CARE Ratings Ltd
NSE:CARERATING
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Abbvie Inc
NYSE:ABBV
|
Biotechnology
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Realty Income Corp
NYSE:O
|
Real Estate
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
| US |
|
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
This note will be permanently deleted.
CARE Ratings Ltd
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to CARE Ratings Limited Q4 and FY '23 Earnings Conference Call. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements about the company, which are based on the beliefs, opinions and expectations of the company as on the date of this call. These statements are not the guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. [Operator Instructions] This now this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Mehul Pandya, Managing Director and CEO. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. I hope all of you are doing well. I extend a warm welcome on behalf of the entire CareEdge family to the Q4 FY '23 and FY '23 investors call. I trust that each of you has had the opportunity to thoroughly review our quarterly results. Today, alongside the valued senior management of CARE Ratings, I'm interacting with you to provide an in-depth analysis of our company's performance over the past quarter and to address any queries you may have following my initial remarks. I will also take this opportunity to offer a brief overview of our strategic road map for the future. Together, we will navigate through our plans and outline the path forward for CareEdge. Thank you for joining us today, and I look forward to engaging in a productive and insightful discussion. Last year, the world economy was faced with challenges from the geopolitical conflict, high commodity prices, a surge in inflation levels, fattening of monetary policy by central banks and slowing growth. This year, the challenges have been amplified by the recent turmoil in the global financial sector. In the midst of such turbulent global conditions, the Indian economy has had a relatively stable footing compared to emerging and advanced economies. The domestic economy is estimated to have grown by 7% in FY '23 as per the second advance estimate. While the manufacturing sector faced challenges from high commodity prices and uneven consumption demand, the rebound in services sector supported the growth in FY '23. Several high-frequency indicators such as GST collections, e-way bill generation, manufacturing and services PMIs have been recording a healthy performance.
Consumption demand in the economy has been uneven due to relaxed rural demand recovery. The recovery in the rural demand is expected to be aided by moderating inflationary pressures and an upbeat rabi harvest. However, weather related uncertainties pose some downside risks. Investment in the economy has been steered by the center with a strong CapEx growth budgeted for FY '24, while private sector investment has been lackluster so far. However, the ground is set for a pickup in the target CapEx with improving capacity utilization levels and the private sector showing intent to invest. Given the uncertain economic environment, we expect the pickup in the private CapEx cycle to be gradual.
Retail inflation at 5.7% in March was back within RBI tolerance band after staying above the 6% mark for most of FY '23. A favorable base, some waning of the pent-up demand and a robust rabi harvest are supportive of further moderation in retail inflation. However, the elevated core inflation above the 6% mark remains concerning. With the full pass-through of the policy rates hike which can be impending, the RBI decided to keep the policy repo rate unchanged at 6.5% after hiking by cumulative 250 basis points in FY '23. Gross bank credit grew by a healthy 15% in FY '23 as against 9.6% in FY '22. Credit growth was steered mainly by the retail segment recording 20.6% growth followed by services with 19.8% growth.
Industrial credit grew by a subdued 5.7% in FY '23 as against 7.5% last year. Credit growth to large industries accounting for nearly 75% of the total industrial credit witnessed a marginal pick up to 3% when compared with 2% last year. Fundraising by businesses showed a mixed trend in FY '23 with upbeat corporate bond issuances, while CP issuances were subdued. Corporate bond issuances cropped a growth of 32%, rising to INR 8.5 lakh crores in FY '23. The higher bond issuances were driven by financial institutions to meet the growing credit demand amid tight liquidity conditions. Commercial paper issuances was subdued on account of sharp increase in short-term interest rates. CP issuances were at INR 13.7 lakh crores in FY '23, 32% lower as compared to the previous year.
On the external front, the lows from the challenging global scenario continue to pressure merchandise exports. However, lower imports on account of easing commodity prices helped translate it into a moderation in the merchandise trade deficit. The upbeat trend in India's services export and remittances has supported a moderation in India's current account deficit, thereby reducing our external vulnerabilities. Overall, the Indian economy remains resilient despite several global headwinds. However, the domestic economy will have to tide over challenges emerging from an uncertain global scenario and some lingering domestic challenges. Let me assure you, CareEdge is prepared to take this challenges head on, and we have been going the extra mile in further cementing our position in the market. To enhance our brand value, CareEdge has significantly bolstered its outreach activities. Our dedicated teams in economics, ratings and industry research have diligently produced an impressive number of 155 reports through the quarter.
These reports ranging from timely updates to specialized analysis have been widely acclaimed and featured across renowned publications. In addition, our senior management, economic experts, sector specialists, industry research team and the business development leaders actively participated in 35 knowledge-sharing forums during the review period. This commitment to sharing knowledge and expertise reflects our dedication to fostering growth and progress within our industry. Furthermore, our presence across media platforms has witnessed a remarkable surge in the past year and continues to expand in the current quarter. From our power packed monthly edition of Foresights, to engaging blogs and thought-provoking podcasts, we are actively disseminating valuable insight to our audience.
