Good
morning,
and
welcome
to
First
National's
Fourth
Quarter
Analyst
Call.
This
call
is
being
recorded
on
Wednesday,
March
2, 2022.
At
this
time,
all
callers
are
in
a
listen-only
mode.
Later,
we'll
conduct
a
question-and-answer
session.
Instructions
will
be
provided
at
that
time
on
how
to
queue
up.
Now
it's
my
pleasure
to
turn
the
call
over
to
Stephen
Smith,
Executive
Chairman
of
the
Board
of
First
National.
Please
go
ahead,
sir.
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Thank
you,
operator.
Good
morning,
everyone.
Welcome
to
our
call
and
thank
you
for
participating.
Before
we
begin,
I
will
remind
you
that
our
remarks and
answers
may
contain
forward-looking
information
about
future
events
or
the
company's
future
performance.
This
information
is
subject
to
risks
and
uncertainties
and
should
be
considered
in
conjunction
with
the
risk
factors
detailed
in
our
MD&A.
Joining
me
today
are
Jason
Ellis,
President and
Chief
Executive
Officer;
and
Rob
Inglis,
Chief
Financial
Officer.
As
you
all
know,
Jason
succeeded
me
in
the
role
of
CEO
in
January,
as
I
became
the
company's
Executive
Chairman.
At
that
time,
Jason
also
joined
our
board
of
directors.
This
planned
and
natural
succession
sets
us
up
well
for
the
future.
Jason
is
a
proven
leader
whose
experience
with
First
National
began
in
2004,
most
recently
served
as
our
President
and
Chief
Operating
Officer
with
broad
operational
responsibilities.
Jason
is
well-known
among
our
business
partners,
well-respected
by
his
colleagues
and
will
maintain
First
National's
long-term
focus
on
providing
competitive
mortgage
products
and
good
service
supported
by
enabling
technology.
I
look
forward
to
working
with
Jason
closely
in
my
new
role.
Now
on to
annual
and
quarterly
business.
We
finished
the
year
with
a
record
MUA
of
CAD 123.9
billion,
4%
higher
than
2020.
Change
of
CAD
5.2
billion
is
large
and
represents
new
investments
in
a
sizable
number
of
single-family
homes,
multi-unit,
and
Commercial
properties
across
Canada.
We
never
forget
that
we're
lending
to
homeowners
across
the
country,
and
our
service
level
to
brokers
and
borrowers
alike
are
important
to
us.
Like
other
lenders,
we've
been
challenged
by
the
furious
pace
of
demand
over
the
past
18
months,
but
our
single-family
and
Commercial
teams
have
worked
very
hard
to
convert
opportunity
into
business,
and
they
have
done
just
that
as
First
National
set
new
annual
production
records
in
2021.
In
this
regard,
2021
did
not
turn
out
entirely
as
expected.
A
year
ago,
on
this
call,
we
told
you
that
residential
originations
would
be
at
least
in
line
with
the
record
set
in
2020
as
the
combination
of
our
built-in
advantage
over
traditional
bank
origination
channels
and
the
stimulative
effect
of
low
interest
rates
brings
more
business
our
way.
And
the
originations
were
more
than
just
in
line.
For
all
of
2021,
single-family
originations
grew
22%
over
2020's
record
to
land
at
CAD 23.4
billion,
while
Commercial
origination
was
7%
higher
at
CAD
9.7
billion,
also
setting
a
new
record.
That
said,
we
started
to see
the
toward
peace
of
homebuying
moderate
a
bit
in
the
fourth
quarter
after
the
extremes
of
2020.
As
you
may
recall,
the
impact
of
a
resurgent
economy
ignited
demand
for
credit
and
effectively
eliminated
the
normal
market
seasonality
in
Q4
of
last
year.
We
knew
demand
at
these
[indiscernible]
(00:04:00) levels
would
be
temporary
[ph]
and
advised
if
such (00:04:02)
on
our
last
analyst
call,
when
we
offered
a
residential
origination
might
be
as
much
as
25%
below
Q4
2020's
elevated
levels.
