© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Welcome to Walker & Dunlop’s First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. Hosting the call today from Walker & Dunlop is Willy Walker, Chairman and CEO. He is joined by Steve Theobald, Chief Financial Officer; and Kelsey Montz, Assistant Vice President of Investor Relations. Today’s call is being recorded and will be made available via webcast on the company’s website. At this time all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be opened for your questions following the presentation. [Operator Instructions]
And it is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Kelsey Montz. Please go ahead, ma’am.
Thank you, Erica. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining the Walker & Dunlop’s first quarter 2018 earnings call. I have with me this morning our Chairman and CEO, Willy Walker; and our CFO, Steve Theobald. This call is being webcast live on our website and a recording will be available later this morning. Both our earnings press release and website provide details on accessing the archived webcast. This morning we posted our earnings release and presentation to the Investor Relations section of our website, www.walkerdunlop.com. These slides serve as a reference point for some of what Willy and Steve will touch on this morning.
Please also note that we will reference the non-GAAP financial metric, adjusted EBITDA, during the course of this call. Please refer to the earnings release posted on our website for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial metric. Investors are urged to carefully read the forward-looking statements language in our earnings release. Statements made on this call which are not historical facts may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements describe our current expectations and actual results may differ materially. Walker & Dunlop is under no obligation to update or alter our forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We expressly disclaim any obligation to do so. More detailed information about risk factors can be found in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC.
I will now turn the call over to Willy.
Thank you, Kelsey, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss another strong quarter of Walker & Dunlop. Q1 2018 results are emblematic of the investments we have made to scale and diversify Walker & Dunlop since going public in 2010.
I’d like to immediately turn your attention to Slide 3, which shows the growth in Walker & Dunlop offices from one office in 2008 to 29 offices today. As you can see on the slide, as we’ve grown the platform we’ve acquired a number of companies that have allowed us to scale our operations and also diversify the services we provide.
If you turn to Slide 4, you can see that in 2010 Fannie Mae and HUD accounted for 69% of our transaction volume. While over the last 12 months those two capital sources have only accounted for 32% of total transaction volume as we have grown volumes in our other product offerings. And this is an extremely important point, for Fannie Mae had a very slow start to 2018, with multi-family lending volumes off 35%. Yet Walker & Dunlop grew origination volumes in every other product line to generate the second highest Q1 origination volume in our history of $4.8 billion as shown on Slide 5.
And Slide 5 also shows in a quarter where Fannie Mae originations, which are shown in light blue, were down dramatically, we grew volumes everywhere else, which produced $1.16 of diluted earnings per share and over $52 million of adjusted EBITDA. These financial results demonstrate the diversification and growth we have achieved in our Freddie Mac, HUD, capital markets and investment sales businesses as we continue to scale Walker & Dunlop. And they also show the value of the long-term prepayment protected revenue streams that are $76 billion servicing portfolio generates.
As you can see on Slide 6, we have grown our servicing portfolio by 18% over the past year from $64 billion to $76 billion, an increase servicing revenues on the quarter by 17% from $51 million last year to $60 million this year. It is extremely rewarding to see such robust financial results due to the growth of our platform, diversification in our service offerings and strength of our business model. As it relates to the rest of 2018, we’ve already seen Fannie Mae come back into the market. And it is our clear expectation that Fannie will capture its historic market share of total multi-family lending this year. As Fannie’s largest lending partner for four of the last six years, our volumes with Fannie should benefit going forward.
Interest rates moved dramatically during the first quarter from a low of 2.46% at the beginning of the year to an intraday high of 2.95% in late February. A 49 basis point increase in the cost of debt financing in such a short period of time would typically freeze the investment sales market as buyers wait for cap markets to adjust, cap rates to adjust. Due to the amount of equity capital looking to be deployed into commercial real estate and particularly in the multi-family, the markets didn’t freeze and transactions continued forward albeit at a somewhat sporadic pace.
W&D’s multi-family investment sales volumes were up 18% in Q1; significantly outpacing the broader commercial real estate markets 5% growth. The current multi-family market environment is very active, for example, we are working on a value add multi-family listing in the Southeast right now that has 40 qualified bidders, which is a much broader investor base than either of the past two years. It’s pretty clear from what we’re seeing in the multi-family space that the amount of equity capital coupled with spread tightening is offsetting the increased cost of debt and supporting a robust acquisitions market, which should continue to drive financing volumes going forward.
