© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Welcome and thank you for joining Rayonier's Second Quarter 2018 Teleconference Call. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, please disconnect at this time.
And now I will turn the meeting over to Mr. Mark McHugh, Senior Vice President and CFO. Sir, you may begin.
Thank you and good morning. Welcome to Rayonier's investor teleconference covering second quarter earnings. Our earnings statements and financial supplements were released yesterday afternoon and are available on our website at rayonier.com.
I'd like to remind you that in these presentations, we include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Our earnings release and Form 10-K filed with the SEC lists some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we may make. They're also referenced on Page 2 of our financial supplement.
Throughout these presentations, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measure in our earnings release and supplemental materials.
With that, let's start our teleconference with opening comments from Dave Nunes, President and CEO. Dave?
Thanks Mark and good morning everyone. First, I'll make some overall remarks before turning it back over to Mark to review our financial results, then we'll ask Doug Long, our Senior Vice President of Forest Resources to comment on our U.S. and New Zealand timber results, and following the review of our timber results, Chris Corr, our Senior Vice President for Real Estate will discuss our real estate results.
We're pleased to report a strong second quarter results reflective of the quality and diversity of our Timberland's and Real Estate portfolio. For the second quarter, we achieved earnings per share of $0.28 and adjusted EBITDA of $111 million which represents a significant increase from the prior year second quarter.
Our Southern Timber segment adjusted EBITDA increase 42% from the prior year second quarter reflecting 10% higher volumes and a significant increase in non-timber income. The increase in harvest volume was primarily driven by incremental volume from recent acquisitions coupled with stronger overall demand, while the increase in non-timber income was driven by roughly $6 million of pipeline easement sales.
Our Pacific Northwest Timber segment reported 36% higher harvest volumes, as well as a 26% lift in average delivered sawtimber pricing driven by continued strengthening in both domestic and export markets.
Based on these favorable market conditions, we accelerated some volume that was planned for the second half of the year. This harvest timing which contributed to the strong second quarter will result in a comparatively lower harvest level for the balance of the year.
We also enjoyed a strong second quarter in New Zealand. Excluding the prior year period Timberland sales, adjusted EBITDA New Zealand increased nearly 40% versus the prior year second quarter driven by 20% increase in volume and 9% increase in both domestic and export sawtimber prices.
Moving into our real estate segment, results improved significantly over the prior year quarter primarily reflecting the closing of a Timberland sale in Louisiana, as well as continued strong demand for rural HBU properties. As we stated in the past, this business is all about premium and we're very pleased to see that our real estate strategy is yielding strong results and meaningfully augmenting our core Timberland returns.
With that, let me turn it back over to Mark to review our financial results.
Thanks Dave. Let's start on Page 5 with our financial highlights. Sales for the quarter totaled $246 million, while operating income was $52 million and net income attributable to Rayonier was $36 million or $0.28 per share. Pro forma EPS was also $0.28 per share as we had no pro forma items in the quarter.
Second quarter adjusted EBITDA of $111 million was significantly above the prior year quarter adjusted EBITDA of $87 million due to favorable results in our Southern Timber, Pacific Northwest Timber and Real Estate segments partially offset by lower results in New Zealand due to the prior year period in Timberland sales. As Dave noted excluding these Timberland sales, New Zealand Timber results also improved significantly.
On the bottom of Page 5, we've provided an overview of our capital resources and liquidity at quarter end, as well as a comparison to year-end. Our cash available for distribution or CAD for the first half of the year was $164 million compared to $97 million in the prior year period primarily due to higher adjusted EBITDA, lower cash interest paid, lower cash taxes and lower capital expenditures. A reconciliation of CAD to cash provided by operating activities and other GAAP measure is provided on Page 8 of the financial supplement.
We closed the quarter with $107 million of cash and roughly $975 million of debt. Our net debt of $868 million represented 15% of our enterprise value based on our closing stock price at quarter. Note that these figures excludes $69 million of cash proceeds from Timberland and HBU sales that are currently held by like-kind exchange and intermediaries and are therefore classified as restricted cash.
I’ll now turn the call over to Doug to provide a more detailed review of our timber results.
