© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Welcome to the Community Bank System Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that this presentation contains forward-looking statements within the provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on current expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry, markets, and economic environment in which the company operates.
Such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in these statements. These risks are detailed in the company’s annual report and Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Today’s call presenters are Mark Tryniski, President and Chief Executive Officer; Scott Kingsley, Executive and Chief Operating Officer; and Joseph Sutaris, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Gentlemen, you may begin.
Thank you, Autra. Good morning, everyone, and thank you all for joining our Q2 conference call. Second quarter results were generally quite solid with GAAP EPS of $0.86 and operating earnings of $0.81, excluding the tax benefit related to option exercise activity.
The improvement in operating results over 2017 21% is due primarily to last year's acquisitions of NRS and Merchants Bancshares. We also benefited this quarter from low funding costs, modest balance sheet growth and modest improvement in loan yields, credit costs and operating expenses. It was a very well balanced quarter.
Total loan book was up slightly due to auto lending, which we expect to be strong in Q2. Business lending was flat excluding the impact of $40 million of municipal credits, which was paid down on June 30 and reloaded in July. Although, we had a record pipeline coming into the quarter and had record new loan originations during the quarter almost double Q1, we absorbed $55 million of early pay downs this quarter, higher than last quarter's $37 million. The mortgage portfolio was flat for the quarter, attributable not to demand, but the low levels of inventory in our markets.
Core funding remained solid with end of period balances down $258 million due to timing of municipal activity, but average balances were up over $80 million for the quarter, all related to non-municipal accounts. Total deposit costs moved up from 10 basis points to 11 basis points, a strong performance in this higher rate environment.
Our non-banking businesses were off slightly in revenue due to the seasonal strength to Q1, but continued to improve forward revenue and margin outlook. Asset quality metrics are very strong low and stable charge-off in non-performing metrics and delinquencies are at their lowest level in over 12 quarters. We also reported lowest efficiency ratio in over eight quarters.
Similar to what I said last quarter, we have significant earnings momentum that we need to support with balance sheet growth asfocus for us for the remainder of the year. We expect our operating and credit costs to be stable, our fee businesses to grow, and our funding costs to increase only modestly. It was a very strong quarter and we're well positioned for the remainder of 2018. Joe?
Thank you, Mark and good morning, everyone. As Mark noted, the second quarter of 2018 was another very solid operating quarter for us. We set a new record for quarterly operating earnings, maintained strong asset quality, and continued to capitalize on our strong core deposit franchise. I'll start off with a few comments about our balance sheet.
We closed the second quarter of 2018 with total assets of $10.63 billion. This is down $113.1 million or 1% from the end of the fourth quarter of 2017, and $333.5 million or 3% from the end of the first quarter of 2018. The end of period results are largely reflective of the seasonal characteristics of our balance sheet’s organic funding sources. Deposit and repurchase agreement balances for New England municipal customers increased seasonally in the fourth quarter of 2017. Similarly, our New York based municipal customer deposits increased seasonally in the first quarter of 2018, due primarily to our market areas property tax collection cycle.
These seasonal factors resulted in a $257.1 million decrease in deposit balances, a $98 million decrease in borrowings between March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018. Comparatively, second quarter average deposit liabilities were up $82 million or 1% on a linked quarter, first quarter basis and $56 million or 0.7% when compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. The company's cost of deposits was 11 basis points in the second quarter of 2018, as compared to 10 basis points in both the first quarter of 2018 and fourth quarter of 2017.
Average earning assets for the second quarter of 2018 were $9.45 billion, which was up $74.3 million or 1% when compared to the linked quarter of 2018. Although, total earning assets did not change significantly between the linked quarters, we experienced a slight change in the composition of earning assets during the quarter, including an $80.3 million increase in average cash and cash equivalents, a $19 million decrease in average investment securities outstanding, and a $12.9 million increase in average loans outstanding.
Ending loans at June 30, 2018 were down $18.7 billion from year-end 2017. During the first half of 2018, unscheduled pay offs on the business loan portfolio totaled approximately $92 million. In addition, ending loans in the municipal sector of our business loan portfolio decreased from $87.9 million at December 31, 2017 to $50.5 million at June 30, 2018, a $37.4 million or 42.5% decrease.
