© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Thank you everyone for taking precious time to attend Renesas Electronics 2024 First Quarter Earnings Call. We thank you very much indeed. Today, simultaneous interpretation service is available. Please select the translation icon at the bottom of the screen and select the language of your choice. Now speakers you are now requested to turn your video on.Today's session is attended by our President and CEO, Mr. Hidetoshi Shibata and our Executive Officer and CFO, Mr. Shuhei Shinkai and some other staff of the company. First, Mr. Shibata will provide you with a few words of greetings and then Mr. Shinkai will provide you with an explanation of the first quarter results followed by the Q&A session. We expect to finish the entire session in about 60 minutes. The materials to be used for today's session is the one that is posted on the IR site of our homepage.Now, Mr. Shibata, please turn the microphone on and the floor is yours.
Good morning, everyone. This is Shibata here. Since the last several times, we, again, think that this is an earnings call that we don't have a major news to share with you. Triggered by the internal organization change this time around, we have slightly changed the classification of segmentation segment reporting, and this will be explained by Shinkai-san later. But still, that is not a major change.As far Altium and -- as well as acquisition processes, so far we are making good progress and nothing unexpected has really happened. As for the first quarter results, well the last time we mentioned that the first or second quarter, we will likely hit the bottom according to what I recall. And that view remains unchanged, as I speak today. The automotive, it's not showing a very robust growth according to our outlook, but steadily, we expect a full year growth for this segment, a steadfast growth. And although this is not a major business in our company, but the AI and DDR5 transition, that is a tailwind for us. And data center and infrastructure businesses has been achieving a very strong growth, and we believe this will continue into the full year.For industrial, and again, mobile, which is not so large again, but I think the sluggishness of the market will continue for some time now, especially Japan customers. The inventory consumption will take some time, I believe. So I think they will need some time to eliminate the inventories. And therefore, when you look at the overall picture, the first quarter hitting the bottom, I think that remains unchanged. But when you look at the details, as I mentioned earlier, depending on the segment, there are segments where gradual growth is expected and the strong growth is expected and the sluggishness will remain in some other sectors. So that's the current outlook that I have in my mind.So now I'd like to hand the microphone to Mr. Shinkai, our CFO, so that he can provide you with more details. Shinkai-san, the floor is yours.
Thank you. This is Shinkai, CFO. I would like to talk about the earnings results for the first quarter of fiscal 2024. I would like to use the material for my presentation and the disclaimer on Page 3. If you look at the very bottom there, as was mentioned by Mr. Shibata, from the first quarter onwards, we have changed the calculation method of the reporting segments in line with the -- to align with the change of the organization change that took effect this first quarter. So previously, we were calculating based on the products. But this time around we have decided to change this based on the actual customer and actual application. So the revenues are calculated in that way to give you more details.For example, if it's an automotive product -- if it's defined to be automotive product, so no matter who the customer is and the actual application is, that will be recorded previously as an automotive product. However, going forward, we will actually based on the actual customer and actual -- based actual application, if it's for automotive, that will be accounted for as automotive. But if it's used for industrial purposes, that will be accounted for as industrial. For -- the segment information for December 2023, we have reclassified them again and disclosed this material based on the new calculation method to align with the new policy.Previously, we have mentioned that the ERP integration that was actually scheduled to go live in the first phase will go -- was expected to go live in May of 2024. However, we have decided to postpone this to 2025 or beyond. In order to ensure the quality of our product data and the consistency of that, we have decided to spend longer time for preparations by expanding the [ spot ] scope of system integration. And also because this is a new year, we have just slightly changed the sequence or the layout of the presentation slides.Now the next page, please. The overview, the snapshot of the results. The first quarter, if you look at the dark blue columns in the middle, the revenue, JPY 351.8 billion. Gross margin, 56.7%. Operating profit was JPY 115.5 billion. OP margin, 32.3%. Profit attributable to the owners of parent, JPY 105.9 billion. EBITDA, JPY 133.8 billion, and foreign exchange, JPY 140 to the dollar and JPY 159 to the euro. Compared against the forecast, I would like to explain this in the following slide.First of all, regarding -- this is the company totals. Numbers are provided in the bottom right -- upper right. Revenue was -- came in 1% higher compared to the median forecast number. But this was mainly