In
reality,
2021
Q4
single-family
production
was
lower
by
10%,
so
a
better
outcome
than
we
expected,
but
a
demonstration
of
the
market
slowing
down
nonetheless.
For
our
Commercial
segment,
fourth
quarter
originations
of
CAD 3
billion
were 12%
higher
than
a
year
ago.
We
expected
them
to
be
strong,
but
with
an
incredible
push
in
the
month
of
December,
we're
able
to
surpass
CAD
3
billion
advanced
in
a
single
quarter,
a
new
high
watermark.
Demand
for
conventional
mortgages
picked
up
this
augmented, our
already
strong
insured
volumes.
Mortgage
renewal
volumes
in
both
segments
were
as
expected,
single-family
renewals
were
CAD
1.5
billion
in
Q4, 10%
lower
than
a
year
ago,
reflecting
lower
available
renewal
opportunities
and
decisions
by
borrowers
to
refinance
rather
than
renew
to
take
advantage
of the
low
interest
rate
environment.
Commercial
renewals
were
CAD
902
million,
62%
higher
than
a
year
ago.
Overall,
we
put
more
business
on
the
books
in
2021
and it
was
solidly
profitable,
but
not
as
profitable
as
the
mortgages
in
2020,
when
spreads
were
exceptionally
wide,
because
of
economic
uncertainty
at
the
time
of
the
early
stages
of
the
pandemic
and
also
reduce
competition.
Going
from
a
year
of
exceptionally
wide
spreads
to
a
year
when
strong
competition meant
spreads
tightened
to
the
narrowest
they've
been
in
about
14
years
that
reduced
operating
profit
as
measured
by
Pre-Fair
Market
Value
Income.
Regardless,
2021
earnings
were
more
than
sufficient
to
support
the
common
share
dividend,
which
we
increased
last
June
to
an
annualized
rate
of CAD
2.35
per
share.
As
you
know,
we
also paid
a
special
dividend
of
CAD
1.25
in
December,
our
fifth
special
in
the
past
five
years.
All
in,
National
– First
National
declared
CAD
210.9
million
in
common
share
dividends
or
CAD
3.52
per
share
inclusive
of
the
special.
That
represents
a
growth
rate
of
42%
from
2020.
We're
proud
to
note
that
with
steady
business
growth
year-after-year,
First
National
has
increased
common
share
dividend
14
times
since
our
IPO.
Rewarding
those
who
purchased
shares
at
the
beginning
in
2006
with
a
cumulative
total
of
CAD 1.6
billion
of
dividends
and
distributions
of CAD
29.32
per
share.
And
people
will
recall
that
the
issue
price
was
CAD
10.
Inclusive
of
share
appreciation,
total
cumulative
return
to
IPO
investors
was
609%
from
2006
to
the
end
of
2021.
[ph]
When
we
think (00:07:40)
about
our
dividend
ratio,
the
board
typically
removes
gains
and
losses
and
account
changes
in
fair
value
of
financial
instruments.
These
gains
and
losses
are
reflective
of
the
current
bond
market
that
are
non-indicative
of
what
we
consider
core
earnings
which
are
distributable
to
shareholders.
Without
these
changes
and
the
special
dividend,
our
core
payout
ratio
for
all
of
2021
was
85%
compared
to
50%
in
2020.
Our
business
model
is
efficient.
This
is
clearly
demonstrated
in
the
management
of
the company's
after-tax,
pre-fair
market
value
return
on
shareholders'
equity,
which
was
a
healthy
39%
in
2021.
I'll
now
ask
Rob
to
give
his
financial
report
before
Jason
reviews
our
outlook.
Rob?
R
Robert Inglis
Yeah.
Thank
you,
Stephen,
and
good
morning,
everyone.
As
you
just
heard,
the
final
half
of 2021
reflected
what
we
consider
a
reset
from
the
market
extremes
of
2020.
This
has
not
only
affected
mortgage
volumes,
but
also
mortgage
spreads.
Together
with
our
decision
to
increase
securitization
to
drive
future
net
interest
margin,
this
muted
the
positive
impact
of
MUA
growth
on
revenue
and
profitability
metrics.