Thanks Mark. Good morning, everyone. Let's start on Page 9 with our Southern Timber segment. Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter of $31 million was $2 million and $9 million favorable to the prior quarter and the prior year quarter respectively. Second quarter harvest volume of approximately 1.5 million tons was 70,000 tons lower than the prior quarter, which we full expected on the extraordinarily high level of production in the first quarter.
The volume increase of 133,000 tons compared to prior year quarter was driven primarily by incremental volume from recent acquisitions, coupled with stronger overall demand. Additionally it's worth noting that our non-timber sales of $11 million, doubled in the second quarter versus the prior year period to the closing of three significant pipeline easement.
Second quarter pine pulpwood stumpage prices of $16.05 per ton were 6% unfavorable compared to the prior quarter and 3% favorable compared to the prior year quarter.
The decrease in pine pulpwood prices compared to prior quarter was due to geographic mix, the portion of our harvest shifting West whereas prior year period pulpwood prices were negatively affected by salvage timber in the West Mims fire.
Pine sawtimber stumpage prices of $26.23 per ton were essentially flat in the first quarter and 2% favorable to the prior year period. While we continue to see some modest strengthening in coastal markets, overall sawtimber pricing in South is relatively flat during the last year, with period-to-period differences generally attributable to geographic mix.
Hardwood prices of $12.12 per ton were 16% and 4% favorable compared to the prior quarter and the prior year quarter respectively. Hardwood markets are very localized and product specific, so changes in price can be driven by both product and geographic mix.
Now moving to the Pacific Northwest timber segment on Page 10. Adjusted EBITDA of $50 million was $1 million and $9 million favorable to the prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively.
Second quarter harvest volume of 374,000 tons was essentially flat to the prior quarter and 36% higher than the prior year quarter. As Dave mentioned, favorable market conditions for both pulpwood and sawtimber, afforded us an opportunity to accelerate volume in the second quarter that was otherwise scheduled to be sold during the second half of the year thus locking in very strong pricing.
Delivered sawtimber prices of $103.38 per ton were 8% and 26% favorable to the prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively. The increase in sawtimber prices can again be attributed to continued strength in both export and domestic markets.
Delivered pulpwood prices of $49.76 per ton, were 12% and 26% favorable compared to the prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively. The increase in pulpwood prices was driven by strong demand at West Coast pulp mill, coupled with attention from a growing market for chip exports.
Page 11 shows results and key operating metrics for New Zealand Timber segment. Our New Zealand Timber segment delivered another very strong quarter. Adjusted EBITDA of $26 million was $4 million favorable compared to the prior quarter primarily due to higher harvest volumes and favorable export sawtimber prices.
And $17 million unfavorable compared to prior year quarter which included land sales of $24 million. Second quarter harvest volume of 738,000 tons was 32% and 20% higher compared to prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively, primarily due to the timing of export shipments and incremental volume from recent acquisitions.
Export sawtimber prices $120.80 per ton increased 3% and 9% compared to prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively, due to continued strong demand mainly from China, complemented by India reaching pricing parity.
Domestic sawtimber prices of $86.21 per ton in U.S. dollar terms were roughly flat compared to the prior quarter and 9% higher compared to the prior year quarter due to continued demand tension between export markets and local sawmills along with a modest rise in the New Zealand to U.S. exchange rate.
Domestic pulpwood prices of $38.20 per ton increased 6% and 15% compared to prior quarter and prior year quarter respectively, due to local mills competing with increased demand for lower quality logs from India and China, as export customers sought cheaper fiber supplies.
In our trading segments, second quarter adjusted EBITDA of $200,000 decreased compared to prior quarter due to higher cost associated with port congestion. Trading margins continue to tighten in 2018 to increase competition for log supply and increased shipping cost.
I'll now turn it over to Chris to cover Real Estate. Chris?
Thank you, Doug. As highlighted on Page 12, our Real Estate segment delivered very strong second quarter results. Real estate sales totaled $50 million on 15,804 acres sold with the activity dominated by a Timberland sale in Louisiana.
Excluding improved development sales, we generated a weighted average price of $3,071 per acre, representing a significant premium to our Timberland hold value.