Continuing the tradition of hosting permanent and insightful events, I'm happy to announce that in our 30th anniversary year, we will be hosting our flagship event at major metros in quarter 1. The COVID-19 pandemic had prevented us from conducting this in the past 2 years, but we got back on track in FY '23, and we'll continue to provide platforms for inspiring discussions and meaningful exchanges, thereby further solidifying our commitment to driving positive changes in our industry. As the lead President, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan had said, knowledge is power and the implementation of knowledge is wisdom. And we at CareEdge have been putting into action the growth strategies devised in the past 2 years. From fresh talent to technological advancement, we are committed to unlocking the immense potential that lies ahead. For the past few months, I have been personally engaging in regular interactions with the young blood at the organization to get a thorough understanding of what the future leaders of CareEdge want from the organization and how best we can all grow together.
We are also focusing heavily on the human resources front to ensure your company is one of the best places to work at. To support this plan, we have come up with multiple training and incentive programs that have been well received by the staff. Now I would like to quickly take you through the CareEdge Group's performance. Referring to the published stand-alone results for the full year FY '23, CareEdge reported revenue from operations at INR 24.8 crores. This shows the growth of 13% as compared to last year, where CareEdge reported the revenue from operations of around INR 219.3 crores. The growth in ratings income was largely attributed to the robust income generated in the initial ratings business during the year. We hope to sustain this momentum going forward.
Net profit has been higher by 23% at INR 103.8 crores in FY '23. On the profitability front, CARE Ratings has reported a stable operating profit margin of around 46% on a stand-alone basis. On a quarterly basis, income from operations has increased from INR 60 crores in quarter 4 FY '22 to INR 68 crores in quarter 4 FY '23. While EBITDA and PBT reported an increase, PAT has moderated due to impairment of assets and the resulted tax impact in quarter 4 FY '23 as compared to quarter 4 FY '22. Let us move to the consolidated results. On an annual basis, CARE Ratings reported revenue from operations of INR 279 crores which is 13% growth from the last year, which was at INR 248 crores. Net profit has been higher by 11% at INR 85.5 crores in FY '23. Both the domestic subsidiaries, CARE Advisory, research and training as well as CARE Risk Solutions have been witnessing traction. Under CARE Advisory research and training, which we call as CART, we have built robust advisory and research team that cover over 50 industries with research reports.
On the ESG front, CART has developed a tech-enabled platform, which we call a [ serial ], which is an on-demand comprehensive data platform that brings together company, industry and ESG insights. The company has completed the ESG assessment of over 900 listed companies in India across various sectors and subsectors. We have also been impaneled with the Association of Mutual Funds in India as an ESG rating provider for the AMCs. In CARE Risk Solutions, we had improved capital to cater to the demand from the BFSI segment, addressing their ALM management and regulatory reporting needs. We are in the process of upgrading the existing products in this company and venturing into new business lines like data analytics, banking solutions, et cetera, and further investing in sales franchises to foray into the global market.
Our Mauritian subsidiary, CARE Ratings (Africa) Private Limited continued its impressive performance during the financial year under review. The company assigned ratings to more than 50 corporates in Mauritius. There has been an increase in awareness about the concept of credit rating among banks and corporates and a clear understanding of the benefits of such ratings. Our subsidiary in Nepal, CARE Ratings Nepal Limited also reported growth with 100 new rating assignments executed during FY '23. The transformative journey of CareEdge has seen remarkable progress in an impressively short time frame. As we move ahead, our unwavering focus remains on enhancing knowledge and productivity, thereby reinforcing the analytical rigor in our rating and diversifying our revenue streams.
This strategic commitment will serve as the foundation for our continued growth and success. We understand the importance of continuous improvement and adaptability in an ever-evolving landscape. By prioritizing these key areas, we aim to stay at the forefront of our industry, thereby delivering value to our stakeholders and exceeding their expectation. I must once again thank you all for your continued support and appreciate my colleagues and the team at CareEdge for their unwavering hard work. Together, let us push ahead with determination and resilience as we unlock the full potential of our organization. Thank you.
Sir, should we now begin the question-and-answer session? Should we now open the floor for questions, sir?
Yes, please.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from the line of Rajiv Mehta from Yes Securities.
Yes, congratulations on strong results. So sir, firstly, could you share the volume of debt rated in FY '23 and FY '22? And if you can just explain the growth of 14% that we have seen in Ratings revenue, which segments of the business drove this as in between bank loans, bonds, CP securitization what drove this? And which sectors drove this?
Okay. Thanks, Rajiv. While my colleague, [ Revati ] would give you the figures on the debt rated. But in terms of the segments, I would say the bank loan segment has given us greater growth during the year. As you would know that during the period of higher inflation, generally, the bank credit is a preferred route as compared to the capital market issuances. So from that angle, we had seen a good growth on the bank debt side, and this is something that we have been disclosing in our earlier quarter results as well. The fact that the higher working capital requirements of the corporates and the other entities, they necessitate funding and considering the fact that the bank debt continues to remain the principal source of funding. So this segment had provided us a better growth for the full year. Revati, if you can give the figures in terms of the debt rated.
Yes. The debt rated showed an increase of about 78% as compared to FY '22. So in FY '23, we rated about INR 3.8 lakh crores of debt as compared to INR 2.2 lakh crores of debt in FY '22. [ And that's incremental debt ].
Sure. Yes. I mean that is for the initial ratings, right? Okay. Yes. Yes. So sir, looking at this 14% revenue growth in rating revenue this year, which is a significant improvement over the preceding years, would it be safe to assume that we have stabilized our market position and stabilize our market share? And if that is the case, how do you plan to grow and further strengthen the market position going ahead?
