© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Good morning. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Jamie Porter, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and thanks to everyone for attending Alamos' Third Quarter 2022 Conference Call. In addition to myself, we have on the line today John McCluskey, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Luc Guimond, our Chief Operating Officer.
We will be referring to a presentation during the conference call that's available throughout the webcast and on our website. I would also like to remind everyone that our presentation will be followed by a question-and-answer session. As we will be making forward-looking statements during the call, please refer to the cautionary notes included in the presentation, news release and MD&A as well as the risk factors set out in our annual information form. Technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Chris Bostwick, our Senior Vice President of Technical Services and a qualified person. Also, please bear in mind that all of the dollar amounts mentioned in this conference call are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.
With that, I'll turn it over to John to provide you with an overview of the quarter.
Thank you, Jamie. To start off the call, I want to introduce Luc Guimond, who was appointed Chief Operating Officer in September. Luc has a long history with Alamos, a deep knowledge of our operations and an excellent track record leading the development and operation of a diverse range of gold mines. Luc has hit the ground running as can be seen by a solid third quarter operational results, and we expect to continue with even stronger results as we approach the fourth quarter.
I'd also like to recognize Peter MacPhail for his leadership and invaluable contributions to the company as our former Chief Operating Officer. Peter oversaw our growth into an intermediate producer while driving significant improvements across our operations, such that our outlook has never been stronger. Peter retired in September, but we'll be staying with the company as a consultant to ensure a seamless transition. On behalf of the entire Alamos team, I'd like to thank Peter and I look forward to his ongoing contributions over the next year.
Starting with Slide 3. We had a strong third quarter, led by another solid performance from Young-Davidson and the standout result from La Yaqui Grande in its first full quarter of operation. Production of 123,400 ounces of gold was near the top end of guidance and represented a 19% increase from the second quarter. Total cash costs of $868 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs of $1,178 per ounce were both below our annual guidance and down approximately 7% from the first half of the year.
Young-Davidson continues to be a steady performer, generating $23 million of mine site free cash flow in the quarter and on pace to generate $100 million for the second consecutive year. La Yaqui Grande is ramping up, having doubled production from the Mulatos district quarter-over-quarter and is the key driver of our consolidated production growth and decreasing costs.
Looking at Slide 4. We expect the strong performance to continue into the fourth quarter with La Yaqui Grande driving another increase in our production to a range of 125,000 to 135,000 ounces. Despite industry-wide inflation, we also expect a further decrease in our costs in the fourth quarter, reflecting the ramp-up of low-cost production at La Yaqui Grande, higher grades at Island Gold and the weaker Canadian dollar. Combined with our stronger -- our strong year-to-date performance, we are on track to achieve our full year production and cost guidance.
We're not immune to the inflationary cost pressures being felt across the industry. but do have several key things working in our favor. The first being the nature and location of our operations. Approximately 70% of our production is coming from underground mines in Ontario, which are less energy intensive, have smaller mobile fleets and are connected to clean grid power, meaning we are less reliant on fossil fuels. Given the majority of our production is coming from Canada, we are also benefiting from the weaker Canadian dollar. Lastly, all of the production growth we are bringing on is lower cost.
Looking at Slide 5. La Yaqui Grande will be a key driver of higher production and lower costs over the next few years. Island Gold is going to continue that trend over the long term through the Phase 3 expansion. I was on site last week and saw the progress firsthand with the work in the shaft area really starting to take shape. The shaft has been covered. Pre-sink of the shaft is more than 90% complete and the concrete foundation work and the surface infrastructure is well underway. This expansion will be a game changer for the operation and the company.
Following completion of the shaft in 2026, we expect our annual production to increase above 600,000 ounces per year with a further decrease in costs. Longer term, we have the capacity to increase our annual production to approximately 800,000 ounces per year with the development of Lynn Lake. We're taking a staged approach to developing our growth projects. And currently, we're focused on Island Gold such that we can continue to fund this growth internally while generating solid free cash flow over the next several years.
I'll now turn the call over to our CFO, Jamie Porter, to review our financial performance.
