© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Altius Minerals Corp. Q4 and Year-end 2019 Financials Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Stephanie Hussey, Director of Finance. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to our Q4 conference call. I'll be filling in for Flora Wood today, who's out this week. Our press release and annual filings were released yesterday after the close and are available on our website. This event is being webcast live, and you'll be able to access a replay of this call, along with presentation slides that have been added to our website at altiusminerals.com. Brian Dalton, our CEO; and Ben Lewis, our CFO, will both be speakers on the call, and then we'll open it up for questions. The forward-looking statements on Slide 2 applies to everything we say in our formal remarks and during the Q&A session. And with that, I'll turn it over to Ben to take us through the results.
Thank you, Stephanie, and good morning, everyone. On an annual basis, royalty revenue was up 16% from $67 million to $78 million or from $1.58 to $1.83 per share. This is largely on the strength of organic growth within the portfolio as no significant current revenue-generating royalty acquisitions were made during the year. Our quarterly revenue of $17.5 million or $0.41 per share compared to $19.2 million or $0.45 per share in Q3. This reflects late year challenges with potash prices and volumes, both being impacted by weather-related demand issues and base metal prices being pressured by trade war concerns. Considering the full year, we are again made appreciative of the benefits of holding a diversified royalty portfolio. As while there were challenges that some of our operators face, there were balancing tailwinds for others. In 2019, the best example of such an offset was a strong rebound in iron ore revenue after a tough prior year. EBITDA margins were strong at 80% for the year compared to 77% in 2018. Royalty business EBITDA margins were actually closer to 85%. As while we expensed costs for our project generation business, we don't include its net equity gains through the income statement and revenue. The PG business did, however, contribute cash proceeds net of reinvestments of $17 million during the year. Annual adjusted operating cash flow, again, not including PG-related proceeds, came in at $44.1 million or $1.03 per share and $9.4 million or $0.22 per share during Q2 -- Q4, sorry. This was 27% higher than in the prior year on an annual basis as a result of cash flow margin expansion that occurred due to the top line growth versus a relatively more fixed components of cost. Actual net earnings per share and adjusted net earnings per share of $0.41 and $0.55, respectively, compared favorably to 2018's net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share of $0.03 and $0.38. We ended the year with $22 million in cash and cash equivalents and $147 million in the market value of mining and other investments, comprised of the remaining junior equity portfolio holdings and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation shares. The value of our residual junior equity portfolio was similar at year-end to the prior year despite the strong level of monetization that occurred. You can find our current project generation portfolio listing on our website. Our capital allocation priorities in 2019 balanced growth investment in our mining and renewable royalty portfolios, shareholder capital returns and debt repayment. We acquired the royalty covering the high-grade polymetallic Curipamba project in Ecuador and also made our first significant investments aimed toward developing a new renewable energy royalty business with the acquisition of Great Bay Renewables and the providing of royalty financing to Tri-Global Energy. In returning capital, we increased our dividend by 25% to $0.05 per quarter and repurchased 802,000 shares under our buyback at prices that we feel are very accretive to assets per share, and particularly so, relative to the expected long-term growth. Repayments on our term and revolving debt facilities during the year totaled $31 million to leave us with a balance at year-end of approximately $109 million. Subsequent to year-end, we have drawn USD 35 million on our revolver to fund another renewable royalty investment. Including this recent investment, our net debt-to-EBITDA ratio will remain under 2x. Our current liquidity includes our remaining revolver capacity of approximately $38 million and our cash on hand of approximately $20 million. And now I'll turn it over to Brian.