I think the trajectory that we are witnessing for us and something of a trend that we have observed almost since the quarter 4 of FY '22 has been on a quarter-on-quarter, we have been posting good traction as far as the initial rating business is concerned. And that is something we'll like to sustain the -- for the future. In terms of cementing this thing and going ahead as far as the future quarters are concerned, this business is principally driven by the credibility that you are posing before the users of the rating as also the fact that how much of a knowledge domain expertise that you are able to disseminate which can create the kind of the traction in the market for the users and the issuers who could be coming to you for the rating. So from that angle, I think our entire focus, which has been on the quality-led growth that is serving us pretty much well. And we'll like to sustain with this strategy. I'll not be in a position in terms of forecasting how much of a growth, which could be there because that is an outcome of so many variables per se. But at the end of the day, what sustains for us in terms of continuing to solidify our position are these key focus areas that we have identified for ourselves related to our overall theme of quality-led growth. And once again, I'd like to emphasize that the knowledge dissemination and the expertise that we have been developing in various sectors that is serving us quite well combined with the kind of a focused outreach that we have been having all through the year and which we'll keep on having for the future as well.
Okay. And just last couple of things I want to check on. What is the employee count as at the end of year? And second is, have we taken any pricing increases through the last year since we have strengthened our rating process, has there been any pricing increases?
Yes. See, as far as the pricing increases are concerned, the -- how we measure it is in terms of that all -- every year, we continue to map in terms of the number of mandates that we tend to get as against that, what's the kind of revenue that we are having on a per mandate basis. And that is showing a consistently improving [ CAT ]. So we'd like to sustain that for the future as well, right? As far as the employee count is concerned on a stand-alone basis, we are slightly more than 500. And on a consolidated basis, we are slightly upwards of 700.
We'll take the next question from the line of [ Varun Bang from Bryanston Investments ].
Yes. Congratulations on steady progress during the year and appreciate the steps that we are taking to drive the cultural transition. So just 2, 3 questions. First one is on ESG. So what are your thoughts on the guidelines that have come on ESG ratings side? And what opportunities do you do we sense for CARE since it is made part of DRSR? Is there enough scope to add value? Can you share your thoughts?
Surely. Thanks, [ Varun ]. See, as far as the ESG domain is concerned -- and currently, the entire activities in this domain, they are being offered from our subsidiary CART. Over a period of time, we have developed good insight into this domain and our offerings have been quite well received in the market. What we see from this -- the guidelines -- while the full guidelines are likely to come over the next few weeks or a quarter, right, but the overall thing that we are witnessing is in terms of a regulatory requirement emanating in this regard, that should augur well as far as the offerings from our side are concerned because we have been, I would say, quite proactive in terms of developing an expertise in this domain. Right from the coverage of almost like 900-plus entities as far as our coverage [indiscernible] platform is concerned, going right up to serving the needs of the DRSR reporting requirements of the various entities as had been outlined by the regulator. Going much beyond that in terms of handholding them to reach a targeted level of DRSR reporting as well as the fact that in terms of identification of any gaps in this regard, helping them and handholding them make that DRSR reporting quite competitive. So from that angle, I think on an overall basis, the ESG practices have been coming up quite well. And I'll refer to [ Swati ], who is the CEO of our subsidiary, where these services are being offered to give further comments on this, [ Swati ].
Yes. So on the ESG front, like Mehul mentioned, the final trend of the guidelines are to come out. The role of the regulator and the intent is very clear that like the corporates, and there is going to be a whole lot of regulatory push and in the right manner and in the right direction. Because if you really look at the sense of the guidelines, it's talking about assurance services attached to the whole sort of reporting paradigm. So in terms of the offerings at CART, we do -- we have an IT enabled platform as well as a very well-defined frameworks across various industries to carry out the ratings. And we also do a whole lot of set of comprehensive consultancy assignments in which we handhold the companies in terms of developing their ESG strategies as well as moving them up on the entire ESG curve.
Okay. And in non-rating business in both corporate advisory and research and advisory, what are the USPs that you are looking at building? And how do you think it will transpire in your opinion?
I think the USPs that we are trying to develop in both the subsidiaries at the end of the day, it has to revolve around our core expertise and which is in the analytics domain. So be it on the corporate advisory side or through the ESG aspect for any kind of a customized research in CART, our offerings are -- always oriented towards giving value addition in the analytics domain. And coming to the Risk Solutions business as well, which is a part of the other subsidiaries, over there also the product offerings, which have been there from our side, we are having a focused approach in terms of augmenting them but continues to revolve around the analytics domain. So we'll like -- we believe that we have a greater understanding in that as compared to any other domain which potentially could be, I would say, available as far as the activities of the subsidiaries are concerned, but we will like to focus in terms of the analytics domain to continue to remain as the driver for our non-ratings business as well.
Okay. And in last 1 year or so, how do you look at our progress in our non-rating business? And I think initially, we might have to prove our capabilities and then clients will -- would come. So is it a long drawn process. So based on your assessment, what could be the time lines for visible success in this business?