Thank you, John. Moving on to Slide 6. We sold 122,780 ounces of gold at a realized price of $1,740 per ounce, $11 above the London PM Fixed price for revenues of $214 million in the quarter. Total cash costs averaged $868 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs were $1,178 per ounce, a significant improvement from the first half of the year, reflecting strong ongoing results from our Canadian operations and the benefit of a full quarter of production from La Yaqui Grande as well as a weaker Canadian dollar. We expect a further decrease in costs in the fourth quarter to the lowest levels of the year, driven by higher grades at Island Gold and additional low-cost production growth from La Yaqui Grande.
Operating cash flow before changes in noncash working capital increased to $96 million or $0.25 per share in the third quarter that's marked the highest level in a year, despite the lower gold price. We reported a net loss of $1 million, which included a noncash after-tax inventory adjustment of $8 million at Mulatos, unrealized foreign exchange losses of $23 million recorded within deferred taxes and foreign exchange, partially offset by other gains of $2 million. As was the case in the second quarter, given the further decline in the price of gold during the third quarter, a review of the carrying value of Mulatos' leach pad inventory was undertaken and this resulted in an $8 million inventory adjustment, which is a noncash reduction. Excluding this and other noncash items, our adjusted net earnings were $27 million or $0.07 per share.
Capital spending totaled $73 million in the third quarter, similar to the second quarter with the ramp-up of spending on the Phase 3 plus expansion, offsetting the decrease in capital at Mulatos with construction of La Yaqui Grande now complete. We expect the rate of our capital spending to increase on the Phase 3 plus expansion in the fourth quarter through our full year -- though our full year spending is likely to be lower than guidance at Island Gold with some of the construction capital deferred into the next few years.
Our balance sheet remains solid with no debt, $117 million in cash and $500 million of undrawn credit capacity. Combined with growing cash flow from operations, we remain well positioned to fund our growth projects internally in any gold price environment while supporting ongoing returns to shareholders. This includes returning $38 million year-to-date through our dividend and share buyback.
I'll now turn the call over to our COO, Luc Guimond, to provide an overview of our operations.
Thank you, Jamie. This is my first quarterly call, and I'm looking forward to working with the team in this new role and supporting our continued growth as a company.
Moving to Slide 7. Young-Davidson produced 49,300 ounces in the quarter and generated mine-site free cash flow of $23 million. Despite some operational challenges, gold production was 6% higher than the second quarter, and the operation remains on track to achieve full year guidance. Mining rates averaged 7,000 tonnes per day and were impacted by downtime to replace the head ropes at the Northgate Shaft, a scheduled change of our underground conveyor belt and a higher-than-typical number of shutdowns during periods of peak electricity demand in Ontario as part of our energy management plan.
Mining rates have increased and are expected to average 8,000 tonnes per day in the fourth quarter. This downtime was offset by the underground stockpiles we had built up on surface over the last several quarters where mining rates had exceeded [indiscernible]. This allowed us to run the mill at 7,800 tonnes per day and maintain strong production rates. Given the solid performance year-to-date, Young-Davidson remains on track to meet full year production and cost guidance. The operation is also on pace to generate $100 million of mine-site free cash flow for the second consecutive year.
Over to Slide 8. Island Gold produced 31,400 ounces of gold, down from the second quarter, reflecting slightly lower grades processed and lower than planned recoveries. Those recoveries were below guidance due to calibration issues with the newly installed automated line application system. The issue was rectified and recoveries returned to budgeted levels prior to the end of the quarter and in October. The new system is performing well, and recoveries are expected to be at budgeted levels in the fourth quarter. With grades expected to improve in the fourth quarter and gold recoveries back to budgeted levels, we remain on track to achieve full year production guidance.
Over to Slide 9. Construction activities on the Phase 3 plus expansion are ramping up following the start of the shaft pre-sink in August. The shaft is now down to a depth of 40 meters and nearing its final depth of 42 meters. Concrete foundation work on the shaft's surface infrastructure, including the hoist and hoist house is also underway. Detailed engineering on the Paste plant began in September and lateral development to support higher mining rates with the Phase 3 plus expansion remains ongoing.