Our New England region municipal customers repay certain short-term loans and lines of credits annually at the end of the second quarter to meet their fiscal cycle requirements and advance on new loans and lines of credit in the third quarter for the next annual fiscal cycle. We expect the balances in this portfolio to increase during the third quarter of 2018 to levels similar to the second quarter. If one were to exclude the temporary reduction of the municipal loan sector of the portfolio, commercial loans were up in the first half of the year in spite of the high levels of unscheduled pay offs.
Switching to an annual quarter comparison, total assets were down $251 million or 2.3% from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018. Between the periods, we reported a $30.5 million or 14.5% decrease in cash and cash equivalents, a $123.3 million or 1.9% decrease in total loans outstanding due primarily to balance decreases in our business lending and home equity portfolios, and a $162 million or 5% decrease in the carrying value of our investment securities portfolio.
On the liability side of the balance sheet, we recorded decreases in the less core elements of our funding base namely time deposits and borrowings, while reporting increases in the more core elements of the funding base namely non-interest bearing checking accounts, interest bearing checking accounts, and savings accounts. In addition, stockholders equity increased $84.1 million or 5.3% between the periods, due largely to an increase in retained earnings.
Average total assets, average earning assets, average loans, and average deposits were all up between 8% and 10%, between the second quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2018, due primarily to our acquisition of Merchants Bancshares in the second quarter of 2017.
As of June 30, 2018 our investment portfolio stood at $2.98 billion, it was comprised of $560 million of U.S. agency and agency backed mortgage obligations or 19% of the total, $491 million of municipal bonds or 16% of the total, and $1.88 billion of U.S. treasury securities or 63% of the total. The remaining 2% was in corporate and other debt securities. The net unrealized loss in this portfolio was $32.7 million at June 30, 2018 and $17.9 million at March 31, 2018. These compared to a net unrealized gain of $23.9 million at December 31, 2017.
The portfolio transitioned from a net unrealized gain position in December 2017 to a net unrealized loss position during early 2018, due primarily to an increase in market interest rates. The effective duration of the portfolio was 3.6 years at the end of the second quarter.
The second quarter tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio was 2.60%. Our asset quality remains strong. At the end of the second quarter of 2018, non-performing loans comprised of both legacy and acquired loans totaled $29.3 million or 0.47% of total loans. This is 1 basis point lower than the ratio reported at the end of the linked first quarter of 2018 and 11 basis points higher than the ratio reported at the end of the second quarter of 2017.
Our reserves for loan losses represented 0.80% of total loans outstanding and 0.98% of legacy loans outstanding. Our reserves remain adequate and we’ve seen the most recent trailing four quarters of charge offs by a multiple of four. We recorded $2.4 million in the provision for loan losses during the second quarter of 2018. This was $1 million higher than the second quarter of 2017 and $1.2 million lower than the linked first quarter of 2018.
The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 169% at June 30, 2018, this compares to 162% at the end of the linked first quarter and 206% at the end of the second quarter of 2017.
We recorded net charge-offs of $933,000 or 6 basis points annualized on loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2018. By comparison, we recorded net charge-offs of $1.1 million or 8 basis points annualized during the second quarter of 2017. Year-to-date charge-offs totaled $4.1 million or 13 basis points. This represents a $1 million or 1 basis point increase over net charge-offs in the first half of 2017.
The increase between comparable years is largely attributable to $1.1 million charge down on a single commercial credit recorded in the first quarter of 2018. Our capital levels in the second quarter of 2018 continue to be very strong. The Tier 1 leverage ratio was 10.53% at the end of the quarter over 2 times the well capitalized regulatory standards. Tangible equity to net tangible assets ended the quarter at a solid 9%, this is up from 8.42% at the end of the first quarter of 2018 and 8.61% at the end of the fourth quarter of 2017.
Shifting to the income statement, we recorded second quarter 2018 net income of $44.6 million or $0.86 per share on a fully diluted basis. This compares to $17.2 million of net income or $0.35 per share reported in the second quarter of 2017. Excluding $22.9 million of acquisition expenses, second quarter 2017 fully diluted earnings per share were $0.67, resulting in a $0.19 per share or 28.4% increase between comparable second quarters. On a linked quarter basis, fully diluted earnings per share increased $0.08 or 10.3%.
Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2018 was 3.73%, this compares to 3.72% in the second quarter of 2017, a 1 basis points increase between the comparable quarters. The average yield on earning assets and the average cost on interest bearing liabilities were both up 4 basis points between the periods. The comparable results were favorably impacted by an increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits and other core funding services between comparable periods.
During the second quarter of 2018, average non-interest bearing demand deposits represented 25.5% of the company's total deposit and borrowing funding base, as compared to 23.4% of the company's total funding base during the second quarter of 2017. The addition of these results were impacted by the inclusion of the Merchants assets liabilities portfolios in the second quarter of 2017, as well as the reduction in the tax equivalent yield gross up in the company's non-taxable municipal securities and loan portfolios due to decrease in the federal corporate tax rate between the periods.
On the linked quarter basis, net interest margin increased 2 basis points from 3.71% in the first quarter of 2018 to 3.73% in the second quarter of 2018. Net interest income was up $2.2 million or 2.6% between the linked two quarters. During the second quarter, we received a Federal Reserve Bank semi-annual dividend totaling $455,000 and reported an increase in interest income on cash equivalents of $391,000 due to both an increase in the overnight federal funds rate and an increase in average cash equivalents of $80 million between the periods.
Interest income on loans was up $1.7 million for the quarter, while deposit and borrowing costs were up $379,000. The second quarter was a 91 day quarter versus a 90 day first quarter, resulting in the estimated $400,000 of incremental interest income.
Although we believe the company's funding costs will rise in the second half of 2018, we also believe that our proactive and disciplined approach to managing funding costs continue to have a positive effect on margin results. In spite of 725 basis point increases to target fed funds rate since the fourth quarter of 2015, as well as a general increase in market interest rates, our cost of deposits has remained between 10 and 11 basis points for 10 consecutive quarters.
We recorded $56.6 million in non-interest revenues during the second quarter of 2018. This represents a $5.3 million or 10.4% increase over the second quarter of 2017. On a comparative year-to-date basis, non-interest revenues were up $18.5 million or 19.4%. All three of the company's operating segments banking, employee benefit services and all other which include revenues from our wealth management and insurance divisions are up on both on annual quarter and year-to-date basis.
These results are attributable to both organic and acquired growth. The Merchants' acquisition in the second quarter of 2017 added significant revenues to both our banking and wealth management business, while the Northeast Retirement Services' acquisition in the first quarter of 2017 significantly contributed to revenue improvements in our benefits plans administration segment.
On a linked quarter basis, non-interest revenues are down $932,000 or 1.6%. This is due to minor seasonal attributes in the banking segment revenues, trust administration and actuarial service fees within benefit plans administration segment. Consistent with full year 2017 results, non-interest revenues contributed approximately 40% of the company’s total operating revenues on both the second quarter and year-to-date basis.
We recorded $86.1 million of total operating expenses during the second quarter of 2018. This compares to total operating expenses excluding acquisition expenses of $86.3 million during the first quarter of 2018. Occupancy and equipment costs were down $1.1 million or 10.4%, while our business development and marketing expenses were up $595,000 or 28.9% as seasonally expected.
Additionally salaries and employee benefits increased $543,000 or 1%, while other expenses were down $243,000 or 1.1% on a linked quarter basis. We expect to report similar amounts of core operating expenses in the remaining two quarters of 2018.
On a comparative year-to-date basis, operating expenses excluding acquisition expenses were up $20.6 million or 13.6%. The increase on a comparative year-to-date expenses is largely attributable to the Merchants and NRS Transactions.
Our effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2018 was 18.7% versus 31% in the second quarter of 2017. The net reduction in the effective tax rate between the periods is primarily due to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2017, which lowered corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%.
In addition, the company had higher levels of stock option exercise activity in the second quarter of 2018, as compared to the second quarter of 2017, resulting in a $0.02 per share reduction in income tax expense between the comparable periods. The effective rate for the first quarter of 2018 was 23%, which included a much lower level of stock option exercise activity in the second quarter. Excluding equity plan activities, we expect our effective tax rate to be in the range of 21.5% to 22%, during the second half of the year.