Okay. I think see non-ratings businesses are always slightly challenging in terms of growing them. Considering the fact that, as I mentioned, that we have the expertise drawn on the analytics domain, the teams that we have over there, both in terms of the consulting advisory subsidiary as well as in the risk management solutions subsidiaries. The teams which are there currently, they are pretty strong. It takes a slightly longer time in terms of developing these businesses and getting traction in that. But what is heartening for me is the fact that as far as CART is concerned, we have done some very good assignments during FY '23, which gives the foundation for capitalizing on the experience drawn from those kind of assignments and to extrapolate it to similar kind of, I would say, client set as well as the multilateral institutions in the quarters and the years to come. On the risk management solutions side, I think the greatest aspect has been in terms of ensuring that the product development that we had envisaged when we were going for a complete reboot of the entire business ecosystem over there, that has sustained itself and it is taking its time. And I'm once again, mentioning that these businesses take a slightly longer time to get to a stage where they are giving us a lot of traction. But we are on the right price. That is something which is a comforting factor for us.
And just one last thing. In this context, can we look at any acquisition to get a ready foundation and maybe it can be built from there on? So maybe that can help us reduce this -- I mean reduce the time lines for success in this business. So if you can just share your thoughts.
I'm sorry to interrupt, we lost the line of the management, I'm reconnecting the line in connected. Kindly stay connected. And sir, you may need to repeat your question. Please stay connected while I reconnect them. [Operator Instructions]
Sir, you said the success time lines could be longer in non-rating piece. So can we look at any acquisition to get a ready foundation and maybe the business can be built from thereon? So that sort of can help us reduce the success time lines in this business. So if you can just share your thoughts on acquisitions.
Sure. I think from the growth perspective, all options are open before us. So while -- until now, we have been focused on an organic growth, but if any good opportunity comes our way, we have an open mind on that. We do believe that a combination of various strategies that need to be deployed in terms of ensuring that we get to that stage in terms of having the right traction and the scale of these entities in as short a time as could be practically impossible. So I would only like to limit my submission to state that all options are open before us and any opportunity coming our way, we should be looking at it in detail.
We'll take the next question from the line of Deep Sankara Narayanan from Trustline PMS.
Firstly, with CapEx cycle turning positively and credit growth has been picking up for banks strongly. So do we foresee double-digit growth in rating business over 3 to 5 years now?
I think, see, it will be too much of a forecasting prematurely in terms of giving any specific number, whether it will double digit or single digit in this regard. But what is important as far as our business is concerned, is that the credit growth in the corporate lending that shall be driven by a few themes. Number one is the government push on the infra CapEx, so the government having been persistently expanded its infra-related CapEx, particularly in the roads and railways segment for the last 3 years consistently now, we believe that the multiplier effect would come into play and that should auger well for the segments like EPC players, capital goods and the infra product companies. The second is in terms of a growing focus on the green areas, including the decarbonization. So both the government and the private entities are taking this pretty much seriously. And this segment also shall be giving us a lot of CapEx-related opportunities. The third is in terms of the improving logistics efficiency, where once again, the investments in the dedicated freight corridors coupled with multiple multi-model logistics pulp so and so forth. That will also be requiring a lot of CapEx and resultantly the debt requirements in this regard. And finally, the push that we are expecting or rather the pull in this regard could be in terms of the deleveraged balance sheet for the Indian corporates. Now the fact that the non-corporates have significantly deleveraged that should auger well in terms of their ability to contract further debt to capitalize on the CapEx-related opportunities in this regard. So a combination of all these factors, that should auger well as far as the overall rating industry growth is concerned because there indeed would be debt requirements pertaining to this. And as one of the main rating agencies in the country, we should be in a position to capitalize it to our benefit.
Okay. Okay. So all this growth will be mainly driven by volumes itself or we are foreseeing realization improvement also coming in future because of strong demand?
I think it will be a combination of both. Higher volumes also and in one of the earlier remarks which I made, we are quite focused in terms of better realization as well. So that is one area where we consistently focus upon on a year-on-year basis to track our progress. And I'm happy to report that it is showing a positive traction on that. So a combination of both is something which gives us the confidence in terms of capitalizing on these opportunities as they come our way with an overall industry-led growth.
Okay. Okay. And lastly, from my side, in terms of employee costs, so have you reached the industry level benchmark and you are able to retain them successfully? If it is so then do we foresee better operating leverage from here on picking up for us? So employee cost growth could be much lesser than our revenue growth.
Yes. See, on an overall basis, we are growing gradually nearer to the industry benchmarks as far as the employee cost is concerned. And from the perspective of retention of this talent, right? So our attrition rate, that has also come down significantly. So which is a factor of the consistent efforts that we have been putting in terms of ensuring that the market-related benchmark paid across the [indiscernible], they are implemented, complemented by the fact that a lot of other employee-friendly initiatives in terms of retaining -- attracting and retaining this talent, right, they all have been implemented during this year. On an overall basis, what I can feel is that our employee cost as a percentage of the operating revenue, so that shall remain range-bound. So in certain quarters, if at all, if we feel that certain skill sets are indeed required to be onboarded by all means we shall be going for that because at the end of the day, this is a people-led business. So the onboarding of the right talent that shall remain a focus area for us. But nevertheless, we do believe that it shall be remaining range bound and it won't be increasing substantially from what the current levels are.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from the line of Hitesh Agarwal from Fair Value Capital.
Congratulations, sir, on good set of numbers. My first question is, we have taken an impairment loss of INR 1.73 crores in stand-alone statement in Q4 quarter. Could you give more details on this?
Yes, sure. This pertains to our assessment of our investment in our subsidiary, which is the tech subsidiary, CARE Risk Solutions. So in this regard, as a matter of good governance, see you are aware that we have infused INR 33.5 crores as equity in this subsidiary during FY '23. But from a good governance perspective, we keep on evaluating the overall things in this regard. And we felt that as a prudent measure, we should be taking this impairment in quarter 4, and that is something that we have done. But our commitment in terms of growing this subsidiary that sustains at the same time, the decision in this regard that is more from a good governance perspective.
