.
So Andy, you have mentioned some upgrades on the frac fleet to Tier 4 dual fuel. Maybe you could just give us an idea, I guess, where you are today in terms of kind of capacity of next-gen frac equipment and if any of the CapEx bump that you all announced today is on the frac upgrades. And then as we think about that, maybe talk us through economics on what we see from those upgraded fleets today.
Yes. What we're doing is we're actually changing the engines from older models of engines to the new Tier 4 dual fuel. So it's not a change in the horsepower, it's an engine swap on the trailer. We started this a few months ago with Tier 4 dual fuel, and we're going to continue to invest some CapEx to do this for the rest of this year and into next year to get ready to have even another full spread ready for Q1 next year. This is -- I mean there's certainly some CapEx in there, but it's a relatively small amount compared to overall CapEx for the company. But we see this as a very cost-effective solution to upgrade the level of technology on our existing equipment without adding horsepower into the market.
Understood. And then maybe you can just, I guess, talk us through just on the rig side. Maybe describe kind of where you think customer interest is coming from as we look a little further out? Obviously, this year, the rig demand -- incremental rig demand has been dominated by private E&Ps. The DUC inventory that was held by the public E&Ps, looks like it's largely been exhausted. So it seems like the setup is there, that the public E&Ps have to come back for rigs as well. would you, I guess, agree with that assessment? And if it plays out that way, just talk through what it means for Patterson kind of relative to a market that's been more dominated by private E&Ps.
Yes. Certainly, as we came off the downturn last year, it was private that moved quicker. But when you look into what we're seeing in the second half of this year and into 2022, it's really broad. I mean it's privates that are going to add rigs, it's midsized publics. It's large international E&Ps. So we're just seeing more of a broad-based uptake in rigs with the discussions that are happening going into early '22.
Your next question come from the line of Vaibhav Coker -- Vaibhav Vaishnav from Coker & Palmer.
So I guess if we talk about Pressure Pumping, could you help us think about like in the market, are we today where we actually can get better pricing for ESG-friendly fleet versus conventional fleets?
Yes. We believe that with -- by changing out the engines and offering Tier 4 dual fuel on existing pump trailers that not only can pick up more work, but we can also get better pricing and margins on that particular work. I mean, it offers a lot of benefits for the customer in terms of cost savings. But as I mentioned earlier, there's also good economics for us.
Okay. Switching to land drilling. As we move from here into 2022, 2023, I'm not trying to pin you down for a number, but just generally, how do you think about where the land drilling margins could go back to versus what we saw in the prior cycles? Obviously, one change is like now you are providing more services on the same rig. So just putting that in context would be helpful.
So the way that I see this evolving because we're already in discussions for putting up rigs across the second half of this year and into '22, it's actually quite interesting. Like I mentioned, we just haven't had this level of visibility in a long while. And my concern is that we've got some of our operators, customers that are still working through their budget process and they may not even make decisions until late this year or early next year on rigs they want. And by that time, some of the rigs that they've been used to running are not going to be available.
And so I think you're going to have this situation as we move into 2022 that's more of a fear of missing out. And there's going to be more of a scramble for the best super-spec rigs that are out there. And now granted, we all have a lot of high-spec rigs. But when you talk about the best-performing super-spec rigs and with some of the operators a little bit slower in their budget cycles, I think they're going to land in a space in early '22 that they're not going to have necessarily the rigs that they want to have.
And when you see that happening in the cycle, that's really a big push on pricing, and that's a big push on margins. It's been a while since we've seen that, too. And so I do think it evolves into '22 that we have the possibility to get back to some of the higher margins that we've seen in the past and other cycles. And part of what may drive that is when some of these larger operators that are a little bit slower decide that they want to add rigs and they can't get all the specs that they want, they've now got to work with the drilling contractor to pay for upgrades and those kind of discussions drive pricing. And I think you'll hear more of that as we get into 2022.
So maybe what I'm hearing is really as opposed to -- correct me if I'm misinterpreting this, but what I'm hearing really is in fourth quarter, when we typically think about like a decline, given where the commodity prices are, based on your customer conversations, actually, we can see more rig increases in 4Q. Is that fair interpretation of what you're saying?
I think you can take fourth quarter decline and throw it out the window this year. If you look at where commodity prices are trading, oil WTI above $65 a barrel in natural gas above $3, we're not considering a fourth quarter decline.
[Operator Instructions]. Your next question is from the line of John Daniel with Daniel Energy.
I know you can't name the E&P company. I'm not asking for that, but you talked about the international E&P, thus, presumably a large one picking up multiple rigs. I'm curious if you could just maybe hazard a guess as to what the relative change in incremental rigs versus where they are today? Just frame it for us. And when that would happen? If you can't, that's fine. I'm just trying -- we all -- and the reason I'm asking is obviously, like you see the privates going from 0 to 1, 1 to 2, I mean the percentage changes are huge. And we typically think of these large guys as being disciplined, but like everything would suggest they're going to be adding rigs and maybe significantly. So just your thoughts.
So I think this may be a situation that's specific to us because this is a large major E&P that has a drilling program that may not -- that may grow their drilling programs somewhat but we're very likely to be growing share within their existing drilling program. So I think there's still relative discipline out there. I'm not calling a lack of discipline or a big ramp-up in their particular program. But because of the technology, because of the performance and efficiency that we've been offering with this particular operator over the last few years, our team has done a great job, and we see ourselves growing share and ESG and emissions-related technology are part of that equation as well.
Okay. Fair enough. On the frac side, I just want to make sure I've got the sequencing right, you're running 8 today. Is that right, going to 9?
Correct. 8 going to 9.
And then did you...
We're at 9. We just finished -- we just activated number 9. And then we're going to 10 early Q4. Could be late Q3, but likely early Q4.
Okay. Got it. And if you said this, I apologize. The number of -- let's just say, year-end. At year-end, what would be roughly the Tier 4 DGB split within your fleet, given the investment?
So we have a number of different things in our fleet. We have Tier 2 dual fuel, we have Tier 4. We have Tier 4 dual fuel by the end of this year with changing out more engines. We'll be up to a full spread of Tier 4 dual fuel and then we'll also be set up for a second tier -- or second spread of Tier 4 dual fuel next year.
Your next question is from the line of Scott Levine with Bloomberg.
So I wanted to see if I can get a sense of your outlook for net pricing for both drilling and pressure pumping for the back half of this year. If I heard correctly in your prepared comments, you said you expected your average daily rig margins to hold about flat in the third quarter, and that's what I think we heard out of one of your competitors yesterday. But your activity levels are increasing, and we've seen the inventory of DUCs drop pretty considerably recently. So is it fair to assume that the pace of activity and drilling accelerates, but maybe the net pricing lags a bit behind the recovery net pricing in Pressure Pumping? Or are you seeing it from a different vantage point from your perspective? Just curious there.
Yes. So our view is we're seeing a steady increase in rig count throughout H2 and into 2022. We're also seeing an increase in pricing, but we've also had some cost inflation as well. So the cost inflation is keeping the margins flat quarter-on-quarter, but then we expect margins to improve after that.
And on the pumping side, is it a different situation? Or is the magnitude any different? Or is it roughly similar trend as far as you can say?
I'd say pumping is coming off a more challenging bottom. And as we increase the number of spreads we're operating, we're improving margins by a mixture of increasing pricing and then better fixed cost coverage as well.
[Operator Instructions]. There are no other questions at this time.
All right. Well, we thank everybody for dialing into our earnings call this morning, and have a good quarter. Thanks.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.