Sales in our improved development category reflect a steady pace of activity at our wildlife development project. During the quarter, we closed 12 residential lots for a total of $625,000 or $52,000 per lot, and two acres of commercial property for $684,000 or $351,000 per acre. In the rural category, sales totaled $4.8 million on 1,071 acres at an average price of roughly $4500 per acre.
We're very pleased with the progress in our rural places program, where we closed on 30 lots and 24 separate transactions. Interest in this product continues to build particularly in Florida and Texas, and we're starting to see a pickup of activity in Louisiana.
In the non-strategic and timberlands category, sales of $44 million were comprised of 14,729 acres sold, at an average price of roughly $3,000 per acre. This includes a sale of 14,447 acres in Louisiana for $43 million, or roughly $3,000 per acre.
Following extraordinarily strong first and second quarters in real estate, we expect much lighter activity during the second half of the year. As we've discussed in the past, our real estate results tend to be lumpy and this year our activity was heavily concentrated in the first half.
That said, we expect activity in our wildlife development project to continue to build throughout the year with steady progress both on infrastructure, construction, and the sales pipeline.
I'll now turn the call back over to Mark.
Thanks Chris. As noted in our earnings release, based on our year-to-date results and our outlook for the balance of the year. We're increasing our full-year guidance. We now anticipate full year net income attributable to Rayonier of $82 million to $89 million, EPS of $0.63 to $0.68, and adjusted EBITDA of $300 million to $315 million.
Additional details regarding our updated guidance, including a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income and EPS, can be found on Schedule G of our earnings release.
With respect to our individual segments, we expect our Southern Timber segment to achieve full year volume of 5.8 to 5.9 million tons in line with our prior guidance. Although we anticipate lower quarterly harvest volumes for the remainder of the year, given the strong volumes in the first half.
We continue to expect pricing in the South to remain relatively flat this year. And then to pick up some momentum as new lumber capacity comes online, primarily in 2019 and 2020.
In our Pacific Northwest Timber segment, we're likewise on track to achieve our full year volume guidance of 1.3 to 1.4 million tons with lower quarterly harvest volumes for the balance of the year.
We further expect a modest decline in our weighted-average stumpage prices in the Pacific Northwest, primarily based on product mix as we move into some more challenging stands.
In our New Zealand Timber segment, we expect to achieve full year volume of 2.6 to 2.7 million tons. Although we anticipate some softening in export prices during the second half as a result of the ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China.
While New Zealand log exports are not directly impacted by tariffs, the general market uncertainty created by the U.S. China trade situation as well as the impact of potential tariffs on some manufactured wood products falling from China to the U.S., have caused some pullback in the log export market. We believe that fundamental export market conditions remain favorable and we're continuing to monitor the situation closely.
Lastly, in our Real Estate segment, we expect very light activity in the third and fourth quarters, following an extraordinarily strong first half of the year. Additional details regarding volume, adjusted EBITDA and operating income by segment can be found on Page 14 of our financials supplement.
I'll now turn the call back to Dave, for closing comments.
Thanks Mark. Overall, we're very pleased with the quarter, as it represents our strongest quarterly adjusted EBITDA result since the spinoff from its fibers business in 2014.
I'm very proud of how our team executed our operational strategies and worked well together to deliver these strong results. We've always stressed the importance of remaining nimble both in our operational as well as our capital allocation priorities. And we certainly put that philosophy into action during the second quarter, as we took advantage of favorable market conditions across each of our segments.
We'll continue to employ this mindset going forward, as we seek to maximize value for shareholders over the long term. To this end, during the second quarter, we announced an 8% increase in our quarterly cash dividend from $0.25 to $0.27 per share, effective for the second quarter distribution.
This action reflects our significant cash flow growth, strong capital structure, and continued confidence in the sustainability of our businesses. It further reflects our commitment to nimble capital allocation, as we seek to build long term value per share.
That concludes our prepared remarks. We'll now turn the call back over to the operator, for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is from Anthony Pettinari from Citi.
This is actually Randy Toth, sitting in for Anthony. Compared to expectations at the beginning of the year, it seems like for your EBITDA guidance has risen in all segments except for New Zealand. Can you talk about what's driving that mild EBITDA cut in New Zealand?