Sire, are we expecting any further impairment maybe in the coming quarters on this related?
We do not anticipate anything substantial in this regard because as I said, that the efforts which are going in terms of turning around this company, they are in the right direction. While it has taken slightly longer in this regard. But nevertheless, we are in the right direction, and that is something that we are hopeful in terms of having the improved performance in the coming quarters and the year, right?
Okay. Sir, as I look at the tax rate for FY '21 and FY '22, it was around 22% to 23%, whereas for FY '23, the total tax rate is at 32%. So could you throw color why there is a bit of variation in this?
Surely, yes. I let my CFO, Jinesh to answer that. Jinesh, please?
Yes. So if you've seen there are certain impairment in FY '23 for whole year. So because of that, we don't get a tax credit of that and it led this along. So that is why the tax -- effective tax rate increased to 32%, what you said. And in the previous year, obviously, that was allowable as a CV panel. So if you compare 2 years tech is the difference only for the impairment -- on the impairment side.
Okay, sir. And what can we expect as a tax rate for -- going forward for FY '24?
It would be nearly to current tax rate, that is 25 to 20 -- between 25% to 27% because there are certain adjustments on deferred tax so that we can't predict on DTA. So the tax expense consists of current tax and the deferred tax. So that's why I'm giving you a range bound.
Okay, sir. Sir, my last question is, could you share -- throw details on the attrition level, which was there for Q4 and for the whole year of FY '23?
Overall, I think the attrition level from the previous year, they have come down significantly. And for FY '23, it was around 28%.
Okay. And in Q4?
We don't have a quarterly to quarterly because at times like say there would be onboarding also which keeps on happening across the quarters, right? So quarter-to-quarter attrition rate is not something that we track. It's more on a yearly basis, which is more reflective of the overall trend in this regard.
We take the next question from the line of Keshav Garg from Counter Cyclical PMS.
Sir, it is very encouraging to know that the rating business is gaining traction. Sir, but our other subsidiaries, non-rating business, sir the losses are increasing drastically, they have tripled year-on-year, whereas the revenue has fallen. Sir so had the revenue also grown then it would be encouraging that at least the business is picking up. But if the revenue is declining and losses are increasing, then, sir, where is the light at the end of the tunnel for the non-rating business when in your journey you think that this segment can break even?
I think when we are talking of the non-rating businesses, I would say the major loss which has been there is on the risk management solutions subsidiary. As far as the consulting subsidiary is concerned CART, which is concerned, it has largely been closer to breakeven during FY '23. So there was only a marginal loss, which was there, and it was largely a cash flow positive outcome for us, right? Both these businesses, they require a significant, I would say, deployment of the resources to get a traction in the market. So the infrastructure in terms of the human resources that needs to be created first, especially on the risk management solution side, considering the fact that a lot of product development efforts have been going on over there, right? So from that angle, this commitment to the resources, having the right team working on those product developments that entails investment from our side in this regard. But the net this product going to the go-to-market stage and start generating the revenue. It has got delayed a bit in this regard, and that is why the result in losses, which have been there, right? But nevertheless, we do believe that the products which are getting developed and the prioritization of these products from the management side, that is with a very clear set focused strategy, and we should be seeing an improvement in this figure as we move forward. But nevertheless, I will also like my colleague and CEO of CARE Risk Solutions, [ Kiran ] to give his perspective as how he is witnessing this trend and how you'd like to take this forward on this. [ Kiran ]?
Sure. So as we say, this particular year has been a year of constructing all our products and solutions to the new norms of parcels. And that timing, which is going to be taken to get these solutions to the market was where we envisaged this investment, which was done. However, now our first few products are into the GTM stage, and we see a very strong traction over there. And as we all speak, this current particular tenure where we were developing the applications, we all know the software industry went into a very large turmoil for resources and availability of resources globally. It's a well-known fact. So there's a couple of things, which we have been able to arrest over the last quarter plus, and all our products are following the time lines on development and are adhering to the release dates shows us positive signs on the sign of how revenue would be generated from the products. Thank you.
Sure, sir. Sir, also, sir, lastly, I wanted to touch upon the share buyback issue, which has been raised multiple times in the past and the company also attempted to do the same, but the pricing was in correct. So the buyback was unsuccessful. Sir so as soon as the 1-year time line gets over, sir, kindly consider another share buyback, sir, because you see our earnings per share way back in 2012 was INR 38, which has now declined to INR 28, and this is not adjusting for inflation. And moreover, the ESOPs are further diluting the share capital and reducing the EPS and also share buyback is more tax efficient, and it will help us increase our EPS growth also. Sir so I hope you will appreciate the same and do a share buyback.
Yes, I take your point. And certainly, I'll tag it off to the Board for an appropriate decision in this regard. Thank you.
We'll take the next question from the line of Vikram Kotak from Ace Lansdowne Investments Services.
Yes, yes, I have a question, one for Mehul and one for Jinesh. If I missed earlier, so someone -- if you answered earlier, you can even pass. So one is on the tech side. I missed earlier answer. So what's the likely tax rate going forward next 2 years after this one spike in the last quarter as well as this year?
Yes. It can be in the range of 24% to 28% or 25% to 28% depending on the...