Looking
deeper,
2021
growth
in
MUA
was
4%
year-over-year,
while
revenue
was
up
1%
to
a
new
record
of
CAD 1.39
billion.
This
growth
was
achieved
on
higher
origination
in
spite
of
accelerated
single-family
mortgage
prepayment
activity
which
affected
both
profitability
of
securitization
and
the overall
MUA.
In
the
interest
of
time
and
because
this
is
our
quarterly
call,
I
will
now
speak
specifically
to
Q4
results.
Beginning
with
MUA,
it
grew
at
5%
annualized
in
the
quarter,
while
revenue
was
down
about
12%,
or
CAD 48
million
to
CAD 339
million.
There
are
a
few
moving
parts
to
this
story,
and
I'll
start
with
the
largest
one.
We
responded
to
the
market
environment
by
shifting
volumes
to
our
securitization
programs
which
will
benefit
First
National
in
future
periods
but
really
penalize
2020
results,
particularly
in
Q4.
Q4
placement
fees
decreased
32%
or
about CAD
32
million.
This
is
largely
a
function
of
slower
residential
origination
in
the
quarter
and
the
company's
decision
to
securitize
more
of
its
insured
Commercial
segment
volumes.
Overall,
residential
origination
volume
was
down,
comparing
fourth
quarter,
by
about
12%,
and
the
portion
of
the
sold
institutions
was
lower
by
about
19%.
As
spreads
returned
to
pre-pandemic
levels,
mortgage
volumes
sold
at
a
funded
basis
attracted
lower
per
unit
placement
fees,
and
overall
residential
placement
fees
were
lower
by
about
30%.
For
our
Commercial
segment,
like
the
previous
quarters
in
2021,
we
shifted
the
most
profitable
form
of
Commercial
origination,
that
is
the
10-year
term
insured
mortgages
from
institutional
placement
to
securitization
In
the
fourth
quarter,
the
company
allocated
about
CAD 200
million
more
of
its
10-year
insured
origination
to
securitization
than
it
did
in
2020.
This
shift
represented
about
CAD
8.5
million
change
year-over-year
in
placement
fees
for
this
segment.
The
shift
was
driven
by
a
CMHC
program
that
increased
the
CMB
allocation
for
issuers
who
lend
10-year
money
to
support
CMHC's
affordability
mandate.
First
National's
volume
in
this
area
were
strong, we'd
like
to
securitize
a
larger
percentage
of
this
product
to
create
future
margin
for
our
securitization
program
at
the
expense
of
onetime
placement
fees.
While
painful
in
the
short
run,
this
strategy
creates
value
for
First
National
in
the
form
of
income
over
the
next
10 years.
A
good
trade-off
for
a
business
that
has
an
advantage
for
the
long-term.
The
company decided
to
use
the
enhanced
CMB
allocation
to
its
fullest
as
CMH (sic) [CMHC] (00:11:57)
programs
are
always
subject
to
change.
The
fourth
quarter
gains
on
deferred
placement
fee
revenue
were
65%
or
CAD 5.7
million
lower
than
the
prior
year,
again,
a
result
of
narrower
spreads
and
our
decision
to
directly
securitize
more
of
our
multi-unit
mortgage
origination.
There
were
partial
offsets
to
these
declines.
Mortgage
investment
income
was
up
14%
year-over-year
in
Q4
or
by
about
CAD 2.2
million
as
we
held
more
mortgages
on our
balance
sheet
prior
to
securitization
and
earn
more
interest
revenue.
In
addition,
we
experienced
a
7%
year-over-year
growth
in
mortgage
servicing
income
in
the
quarter,
an
increase
of
CAD 3.4
million.
This
reflected
administration
revenue
from
growth
in
MUA
and
third-party
underwriting.
While
positive,
the
pace
of
growth
was
lower
compared
to
earlier
quarters,
another
sign
of
the
market
moderation
after
the
extremes
of
2020.
From
revenue
we
move
now
to
expenses.
