© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Q4 2018 HP, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] And please note that today’s event is being recorded.
And I would now like to turn the conference over to Beth Howe, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon. I’m Beth Howe, Head of Investor Relations for HP, Inc., and I would like to welcome you to the fiscal 2018 fourth quarter earnings conference call with Dion Weisler, HP’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and Steve Fieler, HP’s Chief Financial Officer.
Before handing the call over to Dion, let me remind you that this call is being webcast. A replay of the webcast will be made available on our Web site shortly after the call for approximately one year. We posted the earnings release and the accompanying slide presentation on our Investor Relations Web site at www.hp.com.
As always, elements of this presentation are forward-looking and are based on our best view of the world and our businesses as we see them today. For more detailed information, please see disclaimers in the earnings materials related to the forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. For a discussion of some these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, please refer to HP’s SEC reports, including our most recent Form 10-K. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update any such forward-looking statements.
We also note that the financial information discussed on this call reflects estimates based on information available now and could differ materially from the amounts ultimately reported on HP’s Form 10-K for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2018 and other HP SEC filings.
During this webcast, unless otherwise specifically noted, all comparisons are year-over-year comparisons with the corresponding year-ago period. For financial information that has been expressed on a non-GAAP basis, we have included reconciliations to the comparable GAAP information. Please refer to the tables and slide presentation accompanying today’s earnings release for those reconciliations.
And now I’ll hand it over to Dion.
Good afternoon. Thanks for joining us. It's great to see so many of you in New York for our Security Analyst meeting. As we close fiscal 2018, I’m proud of the results we delivered. It was a strong quarter and an exceptional year for HP.
Our results demonstrate sustained operational performance, a disciplined investment framework, and prudent cost management. Our core growth and future strategy is working. And we’re well positioned for continued success across our categories and our regions.
For Quarter 4, we delivered revenue of $15.4 billion, up 10% with strong performance across regions and businesses. Non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.54, an increase of 23%, and strong free cash flow of approximately $800 million. For the full-year, we grew 12% adding over $6.4 billion of revenue. We grew non-GAAP earnings per share 22% to $2.02.
We returned over $3.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends, and we generated these results while continuing to invest in our strategic initiatives that are helping to strengthen our long-term competitiveness.
We are consistently executing and winning with customers and partners or simultaneously fulfilling the commitments we made to our shareholders. With our winning portfolio and strong financials, we enter 2019 well positioned to compete across Personal Systems, Printing and 3D. Let's look at each of our segments.
Personal Systems continue to deliver impressive profitable growth both in the fourth quarter and for the full-year. In Quarter 4, revenue and operating profit grew 11%. For the full-year, revenue grew 13% and operating profit grew even faster at 17%, adding more than $200 million to the bottom line. These results reinforce the strength of our market position as we focus on segmentation and delivering differentiated hardware, services and solutions.
HP continues to be a leader in product design. At our analyst meeting, we introduced you to the stunning ware, the Spectre Folio. The product is now hitting the market receiving high price for design, versatility and performance, and driving renewed excitement in the PC category.
We also recently launched two new Spectre X360s. The Spectre X360 13 delivers the world's longest battery life in a Quad Core convertible, while the Spectre X360 15 is the most powerful convertible we’ve ever created. In commercial, we unveiled the latest EliteBook, the world's smallest and largest 14-inch business convertible and the first with gigabit class 4G LTE.
In gaming, our OMEN PCs and displays powered the Overwatch World Cup where 24 countries battle for domination in front of nearly 10 million viewers. We also launched our latest OMEN desktop and our remote service called Game Stream, that turns the OMEN PC into a cloud-based gaming server to enable experiences on the go.
And at Adobe MAX, we unveiled the new Z by HP workstation portfolio and announced a subscription-based hardware and services bundled specifically designed for elite creative professionals that combines powerful PCs, pro grade displays, printers and accessories.
As we innovate across our core, we’re also continuing to accelerate our growth pillar with Device as a Service. 60% of IT organizations tell us their resources are increasingly taxed by device management and 80% of their costs are coming after the PC is purchased. HP DaaS uses data and analytics to reduce costs and optimize the experience for IT and for end users.
This quarter, the Technology Services Industry Association recognized HP DaaS we its star award for innovation in the standard managed service offering. This is one of the highest honors in the Technology Services Industry.