Yes, like we discussed, we've seen a bit of softening in the export market conditions there. Again obviously New Zealand is not directly impacted by any kind of tariffs associated with the U.S. China trade situation. But there are manufactured wood products in China that flow to the U.S. that have been on the list of potential tariffs.
And so again we think that the overall construction market in China remains robust again fundamental export market conditions remain healthy, but we’ve just seen a little bit of skittishness in the market as a result of these recent trade developments.
You also have some influence from recent currency flows that have made wood more expensive there based on the New Zealand currency. And so that's had some modest impact and we seen just a little tick up in inventories off late?
And then just staying on the China theme, what do you think as far the port inventories and offtake rates?
You want to speak.
Yes I can speak to that, so log exports set a record last in 2017 and they are on track again this year and we saw a really large buildup in the first quarter, but after Chinese New Year we've seen entry levels in China have fallen dramatically over the second quarter. And as we discussed before and we believe tracking inventory demand ratios is more important than just the inventory levels.
And this ratio currently sits within 1.5 to two months range that we feel is a very comfortable and healthy level. During Q1 it built over 3.5 months so we seen a significant drop-down from that and we feel like it’s in a pretty healthy level right this minute.
Our next question is from Collin Mings from Raymond James.
First question just on New Zealand, can you quantify the pressure on pricing you’ve seen today coming off of some of the weakness that you talked about?
Yes Collin, it’s Doug. I would say so far the pressure on pricing we seen is and pretty much attributable to the devaluation of the currency, so it’s been kind of in that ballpark of things. We have seen a little bit of additional impact of freight costs just we see more port congestion both in New Zealand and China with the increase that I mentioned before they were log exports.
So to-date it’s been relatively around that devaluation currency and the slight tick is [inaudible] and freight type things. Right now it’s more just that where we kind of put our guidance flow with some that just general uncertainty that Mark mentioned about kind of fresh products going back.
Yes, so it sounds like some the guidance adjustment is more just forward looking I think there could be continued pressure versus necessarily a meaningful correction pricing here recently is that fair?
Yes, that’s fair.
Yes, that will be to fair to say.
And then just sticking with these deal, and I recognize there are some limitations on what you can probably say at this juncture. But can you just update us on the status of the Phaunos process and your level of engagement at this point. And then Dave maybe just more broadly looks like you guys acquired some Timberlands in New Zealand during the quarter can you touch on that?
Sure. Just as refresher, Phaunos our partner in New Zealand is a publicly traded timber fund listed in U.K. Their shareholders voted the wind down their fund last summer. Their Board and Manager resigned in the ensuing six months and then earlier this year the new board began executing a plan for an orderly sale of those assets.
Stafford the former manager recently made an unsolicited offer for all of Phaunos which is certainly complicated the process that their board was undertaking. Phaunos is now in the process of finalizing its defense statement and ultimately it’s going to boil down to shareholders either committing to the Stafford offer or rejecting it in which case the Phaunos board will proceed with the completion of its asset sale process.
We certainly made it clear that we have an interest in owning that remaining 23% stake but at the right price. And we continue to monitor the situation and we believe it’s going to ultimately resolve itself over the next several months.
And then just as far as again it looks like there was timberland acquired again both in New Zealand and in the U.S. our particularly here in Florida, just maybe touch on the acquisition during the quarter?
Sure. It wasn't a heavy quarter we acquired just under 15,000 acres for $31 million, the bulk of that was an acquisition that we did here in Coastal Florida that we're excited about just under 14,000 acres. It was a sale that we bought for roughly a little over $1,800 an acre and one of the things that we stress internally is having an active portfolio management engagement in the market. Whether it’s on the buy side or the sell side and we recently sold a property fairly approximate to this one at roughly 2x the per acre value.
And so we felt fortunate that we were able to essentially replace that acreage at a significantly lower price and so we’re pretty happy with that. And then in New Zealand we had a small bolt-on acquisition of about 845 gross acres that again we’re happy to continue looking for those small bolt-on opportunities where we feel we can add some value and do so at a low operating cost.
And then just one last one I'll turn it over. Just Doug I mean you touched on seeing some year-over-year improvements in log pricing in certain markets. Recognizing it’s only may be a month, month and a half as far as seeing this pullback in lumber pricing. But are there any customers that are using that as reason on the margin to maybe try and knock pricing down a little bit and prevent some of the market from every experienced gains over the last year or so?