due to the foreign exchange impact. For gross margin, the currency impact was almost flat. Product mix deteriorated slightly. However, the utilization improved and also expenses came down -- came down. And because there was no write-off of inventory. Therefore that was the reason we were able to achieve positive results.For the product mix, relatively speaking, the low gross margin power product increased and that was the major reason behind the deterioration of product mix. Utilization, I'll come back to this topic later. But compared to initial assumption, the utilization came in slightly higher than expectations. Operating profit margin because of the decrease in expenses, a 2.3 percent point increase compared to our forecast. On a Q-on-Q level, at the bottom right, revenue was down by 2.8%. And if you exclude the impact of foreign exchange, down 2.7%. Gross margin, slightly positive. However, automotive increased and infrastructure IoT reduced, and therefore, there was a significant improved deterioration of product mix.However, utilization increased and also the expenses for [ disc guard ] reduced. And therefore, that's the reason why the gross margin improved. For the operating profit margin, because of the decline in operating expenses, we were able to achieve an increase. So by segment, if you look at the left-hand table, automotive and the industrial IoT, if you look at all these columns there, if I just add 1 or 2 comments here, the gross margin automotive basically remained flat. For industrial, infrastructure and IoT, basically because of the improvement of cost because we didn't have to write down the inventory, there was a significant improvement in OP gross margin. For OP margin on automotive, especially because of the increase of R&D on a Q-on-Q, the margin deteriorated.The next page, please. In terms of revenue for 2023, segment revenues, which has been shown here have been retroactively revised according to the new calculation method. And overall, in the first half on year-on-year, there is a decline, 2.2% and Q-on-Q, 2.8% decline in overall sales revenue. Excluding ForEx impact revenue, there is a drop of 8.2% year-on-year and a drop of 2.7% quarter-on-quarter. And the breakdown is as indicated here. Excluding the ForEx impact, there is quite a gap. So I'd like to comment on this and automotive is plus 4% range and also IIoT minus 18% -- top of 18%.And going on to the next page. Here we are looking at the trend by respective financial indicators for reference. And to the bottom right-hand corner in terms of the cash flow, first quarter there is a decline and corporate income tax as well as bonus payment have been incurred. In first quarter, there has been a decline. And against previous year due to premium payments, there appears to be a somewhat heavy decline in premium payments. And thereafter, there are no extraordinary developments, and therefore, we can expect to see a recovery.And as far as inventory is concerned from this time around, we have decided to display both in-house inventory and sales channel inventory in a single side. For the sake of visual representation of inventory management, we have been presenting in-house and sales channel inventory separately. However, we believe that we have been able to achieve a certain level of success in down cycle inventory management. And therefore, we have demonstrated ability to manage both inventories. And hence, in light of the situation to ensure simplicity, we have decided to supplement by comments on segment trades. And Q-on-Q and change factors in future outlook is indicated on the right-hand side of this page.Now when we look at the days of inventory, we are seeing Q-o-Q increase to 101 days. This is due to the enhancement of die bank and also for the foundries, there have been proactive purchase orders and therefore, work in progress has increased. And thereafter die bank accumulation is expected. And also in our foundries, we expect to see increase in work in progress. And also in WOI internal inventory Q-on-Q, there is an increase overall, more than 10 weeks of WOI. And as expected, increase in automotive and slightly up for infrastructure/IoT.In second quarter and onwards, we expect to see a continued rise in sales channel inventory for automotive. However, for IIoT, we plan on seeing somewhat of a decline.And moving on -- and this is in reference to utilization rate and CapEx on the same page. To the left, utilization due to the wafer, there are trends in front-end utilization rate on a wafer input basis first quarter. The wafer input was just under 60%. The expectation early was 59%, so it's somewhat higher than expected. And fourth quarter last year, we have bottomed out.And as for the 12-inch, for the first quarter the 12-inch utilization has increased. And in Naka plant 40 nanometer MCUs production has increased. And there has also been die bank production increase as well and these have been the contributing factors to the increase. In the second quarter, we are expected to see somewhat of an increase and likewise the die bank production is a contributing factor. In third quarter and there is a summer holiday that will come in and there -- where we expect a shortfall. And in order to offset this, we are expecting to see an increase in production in second quarter. And therefore, that will be the explanation.And to the right, this is the CapEx. In the first quarter, the decision to invest 3.9% of revenue has been made. Second quarter R&D related investment is expected a single-digit -- midway