Given the strong dynamics and general health of the commercial real estate markets, we’re seeing a significant amount of capital enter the debt financing space, particularly for transitional properties. Unlike other forms of first step lending, bridge lending has minimal barriers to entry and there seems to be a new debt fund packing up every day to deploy capital into this market. This has made the environment quite challenging for our bridge lending joint venture with Blackstone.
For example, we quoted $2.3 billion of financing opportunities in the first quarter and closed just two loans totaling $25 million. We lost a significant portion of those loans, due to proceeds and rates being offered by other lenders that would compromise our credit and return standards. We added a bridge lending space to use our capital on opportunities with strong sponsors, good credit and a potential for an agency permanent takeout. But we will not chase deal flow for deal flow sake.
One of the benefits of the breath and diversity of our lending platform is that we are not forced to deploy capital. There are still good transitional multi-family loans out there to be done and we are focused on building our portfolio with Blackstone, but only when the sponsor and deal fundamentals meet our standards.
While the multi-family bridge lending space maybe a pocket of the market causing concern related to credit quality, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have enforced disciplined underwriting standards in their multi-family lending, such as the debt service coverage floor of 1.25 times, which has been an important driver of the strong credit fundamentals underline the multi-family market. Overall, Walker & Dunlop’s underwriting standards have remained conservative and exceedingly healthy as evidenced by the average 66% LTV and 1.47 time debt service coverage ratio for all the loans we originated in the first quarter. These underwriting metrics have remained consistent quarter-after-quarter, reflecting the healthy lending standards that differentiate this cycle from the last one.
I’d ask you to turn to Slide 7, to look a little deeper at W&D’s credit metrics on our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac portfolios. As you can see, we have had very solid net operating income growth in the portfolio every year since past eight years. With a 4.15% increase in 2017 and extremely healthy debt service coverage growing steadily over the past eight years from 1.44 times in 2009 to 2.07 times at the end of 2017. We feel extremely good about both the credit fundamentals of our existing portfolio and the loans we are originating today.
In March we posted Walker & Dunlop’s 2017 annual review video to the Investor Relations section of our website, which I encourage you to watch if you haven’t had the chance. In that video we outlined our 2020 vision with the goal of generating $1 billion in annual revenues through continued growth in our lending, brokerage, servicing, and asset management businesses. Two of the most ambitious growth objectives are building an $8 billion to $10 billion asset management business and generating $8 billion to $10 billion of investment sales volume. We made significant progress towards achieving these two goals with the recent acquisition of JCR Capital and the hiring of our fantastic team of investment sales professionals in Boston.
JCR is an alternative asset manager that provides commercial real estate sponsors with equity and debt capital to make opportunistic investments in all classes of commercial real estate. When combined with our Blackstone joint venture, the acquisition of JCR significantly increases our assets under management. We have long been talking about our desire to grow our assets under management by acquiring a registered investment advisor with strategy growth outlook and culture aligned with ours. We are thrilled that we found that in Jay Rollins, Maren Steinberg, and the entire JCR team.
On the investment sales front we hired an exceptional team, which coupled with W&D’s existing team of financing professionals in Boston, has a very real opportunity to be the market leader in multi-family sales and financing throughout New England. We will continue to focus on adding teams of professionals to Walker & Dunlop across the country particularly when their track record, personality and professional capabilities match well with W&D’s existing footprint.
Along with setting a goal to expand our national investment sales presence, we also laid out a strategy to grow our debt financing platform by recruiting and hiring teams in markets where W&D’s market share is not commensurate with our national average. We have a proven track record of acquiring and hiring talented mortgage bankers and brokers, efficiently and effectively integrating them into W&D and then providing them with the brand and support to exceed expectations, both their clients, ours and in many instances their own.
We recently announced the addition of talented mortgage bankers in both South Florida and Philadelphia, two markets where we do not have a dominant presence and we are excited about deepening our footprint in these markets and the future contribution that those teams will make to the W&D.
As we focus on continued growth we were excited to be named one of Freddie Mac’s initial partners in a $1.3 billion pilot program to provide financing to owners of single-family rental homes, from here on called SFR. We love the SFR market, for as we have been saying for many years now, the American dream of living in a detached single-family home with a garage and dog in the yard is not gone. It is increasingly hard to achieve that dream by purchasing a home, due to stagnant wages, student debt, and a lack of supply of entry level single-family housing. The SFR market is huge, accounting for over $3 trillion of the single-family housing stock and Freddie’s SFR pilot meets the big market need.
The Freddie pilot is designed for single-family rental homes of greater than $5 million, with collateral that meets the high affordability threshold. Private equity and institutional capital have entered the single-family rental market over the past several years and Freddie’s entry into this space affords us the opportunity to deploy capital in new market segment to both existing and new Walker & Dunlop clients.