Thank you, Ben, and thank you all for joining us this morning. I'm going to try to keep it short today because I know many of you have lots more on your plate to deal with. 2019 was obviously a very good year for our royalty business in terms of the key performance metrics that we focus on, particularly revenue and cash flow per share. This was particularly gratifying in that it came almost entirely from no cost, organic growth from existing portfolio assets. The royalty cash flow performance, combined with additional strong cash generation in our PG business, allowed us to reduce leverage and increase shareholder capital return. It also allowed us to develop exciting long-term growth opportunities such as successfully launching our renewable energy royalty platform and completing the acquisition of the Curipamba royalty. 2020 is shaping up to be interesting for want of a better word. We made guidance in mid-January that estimated that we should more or less match last year's record revenue performance. Since then, a lot has obviously happened. We made a comment in our release yesterday that our uncertainty level around guidance is higher than at any point since we began giving it. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, prices are uncertain, demand is uncertain, supply is uncertain and on and on. What we've witnessed so far are actually relatively modest declines for our major commodity exposures. The reasoning for this seems to be that while immediate economic growth prospects are being heavily pressured, it also appears that the worst may already be behind top consumer, China. And because there is now an increasing expectation that Chinese and indeed global stimulus spending will be injected into the economy, and that this could actually increase near-term demand for base metals and steel. We obviously don't know which of these sets of arguments will prevail at this time. Once we get better clarity, we will look again on our guidance and decide what if any revisions might be necessary. What we do know is that as top line royalty holders, we are not nearly as exposed to potential continuing price decline as mine operators with their margin-based exposures. We also know that the particular mines that we hold royalties on generally occupy resilient operating margin curve position within their sectors. There is a slide in the deck that illustrates this. With that said, I'll switch now to talk about some longer-term developments related to our business. A while ago on one of these calls, I spoke about our focus on proactively addressing challenges related to the 2 parts of our portfolio that were unusual in the sense that they were not related to long or ultra-long life assets. The first part of this dealt with the expected closure of the 777 Mine in a few years and its impact on the base metals part of our revenue profile. During 2019, we gained visibility on how our efforts to address this challenge were working. Significant developments included: the completion of financing and construction of the Gunnison Copper project, which is expected to ramp up production over the next several years; Lundin Mining acquired the Chapada mine to bring our copper-focused miner with a strong balance sheet in as our new operator. Lundin has indicated on several occasions since that it is focused on opportunities to expand production at the mine. And Adventus Mining announced a positive PEA results with El Domo copper-rich deposit and attracted strong strategic investor support to help it further advance the project through more detailed feasibility studies. As a result of these developments, we believe that the first challenge has been well met. Secondly, we recognize that our thermal coal royalties would decline to 0 over the coming decade based upon accelerated government phaseout policies. While a projection for the complete elimination of coal-based revenues is in many ways a positive feature given the duration of coal amongst most investors, it was still a challenge for us to finding a way to replace the lost revenue on a long-term basis. Directly from this challenge came our strategy to try to use remaining coal royalty revenue to innovate the creation of royalty-based investing within the renewable energy sector. Our long-term view on renewable energy projects is that, for the most part, once one is built, it will be continuously reinvested in to extend and expand its ability to harvest an unending resource. So through the creation of royalties that covered the entire potential life of the renewable energy project, we believe that we could ultimately completely transition our short-term coal exposure into ultra-long life, if not perpetual, revenue stream while also directly helping to enable the meeting of the global sustainability objectives. The initiative is working out better and faster than we could have hoped. In the past 13 months, we have completed investments that are seeing us help fund the advancement of more than 23 gigawatts of new potential renewable energy projects, which to put in context, compares to just over 13 gigawatts of wind power currently installed in all of Canada, and which is enough to power approximately 5.8 million homes. Our internal estimates also suggests that upon signing of a deal with Apex Clean Energy earlier this week, the discounted future value of our renewable energy royalty portfolio now handily eclipses that of our coal royalties. Meaning that we've met the minimum objective of our strategy far sooner than we had hoped. Our renewable royalty innovation is achieving proof-of-concept and gaining rapid acceptance and adoption within the renewables sector. We are not stopping here by any means and continue to advance several additional opportunities. To finish, it is also worth addressing the bigger picture behind our strategy. We are more convinced than ever of the increasing alignment of our assets and prospects with key long-term macro growth trends. Trends that converged around greater global sustainability needs. These imperatives will persist long after COVID-19 has been solved. Electrification of transport, the renewable power generation and storage transition, lower emissions from steelmaking and increased sustainability in agriculture are not fleeting things. They define a future that Altius' shareholder capital has been positioned to fully participating due to the long life, financially strong and highly expandable assets that underpin your royalty portfolio. Thank you. Take care out there and happy to take questions.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Jacques Wortman, Laurentian Bank Securities.