Okay, you will be back to the normal next year?
Yes, yes, definitely, yes.
Okay. Okay. And second for Mehul-bhai for you, is this Slide #7 on the presentation, which you talk about the rating stability in sync with the industry average. Can you a little elaborate on this one because it's an interesting slide. And I just want to understand the slide. Yes.
I mean see, what we always keep on tracking as far as the rating performance is concerned that the bidding overall, they should be, number one, will be displaying in ordinal in the sense that the higher rating categories, we should be displaying a greater stability. And on an overall basis, the investment-grade ratings, we also should be continuing to display a greater stability. The fact that this rating performance has to be checked consistently just well with our overall philosophy of quality-led growth because at the end of the day, that's something that a rating agency, which has completed 30 years, and we are looking forward to a substantial time in the future also, right? So we have to develop that kind of robust systems and processes to sustain the rating performance. I'd also request my colleague, Sachin, who is our Chief Ratings Officer, to give his perspective on this also. Sachin, over to you.
Yes, thanks Mehul. So if you look at the slide on ratings stability, I think there are 2 key takeaways from there. One is, if you see year-on-year, the darker blue bar is talking about the period of 2018 to '22 and the next one is talking about the current -- the more recent 5 years that is 2019 to 2023. So as you can see, there is an improvement in the stability rates in the earlier 5-year period to the current 5-year period. So that is one. So our rating stability is improving over the period. So that is point number one. Second is, we have also compared it to the average of the industry. And there, if you notice the gap, while it was always slightly higher than average even earlier, now the gap is even increasing. So we are better off than the industry average in terms of rating stability. So that is the second point.
The other point which I just wish to add on the same thing is that our -- another metric that we look at is investment-grade defaults, apart from the stability, wherein we very simply say that at the beginning of the year in my total portfolio of entities, which were in investment grade by the end of the year, how many such entities have gone into default. And obviously, the lower the number is, the better it is. So you'll be happy to note that in the current year, we had only one such instance wherein the investment-grade entity went into default. The similar numbers in the prior periods were in double digits and even last year, it was a number of about 5%. So we have been very sharply improving our performance in this respect. And for the current year, our performance is actually either better or same as the other top rating agencies in the country. So in that respect, our performance of ratings is quite strong, and that is largely because of the multiple actions that we've taken over the last few years, including things like we have now specialized sector, specialized rating teams. We have dedicated teams who look after highly rated entities and especially the entities which have high amount of debt. We also have oversight from external committees like ERSC, which is our rating Supervisory Committee. And in general, there has been a strong focus within the organization to make sure that the rating actions are very timely, more objective. And that is also getting reflected in our -- the various mutual funds and other investors who use our ratings, having more confidence in our ratings. Thank you.
Yes. Sachin, what was trying to say that -- and I'm very happy to see the BBB and BB are showing a good improvement. That shows that you're already in process actually kind of showing a much improvement than earlier years. Yes. That's what I have to read in the slide, right?
No. So if you notice, it is also in the higher rating category. Higher rating categories to the point like, say, for AA, the number has moved up from 92.3% to 93.6%. The point is, you also have to note this is a 5-year data. So if we had, say, weak performance in the year, say, 2019 and 2020, that is not -- so therefore, the curve is not that sharp, right? So if I were to play it only for the current year, it will be a much sharper improvement. But because it is a 5-year average, the delta is not looking as sharp. But nonetheless, there is clearly a discernible improvement across all rating categories.
[Operator Instructions] We take the next question from the line of Sanjay Kumar from ithought Financial Consulting.
Just a follow-up on the rating stability. I mean, shouldn't be using the average of the industry, right, I mean, a company like us should be benchmarking ourselves against the leaders, CRISIL and ICRA. And one observation was our AAA and AA stability seems to be behind them, whereas our A and BBB is even better than someone like ICRA, why is this divergence, if there is any, if you could talk about this.
Sachin, you would like to answer? Yes, yes you take it. Yes. Yes.
So the data that we have given here is only for the industry average. And I take your point that we should compare ourselves to the industry, people who are in the same industry position as ours. And maybe next time, we will kind of do it like that, so point taken. But if you look at the improvement, if I were to compare across the industry, in the chart, it is clear that we are better off than industry across all rating categories. So I didn't get your second part of the question that you're saying.
No. Like for example, our BBB stability rate is around 90%, 91% we have improved to 91%. But if I look at, say, someone like ICRA, they're still at 87%. So we are better than them in BBB, whereas we are lagging behind in AAA and AA.
Correct. So your point is valid. So CARE, if you see historically, our rating stability in A, BBB and BB category has been fairly strong. We had some weight of mishaps in AA and AAA categories during the 2017, '18 and '19 period, and that is where the data is kind of showing us in a relatively weak position. But if you look at the data for the more recent periods, and that's what I shared on the earlier question, if you look at the last 2 years, our performance is kind of at par or even better than some of the names that you mentioned on the rating stability and on default statistics.
Okay. Perfect. Okay. All right. And another question, you gave the volume. Can you also give the client-based for [ potential ] ratings in FY '22 and FY '23 how much has that fees grown?
See that we will not be able to disclose as part of the public disclosure. But what we can state very clearly has been that our overall growth in terms of the incremental business, which is -- which we measure in terms of the addition of the new clients that has been very robust, right? And that is a momentum which is sustaining all through the last 5 quarters that I talked about, starting from quarter 4 FY '22 and till the quarter 4 FY '23. It is a very clear growth over there, which has been helping us in terms of posting good results, and we'd like to sustain that.