With that, I’ll turn the call over to Steve to discuss our first quarter financial results in more detail. Steve?
Thanks, Willy, and good morning, everyone. We’re very pleased with how the year has started and what is typically a slow quarter for the business. Our results in the quarter benefited from solid transaction volumes of $4.8 billion, strong adjusted EBITDA of over $52 million and reduced corporate tax rate from the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
We are in $1.16 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2018, compared to $1.35 in last year’s first quarter. As you may recall last year’s Q1 results included a benefit of $0.27 from reduced tax expense associated with the vesting of employee stock awards. This compares to a smaller benefit for $0.13 in this year’s first quarter from a combination of fewer shares vesting and a lower overall tax rate this year versus last.
Including the stock vesting benefit, our effective tax rate in the first quarter was 16.4%. Going forward, I would expect our effective tax rate to be in the range of 25% to 27% for the remainder of this year. We had a very strong first quarter with Freddie Mac with 14% growth in volume over Q1 2017. Our Fannie Mae volumes were down from last year as we originated two large portfolios totally $800 million in Q1 2017. The relatively low volume of Fannie Mae originations is the reason our net mortgage servicing rights declined slightly during the quarter. Brokered originations topped $1.5 billion, an increase of 18% from the prior year as we continue to benefit from the growth in our capital markets team.
HUD volumes were $352 million compared to $207 million in 2017, an increase of 70%. With construction loans comprising 47% of this quarter’s volume and that remains as an important source of multi-family construction lending in the market. Investment sales volume of $338 million was up 18% year-over-year as we continue to see strong appetite for multi-family assets. We were pleased with our overall execution in the quarter as our team expertly navigated a period of interest rate volatility and intense competition to deliver solid transaction volume and financial performance.
Q1 annualized return on equity was 18%, just below our long-term target range of 20% to 25%. Operating margin for the quarter was 30% within our expected range of 30% to 35%. Finally, gain on sale margin was 180 basis points comfortably within our expected range of 160 basis points to 190 basis points.
Adjusted EBITDA was $52.1 million in the first quarter, up from $50.3 million in Q1 2017. Adjusted EBITDA continues to grow along with our servicing portfolio, which at $76 billion is up 18% on a year-over-year basis. The combination of our servicing fees and interest income from the related escrow balances totaled $55.4 million during the quarter, an increase of $10.6 million or 24% over the same metric in the prior year. The year-over-year growth of the portfolio and related escrow balances along with increases to short-term interest rates provides a nice tailwind for growth in both revenue and adjusted EBITDA going forward, and help contribute to the $194 million of cash on the balance sheet at the end of the quarter.
We remain confident in our future cash flow generation and the ability to both sustain and grow our dividend over time. To that end, yesterday our Board authorized the payment of a $0.25 dividend per share to stockholders of record on May 18. The second quarter dividend represents a payout ratio on Q1 earnings of approximately 21% and only 15% of adjusted EBITDA. With respect to share repurchase activity, we did buyback 244,000 shares early in the quarter which we highlighted in our last call. We have not bought any shares since then and continue to have our full $50 million authorization for future repurchases.
Our steady cash flow and adjusted EBITDA generation give us a strong financial position to continue to execute on acquisition opportunities that will help drive achievement of our long-term strategic goals. As Willy mentioned, we recently announced the acquisition of JCR Capital which closed in mid-April. We have been seeking an entry point into the asset management space for some time and I’m very pleased to have the opportunity to bring JCR into Walker & Dunlop. Our core business has historically been first-trust debt lending and brokering, and we have successfully established a reputation as one of the very best in this space.
With over 140 mortgage bankers and brokers on the platform, the amount of deal flow we see on an annual basis is enormous. Included in this deal flow are opportunities that we broker-off to other capital sources, but for which we retain no long-term economic benefit; unlike our agency lending, where we record and retain our valuable servicing assets, which turn into long-term revenue streams.
The JCR acquisition now gives us a platform that combines our access to deal flow with sources of capital looking to invest, and not just that, but preferred equity, mezzanine equity and JV equity in the commercial real estate space. JCR has successfully raised third-party capital for three funds with the fourth fund well on its way to completing the fund raising process. In addition, JCR is a separately managed account with the life insurance company for which JCR is originating fixed rate first-lien loans on transitional properties.
The asset management and servicing fees generated from the funds and separate account will be additive to our ongoing recurring revenue similar to the servicing fees from our own portfolio. In the near-term, we will work closely with a team at JCR to prudently accelerate the pace at which existing funds are invested so that we can get out and raise the next fund as soon as possible. JCR gives us a solid foundation upon which we can grow the business from just under $1 billion of AUM towards our long-term goal of $8 billion to $10 billion under management.