Great quarter. Regarding the new Apex deal, I'll dive right in. Can you provide any additional color? I know you're going to be going around next week and providing some teaching opportunities for the sell-side analysts. But can you provide any additional color regarding the regional focus you're seeing, the wind, solar mix that you expect under the new agreement and the relative timing of these projects reaching commercial production?
Sure. Thank you, Jacques. In terms of how we envision the mix between wind and solar playing out, when I look at the TGE transaction, their portfolio is dominated by wind projects. So naturally, we'd expect more wind projects to come from that investment, although the most recent one was, in fact, wind. Within Apex, it's a much more balanced portfolio, quite a lot of both wind and solar. It's actually a huge portfolio, and it's well diversified across most of the major grid regions in the U.S. If there's a bigger -- if the trends at play within renewables that -- I mean, obviously you're going to impact the timing of which project sale and convert to royalties for us. I would say that there is a real push around solar right now. And if there's another trend that I think is going to become increasingly important, it's that an increasing number of solar, particularly, but also wind projects are now being advanced with storage options attached, and that largely has to do with the dramatic decline in battery costs over the last decade or so. And the importance of that is it takes away some of the challenge that renewable has always faced in terms of its intermittency, and its -- the need to always have additional baseload sources on the grid. When you add more storage, basically, what happens is you can add or you can have more displacement within the overall generation mix and more relative percentage of renewables on the grid. So it's a very strong development in terms of just overall demand and market share advancements of renewables in the market. And sorry, Jacques, what was the third part of your question, again?
Just the relative timing of the projects. I think from my understanding, these things will be coming on a little bit quicker than they have with TGE. And I guess, that's partly because you provided all the investment capital upfront. I just want to get an idea of when you start -- expect to start seeing these royalties, I guess, kick in, for lack of a better expression?
Yes, so with TGE, we'd originally envisioned that it would be around 3 years for enough projects to sell to fully, sort of, vest our royalty entitlements. That's now looking like it's going to be within 2 years, or 2/3 to 3/4 of the way there now. From the perspective of Apex, it's a bigger outfit. So their portfolio is about 10x the size of TGE. So when we put more money in -- so we put about, say, 4x more money in upfront, it's matched by a portfolio size that's 10x larger. If they meet their targets for project sales this year of that portfolio, it's possible that we could be fully vested on the first part of that investment within this year, and if not, certainly, within next year. Beyond that, you've got 1- to 2-year lag time for -- from sale to project commissioning.
And our next question comes from the line of Craig Hutchison at TD Bank.
Can you give me a sense of what you guys are thinking in terms of capital allocation this year, obviously, just given the share pullback, maybe an opportunity to buy back some more stock, maybe possibilities to deploy more money into royalties or just continue along with the development of the renewables business?
Yes. So our capital allocation priorities this year wouldn't be dissimilar to last. Obviously, we're going to continue to make our scheduled debt payments, pay our dividends. Buyback is very much a priority for us. And I wish I could say we saw lots of opportunity for royalties on really high quality mining assets that wouldn't ultimately dilute the quality of our portfolio. But at the moment, we're not. Obviously, these are dynamic times and things can change very quickly. So as far as growth investing goes, the best opportunities we are seeing today remain in the renewable sector. That said, we're not completely unconstrained in terms of how much capital we can deploy in the short term there. So we are also looking at potential strategic co-investments into that renewable platform as we try to scale it up. Yes, so broadly speaking, the priorities are growth investing with an emphasis on renewables. And I'd say, number two, if we're talking about the discretionary part of our allocation, would be on the share buyback, which is enormously accretive for us at this point.