Okay. And is a bit of pricing involved? Or do you think it's down to credibility, expertise?
I think the pricing is always -- has always been there in terms of the market like phenomena. I mean, or the industries like this or for that matter, anything in the industry, where the competition is always intense, right? So the pricing is generally driven by the market dynamics. But at the end of the day, in this kind of a business, what matters is the kind of, number one, your knowledge expertise in the various sectors, which are going in for the ratings, contracting new debt as also the fact that how much of an outreach that you are having in terms of explaining your positions, your knowledge to them, which can create the requisite pull for this. So it's a combination of both this aspect, which has been serving us very well in this regard.
Okay. Okay. And second question on the non-ratings business. I mean, looking at the P&L, you'll not be able to conclude it. So if you could give us any internal metrics that you monitor for your non-rating subsidiaries. How many ASCs have you signed up for ESG, how many banks per year in the management or regulatory reporting and so on. So can you give us what kind of internal metrics that you guys are tracking, so we can get a better picture outside of the P&L?
I think as far as the consulting advisory business is concerned, we track it in terms of the number of clients that they onboarded across the offerings, be it in terms of the customized research or the corporate advisory and the ESG offerings. And as far as the risk management solutions company is concerned, we track it in terms of, once again, the clientele across their business lines, which in terms of the existing product suite on the ALM or the ops risk, credit risk those kind of solutions. Going into the new domains in terms of the data analytics for the -- as Kiran mentioned in your submission that some of the products which you've been developing, they are almost at stage of the go to market, something that's already been done so far and some more would be getting to the GTM stage over the next few quarters. So this is the kind of a metric that -- with which we keep on tracking both these businesses. And on both these aspects, the subsidiaries have done well. In terms of the key aspects or the figures pertaining to this, may I request [ Swati ] to give her perspective in terms of the consulting advisory and Kiran on the risk management solutions. [ Swati ] first you.
Yes. So in terms of the clients added, we boarded something like about -- in total, maybe about 100 new clients we were onboarded. And there could be across various industry spectrums or across various product offerings, whether it is ESG or whether it is industry research or whether it is the consulting business. And particularly in the ESG space, we are currently working roughly -- I mean, instead of giving the exact number, I'll probably say that we're roughly in the high end of the 20s that we are working on the number of assignments that we are working currently. Yes, Kiran, do you want to...
Yes. So from the [ CRS ] prospective, we've been able to add not only customers in India, but having marquee customers in Canada and also customer in UAE. So as we spent, we've also been able to add some marquee customers on the lines from the financial organization. So going further, we look towards our products once they are already a very explorative market in the Basel IV line. So we see a lot of growth on that line as well.
We'll take your next question from the line of Devansh Nigotia from SIMPL.
Sir, regarding ESG we mentioned that in ESG it's supposed to be rated around -- ESG disclosures, we've covered around 900 companies. So in our other segment, can you help us understand how much we have looked for ESG disclosure, ESG ratings and ESG for AMCs?
Yes, [ Swati ], you'll take it?
So the exact breakup in terms of -- I would just say that at this point of time, the ESG offerings if you really look at it, we are about a year old in this. And we have a revenue booking from all the 3 segments, if there's ESG ratings -- I mean, ESG gradings or whether it is ESG assessments or whether it is ESG comprehensive services. So it's all across the spectrum. And a lot of work is undergoing, so it may not be very fair for me to comment further on this. But it's spread all across the various product offerings that we have under the ESG space.
And based on the experience over the last 1 year, can you help us understand the unit economics based on which all 3 -- the revenues that we generate in all these 3 subsegments even a directional you can give even that would be really helpful.
Yes. Okay. So from a direction perspective, see, if you also look at it, there are new regulations that are coming out, and we really have to go through the SEBI defer to understand because the SEBI paper envisages, some kind of accreditation with SEBI in terms of the ESG rating provider. So in terms of -- it will not be fair to give us guidance as such. But as far as our product portfolio is concerned, we'll be concentrating on the consulting business as well as on the ESG grading side.
Okay. And as of now, how many entities are eligible to do all 3, [indiscernible] credit rating with SEBI?
So credit rate with SEBI is just a phenomenon, which has just come in. AMFI Registered are there. There's something called AMFI Registered who are the ESG rating providers and to best of my knowledge, I think there are 4 guys who are AMFI or 4 or 5 years who are AMFI [indiscernible]. Consulting Services, if you really look at the bucket, Europe, it's essentially the big 4 and some of the other larger players like us, and some of the larger or other competitors of ours. So they are providing all the consulting services.
So consultancy would include ESG disclosures and ESG ratings. Is that the right understanding?
No, consulting essentially also means helping a company develop its ESG strategy. So that there's a whole comprehensive set of services. It helps the company make its ESG plan, ESG disclosures, ESG strategy, et cetera, et cetera.
Because in last 1 year, we have on ESG being in that our revenues in other segments have actually declined. So I'm just trying to understand, is it insignificant in last 1 year? Or can you just help us understand how within other the revenue mix has moved within different subsegments?
So I don't think that's the right conclusion. I think if you look at CART revenue, we've only grown over last year. So I don't think that's a fair conclusion to say that our other products or products have gone down. We've grown all across all segments.
We'll take the next question from the line of Himanshu Upadhyay from o3 PMS.