For the next few quarters we anticipate net interest margin to be similar to the second quarter of 2018 results, in the mid-370s. Although we anticipate some loan yield lift on approximately $900 million of variable rate loans, we also expect to face reprising pressure on our non-maturity deposit portfolios and overnight repurchase instruments totaling approximately $8.1 million.
Although we will continue to take a measured approach with respect to deposit pricing retention and growth it is unlikely that we will be able to maintain a near zero deposit beta during the second half of 2018. There is an extra calendar year in the third quarter, which will contribute to incremental net interest income. But we believe this will be largely offset by reduction in interest income on cash equivalents, as we expect third quarter deposit balance to be seasonally low.
From an asset quality perspective, we do not see any major headwinds on the horizon. We continue to expect a net reduction from Durbin mandated impacts on debit interchange revenues beginning this month of approximately $13 million to $14 million annually, negatively impacting quarterly earnings by $0.05 or $0.06 per share.
Also given the unpredictability of stock option exercise activity, we are uncertain as to whether the income tax benefits related to stock option exercise will favorably impact earnings per share in the third or fourth quarters of 2018, similar to the second quarter. The company recorded $1.24 million of stock option related income tax benefit in the second quarter of 2018.
In summary, we believe the company remains very well positioned from both the capital and operational perspective for the remainder of 2018 and beyond. And as Mark mentioned, we look forward to continuing to executing on earnings improvement opportunities for the remainder of 2018.
I’ll now turn it back to Autra to open the line for questions.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We’ll go first to Jeffrey Kitsis at Sandler O'Neill.
Good morning
Good morning
If I recall correctly, you guys have been taking down indirect auto production over the last few quarters due to some tweaks that you made to underwriting, but then we saw some good production in 2Q. Does that indicate that the market has rationalized a little bit or is growth in 2Q more attributable to seasonal factors?
Yes, I think a fair question. The tweaks we made to our underwriting was really just in rates, it wasn't related to structure at all, although we have come up a little bit in terms of some of the terms -- the extended terms that were in the market. But obviously, in the second quarter, things are a little stronger than what we expected in the auto portfolio based on a couple things. One, we had increased our rates a bit. And number two, we expect the market wouldn't be as strong as it was. So it was a better outcome for us there than what we would have expected.
And right now, the new originations this quarter when added about 405 in the aggregate, and the portfolio yields about 390 something. So we're getting a little bit of lift in terms of the new production versus the cash flows that are coming off at slightly lower yields.
Got it, thank you. And one more question, can you give us an update to the M&A landscape as you see it today? Do you think we could realistically see another deal in 2018?
Second question first, it's always really difficult to predict deals, we tend not to do that. It can be an extended period of time between transactions or they can the sooner than we expect based on market opportunity. Right now, the earnings and the operating performance of the whole industry is pretty strong, and the valuations in the marketplace are pretty strong. So, we're not seeing a lot of compelling reasons currently other than something like liquidity or transition of leadership or something like that.
So, it's not -- there is not a lot of robust inbound inquiries, I would say. I mean, we continue to make outbound inquiries and have conversations as we do on an ongoing basis continually. But I will say in terms of the overall environment because of the strength of operating results across the industry and valuation is an excessive degree of market opportunity currently.
Got it. Okay, thank you for taking my questions.
Thank you
We’ll move next to Joe Fenech at Hovde Group.
Morning, guys.
Good morning, Joe.
Good morning, Joe.
Hey, guys. You increased the dividend by 6% year-over-year, but operating earnings were up over 30%. Anything to read into that mismatch, I guess, particularly given the fact that you're already running with a higher level of tangible capital than you really ever had since I've been following the stock. Any reason why you opted not to step up the dividend more materially?
Well, I think we’ve typically evaluated, our Board of Directors has evaluated the dividend in the third quarter, and I suspect that will be on the agenda for our third quarter board consideration, Joe.
Okay. So I'm looking at -- I guess I looked at the commentary and assumed, okay, so it's up, but that reflected kind of the increase from last year, is that fair?
Right.