Like Personal systems, printing continues to drive profitable growth. Total print revenue was up 9% in Quarter 4 and 11% for the full-year with growth in all regions and across hardware and supplies. Operating profit grew in both periods, adding a $177 million to the bottom line for the full-year. This consistent growth is yet another proof point of customer adoption of HP's innovative portfolio.
Similar to the PC market, design is increasingly important for printers. Earlier in the quarter, we introduced the world's first smartphone printer, HP Tango. Tango combines voice activated and app based printing with stunning design and convenience through our Instant Ink subscription program. We believe the Tango reinvent expectations for home printing, setting a new standard for print to fit seamlessly into consumers lifestyles.
We are also strengthening our leadership in the office space to drive new contractual and A3 growth opportunities. As we mark the anniversary of the S-Print acquisition, I'm pleased with the progress we have made. We’re one team focused on accelerating our penetration of this large addressable market.
Earlier this month, we further accelerated our penetration of the copier market by completing the acquisition of Apogee, providing us with deep solutions and services expertise and a faster mean to scale this business and tap into the profit pools that they offer.
Lastly, we're focused on growing our Graphics Solutions business. Our strategy is to provide market-leading products and solutions that enable customization and personalization, while reducing both inventory and turnaround time for print service providers.
A key win that showcases the power of digital is ePac Flexible Packaging, an all digital flexible packaging converter who purchased 20 additional HP Indigo Digital Presses to expand operations across the U.S.
In 3D printing, this quarter we announced a new Metal Jet platform bringing 3D mass production to the metals manufacturing industry for the first time. We are excited by the potential of this business and are working closely with automotive and industrial leaders like GKN, Volkswagen, Parmatech and many more. We are especially encouraged by the volume of final part applications we're delivering across verticals including the transportation, industrial and medical markets.
At Formnext earlier this month, together with customers and partners we showcased many of the new applications that have developed over the last year. One of these BMW is now manufacturing production parts for their cars on HP's Multi Jet Fusion, and Forecast 3D now has two dozen Multi Jet Fusion deployed, operating around-the-clock to produce millions of final parts as their business grows.
Looking at the year-end total, we made great strides in 3D printing. We expanded our portfolio, increased the number of customer applications tenfold, signed numerous strategic partnerships, and generated multiunit customer orders. Multi Jet Fusion is now the most used industrial 3D printer in the world.
Overall, I'm pleased with our company's 2018 results. We've done what we said we would do. We are growing the business top line and bottom line and generating strong cash flow. We are delivering returns for our shareholders and investing in the future to create long-term value.
Looking ahead to 2019, as we said at the recent Security Analyst meeting, we are monitoring several evolving market dynamics, including the global trade environment and currency volatility. In addition, our caution related to industry-wide CPU availability is now playing out and is constraining our growth.
We are working diligently with our vendors and partners to reduce the short-term impacts on our customers in light of our ongoing strong demand. Against this backdrop, we're focused on the things that made us successful in 2018, including innovation, execution and cost management. Short-term category headwinds do not diminish our excitement about this business and will not derail our long-term strategy.
We will continue to play our own game, execute our strategy with rigor and aim for sustainable growth for the long-term. And we will do so with the same sense of urgency and passion that has propelled our business forward since separation.
With that, let me turn the call over to Steve to go through additional details.
Thanks, Dion. We finished FY18 with a strong Q4. Our results demonstrate the consistency of our strategy and focus on creating shareholder value for the long-term. We delivered against our objectives with a focus on day-to-day execution, while also investing in our strategic growth initiatives across personal systems, printing and 3D to position the company for the future.
For the full-year, we grew revenue and operating profit dollars across both printing and personal systems. We also delivered strong earnings per share growth, generated $4.2 billion in free cash flow and returned 83% of that free cash flow to shareholders, above the high-end of our long-term range of 50% to 75%.
Now let's look further into the results for the fourth quarter. Starting with the top line, net revenue was $15.4 billion, up 10% or up 9% in constant currency. Just as we seen throughout the year, our performance remained strong across businesses and geographies. Regionally, in constant currency, Americas grew 6%, EMEA was up 9%, and APJ grew 17%.