Yes. Congratulations on good set of numbers. See, I was -- we had seen our one presentation on analytical-driven risk solution, okay, where we are targeting various types of services like pattern recognition and targeted advertisement and sentimental analysis. Are these products more automated? And because of automation, will there be a nonlinearity in the business profile of these type of products. And hence, once the product gets wider acceptance, the margins can be much better or how -- what is the nature of these services, what we are trying to develop? Or it would be something like credit rating where manhours -- or you'll be pricing it or something else on that?
Kiran, you will take it?
Yes, sure. So mostly on analytical products or the analytics offerings have moved towards our credit risk and market risk offerings, which we are producing under our solution lines. So there are certain elements like network analysis, which is new or graft databases, which are new, which we added to our portfolio. Sentiment analysis or a particular type of analysis is a subset of the overall analytics portfolio that we give. But coming back to the story, what we are doing is more on the lines of fraud analytics, early warning system, network analysis, industry-based analytics and stress related to portfolios. So these are the offerings that we have. They definitely are a lot of value to the organizations who are into lending or probably would take market situation based on our analysis. But they are offering as a product and not as a service because they -- these are a very personalized analytics that we are into. Does that answer?
So it is something like a core -- just an example, I am taking, something like a core banking software type of product where it's just an example where our customer fees based on license fee and then renewal fee type of business model, it will be...?
So there are 2 offerings. One is risk as a service where we are into a smaller model, which is for NBFCs who cannot afford the complete software and hardware. So there we are offering along with a couple of clouds like Oracle and Azure or the cloud, we are tied up with. We are already offering this. We are already in a prototype to offer to 180 cooperative banks, but that's still in POC state. So one model is definitely risk-as-a-service, which is subscription-based. But banks still in India prefer that they be on-prem model. So we have both the models.
Okay. Okay. And can we take this business to beyond lending institutions because some of these things may be useful for other institutions also or organizations? Or we will focus only on that side of the business?
No. So we have built a CFO offering, which has IFRS 9 as a mandate and accounting standards in the Indian accounting standards. These are the 2 new small packages, but they're not very big that can be offered to nonfinancial organizations also. We, however, are keeping this very small right now, and we would like to grow in a very structured manner in the non-BFSI sector. But yes, it can be offered.
And lastly, the cost increase in the subsidiaries means that is majorly to the employee cost, which was increased from INR 20 crores to INR 30 crores, okay. So the majority of cost of employee which has grown is to develop these products? And how good is the sales team? Have you also invested into the sales part of the team and are both the activities, the production and the sales are completely ready? Or you think we will be leading to further invest to drive these businesses, especially on the sales side now?
I'll give you a perspective on this. See the investment as far as the people in the subsidiary is concerned, has been on all these accounts. It is on the product side, it is on the practice and the delivery side as well as on the sales side. As Kiran mentioned, a lot of effort has been going on in terms of developing new products as well as augmentation of the existing products to make them more value accretive for us going forward, right? So for that developing their requisite skill set, having the right people on board to do these things and coming out with the developed products in a time-bound manner that had been the focus. So that has resulted into a higher cost, which has resulted into the losses also at this stage. Going forward, also, our focus sustains in terms of ensuring that these products where we have invested in terms of [ bringing ] right people, they get to the GTM page at the earliest combined with this focus in terms of the augmentation of the sales team so that the requisite business traction comes our way in a much faster manner. So certainly, like the focus on in terms of building up the sales team continues to remain, and it cannot always be in terms of only the product development. So sales team and the product development team working in tandem to ensure that we generate the traction at the earliest shall remain our focus.
And outside India, also we are trying to sell these products. So has the -- what would be the sales channel? Means, would we be doing on our own? Or do you like to piggyback on some consultants? Or what is the move to develop the business outside India? What you had said about in your opening comments?
Yes. So our focus would remain in terms of tapping these opportunities as they arise and are generating new opportunities in this regard. So what matters to us is that when we are tapping the geographies outside India, we should be looking at the opportunities in totality. So wherever we are in a position in terms of getting the business on our own, certainly we'll be going for that, considering the fact that it's always giving us a better margin on this. But we are also equally open in terms of going for the partnership model in this regard that wherever we can partner with anybody else that also remains as a part of the overall strategic framework. So the combination of both these things, which should be ensuring that we have the overall right product and the market fit to give us the requisite traction at the earliest in terms of the tapping these geographies. It can be only one strategy in this. It has to be a combination of both.
Okay. Very informative and very helpful. One small suggestion, okay, the company is going through a very interesting phase where we are entering newer businesses also. If we can do a call at least once in 6 months or midyear and year-end, it would be helpful rather than just at year-end.
Point taken. Thank you for your suggestion. Yes.
So ladies and gentlemen, due to time constraint, that was the last question. I'd now like to hand the conference back over to Mr. Mehul Pandya for closing comments. Over to you, sir.
Yes, sure. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, we are fully geared up in terms of unlocking the potential at the group level. We are quite positive when it comes to the opportunities that are before us. And as also in terms of the determination that as the entire senior leadership team across the group that we are having on the growth trajectory, which is the runway that was set in FY '23 and shall continue determinedly on that part in the future quarters in the year as well. So I would like to once again thank everyone for their continued support, and we'll count on it for the days ahead. We wish you all a very fruitful FY '24. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of CARE Ratings Limited, that concludes this conference. Thanks for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.