Okay. My mistake, I apologize. Okay. And then on the M&A front, it's been a while now building on the last question since the last two deals, just want to refresh on the M&A strategy. I know you guys over the years have been contrarian acquires if you will. I remember you doing low-single-digit deposit premium branch deals in the years after the crisis when no one seemed interested in deposit. So kind of in light of this seeming market shift with the embrace of low cost funding where people want to pay up for it. You kind of shifted things as they more at of favor because they're cheaper maybe in markets you wanted to be in but haven't had the opportunity or it is stuff like that really just not factor all that much into your thinking?
Well, we look at certainly in the markets we're in right now and any strategically valuable opportunities within our market we look to adjacent markets, which for us would be New England and the rest of Pennsylvania. We've had conversations in the past and have interest in Ohio as well. So, I mean, I think you’re right at this juncture, things are expensive generally.
So what we tend to look for is strategic opportunities that can add particular long-term value to our business model and our shareholders overtime, whether that's in the banking space or the benefit space or the wealth management space or the insurance space. So we continue to think about things more strategically and opportunistically, it’s just a bit more difficult in an environment where asset valuations across the spectrum of assets almost every asset class is very high right now. So I'd say there is fewer opportunistic opportunities but we continue to pursue and evaluate strategic opportunities.
Okay. And then on the loan growth Mark, I understand and appreciate the dynamics around the loan pay down activity. But setting it aside for a minute are you guys seeing any noticeable pick up in demand? And then specifically can you talk about production levels and say the business loan portfolio for the first half of this year compared to maybe the first half of last year?
Sure. For the second quarter of this year, our new business originations were about $190 million. Last year, in the second quarter, they were $90 million. Year-to-date, there is $330 million and year-to-date in 2017 they were $170 million. So, the origination levels have clearly ticked up. There is clearly more opportunity. We’re clearly having -- getting more deals doing -- seeing and having the opportunity at the table for more opportunities. It’s pretty clear in the origination numbers.
But the pay downs have continued to be higher than what we'd hoped for. In the first quarter I think they were $38 million and we thought that was pretty high. And now in the second quarter they come in at $55 million.
So that's a little disappointing. I think it's favorable there is a lot of -- the pipeline continues to be strong. The second quarter, end of quarter pipeline is a little bit lower than it was at the end of the first quarter, but because we booked a lot of those and there was a lot of new origination activities. So there was very little that we can do about early pay downs and pay offs and some of those have been large credit that have been taken out by Berkshire halfway and farm credit and those kinds of things where there is no retention opportunity there.
So we continue to fight, our teams are really performing at a high level in terms of sourcing opportunities and getting opportunities across the finish line if we can get some moderation in some of the early pay downs and pay offs that will be helpful, but that doesn't matter. I mean our responsibility is to grow all of our portfolios regardless of the challenges and the headwinds. And our leadership team understands that.
So, we'll continue to work hard. I think we’ll continue to have a lot of origination opportunity into the third quarter. And actually the last few years the fourth quarter has been reasonably strong too. So we'll see what the second half of the year brings in terms of early pay downs, but that's not going to -- that's not excuse, that's just the reality of the current environment we're going to continue to execute to the best we can. Our teams are doing a great job as I said, and we'll see what the second half brings.
Great, thank you.
Thanks, Joe.
We'll take our next question from Collyn Gilbert at KBW.
Thanks, good morning guys.
Good morning, Collyn.
Mark, just broadly, in your opening comments you'd indicated significant earnings momentum lays ahead for you guys. And just kind of want to break that down a little bit and also get a little bit more detail on some of the comments that you had made. Maybe starting with I think, if I heard you correctly flat operating expenses for the back half of the year. If you just talk about sort of what’s driving that? Yes that’s part one of the question, I guess.
Sure, I think in terms of significant earnings momentum, the reference there is really to the comparisons to recent quarters, the comparisons to last year certainly much of that is attributable to Merchants and to NRS. As Joe said, we’re going to hit some headwinds in the second half of the year with the impact of Durbin.
But I think that if you look at -- and I used the word modest a couple of times in this -- in my comments. Because the things we do generally are modest we’re not going to report 12% loan growth, we’re not going to report significant changes in other operating elements of our balance sheet of our P&L and everything is incremental and it does tend to be modest.