Before I turn it back over to Willy, let me summarize what I think are the key takeaways for this quarter. First, we had a solid start to the year with $1.16 of earnings per share and EBITDA of $52 million in spite of a relatively slow quarter for Fannie Mae. We grew volumes in nearly every other transaction category and fully expect Fannie to be one of the dominant sources of capital over the remainder of the year.
Our capital markets and investment sales teams continue to grow and diversify our earnings, and we have now added an asset management platform into the mix to drive further diversification and enhancements to the economics of our brokerage business. And finally, the cash that we have available today and expect to generate going forward continues to provide a significant financial flexibility to both sustain our long-term dividend while continuing to reinvest in the growth of the business to achieve our strategic goals.
Thanks for being with us this morning, and I’ll now turn the call back over to Willy.
Thanks, Steve. I’d like to spend some time discussing Walker & Dunlop’s business model and what we believe differentiates W&D from our competitors in the commercial real estate services and financing space.
If I can get you to turn to Slide 8, since 2013 we have grown our employee base by roughly 190 employees and over that time revenues per employee have increased from $740,000 in 2013 to $1.1 million in 2018. When you look at this metric compared to our industry competitors, Walker & Dunlop generates 2 times to 5 times the amount of revenue per employee, a difference that is a direct result of our business model and operational efficiency.
I want to remain on Slide 8 for a moment, where it tells a great story about W&D’s growth and financial performance. As we’ve integrated employees on to the platform and increased the company’s overall productivity, we have also consistently grown revenues at a faster rate than expenses, allowing us to expand our operating margin from 21% in 2013 to 32% in 2018 on a trailing 12-month basis.
So, let me summarize this slide for a moment. We’ve added 190 employees and grow revenue per employee from $740,000 to $1.1 million while increasing operating margins from 21% to 32%. We’ve been able to deliver these enhanced operating metrics by remaining disciplined about who we hire, and how we integrate them into our business. It is our intention to continue expanding W&D’s platform to drive both top and bottom line growth, while maintaining the best-in-class service that has allowed us to expand our client base so dramatically.
Beyond our tried and tested growth model and our durable business model, our core business is underpinned by strong demographic and macroeconomic trends in the multi-family market that should continue to drive demand for many years to come.
If you turn to Slide 9, it shows that in 2017 was a record year for multi-family deliveries in the United States. But according to real page, absorption maintained its 2016 pace of 95% across the top 150 markets. Even with peak deliveries coming online, the market saw a rent growth of approximately 2.5% in 2017. And as I mentioned previously, we saw 4.15% NOI growth in the Walker & Dunlop portfolio. 2018 deliveries are scheduled to be around 354,000 units, slightly down from 2017, while demand for multi-family remains as strong as ever with a growing number of millennials reaching the prime renter age of 20 to 24, and baby boomers beginning to downsize as they reach retirement age.
The demand for apartment is also being driven by the lack of supply and affordability of single-family homes. If you turn to Slide 10, it shows that home construction per household remains near the lowest level in 50 years. And the National Association of Home Builders estimates that builders will start fewer than 900,000 new homes in 2018 compared to roughly 1.3 million needed to keep up with population growth. At the same time home prices have been on a steep upward trajectory.
If you turn to Slide 11, on the left-hand side of the chart you can see that 54% of the new homes sold in 2002 had a sale price of less than $200,000, whereas by 2017 the entire graph has shifted to the right dramatically with 56% of the sales at greater than $300,000 per home. The increased cost of single-family homes is far outpacing economic growth. As indicated by 2017 home prices growing at 2 times the rate of income and 3 times the rate of inflation based on the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Home Price Index. But it’s also true that multi-family housing has become more and more expensive. The bottom line is that renting continues to be far more affordable than homeownership for a large portion of the American population.
This economic reality coupled with steady household formation should keep rents and occupancy levels at healthy – keep rents and occupancy at healthy levels, maintaining positive fundamentals for multi-family properties which will drive investment sales and financing activity for the foreseeable future.
Walker & Dunlop has grown in a disciplined manner to build a platform that has captured 7.3% market share of the overall U.S. multi-family financing done in 2017, and we are focused on growing our market share to over 10% in the coming years. We continue to grow our capital markets platform with volumes up 18% in the first quarter. With less than 2% market share of the non-multi-family commercial real estate financing market in 2017, we have a huge opportunity for continued growth in this space to gain market share, commensurate with what we have in multi-family. We’re excited about the opportunities ahead of us as we continue to execute on our strategic initiatives and deliver financial outperformance to our shareholders.