Would you guys consider adding to your R&R position, just given where prices are and relative to the share price of LIF?
If we had unlimited capital, we probably wouldn't hesitate. If it comes down to making choices, when I look at our own assessment of the net asset values of LIF saying just in comparison to Altius. They're both trading at similar discount to net asset value. But when I consider the fact that Altius' net asset value is almost entirely royalty based, whereas LIF is significantly weighted towards the equity component. I'd have to say that Altius represent far better value over here.
Our next question comes from the line of Brian MacArthur, Raymond James.
Just a couple of questions. Again, just so I'm clear on the renewables. So in the $35 million, you were sort of implying that may all get invested this year or by early next year, so that then will be a 1- to 2-month lag or 1- to 2-year lag before that would all start generating the $3 million to $4 million that you envisage going forward on a baseline level. Is that correct?
The $35 million is all invested. So what I'm referring to there is the time it would take for enough project sales to come from that portfolio to have us receive the number of royalties we're meant to receive from that investment. So money goes into the developer. They sell projects, we receive royalties until a hurdle rate is reached. That we'd expect to close sometime next year at the latest, possibly as soon as this year based on their sales projections. So it's -- after each project is sold, I know there's a lot of variables here. But after a project is sold on to an ultimate sponsor operator, it can take a year to 2 years for equipment deliveries to occur and for construction to take place. So there'll be a bit of a continuum. The royalty revenue will begin to kick in sort of with a lag behind each sale, not all in [indiscernible]. I should also point out that our regional investment, when we put our money in, it begins compounding the minute it goes in. So the longer it takes the royalties to be created from the investment, the more royalties we ultimately receive. So there's -- when you're thinking about how to model it, you're not -- you shouldn't be all that worried about how many 0 you're -- you may have to put in at the front end because there is a recurring compounding even before royalty revenue kicks in, if that makes -- if that's clear.
Yes. No, that's very clear. I'm just trying to get the exact timing down. That's very helpful. The second thing in your renewables presentation, you have a nice chart showing a bunch of comps and leverage factors. And then obviously, the issue is where the multiple might be on a renewable royalty company. But do you envision putting leverage in the ARR subsidiary with debt? Or is it ...
Not right away. Like, to me the right point to consider leverage for that business is after it has achieved significant scale of assets, which is happening pretty quickly. But also when first cash flows are much more imminent. So the first deals that closed or went through last year, sales deals that went through would have been, I think, October and December. And we're projecting cash flow from those to kick in late next year, mid- to late next year. So before that sort of really imminent, I don't think the business is ready to consider using leverage. So scale up assets get closer to cash flow, and then that becomes a bit of an option for us. For the time being, all of the money we want to put into the business is equity-based. We'll frontline the -- we'll front load, the equity capital contribution and then consider leverage on top of that.
Great. And just one other question, if I may. Where do we stand with the coal situation with the Alberta government? What's -- where are we in the process of going through the legal side?
It's actually moving along pretty well. There's been lots of back and forth around what the agreed facts might be. And to be honest, there isn't a whole lot under dispute there from either side. What's happened has happened. It just really comes down to a test in the end of what those facts actually represent and if it was an event that requires compensation. So the next step from here is discovery. And Ben might correct me on this, but I believe that's scheduled for the May, June period. Am I correct there, Ben?
Yes. It's sometime in May is the dates they're looking at. Yes.
And there are no further questions at this time. I turn it back over to your presenters.
Okay, folks. Thank you very much for joining the call. We really appreciate it, and take care of yourselves. And we'll talk to you again at the next quarterly results in April -- May, sorry.
It feels like a long ways off right now, doesn't it?
Yes. Thanks. Take care.
Thanks, everyone.
All right. Bye-bye.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.