So I think the cumulative effect of the levers that we have available to us to pull and I think there are many in loan growth. I know kind of the industry looks at loan growth as that’s the momentum driver. We don’t really look at that way, loan growth is not unimportant, we expect to get it overtime. I think we have historically there are times that are better than others in terms of the operating environment, in terms of loan growth, but it’s not just loan growth it’s focused on core deposit gathering and margin growth and operating expense management. Our business -- our non-banking businesses and the revenues and the margins of those.
And so, there are lot of levers that we look at and that we pull and that we manage improve our earnings momentum overtime and we’ll continue to pull those levers. I think we have done that for the last couple of years, I mean, you look back three years our EPS was $2.60 [ph] or something like that $2.30 [ph]. Now it’s running 3 plus, so it’s really about managing in a disciplined way, managing all those levers, paying attention to all those levers, executing on additive M&A opportunities overtime, which is an important or has been historically important part of our business model, in terms of both the banking and non-banking spaces and that will continue as well.
So, and that's why I talk about operating momentum it’s continuing to effectively manage all those levers of opportunity that we have across the company. I think Collyn to your second point related to run rate and operating expenses, I’ll let Joe, comment on that.
Good morning, Collyn. Just to add a couple of comments regarding operating expenses. So, it’s typical that in the first quarter and even trailing slightly into the second quarter we had some occupancy related expenses that are a little higher than we would see in the third quarter. So, in terms of the occupancy and equipment expenses we would expect those effectively to be down a little bit in third quarter, we don’t have any major initiatives on the horizon that are going to drive up those costs.
And from our salaries and employee benefits line item perspective, we had some incentive related costs in the second quarter that we do not expect to incur in the third quarter. So they are really the factors driving that expectation around operating expenses, we were $86.3 million versus an $86.1 million the last two quarters and our expectation is that those levels are reasonable for the next two quarters.
Okay, that’s helpful. And then just on the margin, your betas have held up just amazingly well, and I know you had indicated that you don’t expect that necessarily to stay. I know that that’s also been the commentary you guys have offered for the last couple of quarters and they seem to stay low. Is there something that you are seeing definitively in your market or in your deposit base that would suggest that you think the betas are going to go higher, or is that just more of a logical defensive conservative comment that you’re making?
I think it’s a little of both Collyn, I mean, if you look at the -- you look at other banks in our market, if you look at what their funding costs are, and look at the expectation of customers generally, you start and see and have for the last couple of quarters larger customers after more we expect that trend will continue, we expect there’s going to be more Fed hikes. So, I mean, it’s a little bit of what we've seen, as well as -- what we've seen ourselves, what we've seen in the marketplace and what we expect going forward.
I think we tend to be conservative by nature, and we'll do our best to hold deposit costs in there. Again, I think, the word modest is probably the right word to use, in terms of what you are going to see for the remainder of the year, in terms of funding costs 10 to 11, I guess as it goes in the third quarter 11 to something else it's a bigger number, it's not going to be 11 to 13, might be 11 to 12, or 11 to 15, or whatever the number is, but it's -- so we do expect to see increased deposit costs over time.
And I think, we probably didn't expect that we're going to come in at 11 this quarter and we did, and I think sitting here, we don't actually next quarter is going to be 11, but it might be 12 or 13 or something like that. So I think any increase in deposits funding costs is also going to be incremental and modest. We expect that -- you just think directly that's the environment right now in terms of both our customer base, the markets we're in and the expectation for higher market rates.
Okay. Okay, that's helpful. And then just finally, on the mortgage side, both from a mortgage banking sale -- gain on sale perspective as well as portfolio perspective. I know that -- I think that you had indicated maybe last quarter or so that application volume was up and then I know, you had said that inventory is low, but can you just kind of tie some of those comments together and give us a sense of what your outlook is for mortgage both from a sales perspective as well as a portfolio perspective?
Sure, I think it was -- the mortgage business was flat, which is a little disappointing in this quarter for us in our markets. Because the growth in that portfolio has never been very robust other than when we were in the refi markets and you get more opportunity there. But, it's been -- in the second quarter was pretty good. We booked $89 million worth of mortgage loans in the second quarter compared to $74 million in the first quarter.