We have made significant progress on the expansion to date and expect to start sinking the shaft next year. As noted previously, this is a lower risk expansion with the majority of the earthworks completed. The tailings facility already expanded and far less unknowns with this being an operating mine. Once the expansion is completed, Island Gold will be among the largest, lowest cost and most profitable gold mines in Canada.
Moving to Slide 10. Production from the Mulatos district increased considerably to 42,700 ounces in the third quarter. This was double what we produced in the second quarter and at significantly lower costs driven by the full -- first full quarter of production from La Yaqui Grande. Mining and stacking rates had been impacted at both sites by heavy rainfall during the quarter, which temporarily limited the transportation of consumables to the site. This was more than offset by a strong quarter from La Yaqui Grande.
Over to Slide 11. La Yaqui Grande produced 25,300 ounces in the quarter at mine-site all-in sustaining costs of $699 per ounce. In addition to the production growth, this reduced Mulatos district cost to $1,137 per ounce, a 34% decrease from the first half of 2022. Stacking rates at La Yaqui Grande averaged 8,700 tonnes per day in the quarter, nearing the design rate of 10,000 tonnes per day. With the rainy season now over and mining and stacking rates of La Yaqui Grande continuing to ramp up, we expect a further increase in production from La Yaqui Grande in the fourth quarter at lower costs. Overall, the Mulatos district is on track to meet its full year production and cost guidance.
With that, I will turn the call back to John.
Thank you, Luc. That concludes our formal presentation. I will now turn the call back to the operator, who will open the call for your questions.
[Operator Instructions]
The first question is from Cosmos Chiu with CIBC.
Congratulations, Luc. Maybe my first question is on the Canadian assets. As you talked about Island Gold, some ore was transported to YD for processing about 10,000 tonnes in the quarter. Can you maybe touch on some of the additional costs? I don't think there's a lot. And then more importantly, longer term, any kind of synergies that you can take advantage of, of the 2 operations that you can speak to or that you might be exploring at this point in time?
Yes, I can take that, Cosmos. I mean we -- and thanks for the congratulations, by the way. Yes. I mean the cost of running that ore over to Young-Davidson is -- it's running about $1,000 an ounce, so it's certainly still profitable in the fiscal market. And as I think we've mentioned in the past, it's a stockpile that's been sitting there for a number of years. So there's revenue sitting in the yard, and this was an opportunity to unlock some of that revenue and generate it earlier. We still plan to process some of that material in Q4. It's all been trucked now over to the site as far as what we were planning to send over for this year, but we will continue the milling process of that ore through the Q4 period and finish that up.
And then longer term, anything you can speak to or...?
Yes, Cosmos, it's Jamie. I would say we've benefited from a number of synergies just from having 2 mines, a 6-hour drive apart in Northern Ontario, especially with respect to personnel. I mean, we've been able to take our certain key technical people to move them back and forth between the sites. A great example of that is, we just took our mill super inherited from Young-Davidson and transitioned him over to Island Gold. So we benefit from that. There's other, obviously, purchasing and operational synergies as well. But yes, from a workforce perspective, there's meaningful synergies there.
Of course. Maybe a question on La Yaqui Grande. You kind of mentioned that you kind of touched on it. But as you said, you're targeting 10,000 tonnes per day as per design capacity, are you going to get there in Q4. Can you comment on that?
Yes. Our expectation is that we will be there in Q4, Cosmos, with regards to that stacking rate.
Okay. Sort of at the end of Q4 or could you actually average 10,000 tonnes per day?
We will average 10,000 tonnes per day through the quarter.
Great. And then also on La Yaqui Grande, as you mentioned, you're stacking 1.23 grams per tonne, meeting expectations. But can you touch on the consistency of the grade at this point in time, what you're seeing as you open up the pit?