Year-over-year,
broker
fees
decreased
by
13%
in
Q4,
reflecting
lower
origination
for
third-party
investors
as
I
noted
before and
discussing
placement
fees.
On
a
per
unit
basis,
broker
fee
expenses
were
marginally
higher,
particularly
as
the
company
paid
out
loyalty-based
rewards
that
reflected
the
entire
2021
record
year.
Our
expense
base
was
also
higher
in
2021
than
in
2020
on
increase
in
staffing.
Frankly,
we
were
understaffed
in
2020,
having
not
anticipated
such
a
substantial
and
abrupt
increase
in
mortgage
demand.
First
National
residential
and
Commercial
teams
worked
a
lot
of
extra
hours
to
get
through
the
increased
workload,
but
this
was
not
sustainable
for
our
people.
Accordingly,
in
2021,
we
built
up
the
capacity
to
handle
higher
volumes
with
a
30%
increase
in
FTE,
primarily
within
residential
underwriting
departments,
our
own
and
for
our
third-party
business.
With
higher
head
count,
year-over-year
salary
and
benefit
expenses
increased
21%
in
the
quarter.
This
included
Commercial
underwriting
compensation,
which
is
tied
to
volumes.
However,
these
wages
grew
in
similar
fashion
by
about
20%.
That's
at
generally
all
salaries
and
benefits
increased
by
this
rate
across
the
whole
company.
Q4
interest
expense
was
CAD 13.3
million
compared
to
about CAD
10.3 million
a
year
ago
due
to
increased
use
of
our
loan
facilities
to
fund
the
mortgages
accumulated
prior
to
securitization.
And
moving
on,
the
Q4,
Pre-Fair
Market
Value
income
of
CAD 57.2
million
was
40%
lower
year-over-year,
reflecting
revenue
expense
drivers.
We
remain
solidly
profitable
as
we
have
since
the
year
of the
IPO.
Q4
net
income
was
CAD 42
million
or
CAD
0.69
per
share.
For
all
of
2021,
First
National
earned
CAD
194.6
million
or
about
CAD
3.20
per
share.
One
final
item
of
note
and
that
is
our
capital
expenditures.
First
National
reinvest
each
year
in our
leading
technology
as
well
as
our
office
space.
Typically,
our
annual
capital
expenditures
are
in
the
neighborhood
of
CAD 7
million.
But
in
2021,
they
increased
to CAD
32
million
as
we
moved
our
Toronto
office.
First
National's
new
head
office
consists
of
over
130,000
square
feet
at
16 York
Street
in
Toronto.
The
building
was
designed
to
exceed
LEED
platinum
and
WELL
Building
Institute
guidelines
for
environmental
and
workplace
excellence
and
will
accommodate
our
needs
for
years
to
come.
With
that expenditure behind us, you
can
expect
capital
expenditures
to
return
to
traditional
levels
in
2022.
Now, over to Jason.
J
Jason Ellis
Thanks,
Rob,
and
thank
you,
Stephen,
for
your
kind
words
of
introduction
earlier. I'm
honored
to
have
the
opportunity
to
lead
First
National
and
very
grateful
to
Stephen
for
having
served
as
a
mentor.
I'm
glad
I
can
still
look
to
his
counsel
as
First
National's
Executive
Chairman.
Stephen
and
Moray built
a
great
team
and
an
effective
business
model.
I
think
we
can
continue
to
leverage
those
fundamentals
and
accomplish
what
they
achieved
in
the
past,
continuous
improvement
and
performance
that
rewards
all
stakeholders.
As
you
heard,
the
last
two
quarters
of
2021
represented
a
reset
from
the
extremes
we
experienced
in
2020.
As
we
look
ahead
to
2022,
despite
starting
the
first
quarter
with
another
COVID
lockdown,
there
has
been
considerable
momentum
in
the
economy.
We
know
that
the
Bank
of
Canada
increased
the
overnight
rate,
25
basis
points
just
as
our
conference
call
started
today
with
strong
inflationary
forces
at
play,
markets
are
signaling
multiple
rate
hikes
this
year,
which
is
a
further
signal
of
a
return
to
a
more
normal
economic
condition.