Collin I would say that there was always people trying to do everything in negotiation strategy. So everyone is going to using tactic they have but we haven’t seen pricing retreating based on those lumbar prices yet. The southern mills are obviously and the western mills are obviously having nice margins given the per price even if they repeatedly had. So that’s always a discussion of price negotiations but we haven’t seen that reflect prices.
Our next question is from Ketan Mamtora from BMO Capital Markets.
First question, can you provide an update on kind of progress on log exports out of U.S. south you’ve talked about kind of that number going up meaningfully off of small base. But kind of what the progress is there?
Sure, as we say it started a small base that that we seen exports in south in general, really growing quite rapidly if I read in recent press releases. So I think less things actually in 2017 in the south in general we had over 1 million cubic meters just in the first half of the year where as we did about 1.2 million across the south in 2017. So it’s been extreme increase as we go forward.
For us as we look at where we've been at our key resource units approximate to the ports over third of our southern mill was exported and with three quarters of southern land based within 100 routed miles of ports in the south. In the first six months this year we already surpassed our total 2017 export volume. So we’ve already in the first six months essentially we did last year so we we’re on track doubling what we did last year and continue to improve upon that.
Second question do you anticipate - and I appreciate when you talked about the New Zealand kind of export price pressure a lot of that was due to trade issues and its more kind of forward-looking. But do you anticipate any ripple effects into kind of the U.S. export log market or kind of that works on different dynamics?
It’s hard to guess what’s going to happen in trade war but I think one important thing is that the loss coming out both the South and Northwest are used primarily in construction industry over in China. And we’re recently seeing China announced that is kind of one of the tools are going to work against the trade war and is increasing infrastructure spending particularly rural areas of China. So we think China productive to put tariffs on logs, they’re going to work in that process but it’s hard to predict what’s going to happen in trade war also.
Yes, so Ketan it’s important to note that a lot of radiant going into China get used in the manufacturing of plywood again which is on the list of potential tariffs with respect to the U.S. and China. So there is a different use in a lot of the logs going into China versus some of the New Zealand logs going into China.
And last question, there has been some press recently around reworking the Endangered Species Act. Do you think there was any possibility that the federal lands could be opened again on the Pacific Northwest for harvest I mean for most of us we haven't seen that at all in the last 25 to 30 years but do you think there is any possibility that could happen?
That would surprise us. I think that recognize that you have virtually no manufacturing capacity in place that could even handle that wood if it were to occur. And I think that we've just gone too far down that line you know from a policy standpoint. So I think that that's not something that we think is really on the horizon.
Our next question is from John Babcock from Bank of America.
Just two quick questions here. The first it's obviously wildfire season here. Just want to get a sense for what you're seeing in your markets if there has been any risk there and kind of the next question I had was just on the timberland markets, but if you could just kind of talk on the first point that will be great?
Sure, with respect to the wildfire seasons. We've seen some impacts particularly in our Oregon properties where we've been put down some restrictions, so kindly work till to 1 p.m. So that's starting to cause some supply on dynamics basically as people can't work a full day. So that's probably we've seen impacts in the Northwest.
It hasn't been significant yet but it appears to be building it’s an early fire season and obviously that you can see in the press that we have lot issues and there is quite few large fires in Oregon as we speak. So we're starting to see that come forward.
And then just my last question before I kind of turn it over if you could just talk about kind of the activity in timberland acquisition markets how is kind of availability out there? Are there number of properties for sale that might be interested in any sort of information right now would be helpful? Thanks.
Sure, I mean we generally don't comment on prospective M&A activity but having said that I think it is a pretty active season right now pretty much in all three of the geographies that were operating in. So, we’re pretty busy right now assessing a number of potential opportunities. And some of this really gets back to just where we feel like we're really well positioned with a strong balance sheet and a fair bit of capacity to do so.
But you know we're going to remain pretty disciplined. As I mentioned earlier this last quarter and this year has been pretty light and that's not been a function of just not seeing properties for sale just been a function of kind of sticking to the disciplined approach that we've used on acquisitions.
Our next question is from Steve Chercover from Davidson.