I would like to thank my colleagues at Walker & Dunlop for a strong start to 2018, and our investors for your continued confidence in Walker & Dunlop. With that, I’d like to ask the operator open the line for any questions.
Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Jade Rahmani from KBW. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much. On your 2018 guidance that you previously gave last quarter, are there any changes that you are making? You’ve previously cited 10% to 15% producer headcount growth double-digit operating income and EBITDA growth, for example.
Yes. No, no changes, Jade.
Okay. Can you characterize the current mood and tone in the market from multi-family investors? Maybe if you could give some color on, if there’s any pull forward in volumes as far as maybe lift to lock-in today’s rates, or if you’re seeing any mix shift in acquisition versus refinancings?
I guess from our prepared comments, Jade, the market commentary on investment sales was that it’s an extremely active market. I do think that rates moving as much as they did in Q1, made it so that the transaction volumes from both the financing and investment sales standpoint were a bit sporadic. I was quite interested that when rates got up close to 3% and then backed off a little bit at the end of Q1 that we didn’t get kind of a flurry of financing activity at the end of the quarter to meet that rally in rates, but we didn’t.
And at the same time we’d say to you that the general outlook is very positive from an economic standpoint and from a commercial real estate, as an asset class standpoint. And if investment sales is any, if you will, general indicator of interest in the asset class and transaction volumes, things are very healthy right now.
And any color on the mortgage banking side, mix of refinancings versus acquisition financing?
I don’t have that number. Do you have it, Steve?
No, I don’t think there’s really been much change on that, Jade.
Okay. In terms of the servicing portfolio, do you have any color you could provide on what percentage of adjusted EBITDA comes from servicing? Is it well more than half? Considering the size and duration of the servicing portfolio and the prepayment protected profile, I think this information would help investors gain insight into the stability of W&D’s earnings.
Yes. Jade, as we’ve discussed in the past, we don’t provide that level of detail.
In terms of how you think about valuation, when you’re underwriting M&A transactions, in what multiple do you think that servicing EBITDA should trade at?
It really depends a lot, Jade. As you know we’ve acquired companies that are predominantly agency origination companies like Column Financial, and CW. And then we’ve also purchased fewer brokerage firms that don’t have an agency component to them today. And as we’ve discussed in the back past, the difference in the value of agency servicing versus non-agency servicing is dramatic.
And as a result of that, the fact that our servicing portfolio is the majority servicing which is – whether we are at 86% or 87% prepayment protected on our servicing portfolio today, and also at an average servicing fee of 26 basis points. The asset value there is dramatically different. So as we look at acquisitions, it really depends on the composition of the servicing and we haven’t done a GSC, if you will, a GSC focused acquisition since CW, and how we value that servicing portfolio is very different from some of the brokerage firms we have acquired recently that may have hundreds of millions or billions of dollars of servicing, but if it’s general commercial servicing on CMBS loans or life insurance company loans, those not only come with a much, much lower servicing fee, but they’re also not prepayment protected to us. So as a result of that, if the loan pays off, the servicing goes away.
And just in terms of 1Q’s production headcount growth, can you give me any color on how many producers overall you hired and just the mix between the agency business and investments sales?
Yes, go ahead.
Jade, we’ve had nine production folks though today, so rather than just talking about Q1, but to-date we have nine new additions to the team.
And what’s the mix between investment sales and agency lending?
Yes, it’s about one-third, two-thirds investment sales. And then I’d say, it’s capital markets, not necessarily agency lending, but as you know our capital markets brokers do a fair amount of agency business as well.
Okay. So two-thirds is capital markets?
Two-thirds capital markets, one-third investment sales. And on the capital markets as we’ve talked through before, as Steve just said, many of those people who joined us, for instance, the team that just joined us in Philadelphia, there are on the platform today that does not have access to the agencies, they’re not coming to W&D and will have access to Fannie’s largest partner, and Freddie Mac’s their largest partner. I can guarantee you that that team that just joined us as a capital markets team will start originating agency there.
Okay, thanks for taking the questions.
Thank you, Jade.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will go next to the line of Steve DeLaney from JMP Securities. Please go ahead.
Good morning, everyone. I’d like to start with JCR Capital; I know that’s a positive development on one of your important long-term goals. Can you comment on the funds available today whether they can call capital from their investors? So what do they have available to them today to deploy? And also, Willy, where do you see in the capital stack as far as borrowers, clients that are developers and owners of multi-family? Where is the greatest need in the capital stack and along with that probably the best return profile for that profit capital? Thank you.