Gross margin was 17.6%, down 0.5 points, primarily resulting from the addition of S-Print. Sequentially, gross margin was down 0.8 points, driven by seasonal business mix and currency.
Non-GAAP operating expenses of $1.6 billion were up 7%. This increase was driven by the addition of S-Print along with incremental R&D and go-to-market investments to support growth. Non-GAAP net OI&E expense was $54 million for the quarter. We delivered non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share of $0.54, up $0.10 or 23% year-over-year, with a diluted share count of approximately 1.6 billion shares.
Non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share excludes amortization of intangible assets of $20 million, acquisition related charges of $26 million and restructuring and other GAAP only charges totaling $45 million, offset by non-operating retirement related credits of $54 million and related tax impact on all of these items. It also excludes a net gain of $597 million related to tax adjustments. The non-cash gain was primarily related to a change in our ability to utilize certain deferred tax assets. As a result, Q4 GAAP diluted net earnings per share was $0.91.
At the segment level, Personal Systems net revenue remained strong, delivering $10.1 billion, up 11%. Results were again broad-based across customer segments, geographies and products, reflecting the strength of our product portfolio, go-to-market and supply chain.
By customer segment, Consumer and Commercial revenue were both up 11%. By product category, revenue was up 14% for notebooks, up 6% for desktops, and up 10% for workstations. In calendar Quarter 3, our market share was 22.5% as we continue to execute our strategy and focus on profitable growth.
Our performance was driven by strong execution as we managed a dynamic market environment and the initial signs of CPU shortages, which we expect will constrain our growth in the first half of 2019. Personal systems continue to grow operating profit, up $37 million versus last year. This increase was primarily driven by higher volume and better ASPs, partially offset by higher commodities and logistics costs and the initial impact of tariffs in the U.S.
Operating margin was 3.8%, flat year-over-year. In printing, revenue was $5.3 billion in the quarter, up 9%. We have made steady progress in the performance of the business and remain focused on managing our core businesses, while building for the future across our strategic growth initiatives.
Total hardware units were up 11% with consumer units up 3% and commercial units up 85%, including S-Print. We continue to take advantage of opportunities to place NPV positive units when we see them. In calendar Quarter 3, overall print unit share was 42%.
Q4 supplies revenue of $3.4 billion was up 7%. The supplies mix of total print revenue was 64% down year-over-year and sequentially. We continue to operate below our ceilings for supplies channel inventory. For the full-year, supplies revenue grew in line with our outlook, inclusive of the acquired S-Print supply stream and installed base, which as we described at SAM, we expect to continue to decline.
Printing operating profit grew $46 million versus last year and operating margin was 16.1%, down 0.5 points year-over-year, up 0.1 point sequentially. The primary drivers of the year-over-year margin decline were the addition of S-Print and the strong unit placements as well as investments in growth and future initiatives including A3 and 3D printing, partially offset by favorable currency.
Turning to cash flow and capital allocation, Q4 cash flow from operations was $968 million and free cash flow was $843 million. For the full-year, we delivered free cash flow of $4.2 billion above our previously provided guidance of at least $3.7 billion. Q4 free cash flow includes both the timing benefit of higher Personal Systems volume and a better year-end cash conversion cycle of minus 32 days. This was an improvement versus our prior outlook of minus 29 to minus 30 days driven by lower days of inventory.
Sequentially, cash conversion cycle weakened two days, in line with typical seasonality with a 3-day decrease in days payable outstanding, a 2-day increase in days sales outstanding driven by revenue linearity and a 3-day decrease in days of inventory, largely a result of a decrease in strategic purchases.
We returned $598 million to shareholders through share repurchases and $219 million via cash dividends in Q4. For the full-year, we returned $3.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends or 83% of free cash flow.
Looking forward to FY19, keep the following in mind related to our overall financial outlook. Based on recent moves in the U.S dollar, we're expecting an increased headwind from currency compared to the end of September rates we used in the outlook we provided at SAM.
Our plans to mitigate previously announced and implemented China U.S tariffs are on track. As described at SAM, we expect the headwind to be larger in the short-term and reduce throughout the year. We have not considered any impact from unannounced tariffs or any significant demand changes that may result from an increase in geopolitical uncertainties.