With
new
mortgages
locked
in
at
historically
low
rates
and
interest
rates
likely
to
rise
over
the
next
12
months,
it
is
unlikely
First
National
will
see
the
kind
of
mortgage
prepayment
activity
we
experienced
last
year,
which
was
a
headwind
for
2021
profitability.
Turning
to
our
immediate
business
outlook,
we
expect
Q1
residential
production
will
be
lower
than
last
year's
first
quarter,
itself
and
exceptionally
strong
period,
when
originations
were
almost
CAD
4.4
billion.
We
base
this
expectation
on
signs
of
slowing
origination
as
housing
inventories
fall
and
mortgage
rates
rise,
but
also
just
the
fact
that
Q1
last
year
was
so
unusually
active.
Based
on
our
pipeline,
we
expect
Commercial
origination
to
remain
strong
in
2022.
But
as
always,
volumes
will
vary
by
quarter.
It's
important
to
remember
that
we
are
resetting
to
the
norm,
not
to
a
depressed
state.
According
to
the
last
Bank
of
Canada
forecast,
GDP
is
expected
to
grow
around
4%
this
year
and
3.5%
next
year. We
will
also
see
the
positive
influences
of
immigration
on
the
types
of
housing
we
finance.
And
for
the
long-term,
the
demand/supply
imbalance
and
housing
stock
will
most
definitely
require
more
capital
for
construction,
another
activity
First
National
finances.
Our
priorities
in
this
new
normal
environment
begin
with
offering
a
full
range
of
mortgage
solutions
for
customers
across
both
business
lines.
This
year
sets
up
well
as
we
launch
the
CMHC
MLI
Select
product
this
month
in
our
Commercial
division.
This
is
a
new
way
of
financing
much
needed
affordable
housing.
In
Residential,
work
will
continue
in
promoting
our
Excalibur
product,
including
in
Western
Canada,
the
subject
of
our
expansion
in
2021.
These
and
other
activities
will
feed
into
our
priorities
which
is
to
grow
MUA,
the
source
of
most
of
our
earnings.
To
do
this,
we
are
very
focused
on
providing
great
service
to
our
mortgage
broker
partners
and
our
customers
as
they
shop
the
competitive
market
for
mortgages.
It's
not
possible
to
predict
competitive
intensity,
but
we
know
borrowers
always
have
a
choice
which
is
why
service
is
critically
important.
True
to
past
practice,
we
will
continue
to
invest
in
our
technology
to
enhance
service
on
both
sides
of
our
business
and,
wherever
possible,
improve
efficiency.
This
year,
we're
going
to
automate
additional
aspects
of
residential
administration,
and
we're
working
on
a
new
servicing
portal
for
Commercial
borrowers.
As
always,
we
will
maintain
a
conservative
risk
profile,
investing
in
the
most
creditworthy
mortgages
in
the
country.
In
summary,
we
believe
our
decisions
in
2021
positioned
First
National
for
long-term
success.
We
added
almost
370
talented
people
to
support
our
business
volumes
and
sustain
our
reputation
for
good
customer
service.
We
sacrificed
immediate
Commercial
segment
placement
fees,
but
created
10 years
of
future
securitization
net
interest
margins
by
electing
to
securitize
about
CAD 2
billion
of
10-year
multi-unit
residential
mortgages.
That's
about
CAD 1
billion
more
than
in
2020.
Of
course,
by
growing
our
mortgages
under
administration
in
2021,
we
can
look
forward
to
generating
income
and
cash
flows
from
our
now
CAD 33
billion
portfolio
of
mortgages
pledged
under
securitization
and
CAD 88
billion
servicing
portfolio.
I'll
conclude
with
a
thank
you
to
all
First
National
employees
for
their
hard
work
in
2021,
our
mortgage
broker
partners
for
their
business
during
these
unusual
times,
and
our
clients
for
their
continued
trust.
That
concludes
our
formal
remarks,
and
now,
we
would
be
pleased
to
take
your
questions.
Operator,
over
to
you.