into single digit, vis-a-vis revenue.And next page. This is the second quarter expectation. And let's look at the dark blue at the center. We are looking at the median in revenue, JPY 355 billion year-on-year, down 3.7% and up 0.9% Q-on-Q excluding ForEx impact. And we are looking at the ForEx exchange as indicated here. And in terms of the gross margin, as we can see on the right, 3.7% year-on-year decline. And further to the right, Q-on-Q, 0.9% decline and [ accepting ] foreign exchange, 8.6% decline and 4.9% increase. And automotive is up and IoT somewhat of a decline is what we're expecting.And in terms of gross margin, there is a deterioration due to product mix and also increased manufacturing costs and therefore, a 1.2% decline on a Q-on-Q basis. And in terms of operating margin, because of R&D, Q-on-Q increase is expected and hence in operating margin Q-on-Q, 1.8% decline is expected.And let's move on to the appendix. And please turn to Page 18. As I've indicated, we have changed the calculation method for the segments. And to the left, we are looking at the old and new classification, and this will display the relationship. The thick line indicates the major change up until this point in time, for automotive [indiscernible] power products and also MCU products. Recategorizing by destination, some have been shifted to industrial. And also what has been looked at, including IoT, the smart home have been recategorized as smart appliance under industrial. And these are some of the changes to take note of. And overall, in automotive and also IoT, the structure has not changed much. However, as far as automotive is concerned, 2.3% has declined and shifted over to IIoT. And that is our expectations in terms of classification.To the right we are looking at the revision made by a product. Power management IC, which used to belong to the analog category has now been reorganized as it is generally observed as power and therefore it has been reorganized into power. And therefore, in the new categorization where it reads power, the power semiconductors, discrete and parent management products will be reclassified into power management products. And moving on, this is a new segment. And here, we are looking at the portfolio, and this is how it will appear for your reference.And moving on, and here are some of the highlights. Acquisition of Altium and also a joint venture in India has been established. Also Kofu plant have resumed operations. And these are some of the recent developments. And I would like to conclude my presentation here.
Thank you. Now I'd like to move on to the Q&A session. The [ MC ] will explain how to raise a question.
[Operator Instructions] First of all, Goldman Sachs, Takayama-san, please begin your question.
I have 2 questions. 3 months ago, you said that it will be July, September period that you'll be able to see a steadfast growth in the market, and the April-June period will be quiet, you said. And that, I think, remains unchanged as we speak today. After 3 months, what is your confidence about the recovery of the market in the July-September period? Do you think it is -- do you see any weaknesses or strength depending on the segment and/or application of products? And -- because I think depending on that, I think the April to June performance will also be affected. So if you could just share with us your view on that that will be appreciated.
Well, the last time I mentioned that the second half -- we have our outlook for the second half and -- but we are not really sure about that. That's what I meant the last time. But according to what we see today, the second quarter into the third quarter, I think we can only expect a slight increase, nothing particularly strong, nothing particularly bad either. That is how we look at the market right now.It is possible to dissect by the segments, but the elimination of inventory rather, according to how we see it, especially amongst the Japanese customers, and particularly, they're not really big customers, I think those are the centerpiece of these efforts of eliminating the inventory. So previously, compared to the large companies, I think they struggled. These customers struggled in acquiring inventory. So I think they are now delayed in the progress, and therefore, I think they are currently working to eliminate the inventories.And I think the end demand did not increase as strongly as expected. And I think that is the reason why they are taking longer than expected time to eliminate inventory. If I try to divide by application, industrial and some Tier 1 automotive, this trend is quite conspicuous.But that may not be corresponding to the [indiscernible] demand at the very end, because there's only so much we can see. But if I try to divide by segment, some portion of automotive and the industrial segment is conspicuous when it comes to inventory elimination and also the mass market, too. So it's not really a segment view, but rather, I think these are now happening rather in Japan, I think. That's how we look at it. All right.So it might be difficult to generalize by segment. But when it comes to data center infrastructure, I think the growth might be stronger today compared to 3 months ago. Smartphones, I think, had some seasonality as well. So is that the area that is currently struggling? Well, the driver of growth overall would be automotive. And of course, as you mentioned, AI related and also DDR transition for data centers, especially. I think these will be the drivers for the growth in the future.