Specific to Personal Systems, we expect CPU supply constraints through the first half of 2019. Regarding the overall basket of components and logistics, we expect that the cost to improve compared to Q4 levels. This should offset some of the increased currency headwind assuming the market is not incrementally more competitive.
In Printing, we continue to expect overall supplies revenue to be flat to slightly up for the full-year, and we are including the full-year expected impact from the Apogee acquisition. In addition, for the full-year, we expect our non-GAAP tax rate, which is based on our long-term non-GAAP financial projection to be 16% in FY19.
Taking these considerations into account, we are providing the following outlook. Q1 '19 non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.50 to $0.53. Q1 '19 GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.46 to $0.49. We're maintaining our full-year fiscal 2019 non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $2.12 to $2.22. And full-year fiscal '19 GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $2.04 to $2.14. And we expect to return approximately 75% of free cash flow to shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases over the course of the full-year.
And now, let's open-up the call for questions.
Thank you. And we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first questioner today will be Amit Daryanani with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Thanks a lot guys. Two questions for me, I guess, maybe the first one, Dion, you mentioned about CPU shortages impacting your growth in the quarter you’re in. can you just touch on how much revenues do you think you left in the table because of these issues and as you think about the first half is the impact sort of start to diminish in Q1 and Q2 or does it actually magnify more so which is in Q4?
Okay. Thanks, Amit. So you recall the Security Analyst meeting, that we said we were cautious for the first half of 2019 with regards to CPU shortages and that's exactly what’s playing out. Intel stated again this week that shortages are constraining the customers growth across their ecosystem and we're seeing that impact across multiple core families of processors and chipsets. That have an effect or an impact both the high-end and the low-end of the range. We also said at SAM that we expect bigger impact in the first half of 2019 with more variability around revenue, depending on the ability to secure supply in order to meet out robust demand. The demand signal for our products is and remains really strong, even through the market supply constraints that we’re seeing. And while the shortages are expected to put a strain on the industry and the ecosystem, this is just something that we have to work through without supplies, our partners and our customers in the short-term.
The only thing I would add there, Dion said our caution is definitely playing out and it's really not dramatically different than our views at the Security Analyst meeting in totality, but probably expected more of an impact in Q4 and so would see a larger impact in Q1 than we saw in Q4.
Got it. Thank you. And Steve, let me just follow-up. You had very impressive free cash flow in fiscal '18 at $4.2 billion. As I think about the fiscal '19 guide of $3.7 billion and I think you had assumed at least at Analyst Day that cash conversion cycle would improve by couple of days in '19 versus '18. Maybe just help me understand what are the couple of levers or headwinds you have that drives down fiscal -- free cash flow down in fiscal '19, or are we just being conservative over here?
Yes, so maybe I will just sort of describe some of the assumptions. We did have a strong finish to fiscal '18 and Q4 specifically. As a reminder, we do expect that our free cash flow to grow in line with earnings over time. But as we saw for the full-year and again in Q4, we had stronger Personal Systems volume and we did have an improving cash conversion cycle. Personal Systems volume, for example, grew 7% sequentially from Q3 to Q4. And our cash conversion cycle was minus 32 days. That was better than our outlook for the year and how that then bridges to '19, I do remain confident in delivering at least $3.7 billion for the full-year. However, taking into account our strong FY18 results did pull in some upside from '19, and also given some of the comments we just made on the constraints on CPUs, I would expect that in the first half some of the softening of the Personal Systems revenue and constraints, we would expect a weaker first half free cash flow, just given the negative working capital in the Personal Systems business. So, the assumption I discussed at SAM hold [ph], I would just add we have factored in all the respective segment level -- kind of business volume, including the implied slower growth in Personal Systems. We've also seen additional opportunities to improve cash conversion cycle beyond that -- the minus 32 days, primarily around a DPL. And finally, we do expect now to have other cash flow favorability in '19, including timing of certain tax and other cash items. So altogether, our bottom outlook gives us confidence of maintaining at least $3.7 billion for the full-year.
And our next questioner today will be Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you. Dion, just a clarification on your answer to the prior question. You said you’re seeing constraints, CPU constraints both at the high-end and the low-end of the range. I was wondering if you could maybe give us some color that help us triangulate like is that -- either in terms of units or in terms of revenue impact in the first half of the year that you will be seeing from the CPU shortages, that can help us like think through the quantification of that. And I’ve a follow-up.