Operator
Thank
you,
sir.
[Operator Instructions]
And your
first
question
will
be
from
Nik
Priebe
at
CIBC
Capital
Markets.
Please
go
ahead.
N
Nik Priebe
Analyst, CIBC World Markets, Inc.
Yeah.
Okay.
Thanks.
I
was
just
trying
to
square
the
tighter
mortgage
spread
environment
with
the
higher
net
interest
margin
achieved
on
the
securitization
portfolio
in
Q4. It
looks
like
net
interest
income
was
up
something
like
over
10%
sequentially
despite
securitized
mortgage
principal
being
virtually
flat.
Was
there
anything
unique
driving
that
margin
expansion
in
the
quarter?
J
Jason Ellis
No.
I
noticed
in
some
of
the
notes
that
you
guys
posted
yesterday
evening
after
our
earnings
announcement
that
that
was,
in
fact,
the
case
sequentially,
I
guess,
as
a
measurement
of
NIM
over
the
securitized
mortgages.
I
would
say
that
there's
a
CAD
33
billion
portfolio,
and,
I
guess,
it
just
may
be
that
there
may
have
been
some
older
pools
running
off
combined
with
whatever
was
going
on.
I'd
have
to
look
at
it
more
closely.
I'd
say,
though,
very
clearly
the
trend
is
current
margins
between
mortgage
coupons
and
NHA
MBS
coupons
are
compressed
relative
to
both
the
entire
book
and
what
we
would
have
seen
historically
over
time.
So
I
will
look
a
little
bit
more
closely
at
that,
but
I
would
say
the
trend
is
likely
to
see
a
tightening
in
the
overall
NIM
on
the
securitization
book
if
the
prevailing
spread
market
prevails.
N
Nik Priebe
Analyst, CIBC World Markets, Inc.
Understood.
Okay.
And
then,
on
the
expense
side,
I
think
you
had
alluded
in
your
prepared
remarks
to
the
growth
in
salaries
and
benefits
expense.
Given
the
investment,
the
pretty
substantial
investment
made
in
your
team
over
the
past
year,
do
you
expect
the
pace
of
hiring
to
taper
as
we
enter
2022?
J
Jason Ellis
Most
definitely.
I'd
say
that,
over
the
course
of
the
pandemic,
we
have
definitely
been
chasing
full
employment.
As
I'm
sure
you're
aware,
it's
a
very
tight
labor
market
generally.
And
in
particular,
I
think,
in
the
mortgage
industry
as
all
of
our
competitors
have
been
growing
at
quite
quick
paces
and
been
hiring
quite
aggressively.
But
to
answer
the
question,
yes,
I
think
that
we
definitely
should
see
a
moderation.
We've
surrendered
in
the
near-term
a
little
bit
of
operational
leverage.
But
I
think
once
we
get
settled
into
our
new
[indiscernible]
(00:24:04)
and
all of
our
new
employees
become
increasingly
effective,
that
we
should
be
able
to
claw
back
some
of
that
operational
leverage
we've
enjoyed
over
the
years.
N
Nik Priebe
Analyst, CIBC World Markets, Inc.
Okay.
And
then
just
one
follow-up
to
that.
In
the
fourth
quarter,
I
think
the
expense
was
close
to
CAD
50 million.
Was
there
anything
one-time
in
nature
in
Q4
or
is
that,
like,
true-ups
with
respect
to
year-end
bonuses
or
is
that
a
pretty
good
run
rate
for
2022?
J
Jason Ellis
I'll
let
Rob
address
that
one.
But
I
think
there
may
be
a
little
bit
of
an
extra
bump
in
the
fourth
quarter
with
year-end
true-ups.
R
Robert Inglis
Yeah.
We
paid,
Jason,
too
much
money
and
that
reflected
badly
on
me
now.
We
accrue
every
month
and
there
will
be
bonuses
probably
that
exceed
our
accrual
for
sure,
but
not
a
lot
like
we're
pretty
good
at
accruing
those
moneys.
So
I
think
it's
just
– typically, it's
going
to
be
the
run
rate.
