© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Good morning. My name is Krista, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust Fourth Quarter Results. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the call over to your host, Kim Lee, Vice President, Investor Relations. You may begin.
Thank you, Krista. Good morning, and welcome to the Choice Properties REIT Fourth Quarter 2017 Conference Call. This call is also being webcast simultaneously on our website at choicereit.ca, where you will also find a copy of our Q4 summary information package that we will be referring to on this call. I'm joined here this morning by John Morrison, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Bart Munn, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin today's call, I want to remind you that by discussing our financial and operating performance, and in responding to your questions, we may make forward-looking statements, including statements concerning Choice Properties' objectives, its strategies to achieve those objectives as well as statements with respect to management's beliefs, plans, estimates, intentions, outlook and similar statements concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance, or expectations that are not historical facts. These statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the conclusions in these forward-looking statements. Additional information on the material risks that could impact our actual results and the estimates and assumptions we applied in making these statements can be found in the 2017 annual report and management's discussions and analysis related thereto, together with Choice Properties' annual information forms that are all available on our website and on SEDAR. With that, I'll turn it over to John.
Thanks, Kim. And good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on our Q4 and year-end 2017 conference call. Let me begin with a brief overview of the quarter and the year. With the close of the fourth quarter, we marked another successful year for Choice Properties. Throughout the year, we made progress on all fronts and achieved important goals in each of our core drivers: acquisitions, developments and active management, and delivered positive operational and financial results. During the quarter, we acquired 7 additional properties for a total value of $80 million before transaction costs; 2 were retail income-producing properties purchased from third-party vendors, and 5 were part of a portfolio of properties we acquired from Loblaw. The properties from Loblaw included 2 parcels of the land that provide future development potential of approximately 80,000 square feet of GLA in Hamilton and Toronto. Acquisitions for the year total approximately $126 million in value and added over 500,000 square feet of GLA and 6 parcels of land for future development to our portfolio, with a weighted average capitalization rate of 6.4% for income-producing properties. On Slide 5 of our summary information package, we highlight the 63,000 square feet of new gross leaseable area we constructed during the quarter for 19 new retail spaces for third-party tenants in Nova Scotia, Québec, Ontario and Saskatchewan. Having met our target for 2017 project completions and achieving an approximate 8% yield on the development capital as of last quarter, this 63,000 square feet of GLA contributes to 366,000 square feet we plan to complete this year with expected yields ranging from 6% to 9%. With respect to mixed-use projects, we are making good progress. Design and development concepts for our property in the Bloor-Dundas West Mobility Hub in Toronto are proceeding towards plans that we target submitting as part of our zoning application to the city later this year. In addition, we have initiated the preplanning process for a mixed-use project on North Road in Coquitlam, British Columbia. Leasing activity during the fourth quarter resulted in binding commitments for approximately 140,000 square feet of GLA. This includes approximately 42,000 square feet of renewals and 56,000 square feet of GLA we completed within our development program. Our renewal rate this quarter was 58.2%, with an average rent increase of 12.7%. Overall, we maintain our total portfolio's high occupancy rate at 98.9%, flat compared to 2016. And with that, I will turn the call over to Bart to provide you with a review of the financials for the quarter.
Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. I'll refer you to Slide 9 of our presentation material, where you'll find selected financial results for the fourth quarter. As of December 31, 2017, Choice Properties' portfolio comprised 546 properties, with a total gross leasable area of 44.1 million square feet. Under IFRS, Choice Properties' investment properties were valued at approximately $9.6 billion. That's based on a weighted average cap rate of 6.07% compared to 6.12% at year-end 2016. For the quarter, rental revenue was $211 million and net operating income was $152.8 million, representing increases of 6.7% and 9.4% over Q4 2016, respectively. The growth in NOI was attributed to acquisitions, lease surrender revenue and new developments. On the same-property, same-GLA basis, organic NOI increased to $140.1 million, or by 3.4% from Q4 2016. This increase was driven by [ stuck ] rents in Loblaw leases and higher average rents per square foot on ancillary leases. For the full year, rental revenue was $829.8 million and NOI was $584.7 million, 5.9% and 6.9% better than 2016, respectively. Organic NOI increased 3.2% to $545.2 million for the reasons I mentioned earlier as well as higher recovery of capital expenditures compared to last year. Adjusted general and administrative expenses for the quarter were $5.5 million compared to $5.9 million in Q4 2016. The ratio of G&A expenses to total revenue was 2.6% compared to 3% of revenue for Q4 2016. We target G&A expenses spending to be approximately 2.5% of total revenue. G&A expenses on a similar basis for the full year were $19.3 million or 2.7 -- 2.3% of revenue compared to $21.7 million or 2.8% of revenue last year. We target annual G&A expense spending to be approximately 2.5% of total revenue. Funds from operations for the quarter were $116.8 million or $0.282 per diluted unit, compared to $103.1 million or $0.251 per diluted unit last year. The 13.3% year-over-year growth in FFO was primarily due to an increase of $12 million in net property income. For 2017, FFO was $442.9 million or $1.072 per diluted unit, 8% and 7.2% year-over-year increases, respectively. Similar to the quarter, the main driver of FFO growth for the year was higher net property income. Our adjusted cash flow from operations, ACFO, was $102.6 million compared to $92.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2016, with total distributions declared of $76.3 million or $0.185 per unit for Q4. Our payout ratio for the quarter was 74.4%. This compares to 78.9% for Q4 2016. Excluding lease surrender payments and transactional fee, our payout ratio was 79.6%, in line with Q4 2016. For the year, ACFO was $363.1 million, with a payout ratio of 82.7%, compared to $339.2 million and a payout ratio of 83.2% for 2016. We anticipate the annual ACFO payout ratio to be approximately 85%. At year-end, our debt service coverage ratio was 3.7x, and our weighted average term to maturity on our senior unsecured debentures was 4.5 years. In January, we started the year with a successful debt offering, raising $650 million in senior unsecured debentures, improving our financial flexibility and reducing our refinancing risk. We currently have approximately $210 million of liquidity available on our credit facility. Let me now turn it over to John to provide closing remarks.