Yes, I would say it actually affects both units as well as revenue. And I believe that the shortage is certainly what we're seeing today exists both at the low-end of the range as well as the high-end of the range. So there is a mix and the mix is still moving around as Intel is working furiously to get capacity up to support demand. So it is moving around, but I expect that we will see both in terms of units and in revenue.
Okay. And as a follow-up, are you seeing any evidence of the channel behaving differently in terms of maybe building some inventory ahead of these tariffs and what are you thinking about from a broader supply chain standpoint, if there are incremental tariffs that are not included in your guidance, as those get put on. What are some of the levers that you can use or you thinking about moving production and working with your ODM partners to do incrementally more outside of China. If you could give some color there, that will be great.
Sure. In terms of -- so the first part of your question there was around inventory levels and partner behavior and customer behavior. What I would say is our demand signal is really strong. It's not perfectly measurable, exactly how much of that is because of a well understood reality is there are shortages. We are looking at our sellout data very closely and that gives us a signal as what are actually going into aim customers hands and that remains broadly strong. And so, I think whilst generally when this happens in the industry, there is a tendency for a lot of order load to come into the system. We are certainly seeing that, but I would say, generally speaking, as you think through the course of 2018, demand has been strong for our products off the back of really strong innovation. Steve, you might tackle the first part of the tariff question. I’m happy to comment that as well.
Yes, I mean, it's somewhat kind of what I commented earlier. I mean, at this point we’ve factored into our guidance all the known tariffs. This includes the tariffs that were announced, implemented in the September period. We've not included any incremental unannounced tariffs into our guide and we’ve multiple levers that were implementing to mitigate the tariffs. There's a variety of strategies in place. But at this point, there's no reason for us to put into any sort of guidance what is unknown. So we are just sticking with what we know and the certainties around that.
And I think we’ve been pretty consistent about that. We said we would continue to monitor the evolving tariff situation just as all of you’re doing as well, I'm sure. We've said it before, we don't speculate or chase ghosts. We have, as Steve mentioned, a number of levers available to us, should additional tariffs come into place. The tariffs that we know about, the first tranche and the strong tranche that being fully factored into the guide that Steve provided at the Security Analyst meeting. And we will continue to work to optimize all that operations to deal with the industry dynamics that are just part of operating this business.
And the next questioner today will be Toni Sacconaghi with Bernstein. Please go ahead with your question.
Yes, I just wanted to follow-up on some of the previous commentary. I was at the Securities Analyst meeting and my sense was that the message around CPU availability was much softer than it was on this call. I think the notion was, we face these, we can manage around it, there will be some impact, but we can manage it. And it feels like incrementally that's become a bigger issue than you had thought. And kudos to you that you can still manage around it and uphold your guidance, but I just wanted to be clear about whether this is incrementally tougher than you thought a month ago, and ultimately what has driven it? Is it stronger-than-expected demand or the relative availability to you as one of the biggest players is not as strong as you thought? And I have a follow-up, please.
Yes, I think, Toni, I think part of your question, sort of to answer which is we are maintaining our full-year guidance in our Q1 outlook of $0.50, $0.53, it does incorporate all of the known risk and opportunities, including the risks around the CPU constraints. At SAM we did talk about the caution and that that caution is clearly playing out. But again, it is all factored into our guidance and I would say sort of directionally speaking, it's not dramatically different than what we provided from caution. It is just now real and playing out.
And that demand still remains strong as it has been all throughout 2018.
Okay. And then just on the tariff question. You have had some tariffs impact principally your Desktop Machines and your Workstations. I think in response to that there's been selective price increases. I did notice your Desktop growth rate was a little bit lower in the quarter than your Notebook growth rate. So I'm wondering if you can comment on whether you've seen any elasticity associated with price changes from tariffs? And then secondly, if we were to see the $200 billion in tariffs, would that not apply to essentially all of your Notebook business and the vast majority of your printing business or am I misguided in that assertion? Thank you.