Yes. I mean, our expectation is to continue with that sort of stacking grade through the fourth quarter. I mean it's -- we're in the early stages, but we had seen a little bit of overperformance in Q3 with regards to the model versus what we did stock. But moving forward, we're certainly expecting at least reserve grade as far as stacking grades.
Great. And then maybe one last question on the financial side. Jamie, as you mentioned, there's $500 million undrawn line of credit. Could you remind us what's the interest rate on that undrawn line of credit? And would you need to tap it to for your development projects? And if you do, what's sort of the timing on that?
Yes. So the rate, just based on -- obviously, it varies depending on financial ratios. But given the fact that we have no leverage right now, it's a little under 2% over LIBOR. We have no plans in the near term to draw on the facility. I think I mentioned through my part of the script that current gold prices were well funded to complete the Phase 3 plus expansion at Island without needing to draw on the facility. So it remains there as a backup for us, but we're in great shape with our cash flow from our existing operations, financing the growth in production at Island.
The next question is from Kerry Smith with Haywood Securities.
Jamie or Luc, could one of you just explain to me how the energy management program works at YD? And I assume because you don't need much power at Island and it doesn't get impacted. But is this something that we'll likely see on a go-forward basis where you will have periods of time where you won't be able to run the facility at the rate you'd like to run because of this program? I'm just trying to understand how it might impact your production going forward.
Yes. Kerry, it's Luc here. I can take that. I mean this energy management plan that we talked about with regards to the peak periods, we've been in -- Young-Davidson has been involved in that since 2016 and Island Gold is now a part of that as well. What typically happens is the way that works is that usually you need to monitor the peak load in the province of Ontario when that occurs in a specific 1 hour window. We need to have the facility down for that 1 hour in order to get that cost benefit. So typically, we need to shut our facility down for about 4 hours. And it's not the entire facility, it's the milling process, the hoist and the Paste plant in the YD case, and at Island, it's the mill. So you need 4 hours to be down in order to get that 1 hour peak period.
Typically, we need to shut down probably anywhere from 10 to 15x in the period to be able to get those peaks. In this case, we had more shutdowns required in order to capture the peaks and they were longer in duration, meaning the low profile in the province in that period was pretty flat line. So typically, it's a 4-hour window shutdown. We had a couple of them this year that were about 6 hours as a result of that in order to capture that peak. But I mean, that's something that we plan for a part of our business plan on an annualized basis. The bigger impact really in Q3 was the head ropes having to be changed out. With that job, that's really what led to the mining rates being at 7,000 versus 8,000.
Yes. The other point to make there, Kerry, is the benefit of shutting down during those peak periods is significant. I mean we saved millions of dollars every year in our power costs, okay, before if we're able to capture those -- the 5 peaks and then we have been successful most years in doing so. So this is nothing new. It's just we had to be shut down a bit more than what we'd budgeted this quarter, but it's still worth doing because we save, again, millions of dollars in power costs.
And are you seeing -- you've been doing this since 2016, you said, right?
In YD's case, yes.
And so over that period of time, that's, call it, 6 years, have you seen the frequency of these energy management shutdowns increasing over time because obviously, we've got GDP growth in Ontario, and I'm not sure what Hydro One is doing with the power infrastructure, but I can only assume that it's a disaster.
And I'm just wondering if there might be a situation where you're seeing a gradual trend higher in terms of the number of shutdowns that you have to implement and if that might sort of impact your milling throughput on a go-forward basis, more than what you're already kind of budgeting for?
Yes. I mean, like I said, typically, they've been 10 to 15 a year, and it's by choice. I mean, we manage that decision. I mean if we don't see the cost benefit there, then we would not necessarily shut down. But at this point, based on market conditions, we see the benefit of taking that shutdown and realizing the benefit on our power bill.
Okay. I got you. Okay. Okay. That's helpful. And then just -- this was kind of the first full quarter out of YD -- pardon me, of La Yaqui Grande. Are you kind of planning to use this reporting formatting that you've used in the Q3 on a go-forward basis where you split out La Yaqui Grande from the rest of the operation there.