My second question, this is a frequently asked question. So I'm sure you might be able to provide some answers to this. But the AI-related market size, I think previously AI was very limited, if any, and was not really significant as a size. However, going forward towards the end of this fiscal year or into the next fiscal year, the industry itself, this industry sector, I think, is rapidly growing. So I think that this could become a meaningful size of business for you. So if you could just share with us the size of that business in your company? And maybe which product for AI, if you could give us a size indication of that around the end of the year this year.
Well, I do understand where your question is coming from, but AI, and as you mentioned, how to -- this depends on how you define AI in the first place. So we don't want to talk about an inflated numbers. And the real hard, hardcore AI in the sense of our company, GPU-related power, I think that's the real AI, I think. So its contribution to the total sales of the company would be only single digits and -- the lower single digits, lower to mid-single digit. I think that is their contribution to their total company sales, to our total company sales in the recent months. So I don't think this will change significantly. So as we move towards the end of the year, there might be a 1 percentage point or 2 percentage point increase. But then will it account for 10% of the company's total sales? No, that is not our expectation. We don't expect the size to grow to that level.And then although, this is not included in our outlook, maybe this might be some optimistic view included in this, but the domino effect from AI, if you will, so by utilizing AI, there might be some ripple effects from DDR4 to DDR5. This transition is not really GPU. So this is not accounted for directly as AI. But the CPU will have to enhance. And because of these secondary effects, the DDR transition may accelerate. So that could be the potential case. So if that is the case, then as we've been talking from before, with the transition to DDR5, the content will increase significantly compared to DDR4. So that growth is something that we would like to expect in the future. But it's too early for me to comment any further. So that is not the reason why we have not included this in the outlook.
BofA Securities, Mr. Hirakawa, please.
BofA Securities. My name is Hirakawa. This is the first question. I know it's not a hot topic. It might diverge from the topic. After Infineon in 2023 onboard MCU sales, 44% growth has been registered and 23% share has been [ clinched ]. Now when we look at Infineon and competing with you, do you have the notion that they have competed with you and have the upper hand? And how do you view your share of the MCU market? And that's my first question.
In the Capital Market Day come next month I had been intended to speak over that topic and therefore I refrain from offering a comment today. However, we were also taken aback as we viewed the numbers. 6% share declined at our company. And I'm talking about automotive applications within MCU. It's about 200 basis points in terms of drop in shares according to Gartner. And what is driving this? This is driven by automotive. 6% of share decline is what we are seeing according to Gartner. And basically half of this is transient attributed to ForEx. And also, as we mentioned, from early next year -- last year, the NCNR or channel inventory perspective is also to account for this. And half is basically the [ apparent ] numbers, but then half of which reflects the reality, the reality being a decline in the share -- market share. And that is how we look at this.As you have pointed out, in the compute and automotive, from design into the actual numbers materializing, it takes about quite some time, about 5 years almost. So the question arises as to, of course, what is the driver 2018-2019 thereabouts [indiscernible] have been laid. And back then, the number, of course, we do not expect this with confidence. And when we will look at the specification of our products as a result vis-a-vis the mainstream in the market, there were some diversions and that is how we reflect on this. The transition to 4-nano and the -- transition to 40-nano, excuse me, we were taking the lead in the market. And with this happening we were the early mover or the early mover advantage has been gained, and this has pushed up our performance. However, developments thereafter has demanded different specifications, which Infineon has been able to address. And that has been the major reason attributed to this.And also in July 2018-2019 here within our company, within the organization, the leadership have also been slow to move, and that has been responsible for the -- some of the losses in terms of analysis and retrospect. And then are we going to be able to bridge the gap, 3% gap over a single year? That will not be likely and therefore it would consume several years down the road.And in order to provide you with some sense of security thereafter, in terms of product specification, we have been able to take steps to expand the specification so that we are able to address the features that the market currently demands. And we believe that we are on top of that. However, when we look at the design in the results, and this will only materialize in 5 years down the road, ultimately, in terms of revenue and also market share until we are able to display the results, there is going to be a time lag. However, as of now, what I can say, and of course, we can only dwell on the results and hence, we will need to only accept the results. When we look at the lineup, we are not pessimistic about the future.