Yes. Steve, I’ll handle the first part. So with respect to what’s available, so again, a little bit of history here. There aren’t Funds 4 at the moment, Funds 1 and Fund 2 have both kind of cycled through and paid back at this point in time successfully. So Fund 3 is in the kind of recycling phase, if you will. And then Fund 4, they’ve had their first closing on Fund 4, the fund raising process is still open through probably the next few months, but they – when it’s done should have about $300 million available in Fund 4 and part of that in Fund 3 still available for investments. So, one of the things that we were excited about in terms of the acquisition was the fact that they actually did have a fair amount of dry powder available to investors. So it’s not like we bought a wholly invested firm that was starting over with the fundraising process.
Okay, got it.
Steve, on the…
Yes, Willy.
Where the market is looking for capital, I mean I would honestly say to you that given the breadth of our platform today it’s sort of all over in the sense that there’s no one specific need that I continue to hear about. Clearly, if you go back to what we put forth as far as our underwriting standards on our Q1 agency business of 68% – 66% LTV and 1.47% debt service covered.
The agencies are holding very, very tight as it relates to the leverage that they’re putting on their assets, which is meaning that’s a market for really sort of established developers, owners and not one where people who are trying to stretch a $1. You can really access that capital if you will at those lower leverage levels. And so as a result, there is a significant amount need for mezz debt. There’s significant amount need for preferred equity. And the thing that’s so exciting about JCR is that we’ve done preferred equity investments in multi-family, we’ve done mezzanine loans in multi-family, and we have our Blackstone joint venture focused on multi-family bridge loans. What JCR allows us to do is to focus on providing that type of capital to the rest of the market, in office, and in industrial and hospitality.
And so we did $7 billion of brokerage – debt brokerage last year at W&D. And as you saw we had very significant volume increases in Q1 and our capital markets grew. This provides all of those brokers with an additional source of capital to meet the needs of their clients. And as Steve walked you through, the greatest part about that is when we put that financing on there, we’re going to continue to make ongoing revenue streams out of that financing rather than just brokering the deal off to somebody else. So that’s the strategy we’re really excited to have them, and specifically to what the market is looking for today I would just say to you that people are going for sort of every dollar they can get.
Yes. Willy, given your comments on Blackstone joint venture and competitiveness of that market I think that’s widely understood in the marketplace with these new debt funds coming in. Is it possible that – I think you made a 15% commitment to $1 billion fund there, don’t know where that stands as far as the amount deployed exactly on your books. But would you consider allocating W&D capital more to mezz loans or preferred equities, do you think the returns there might be more attractive to W&D than the capital you have committed to the bridge loan joint venture?
So, Steve, we have two things; one, we reiterated in our comments how focused we are in growing our joint venture with Blackstone. We want to see that partnership grow and it’s a fundamental piece to our overall platform. With that said, deals that don’t size for the joint venture, we have in the joint venture agreement the ability to do them on our balance sheet, should Blackstone say this doesn’t meet our return threshold and Walker & Dunlop might say, hey, we – it’s strategic for us. It will meet our return threshold what have you. So there is sort of the ability in that partnership for deals that go to that joint venture that for whatever reason don’t go into the venture can contact and find their way to Walker & Dunlop’s balance sheet, or can find their way to another source of capital.
So I would just reiterate our very clear focus on continuing to grow that joint venture and put additional capital to that joint venture. But it does not limit us in our ability to do other things that may meet our criteria that might not meet the joint ventures criteria.
Great. Thanks for clarifying that, Willy.
Yes, Steve, if I could add to that as well.
Please.
Yes. I think one of the other things to consider here is in the asset management space, and I’ll talk specifically about JCR, in future fund raising effects I would expect that we will be one of the lead investors in new funds. And so through that mechanism we actually would be allocating capital towards our preferred equity, mezz equity, JV equity through that.
Exactly. I assumed you would be, just whether your name is involved, whether it would obviously help with the fundraising if you guys are putting your own money into the deal. Sure.
Steve, I noticed in the income statement in the mix of revenues, obviously, mortgage banking downed, but dramatic increase in escrow earnings and interest income, I think that’s something the investors tend to overlook in W&D. Can you give us a sense like for each 25 basis point Fed hike; do you know off top of your head what that means as far as incremental revenue either in dollar terms or for share?