Yes, I mean, taking a step back on Q4, the overall tariffs that have been announced, implemented through September, I would say didn't have a material impact on the company. But to your question, they did have an impact on our Personal Systems business and Desktop. And we saw that really is a margin headwind that we help mitigate through other factors. And we are working through a variety of mitigation items on the tariffs, a pricing [technical difficulty] one of the ways we mitigate, but there's other ways to do it as well. Maybe, Dion, you want to talk about the broader unknowns, but there's not a whole lot to say.
Yes. So, I think, Toni, it's important to understand how we think about pricing in all of our markets. We have a pretty definitive process and strategy that looks at our products' performance adjusted based on the various differences from one SKU to another SKU, what we call PFE and we set a strategy market-by-market and we need to ensure that we remain competitive. So I would say that we're obviously watching our pricing very carefully. We are looking at our competitors pricing very carefully. We tend not to lead the market down on price and sometimes in many cases where the first to take up pricing. But having said, I think Steve is quite right, we've got many levers available to us and we’re exercising all of them as it sort of relates to the second part of the question, which was around …
Any unknown.
… any unknowns. We just don’t chase ghosts, Toni. We don't know what the rights would be if they were tariffs, we don't know to what extent it would include listed items, would it be everything, would it be partial? So rather than speculating on that when they become announced, we put our mitigation plans into place.
And the next questioner today will be Shannon Cross with Cross Research. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. I was hoping you could provide some more insight into the competitive environment within Printing. Xerox and Lexmark have both had some pretty significant changes in senior leadership. Rico, I think, is a little more focused on profit. So, I am curious how you are seeing some of your competitors react to the industry.
Yes, look, I would say the printing market is still -- there's many players. There's upwards of over a dozen players in the printing market. And in an overall market that’s relatively flat, generally what happens in that environment is where you don’t have the scale, it becomes more difficult to compete. Some of our competitors are a little distracted, others are focused, we look at all of our competitors, but ultimately we are playing our game. We’ve an incredible portfolio of products, a very clear strategy, both transactionally as well as the work we are doing in our contractual space. Our security message is really resonating with our customers. It's on every C-level executives' mind, and we’ve the most secure printers on the planet. Our managed print services business continues to be an area of focus for us. The integration of Samsung's business has just gone through its first year anniversary and I’m really pleased with how we’ve integrated that company and how we are making progress against our goals in the A3 contractual space. So, all in all, we’re playing our game. We are very focused on that. And we will continue to be competitive in the marketplace.
Thank you. And then with regard to 3D printing, you had a successful show, I think, at Formnext. Clearly, there have been some product launches during the past year and then coming up in calendar 2019. What are you hearing from end markets? Do you feel like you are getting to a point where there is an inflection in demand within 3D printing? Where are the areas that you are seeing the most growth and the most interest and sort of as you look to next year? Thank you.
Yes, look, I’m really excited by the 3D printing business. This is an incredible business and as we talked about at the Securities Analyst meeting, it sits on our third-time horizon of the future. And it's not something that we expect will have a material impact for us in 2019, but over time, in my mind, it's incredibly clear. It's not a question of if the fourth industrial revolution will happen, it's when. And we’re certainly positioning ourselves to be in pole position when that happens. We’ve had a great 3 years since we announced the creation of the business and we introduced our first technology. We’ve done exactly what we said we would do. We said we would lay markers for all of you, because we don't talk about the financials specifically. But there would be very specific markers and milestones by which you could hold us accountable to, and I think we've delivered on all of those. The introduction of the 3D printer for the plastics market, we've become the number one player for production in a very short period of time. We’ve expanded our portfolio in line with our expectations. We’ve inside the first product that we released, the follow-on product, the 4210, which really improves productivity of core plastics. We introduced color with the 300 and 500 series, which will begin generating revenue in 2019. We introduced Metals last quarter. Customers will begin using our Metal production service with our partners in 2019. We’ve added new materials. We started with PA12 plastic. We then went to glass beads. We've got PA11 and TPU coming very soon. And metal powders with GKN, which is really focused in the automotive industry. So with the partnerships that we’ve created and the ecosystem we are building, we are right on track to how we think we maintain this market leadership as the industry is set to disrupt this $12 trillion industry.
And the next questioner today will be Jim Suva with Citi Investment Research. Please go ahead.