And this is a follow-up question. We talked about some changes in the market trend and those that are already on the mainstream. If you could just offer some comments about what is in the mainstream.
20 nano, the transition back then, we do not expect that there will be such a speedy acceleration to EV. And therefore, when we look at the early products, there was an emphasis on the environment. That is to say, to set us a high-compute news -- needs for the gasoline-powered vehicles. And also, we expected that zoning will also pick up pace. And therefore, we believe that MCUs will be used for cross-functional purposes. And therefore, various features have been integrated to provide high-end calculation in our product design.However, there has not been such an investment in [indiscernible], and there has been acceleration of transition to electric -- to EVs. And in terms of zone computing, unlike what we have expected, the heavy use of high compute has not made way in the market. And if I may refer to as discrete, it's somewhat different, but the market has made a demand towards more diverse products, not just integrated into discrete. And hence we have caught this information early on. Therefore, we introduced ARM core so that there's an integrated MCU. Plus on top of that, MCU for individual features and also using ARM to realize a scalable design. And this fared quite well.And when we look at the current situation, we have been able to win attraction. And therefore, we're not pessimistic about the future. However, as of now, we are quite surprised with the drop in shares as the results have informed us in the year ahead. And also, we will look at the Gartner research results and if we understand that there needs to be somewhat of a change in our perspective, we will ultimately do so.
Now we'd like to move on to the next question which will be from Yasui-san of UBS Securities.
This is Yasui from UBS. I also have 2 questions. The first is about the internal production for China customers, meaning that the China customers are prioritizing Chinese vendors. I think that is a trend that we have been witnessing for the last 12 months or so. As far as MCU is concerned, I think have you seen any moves like that in China?My second question, in the new segmentation, what about the percentage of China? I think that it's about 25% to your total business. But if you could give us a higher visibility on the China's contribution when it comes to major smartphones, if it's produced in China, are they accounted for as China? Because they could have been -- they could be categorized as America. But -- because I just wanted to ask this because I would like to see if there's any possibility of the sourcing changing to China in the future.
Right. That is a spot-on question actually. The sales towards China -- [ side ] China sale is [ the ship to ] number. So of course, this could change over quarter-by-quarter, but 20% to 30% is a local design-in, therefore, [ 25% ] -- multiplied by [ 25% ], [ 6% ] or so is their contribution to the total company revenue. So that is the real local sales in China. And of course that contribution does not really change between automotive and IIoT.For local sourcing in China at this point of time the embedded compute has not seen that trend as much as we had anticipated in the past. So this is predominantly happening in the power discrete space. We'll talk about this in the Capital Market Day next month and that provides you with our updated view. Especially the IGBT silicon, our current pipeline and our current view is that compared to 1 to 2 years ago, it has changed significantly compared to 1 or 2 years ago. China, I still believe the situation will remain tough. But instead, we have been able to gain orders in Europe and other markets. So I think this China landscape will change in the future.MCUs, for example, again, at the risk of repeating myself, the initial feature, the original feature, I'm not sure, but maybe we still have advantage for the next 2 to 3 years in this space. And especially the stickiness of the ecosystem, mainly driven by software, is still the case. So it will be realistically very difficult to switch immediately. So towards 2030, which we've been talking about since 2 years ago, the aspiration for 2030 digitalization, I think those will be a very important milestone. That view remains intact. So by then, we would like to achieve differentiation by various elements, not only the hardcore -- hardware specification. If we are able to make that kind of transition, I think that will be a very good rephase for us and that view remains unchanged.
