Puma SE
OTC:PMMAF
Decide at what price you'd be comfortable buying and we'll help you stay ready.
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
|
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US |
|
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US |
|
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio compares a company`s total enterprise value to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company`s earnings, including both equity and debt.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio compares a company`s total enterprise value to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It shows how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company`s earnings, including both equity and debt.
Valuation Scenarios
If EV/EBITDA returns to its 3-Year Average (11.2), the stock would be worth $8.06 (74% downside from current price).
| Scenario | EV/EBITDA Value | Implied Price | Upside/Downside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Multiple | 42.5 | $30.63 |
0%
|
| 3-Year Average | 11.2 | $8.06 |
-74%
|
| 5-Year Average | 12.7 | $9.18 |
-70%
|
| Industry Average | 9.9 | $7.17 |
-77%
|
| Country Average | 9 | $6.5 |
-79%
|
Forward EV/EBITDA
Today’s price vs future ebitda
| Today's Enterprise Value | EBITDA | Forward EV/EBITDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
$4.3B
|
/ |
Jan 2026
€114.8m
|
= |
|
|
$4.3B
|
/ |
Dec 2026
€300.2m
|
= |
|
|
$4.3B
|
/ |
Dec 2027
€607.3m
|
= |
|
|
$4.3B
|
/ |
Dec 2028
€781.3m
|
= |
|
Forward EV/EBITDA shows whether today’s EV/EBITDA still looks high or low once future ebitda are taken into account.
Peer Comparison
| Market Cap | EV/EBITDA | P/E | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE |
|
Puma SE
OTC:PMMAF
|
3.8B USD | 42.5 | -5.9 | |
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
67.6B USD | 18.7 | 30 | |
| JP |
|
Asics Corp
TSE:7936
|
3.2T JPY | 18.9 | 32.8 | |
| US |
|
Deckers Outdoor Corp
NYSE:DECK
|
15.3B USD | 9.8 | 14.8 | |
| CH |
|
On Holding AG
NYSE:ONON
|
12.1B USD | 17.9 | 47.4 | |
| US |
|
Skechers USA Inc
NYSE:SKX
|
9.5B USD | 7.8 | 14.3 | |
| UK |
|
Birkenstock Holding PLC
NYSE:BIRK
|
7.5B USD | 11 | 16.9 | |
| CN |
|
Huali Industrial Group Co Ltd
SZSE:300979
|
50.4B CNY | 11.1 | 15.5 | |
| US |
|
Crocs Inc
NASDAQ:CROX
|
5.3B USD | 6.4 | -65.1 | |
| HK |
|
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
HKEX:551
|
27.1B HKD | 6.2 | 8.3 | |
| US |
|
Steven Madden Ltd
NASDAQ:SHOO
|
2.9B USD | 20.6 | 63.9 |
Market Distribution
| Min | 0.1 |
| 30th Percentile | 6.2 |
| Median | 9 |
| 70th Percentile | 13.6 |
| Max | 6 112.6 |
Other Multiples
Puma SE
Glance View
Puma SE, a formidable presence in the global athletic and lifestyle market, traces its roots back to Herzogenaurach, Germany, in the post-war era of 1948. Born from a sibling rivalry within a family shoemaking business, Puma rapidly evolved into a brand synonymous with athletic innovation and style. The company strategically navigates the competitive sportswear landscape by blending high-performance technology with fashion-forward designs, effectively capitalizing on both the utility sought by athletes and the stylistic aspirations of trendsetters. Puma’s product line, which encompasses sports footwear, apparel, and accessories, serves as the backbone of its business model. Through strategic partnerships, sponsorships, and a focus on emerging markets, Puma broadens its reach and strengthens its brand equity. Driving its revenue engine is the company’s adeptness at leveraging diverse market dissemination strategies, from penetrating elite sports events to collaborations with iconic figures in music and fashion. Puma’s ability to maintain this equilibrium of tradition and innovation is evident in its product evolution—meeting the demands of its audience while integrating sustainability practices. Manufacturing is handled globally, balancing cost-effectiveness with quality assurances. This worldwide production network, coupled with an expansive distribution system through retail stores and e-commerce platforms, ensures Puma remains agile and responsive to market demands. In essence, Puma SE's narrative is not just one of athletic success, but of a brand that successfully marries heritage with modernity to generate substantial profitability.