… much. Kind of a housekeeping question and more of a strategy question. The housekeeping question is, on your EPS guidance that you gave last month, am I correct that that included like a penny or two from Apogee, and is that still intact or is that incrementally changing at all? That’s the housekeeping item. Then strategically, when we think about, if memory prices come lower, because the past, say, 12 to 18 months you’ve been adjusting prices higher, are you going to be adjusting prices actively lower? Are you looking to harvest some of that profitability or give some of it back, because it looks like you’ve been gaining share still while increasing pricing. So, I’m just kind of wondering about the strategy of how we should think about those component costs in your go-to-market strategy. Thank you.
So, Jim, on the housekeeping topic, the guide provided today does include Apogee and at the Securities Analyst Meeting, it did not. So we’ve -- just getting started with the year and have -- the range captures kind of all the known risks and opportunities, but I have included Apogee in the guide today.
And as it relates to the sort of second part of the question, whilst it's true memory is certainly trending lower overall, some of that is offset with currency headwinds with the stronger U.S. dollar that we are seeing. But, again, we use this mechanism of price function value as we look at all of our competitors. We don’t lead the market down on price. We want to ensure that we remain competitive in the marketplace. We are vigilant always on cost management across the ecosystem. And we are just looking to segment the markets, find the profitable areas of growth in the business, and target profitable growth. We don’t chase share for share's sake.
And the next questioner today will be John Roy with UBS. Please go ahead.
Great. Thank you very much. So, you were able to pretty much hit your print margin number for the quarter. Can you give us the puts and takes that would make that move around and for the rest of fiscal '19? And what are you thinking, essentially all in, when you sum it all together, where you might come out for '19?
Well, we are pleased with the profit we drove in print in Q4. We’ve been focused on driving incremental operating profit dollars consistent with our strategy and we grew $46 million year-over-year, and for the full-year $177 million. And so we are continuing to focus on our strategy. That includes investing in our business and A3 and the opportunities to disrupt that market and also 3D printing. We are also going to continue to place units where we see NPV positive opportunities to do so. So as we are shifting the business over time to more services and contractual, we are going to operate that business with an operating margin target in the next three years of at least 16%. And we will continue to drive supplies to flat to slightly up this year.
Great. Thank you.
And the next questioner today will be Paul Coster with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Yes, thanks for taking my question. I’m just wondering if the trade conflict that seems to be happening with China, whether that has any impacts on your ability to go into the PC end market there, which I know in the past you’ve described as being an area where you're under-indexed at the moment from a growth opportunity?
Look, China has been and continues to be a very strategically important market for us. We’ve a very strong brand in the country. We've been present for a very long time. We obviously continue to assess the situation and the potential impact on our business and our plans that we may or may not need to make as a result.
But again, we are not chasing ghosts, but we're also not sticking our heads in the sand either. It's an important market and will remain so.
Okay. One quick follow-up. The printer market share seems to bounce around a little bit. It's up year-on-year, but only 200 basis points, which is a little less market share gain than the prior quarter. Probably it doesn't mean much is my guess, but I'm just wondering if you can give us a little bit of color on whether there's any segments in which you think you are outperforming strongly or struggling a little bit.
Yes, I mean, we concur. I mean, I think the market in the long-term has some ups and downs and pockets of growth. In any particular quarter, share shifts will occur. For us, we are going to remain very disciplined on pursuing profitable share. It's what we did in the last quarter and you see it in the calendar Quarter 3, where there's some pockets of the overall market where we are choosing not to compete. And we see that primarily on the low-end consumer. But, overall, pleased with our performance growing A3 and on the office more broadly. But I think, to your question, I mean, there will be puts and takes every quarter. But we will be very disciplined on ensuring we go after the profitable growth.
And our next questioner today will be Rod Hall with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Yes. Hi, guys. Thanks for the question. So, I guess, my first question is on the 0.8% move in gross margins. You said it was seasonality and FX. I just wonder if you might be able to quantify how much of that was FX on the sequential move. And then, I also wanted to see if you could update us on the A3 market share. You gave it last quarter, I believe, and you've got this targeted 12%. So I was just curious how that progressed in the quarter. Thanks.
So, I will take the first one. I mean, the largest driver really was due to seasonality and higher personal systems mix. Personal Systems, again, sequentially, grew 7%; Print, sequentially, grew 2%. So, that's the largest driver. Incremental to that, to your question, we did have some FX headwinds quarter-to-quarter. We did also have the initial impact of the tariffs on the Personal Systems side. But I would say the short response is the primary driver is really on the Personal Systems mix quarter-to-quarter.