So first of all with respect to the earnings guide you've already got $0.59 in your pocket. So are you suggesting that you're going to generate $0.49 in the second half, so are you just going to cut high basis wood or how will drop-off that much?
I mean so it's really a function Steve of having taken a lot of that. You know the EBITDA in the front half of the year. You know recognize there is [op-inc] leverage to incremental harvest and there's a lot of [op-inc] leverage to the real estate sales.
And so is those taper off for example you're going to have the same roughly same level of interest expense and in the second half of the year as you do in the first half of the year but you've got a lot more [op-inc] in the first half of the year. And so it's really just a function of as you scale back that EBITDA having taken a lot of that forward it just translates into lower EPS.
And we've got a pretty detailed reconciliation. Again recognizing that this is an area in which there has been a disconnect from time-to-time in terms of the actual math to get down EPS and from the research analyst and the guides we try to be pretty explicit about that guidance. And so we have the detailed kind of step down from adjusted EBITDA to net income and EPS so I'm happy to walk you through that in more detail offline.
Yes absolutely, because I mean right now the consensus is for a combined $0.25 in the first half. And then maybe this will….
Yes but Steve that also I think we're well above this quarter so again it is just a function of a lot of that real estate activity in particular which has a high [op-inc] contribution just came in the first half of the year. And so it like we don't – we try to shy away from sort of managing towards quarterly earnings but really kind of managing to maximize value.
And we take those opportunities when we get them, we saw some real market strength in the first half of the year we pull forward some volume in the Pacific Northwest, but that doesn't mean that we're going to go cut what we otherwise planned to cut in the second half. You were managing towards annual targets. We're trying to kind of optimize the economics of the business during the course of the year.
And then my second one, like I said it could be a little bit of a long-shot but China has put an embargo on recycled fiber I’m sure you know that, and that clearly provides a boost to Virgin fiber. And I'm just wondering as we move down through the ecosystem can it provide an opportunity for you to sell them chips or even pulpwood out of any of your geographies?
Yeah Steve this is Doug, you're right that's definitely something we're watching. We've heard a lot about Chinese buyers for some potentially shuttered pulp mills right now. We're looking at trying to move the pulp itself and into their markets to replace that but we've also seen very much interest particularly off of the West Coast. And as I mentioned you know also New Zealand and even in the south about some pulp opportunities.
So we're exporting pulp right now to Turkey but we've seen increase about pulp to Asia from the south also. So it's definitely something that over the next few years seems to be developing trend that we're monitoring.
Our next question is from Mark Weintraub from Buckingham Research.
Two quick questions one on the Timberland sales that you're seeing out there. Is this primarily an auction type processes or are you talking about more situations where it's you and maybe a contiguous owner et cetera?
It's really both. We're always in discussions with neighbors whether it's on the buy side or the sell side. Those are obviously logical situations and then there's always a decent mix of negotiated sales versus auction situations and different sellers have different preferences around doing that and it's our job to sort of understand both the landscape there in terms of properties that may or may not be for sale as well as the preference of those owners in terms of how they take it to market.
And in those situations where it is more auction process, is there any shift that you could describe as to what seems to be going on in the processes relative to what we've been seeing in the last couple of years? I know that's a tough question to answer but any color you could give?
I am sorry, what do you mean by that Mark in terms of what's going on in those processes. I mean they remain very competitive I mean we certainly haven't seen demand for timberland properties trailing off and in fact we haven't been very successful in auction processes in the last couple years.
And that's really what is trying to get out is I mean you haven't been very successful because it's been so competitive. Is there any reason to think that you're that much more likely to be successful in the auction type processes or I assume if it still remains very competitive. It's more likely you're going to be in the more private type of negotiated transactions?
I'd say the bulk of the activity that we have acquired has been and negotiated transactions. No question, that doesn't mean that we don't still take a crack at auctions and we have a low batting average there that we're proud of. You don't want to have a high batting average in auctions frankly.
Right, and then lastly when we look at the timber volumes that you're laying out or in the guidance, how do they compare to what you would expect in the next year or two? Are these sort of – trend run rate levels or are they little high, little low?