So, the fact that there wasn't much growth to kind of show for that it was a little bit disappointing for this quarter, I will say, we are turning around our mortgages in record time. So, we made some improvements in our processing in terms of the mortgage origination process and that’s how -- but also I think we expected a little bit more on volume for this time of year and our understanding from talking to our originators is that it's not a demand issue, it's a supply issue, there is enough inventory in the markets.
So hopefully the third quarter will open up a little bit further off the top of my head I am not really exactly sure where the pipeline is, I think it's up a little bit from the last quarter, but I'm not exactly sure. It doesn't really change that much over time. It's always been that kind of little over $100 million range to kind of ebbs and flows seasonally. But, we would hope to see a little bit of growth in that market -- in that portfolio in the third quarter, which is pretty seasonally typical for us. But that may, again, be a function of supply of inventory in the market.
Okay, that's very helpful. I will leave it there. Thank you, guys.
Thanks, Collyn.
We'll go next to Russell Gunther at D.A. Davidson.
Hey, good morning, guys.
Good morning.
Good morning, Russell.
Just appreciate all the comments on the loan growth and pipeline and including in the release on some of the geographic puts and takes. Can we just kind of hone in though on the New England footprint for a bit. Could you just share with us what you're seeing on the commercial outlook and what you think that's going to contribute results going forward in the back half of the year?
Sure. The pipeline is actually improving in New England, which is good. If you look at the pay offs and pay down, including the two larger ones that I had mentioned, those were both in the New England region. So if you look at across the footprint, I mean, we're getting early pay offs in all of our markets. It's probably a little bit more concentrated in New England. Certainly, those two larger ones I mentioned attributed a lot to that.
We're again, we're seeing it across the footprints, it's proportionally more has been in the first half of the year proportionally more in New England, but the pipeline is getting bigger there as well, which is also very good. We got a great team there, we’ve got a great customer base there, is a great market. We love the markets, we love the teams we have there. We need to keep growing the pipeline there, and hopefully we'll get better luck on some of those early pay offs there.
Okay, great. And then last question for me is on the employee benefits line and fee income. Just kind a share with us what you're seeing with the revenue growth outlook might look like there?
It continues to grow organically. It has for a number of years probably 10 years or more. Certain elements of that business that are growing at a faster pace than others, the business we bought last year NRS in Boston is growing faster than the other elements of that business. The 401k administration record keeping business is also growing organically at a slightly slower pace.
So, I mean, it's actually a little bit difficult to predict, Russell. There were times when that business -- there were years where that business grew at double-digits. I don’t know if that's going to be the pace for this year. And I don't even know where we're at year-to-date, I know it's up. But we almost overtime always grown that portfolio organically anywhere from 5% to 10%. I mean Scott sitting in, so I don't know, Scott, if you want to comment.
I think it's -- in terms of some color around that, the standard record keeping 401k business it has lower growth trajectory today. Those combined businesses now are between $90 million $92 million. So the years of 8% to 10% organic revenue growth are pretty tough hurdle for us or kind of log that back in down to the mid-single-digits. And lot of times what you'll see is that this new customer transitioned is a first quarter transition of that's in a lot of these in other words the timing of coming on to our platform versus somebody else's or the formation of new plans tend to be calendar specific in the first quarter of the year.
So last time what you'll see is a nice spike on a year-over-year comparison in every quarter, but not a lot of movement quarter-to-quarter in that business with the exceptions to some small seasonal factors. So I think it's better to frame it on a year-over-year basis, Russell. Because quite frankly not a lot of people convert and transition their plan to mid-year.
That's very helpful, guys. I appreciate the color there. That's it for me.
Thanks, Russell.
We'll take our next question from Matthew Breese of Piper Jaffray.
Good morning, everybody.
Good morning, Matt.
Wanted to touch on the margin guidance for the remainder of the year, I think you said in the 370s was the forecast. I just wanted to get a sense for your assumption no accredible yield, assumptions for the Fed dividends. I think there is one more in the fourth quarter. And then the last part of that is what is the core margin guide from here?
Right, Matthew this is Joe, I'll take that question. So with respect to the accredible yield, we've been running about $2 million a quarter. We don't expect that to change very much in the quarters looking forward. So I think that's a reasonable expectation we have. As far as the Federal Reserve Bank dividend, we booked $450,000 this quarter. We expected to book about the same in the fourth quarter.