Yes, Kerry, I think we'll continue to do that for the next several quarters. While we're still getting significant production from the Mulatos leach pad. I think this time next year, we'll reevaluate that. I mean we do have the underground PDA deposits that will be coming online at some point. So we'll likely look to report that separately as well. But yes, I think for the near term, we'll keep the formatting and presentation similar to what we had this quarter.
Okay. Okay. And then just one last question, I think I know the answer. But when you track the order from Island over to YD, I'm assuming that those tons and those grades are captured in the Island reporting table and then you capture in the extra cost to truck it over as well. Is that correct, Jamie?
Yes. Everything gets attributed back to Island. Absolutely. So those are stripped out of the YD results and included in the Island results where they belong.
The next question is from Trevor Turnbull with Scotiabank.
Yes. Thank you, Luc. You mentioned that at Island, those stockpiles have been sitting there for a long time and that you just took advantage of that capacity window at YD. I was just wondering if you expected those stockpiles to grow again? Or if you could maybe remind me what the mining rate is at Island. And also when that permitted capacity increase at Island is expected?
Yes. So I mean the typical mining rates at Island currently are 1,200 tonnes per day. Now stockpile has been sitting there really since we acquired the property back in 2017. So -- sorry, I missed the other part of that question, Trevor.
Well, it's kind of -- I was kind of wondering if you expected those stockpiles to kind of grow again? And my follow-up to that was when you expect that permitted increase in capacity for the Island plant, but it doesn't sound like those stockpiles are really going to be an issue before Phase 3 is ready.
No, correct. Correct. I mean we'll -- I mean, through the permitting process, we're working through that, obviously, to ramp up for 2026 when the shaft comes online and then gets a full production at 2,400 tonnes per day in early 2027. But I mean we typically will always have a bit of a stockpile sitting in the yard at Island Gold, similar to what we do at YD. In the case of this quarter, where we just had YD where we did have some downtime, with regards to the head rope replacement, we're able to continue to run the mill at full capacity. So we would have that same benefit with Island Gold.
Yes. No, that makes sense. And obviously, the metallurgy works out that you can use either facility. Then just my only other question was about Lynn Lake. The EIS approval expected here fairly soon next couple of months. And you said there would be a feasibility study coming out following that. I'm just wondering if the feasibility really comes out very quickly after the EIS or if there's a bit of work that you guys need to do so that we might have to wait a bit longer to see those numbers?
Trevor, yes, I think the feasibility study would follow pretty closely after the receipt of the provincial and federal permits, like within the quarter, certainly. And yes, that would likely be after -- I mean, the feasibility study would be after the release of our updated reserves and resources, so at the end of 2022 numbers so we can incorporate the exploration work that we've done this year.
The next question is from Mike Parkin with National Bank.
Congrats on the quarter, and congrats to Peter and his retirement, and Luc welcome to the team. One quick question back down to [Technical Difficulty] with the legacy sulfide stockpiles. Is that something that's kind of temporarily on hold in terms of aggressively putting that back or putting that back into stacking in terms of like consumable prices being elevated? Would you look to be opportunistic and look to capture a greater margin, assuming consumable prices soften in the near term? Or just keep going at the rate you're going?
Yes, Mike, it's Jamie. Yes, absolutely. I mean our business plan for the rest of this year and into 2023 is focused on mining the El Salto, the bottom parts of the Mulatos pit and that's the basis for our production guidance. The stockpile, we will continue to evaluate that and look for opportunities where -- when it makes sense based on the gold price and consumables prices to process it. But there's optionality associated with that that's not entirely factored into our existing near-term outlook.
And is it something that you could blend easily with the oxide? Or do you tend to try to separately stack that on a pad and be more as it consumes more consumables. So is it something that makes sense to try to isolate versus mix with the oxide at El Salto?
Yes. We tend to -- I mean when we're processing with the stockpile, we certainly can blend it. We tend to stack the stockpiled material separately. It is almost batch process, but we can blend it as well.
Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. This concludes this morning's call. If you have any further questions that have not been answered, please feel free to contact Mr. Scott Parsons at (416) 368-9932 extension 5439.