And as it relates to A3 share, Rod, we grew share year-over-year calendar Quarter 3 by 0.8% and I remain really excited about the future opportunities and really encouraged by the progress of our A3 business since we started. We continue to introduce new products and solutions to complement an already very robust portfolio. We continue to sign up premier partners around the world, which is critical to scaling the business. We continue to focus on differentiators that really matter for our customers in areas like security and print quality. And as a reminder, and as we've said in the past, we don't expect the sequential growth to happen every single quarter. We will remain on track to achieve our 12% market share by the end of calendar 2020. That’s the marker, the longer-term marker we put in the ground and that’s what you can expect to see from us.
And the next questioner today will be Aaron Rakers with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you for taking the questions. I want to go back on the pricing discussion on the PC category. You guys have had several quarters now where pricing has been up solidly and given the variables at play, I guess, the first question on that is, often times in the past, HP has had the advantage of gaining share in the face of component supply constraints, such as the CPU situation. So, I’m curious of how you plan to react and potentially if you see opportunity to take incremental share on that. And then, second to that, on the component pricing dynamic, I’m curious of how much of the past couple of quarters, in terms of pricing, has been driven by mix versus, say, the pass-through of component pricing.
So, I will take a crack at it. So on the last piece first, so what we saw in Q4, roughly speaking, about a 5 point ASP increase when you look at the revenue versus units, just under a quarter of that is the structural improvements we are making in mix and the remainder was sort of the broader pricing category where we are factoring in the competitive situation, currency, commodities, etcetera. On the first part, I mean our strategy continues to be to kind of profitably grow share. And we see the current situation no different than we see it at any market situation, where we like our product portfolio, we like our lineup, we like our ability to compete and win in the marketplace, and so just like we do in any market situation, our goals are go out there and to gain profitable share.
The only other thing I would add to that is you will -- you should expect to continue to see us focus on mix shift toward more profitable parts of the market as we do our segmentation. We’ve mentioned on previous calls premium and gaming. The Spectre Folio that we showed at the Securities Analyst meeting is an incredible piece of art and innovation, the intersection between the two, and it's been really well received by our customers. So, customers are looking for premium devices. Our gaming franchise continues to grow. We remain excited about that. And we are focused on other more profitable areas of the Personal Systems category. And you heard Alex say at the Securities Analyst meeting, there's displays and accessories and services where, traditionally, we've been under indexed, where we’ve a lot of focus, as well as new growth opportunities with Device as a Service.
And the next questioner today will be Steve Milunovich with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.
Thank you. I believe that you are the largest user of AMD processors among the PC vendors. Is that the case and does that relationship help you offset the Intel issues?
So, that’s probably a better question for AMD, to ask them if we are the largest or not, but I would say that we’ve had a very long partnership and a very good partnership with AMD for many years. They are part of our multisource strategy and we’ve a variety of tremendous AMD offerings in our portfolios. Customers make decisions. They weigh price and performance and functionality when making purchasing decisions and there are definitely segments and geographies where AMD offerings are an attractive alternative.
And on the A3 business, you’ve talked about this past year was a placement year of hardware and then, down the road, you would begin to benefit from the associated supplies and services. Do we get much of that benefit in fiscal '19, or do you need the install base to get larger so it's more of a fiscal '20 occurrence?
We start to get some benefit clearly in '19, but it does take time to get that install base built. So we certainly see the greater upside in FY '20 and years beyond.
With that, I think we are out of time. Let me close by thanking you all for all of your attendance over the course of this year. It's been a very strong year for us this year in 2018. We’ve done what we said we'd do. I’m very proud of that. As we look into and look ahead to 2019, we remain very focused on the things that have made us successful since separation. We are focused on innovation. We are focused on execution. We are focused on relentless cost management. We’ve very strong financials, the best portfolio I think we’ve ever had, we’ve solid opportunities across Personal Systems, Printing, and 3D in core growth in future. We will continue to play our own game, execute against our strategy with rigor, and aim for sustainable growth for the long-term. With that, I wish you all happy holidays. Thanks very much for joining us.
And the conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation and you may now disconnect your lines.