For Nikkei BP, Mr. [ Kojima ].
For Nikkei BP. My name is Kojima. This is a very general question. I have 2. The first of which is the following. When we look at the media coverage EV to hybrid, there seems to be somewhat of a shift in that direction. And looking at it from your perspective, do you also observe the same? And if that is the situation, will that impact your revenue or performance? And that is the first question.
In terms of the direction, I would say yes to both. Such a shift appears to be happening, and that will have a positive implication on our performance. However, as I spoke earlier, when we look at the hybrids in terms of the direction, that will be a positive for Japanese clients. And here in Japan domestic, this will be like Tier 1 customers, not so large in terms of scale. They are struggling with elimination of their inventory and hence there is a transient effect. And also there is, of course, a positive through the shift over to hybrids. That's a tailwind.
And the second question is regarding the chiplets, heterogeneous integration. For now, in your product lineup, the heterogeneous integration, the chiplet aggregated products are not in your portfolio yet. However, is this likely in the days ahead? And if so, when will that happen? I would like to seek your comments.
As I have spoken in the past, the situation remains unchanged. We are working on this and not just attributed to, of course, our circumstances, but also the circumstances of the users. And hence, it's very difficult to be exact as to when that is going to happen. But most likely 2027. That will be quite likely the timing by which we will be able to roll over into the market and preparations are underway.
Will this be onboard when you are talking about 2027?
Yes.
Moving on to the next questioner, SMBC Nikko Securities, Hanaya-san.
This is Hanaya from Nikko Securities. Can you hear me?
Yes, I hear you.
All right. So I also have 2 questions. You talked about the EV coming back to the hybrid, this trend is already happening. So can you talk about the business opportunity and its impact, especially in the area of power products? Like various companies and various countries, they are making a lot of investments for power-related products. And according to my understanding, you were rather late in accelerating your investment in this space. So -- because of that -- because of this, there's a shift back to hybrid. Can we consider that you were able to catch up because of this going back to the hybrid? And also for SIC, what is the demand and supply balance in the market? So can you also share your view on that at this current point?
Well, will that be advantageous for us to catch up, I don't really think that is the case necessarily. So we're not really so optimistic about that in that context. However, as far as power is concerned, the silicon, the SIC, the gallium nitride, we have a strategy to have a full lineup strategy, which remains unchanged. The -- this relates to the timing and the size of investment, but how should I put it? We're not in a position to address power in an all-in structure, especially when it comes to automotive. This relates mainly to automotive, but I think data center as well in the future. For those solutions, the indispensable piece will be this product. So that's how we view it.To a certain extent, we would like to achieve growth and expand this business. But compared against our competitors who are really focused on power, that is not our ambition. We don't have that policy. So the market correction in that regard could be considered a -- well, if I talk about 2 of the optimistic view, I will be -- we'll have to pay back later. So it's -- to be honest with you, we are relieved with this new recent trend. We thought that it was good for us that we didn't expand our capacity that significantly. So in terms of strategy, our initial view remains unchanged here again.So for us, we made a necessary investment for us, which was definitely needed. And if this is going to be needed in the partner, we -- even if the expenses are high, we might have to align with external partners so that -- so rather than trying to make profit only by power, we would like to also address power and strengthen our position with a combination of compute.So in the short term, therefore, tailwind maybe too strong an expression, but maybe I should say the demand building up significantly, capacity building up significantly. That is not the case really in the market right now, which gives us a relief.
My second question, the price negotiation with the foundries, once a year, I believe you have negotiations with them. So I think you have already completed negotiation for this year. Usually, I think it should be on the declining trend. And I think that will be contributing to your margin. But compared to usual years, have you seen any major changes? Or if you can give us some color on that, that will be appreciated.