Yes, I mean they're generally trend run rate levels, Mark. We have a commitment to operating on a sustainable yield basis. You will see some peaks and valleys just based on your age plus profile kind of relative to that long-term sustainable yield. But again we disclose that the long-term sustainable yield in our 10-K in each of our different segments and so you can kind of see where our current harvest is relative to those sustainable yields.
But for the most part it's in the range it's probably a little bit towards the higher end of that range in New Zealand this year. It's at the lower end of that range in Pacific Northwest as we're still sort of building back up from the inventory issues of a few years ago. And in the south I'd say we're still sort of at the early stages of kind of lifting that harvest over the next five years.
Yes, I would agree I think – tracking 4 billion board feet of additional capacity about 3 billion of that kind of in our operating area and I think it pays to be a little bit patient as we think about what those can mean for future years. So we're in the process of lifting things in the South but not inspired to write the second.
And then specific to the Pacific Northwest, I wasn't quite sure how to interpret - I think you mentioned you had accelerated from in the first half of the year and then we’re kind of keeping at expected rates in the second half. So is the full year harvest in Pacific Northwest going to be a little bit higher than you anticipated and then what happens actually if were the case or that’s not the case you're basically in line with what you are originally anticipating?
Yes, we’re in line with what we originally anticipating. We just took more of that full year harvest target in the first half of the year given the strong market conditions. So again we have updated guidance by segment in the financial supplement and that reflects our current expectation of full-year harvest then alongside that we provided the year-to-date levels.
[Operator Instructions] And our next question is from Chip Dillon from Vertical Research.
Question I have, could you just remind me again why the tariff issue is an issue for New Zealand but not for the Pacific Northwest especially given that the tariff would be applied to the logs in the Northwest and not to New Zealand we would think?
Chip the issue or the perspective issue and recognize it's not kind of locked in the perspective issue or the concern is that it's in the form of finished products coming back particularly plywood and recognize that roughly 30% of our New Zealand volume goes into plywood whether it's a softwood core that’s part of a hardwood facing back or a full softwood sheet. So that's probably where there is the biggest theoretical or potential exposure is on that front.
And then I think that keep in mind that certainly some of what we were discussing earlier with respect to guidance was also a reflection of a kind of the currency change, as well as kind of shipping conditions.
And then what that means kind of in reverse, is that if they do slap a tariff on our timber going into China a lot of what they buy from the Northwest they can't get anywhere else I would imagine.
We don’t see this much of the tariffs being slapped on logs, it's more of a flow-through effect if there's a tariff on products coming back then it’s going to have a ripple effect back through to the log volumes.
And then just shifting gears to real estate, you mentioned you had a pretty active first half I know you've done some higher value sales you mentioned earlier in the call. And I guess there is slowdown but given sort of the robustness of the economy et cetera. What would sort of be a range of expectations for next year especially be on this - the kind of the normal pace of the - of the rural or lower value HBU sales?
I think already talk to next year yet Chip but what we talked about in the past is it we generally expect to sell in the range of 1.5% of our southern land based on annual basis. And that’s not really - a target is much as it is just what we've experienced historically on average.
And so I think that give or take we kind of go into you're expecting that we’re going to sell 20,000 to 30,000 acres of land into those HBU channels. And really kind of as we get closer to the specific timeframe, we have a better sense as to what that specific pipeline looks like.
And then last thing is as you think about - I know - as you think about allocating capital right now when you look at the areas you mainly operate in. Would you find it more or less on average better to buy timber through your stock or through the open market just sort of looking at where your stock is and looking at - what asking prices are recognizing that each transaction is unique but just in a general sense?
Yes, I mean Chip you answered your own question. It’s so hard to answer that. It’s really is every transaction is unique we look at it on a very transaction specific basis. I don't think we have a broad point of view as we sit here today that there is a strong difference between kind of the broad timberland M&A market and kind of the share buyback market.
But keep in mind we’re always making that comparison on transactions where we look at the trade-off of the implicit return based on where our stocks trading and converting that into an IRR compared to an acquisitions. So we’re always mindful of that trade-off as we look at any transaction.
Thank you. And I am showing no further questions at this time.
Well, thanks everybody. This is Mark McHugh. If have any questions feel free to follow-up with me. Thank you.
Thank you. And this does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect at this time.