Yes. So Steve, our average escrow balances have been kind of bouncing around between $1.8 billion and $2 billion over the last few months. And most of that money is tied to short-term rates whether it’s Fed funds or LIBOR. I don’t think we’re necessarily getting 100% lift every time you get a 25 basis point increase, but we’re capturing a significant portion of that increase every time it happens.
Steve, if I could…
Okay. We will check what we’ve got in our model there as far as rate sensitivity.
Steve, just one quick thing on that. I would keep in mind the following that as the yield curve flattens our warehouse interest income goes down. So one of the things just as you get – you continue to get a flattening of the yield curve and what would make in our warehouse interest income will go down and we’ll eat into some of the increase interest income we make off of our escrows.
So it’s just that as Steve just said, it’s not a one for one as you rise by 25 basis points, you’re going to get all of that into it, but we watch those numbers very closely, we think we are maximizing the returns on those escrow deposits. And at the same time, the flattening yield curve does take out on the warehouse interest income line.
Yes, makes sense. So thanks for the comments guys.
Absolutely.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will go next to the line of [indiscernible]. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. Willy, I appreciated your opening comments about the level of competition you’re seeing in the JV. I think it’s a nice reminder that you guys get a very nice benefit from barriers to entry for your JV businesses.
When I was looking through the release I had a quick question on the expenses and how we should think about those. I know that you called out increasing the fixed expenses do the hiring of support staff in recent acquisitions. And I think we’ve spoken about a natural lag time or ramp up when a new hire starts generating revenues. So is it fair to assume that as fixed expenses percent of total revenue that marginally improve in the later parts of the year as those new hires actually start generating revenue for the platform?
So, Ben, first of all, great to have you on the call and thanks for joining us this morning. The second thing is that your comment about barriers to entry on our core lending business are exactly right, and it does allow us to be extremely disciplined in what we’re doing.
As it relates to overall expenses and when those people come on and the time to ramp it up, first of all, the people at W&D who are responsible for the majority of our recruiting are very clearly trying to do as much as early as possible to get the maximum benefit from those hires in 2018. So there’s very much – if you wait until November or December to do all of the annual hiring, you’re not going to get any benefit from it during the year. So there’s very much a focus on that.
The second thing I’d point out is that compensation expense as a percentage of revenue in the first quarter was 38%. I looked at a number of our competitor firms and that percentage is dramatically lower in it than our competitor firms, and that is due to our business model and the amount of revenues that we make off of our servicing and if you will financial income that Steve DeLaney just asked about.
And so we have managed this business to a range of compensation expenses, a percentage of revenue between a band of sort of 37% up to 43%, 44%. And it obviously will vary quarter-to-quarter depending on what origination volumes are, where our producers are in their annual splits et cetera, et cetera. But we feel very, very comfortable that the business model works for our ability to continue to grow earnings and remaining increasingly profitable; as I pointed out in that slide as it relates to the growth in revenue per employee and how we’ve driven operating margins up very steadily over the last five years.
So the model’s working really well and specifically your question we want to get as many people on the platform as quickly as possible to get the benefit of their revenues in 2018.
That’s great, I appreciate that. And since we’ve just kind of touched on it, and Steve, opened up with it, on the servicing portfolio when I try to think about revenues generated from that portfolio, would it be fair to include the escrow balance income as cash servicing fees? And I only ask because maybe a year or two ago it wasn’t such a big number, but now that short-term rates are increasing and where they are, we’re starting to get a very nice contribution from that line item that feels like it’s going to be left out of the valuation approach.
Yes. I would agree with that, Ben. I think we’ve always viewed servicing fees is obviously the primary component of revenue from the portfolio, but in addition to that we also get the earnings off the escrows that we also earn fees of the processing assumptions of loans that are in our servicing portfolio. So that’s another revenue stream that comes written up.
That’s great. And then also I know in the press release that you mentioned transfer of Freddie Mac quarter in book 2018. And in your prepared remarks I think I heard your expectation at Fannie will eventually capture its historic share in the market. What now pushing or going to push that marginal borrower to Fannie? Is it just the curve tightening that’s making that fixed rate debt a little more attractive right now?
Ben, it’s just – it’s sort of a historic – it’s a historic pattern, where the agencies both are very competitive against one and another on a day-to-day basis. But at certain times during the year, one is more competitive on a certain product that the market really wants and then lumber whole [ph] that agency is sort of filled up and they slow down a little bit, the other one steps in. And you can see it quite honestly and it happens. So Fannie Mae comes out of her first quarter, where their volumes were off 35%. And they come into Q2 saying, okay, we’ve got work to do. And guess what, they get to work and we get to work with them.