Well, maybe Shinkai-san could add some words later. But for the short term, situation remains very tough. Unfortunately, the price concessions that we received was not that significant. But over the mid- to long term, the -- if we talk about the price base needed for design-ins, the last several years of initiatives or initiatives that we have implemented have made -- have turned out to be effective. So we are receiving a lot of expectations from the foundries. So I think they have been providing us with a certain level of good prices.But if you ask me if the price reduction was steep enough, that's not really the case for the front end. Back end we have seen a good amount of price adjustment, but not really -- that's not really the case for the front end. Shinkai-san do you have anything to add?
Yes. The situation before or in the middle of COVID crisis, that situation is no longer the case anymore. Then, did we return to the pre-COVID era? That's not necessarily the case. So that's my -- the only comment that I would like to add.
From Nikkei, Mr. [ Nukai ], please.
My name is [ Nukai Noa ] from Nikkei. There are 2 questions. The first is in reference to the trends in chip prices for onboard and IIoT. I'd like to inquire about the trends in price reductions. Has that been seen in the past quarter between -- that is to say, first quarter, January to March quarter? If you could fill us in.
It's very difficult to say. And how should I put it? To say the least, from the investors' perspective, the situation is not so worrisome. As I've mentioned earlier, the wafer cost from the foundry side has not declined dramatically. And as far as raw materials are concerned, the price has not dropped either. And that has been, of course, accepted by many of our clients, of course, not with enthusiasm, but has been accepted. Of course, in some areas, of course, demand has declined and adjustments have been made on the price side.And ASP, as we look at it, has not been declining. ASP has not been declining so dramatically. In terms of pricing conditions, after the supply crunch during the COVID days there has been a swing which has been made from right to left. Now -- it's now returning to normal. However, not to the extent has been restored to the past.
The market has hit bottom. So if you mentioned. However, in terms of gross margin topping 30% more beyond expectations. And if you could let us know how you feel about this? And also, in the earlier first quarter, there has been a decline. And I would like to inquire as to what steps have been taken.
I'm sure that Mr. Shuhei Shinkai will respond for the most part. But in reference to your first part of the question, on Q-on-Q basis, of course, revenue has dropped. And therefore, this is nothing that we can really take pride in. However, to say the least, in the early days of COVID, when the numbers surged and when we spoke with investors, it has been pointed out that Renesas the structure has changed.
Yes. You're in good shape right now. However, what is going to happen at the down cycle? And that is the question we have received. And in response, we have mentioned that we have been able to somewhat win a passing score -- and with, of course, a measure of positive expectations. And if you like to add?
And as for the first quarter, I believe that was your question and vis-a-vis the fourth quarter last year, there is nothing to point out that is out of the ordinary. But generally speaking, seasonality in the fourth quarter, R &D and SG&A, there have been expenses that have pumped up and the first quarter has been lowered. And so this is attributed to seasonality.
Now since we are running out of time, this will be the last question that we are going to take during this session. NHK, [ Shigata-san ], please.
This is [ Ning Shigata ] from NHK. Well, you've been talking about for some time that the slackening of the EV market is now happening around the world. So what is your view towards the electrification of the automotive market in the future? And how will that affect your power strategy? If you could comment on that once again, that would be appreciated.
Well, electrification, I believe, will make progress by spending an appropriate amount of time. I don't want to [indiscernible], but everything converted into electricity, we think is easier for manufacturing and of course, easier for operating after production is finished. So I think electrification will definitely make progress in the future. However, this may take time. So I think it is necessary to spend appropriate amount of time with a practical view. I think that is all that I can comment on right now. Thank you.The earnings result is not newsworthy. However, next month, come the Capital Day we may be missing in terms of newsworthiness. However, as for the content that we have been communicating, there will not be major changes. However, we have upgraded the structure as well as the leadership. And hence, for those of you who will be attending, I do hope that he will speak with the members during Q&A session with the members who are responsible for our business. This will allow you to hear more about what's not on the text about our confidence level. I do hope that that will be such an opportunity for you. And therefore, if you do have time, and if you're interested, I do hope that you will join.Thank you very much for having joined us today in spite of a very busy schedule.
With this, we would like to conclude the Renesas Electronics Corporation 2024 First Quarter Earnings Call. Thank you very much for having joined us on this occasion.[Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]