With regard to the forward-looking margin, we're estimating in the ballpark of 370 at current levels. We have a variable rate loan portfolio above $900 million. So we will likely see some lift in the third and the fourth quarter of around that portfolio. Also on some of our shorter amortization portfolios as Mark mentioned, the indirect loan portfolio, we're starting to see new volume go on at a rate higher than the volume that's running off. So we do expect some modest lift on the pure rate around our loan portfolio.
Obviously the challenge is we’re sitting on above $8.1 billion of immediately repriseable deposits and borrowings. And we are beginning to see some request around increasing rates from customers, we’re starting to accommodate that, we moved up a couple of our core deposit rates a few basis points. So we expect that that $8.1 billion will limit some of the positive impact that we’ve had on the earning asset side.
Got it, okay. And when you make that move, will you make that accommodation, given the absolute low level of your deposit costs. If for say it’s a 20 basis point money market account, where is that incremental move to given where your competitors are?
Well it depends on -- we do have competitive conditions that are different in each of the markets. And so it depends on sort of the product type whether it’s a municipal account, whether it’s an individual account, a business account as well as the market dynamics of each region. So, we have been very measured in those increases, at least in the second quarter we expect to continue to be measured.
So some of our core accounts we have raised the core rate 2 to 5 basis points across the board. So those kinds of rate increases will hit us in the third quarter, but we’re not making significant wholesale changes to the core deposit pricing structures.
Our strategy Matt, right now is really to play defense, I mean, there are others who need to offense. When your loans are growing at double-digits, you need to play offense on deposit gathering to fund your loan growth. We’re not in that position so we can be -- we can play more defense and that’s really been our game plan right now is to play defense. We have, as Joe said made some modest moves on some of our accounts in terms of moving up the rates.
We have opportunities in terms of high balance customers, there is a multitude opportunities we have in off balance sheet money market product, we have wealth management products, we have let’s call a defensive special deposit account that have higher rates that we can use on defensive basis. So there is a multitude of opportunities there.
Understood, okay. And then just following up on the capital question, might we see you increase the size of the securities portfolio as you wait for M&A opportunities or should that stay about the same?
I think right now we’re just watching what the market is, we haven’t really been in the market in terms of the securities portfolio for a long time. We kind of like the portfolio we have, the yield is pretty good, it did flip to a net underlying loss position recently. But it’s been -- I think the timing has been good in terms of when you look at when we put those securities on mostly 10 years, we did it something like eight years ago. Right now it’s a -- we just -- we aren’t compelled to do it right now for a number of different reasons we don’t have less surplus liquidity, but we have lots of liquidity because the portfolio in terms of cash liquidity.
The yield curve right now is pretty flat in the middle. I think we’re in a kind of period of what everyone expect is going to be rising rate, so you don’t want to jump in before you see where this the rate increases are going to go in terms of where they moderate again. And how long is that take is it a year, or is it two years. So, I mean we’re not really looking right now at the particularly it’s flat out -- it’s pretty flat at the end we would be interest in looking at which is usually historically has been the 7 to 10 year, I mean, the five year right now and 10 year almost the same yield.
So, it’s too flat, rates are going up, we don’t need to do it. If there is a spikes in the 10 year for some reasons or a spike in the part of the curve that was attractive to us in terms of our asset liability management overall, we’d probably look at doing something at that point. So we’re just watching it right now and we’ll see what the yield curve does.
Okay, last one is just on seasonal, any incremental thoughts or color anything you can provide for us in terms of what the allowance to provision might look like once that’s implemented?
We’re in a process of evaluating implementation in models, we’re not at a point where we have any expectations around what seasonal reserves will be effective on January 1, 2020. But we certainly have started the process and we’ll be evaluating the model for the balance of this year and then throughout 2019. But at this point it’s a little too early to certainly put a number out.
Okay, understood. That’s all I had. Thank you.
Thanks, Matt.
And that does conclude the question-and-answer session. At this time I’ll turn the conference back over to management, for any closing remarks.
Thank you and thank you all for joining our Q2 call, we look forward to reconvening at the end of the third quarter. Thank you.
And that does conclude today’s conference. Again thank you for your participation.