So it’s – and in that – but the one thing that is I think very important to keep in mind is A, both Fannie and Freddie have the opportunity to do a huge amount of lending in 2018. And the second thing to all that is Freddie has traditionally been better on floating rate debt and Fannie has traditionally been better on fixed rate debt. They’re both really good at both, but typically that’s where it’s been. You’ve got to borrow on floating rate; chances are that Freddie probably is going to have a more competitive bid due to their securitization model. You want fixed rate loan, on the margin Freddie might be a little bit better.
So one of the things there is that as rates start to move, you would think that many people want to lock-in rates and go with fixed rates. Except for the fact that there is so much private equity out there, in funds waiting to be deployed, and those borrowers are almost always floating rate borrowers because they want the flexibility that floating rate debt gives them to be able to trade the assets. So you could be sitting there in a rapidly increasing rate environment and still have a huge amount of capital deployed in floating rate debt because the big sponsor groups are the big buyers at that time in the market and they want the flexibility that floating rate debt will bring them. So it’s very difficult to look at any sort of macro drivers to determine specifically who’s going to be most competitive at that time because it really gets back to the financing needs of the acquirer of the asset.
I think that makes a lot of sense. It’s not as easy as I think it excels rates on the macro trend which is who has the dry powder and he’s looking to deploy it. Well, I appreciate your comments guys and congratulations on your recent hiring efforts and definitely excited to hear more about this Freddie Mac SFR program in the future.
Thanks, Ben.
Thank you. And we will go next to the line of Fred Small from Compass Point. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, thanks for taking my question. Just on market share, what do you estimate your market share was? Sorry, if I missed it earlier between – with Fannie and Freddie each in the first quarter.
We have that. What was it?
It’s about 11% combined, Fred, so pretty much in line and combined.
And that’s on originated volume or securitized volume?
Securitized – delivered volumes, right, what we’ve delivered to agencies because that’s what their number is based on as you know.
Right, when they report there or not. Do you know how it was on origination?
No, there’s no way to know that.
Okay, great thanks a lot.
Thank you. And we have our next follow-up from Jade Rahmani. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much. In terms of Fannie Mae, do you attribute the 1Q decline to a tough year-over-year comparison since they took delayed deliveries in 1Q 2017? And I guess anything you could provide on, say, April volumes or what gives you confidence that the volumes are going to pick up?
So on Q1 year-on-year and there 35% fall off in overall volumes. I don’t – Jade, you maybe correct, they carried business over from, what was that, that would be 2016 to 2017.
Some element of that in the number, that doesn’t explain all of it.
Right. As it relates to HUD, if you look at our flow business with Fannie Mae, it was actually up on a quarter-to-quarter basis. The real delta in our numbers is that in – as Steve said, in Q1 of 2017 we did two large portfolios for $800 million. And as investors in Walker & Dunlop know we don’t do a big deal every quarter, we’re very lucky to be one of the few lenders who the big deals come to, but they – you don’t build your business based off of next quarter, we’re going to do a mega transaction, or in the next quarter we’re constantly looking for them and we get phone calls from time-to-time to focus on very, very large transactions, but we did not have a large transaction in Q1.
As it relates to the confidence on Fannie coming back into the market, as I said in our – in my prepared remarks, we are seeing Fannie back in the market. And what gives us confidence about it, just looking at their track record, they’ve got huge amounts of dry powder, they’ve got the ability to deploy massive amounts of capital and we’ve been their largest partner for over the last six years. So chances are that they’ll put their money, chances are that Walker & Dunlop will get us commensurate share of that capital.
Yes, and I just add to that. I think just look back historically since they’ve had caps base, we’re pretty hard to get to the max on the caps each year, plus do as much business outside of that and Fannie did over 60% of their Q1 business outside the cap, so certainly our expectation that history will continue on that front.
Okay. On the JCR deal, what level of annual accretion do you expect there? Previously estimated around $0.13 a share, around $0.03 to $0.04 a quarter. Is that reasonable? And also do you anticipate any 2Q impact that are positive or negative from transaction expenses?
So, Jade, I think we incurred a fair amount of legal expense in Q1 associated with the transaction itself, I wouldn’t expect a significant impact in Q2 from that. Going forward I think your number is probably a little high certainly with respect to the first year as we do work to integrate and bring them fully into Walker & Dunlop from an infrastructure standpoint.
Thanks very much,
Thank you.
Thank you. And at this time we have no further questions. So I would like to turn it back over to Willy Walker for any additional or closing comments.
Great, thanks everyone for joining us today and have a terrific day.
Thank you. This does conclude today’s conference call. Please disconnect your line and have a wonderful day.
Thanks.