Thanks, Bart. 2017 was another solid year for Choice Properties. Since day 1, we have established a track record of strong performance. In less than 5 years, the Choice Properties' crew has built a high-quality real estate business while consistently delivering results and growth in cash flows. We look forward to 2018 and another successful year of generating solid, stable and secure cash flows, while driving our growth through acquisitions and active management as well as our development program. We are excited with our mixed-use development projects and expect to share more progress with you in the year. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank the entire Choice Properties crew for all their efforts and to congratulate them on another successful year. And now, operator, we would be pleased to take questions.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Mark -- I'm sorry, of Mike Markidis from Desjardins.
Just trying to think of the timing of the potential mixed-use projects. It sounds like you're making -- or going to be submitting zoning applications on Bloor-Dundas and also on the Golden Mile. John, maybe just given where the municipal processes have evolved with the OMB and what your project entails, is it possible in this structure to kind of think of a potential delivery date for either of those properties, roughly?
Yes, I can give you a bit of a highlight on both of them. So if you'll recall, with Golden Mile, we filed an OPA with the city in January of last year. We received comments back and our application was more or less -- was approved by them in sort of March. Back in June last year, they held -- the city held the first public meeting for the secondary plan for the Golden Mile area, and we had about 200 people show up and so we were able to take the community through the plan. And then, we've had some other meetings, obviously, with the city going forward. So in terms of timing, we're projecting to start construction which -- on what we call Phase 1 next year. And Phase 1 will entail building the new retail component first, and then we would go back and demolish the existing retail and start building out the balance of the project. So we expected that this schedule that we have today is going to continue, because all the indications we have from the city and communities, thus far, have been very positive. So that's sort of the timeline around Golden Mile. 2280, we, as you may recall, we've been engaging with the community in advance of any official applications with the city because we just feel that this project is a little bit different in terms of where it's located, and the fact that there's so much -- it's an integral transit hub for the city of Toronto, and so we just feel that it's kind of a different situation, if you will, and it's more of a larger-type community that we're going to be building there. So we've been working with -- through the city or with the city on the master planning aspect of it and getting comments back on an unofficial basis. And so we expect to file an application for official plan and some zoning by-law amendments late spring this year. And so we're not anticipating any delays on that project of any significance as well. So those 2 big projects are proceeding and obviously there's a lot of work going on behind the scenes.
Okay. So it would seem that in terms of your CapEx schedule that you put on, perhaps you're going to start incurring capital more meaningfully in 2019, specifically as Golden Mile starts construction, but reality is, in terms of actual delivery of space, 2020, 2021, 2022 is more realistic?
Yes, exactly, Mike. And I would think that realistically, the capital spend will be later in '19 as opposed to earlier in '19.
Right, okay. So them, just thinking about the -- you guys have, it seems, gotten up to a -- if we just look at intensification and other greenfield developments on the sort of the mixed-use side of things, kind of $100 million in terms of deliveries -- maybe call it $70 million to $100 million would be sort of where you guys have gotten to in terms of development activity. Is that at a level that you think you can sustain for the medium term in terms of an annual -- so I guess, where I'm going is, 3 years, 4 years from now, when your mixed-use deliveries come on stream, can we still count on that sort of $75 million to $100 million of other activity as well?
So your definition of medium term might be different than mine, but here's what I would say on that, that we still do have a pipeline of intensification opportunities, which we're going to continue to execute on. But what you will see, over time, and let's call it short to medium term, whatever that means, and you and I can talk about timelines, they will start to diminish because we will start to run out of opportunities. But as that is happening, we will be ramping up our capital spend on the mixed-use residential projects. So you'll see, ideally, a consistent spend, more or less, but as we get deeper into the residential projects and some of the bigger ones, then obviously that would get more a little bit more lumpy as we go further down the road.
Okay. As you guys go down this path and you look at potential -- I would assume rental residential is maybe part of your thought process, have you guys had any discussions with operators at this juncture? Not necessarily naming them, but are you at that path where you're starting to consider who you might strategically partner with?
Yes. The answer is yes, and we've been -- it's not recent, so we've been in discussions for a bit of time now.
Okay. And would be that be something you expect to have news on in the relatively near future, or something that's sort of further down the road?
No, in the relatively near future on a couple projects.
Okay. Last one for me before I turn it back. Bart, can you refresh me, just on the same-property NOI growth, obviously the contribution from the CapEx recoveries is still positive. Is there a point in time where that will plateau, just given the nature of where the leases started and where you will have sort of an annual CapEx number, but the amortization will sort of level out?
Yes, I mean, right now we've been in this program for 5 years. Our average amortization period for the various projects, probably somewhere around 15 years. And so if you say we've got another 10 years to get there, assuming the status quo, and we're suspending about $45 million to $50 million. So by 15 -- year 15, year 16, we should be sort of flatlining at around $45 million to $50 million.
$45 million to $50 million. So anyway, so for the next 7 to 8 to 10 years, keep counting on that 1% contribution roughly, every year?
That's right. That's right.
[Operator Instructions] We have no further questions in the queue at this time. I would now turn the call over to John Morrison, President and CEO, for closing remarks.
Thank you, operator and thank you, all, for joining our call today and have a great day.
This does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.