I
think
we
really
ramped
up
a
lot
of
our
operations,
a
lot
of
hiring over
the
course
of
the
fall.
The
biggest
number
there
always
is
the
Commercial
underwriting
team,
and
they
had a
record
quarter.
They had
CAD
3
billion
of
origination.
So
they're –
and they're
going to
be
paid
a
lot
of
a
commission
in
that
quarter.
So
that
probably
is
the
only other
reason
why
it's
higher.
And maybe
it's
a
little
bit
higher
than
the
typical
run
rate,
to
be
honest.
Yeah.
N
Nik Priebe
Analyst, CIBC World Markets, Inc.
Yeah.
Okay.
All
right.
Thanks
very
much.
That's
it
for
me.
Operator
Thank
you.
Next
question
will
be
from
Graham
Ryding
at
TD
Securities.
Please
go
ahead.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Good
morning.
Looking
at
your
securitization
volumes
for
the
year,
I
think
it
was
up
year-over-year
in
part
due
to
that
increased
CMB
access
around
the
affordability
like
Commercial
real
estate.
So,
I'm
just
wondering,
should
we
expect
that?
I
guess,
portion
of
your
business
to
increase?
Does
that
look
like
sustainable
and it's
CAD
13
billion
roughly,
like
is
that
a
reasonable
outlook
for
securitization
volumes
in
terms
of
capacity?
J
Jason Ellis
Hey,
Graham.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
we
are
definitely
mature
users
of
CMHC's
securitization
programs,
and
our
expectation
would
be
to
leverage
those
programs
to
their
fullest
extent.
As
you
indicate,
the
allocation
protocol
for
the
10
years
CMB
program
does
afford
preferred
allocation
for
affordable
multifamily
pools,
which
fortunately,
First
National
is
an
area
of
expertise.
We're
probably
are
most
certainly
the
market
leader
in
originating
that
type
of
product.
So,
I
expect
that,
yes,
we
would
fully
leverage
the
traditional
CAD
9
billion
limit
of
total
MBS
allocation.
And
on
top
of
that,
additional
affordable
pools,
which
do
not
count
against
the CAD
9
billion
limit.
I
think
somewhere
in
the
context
of
CAD
12
billion
is
a
reasonable
expectation
in
terms
of
total
issuance.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Okay.
Great.
And
does
that
include
any
of
the
other
securitization
activity
that
you
do
outside
of
the
real
CMB
and
NHA MBS
at
CAD
12
billion...?
J
Jason Ellis
Yeah,
that'll
– yeah,
that
– sorry, that'll
include
amounts
into ABCP
conduits.
But
those
balances
tend
to
go
up
relatively.
I
mean,
I
guess
it's
net
or
total
amount
sold
in.
Are
you
thinking
about
net
or
total
amount?
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Total
amount.
J
Jason Ellis
Total
amount?
Yes.
So,
I
would say, CAD
12
billion to
CAD
13
billion
total
securitization
activity
for
the
year,
Rob?
R
Robert Inglis
Yeah,
that
makes
sense.
I
think
we've
really
maximized
the
capacity
in
2021.
So,
hopefully,
the
2022
is same
thing.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Got
it.
Okay.
That's
helpful.
So,
obviously,
it
sounds
like
you're
anticipating
or
you're
seeing
some
slowdown
in
single-family
originations
on
the
back
of
higher
interest
and
mortgage
rates.
What
sort
of
decline
in
activity
are
you
seeing
so
far
in
2022
year-to-date?
J
Jason Ellis
Well. We're
definitely
seeing some
moderation
in
the
commitment
pipeline.
I
wouldn't
characterize
it
as
a
material
shift,
but
definitely
seeing
some
slowing.
But
what
we
do –
what
I
would
say
is
that
as
prices
continue
to
rise
in
terms
of
dollar
value,
I
would
say,
less
of
a
change
year-over-year
than
there
is
in
unit
transactions.
But
I
would
say
single-digit
kind
of
changes
year-over-year.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Okay.
J
Jason Ellis
Percentage wise.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Understood. Okay.
And
then
my
last
question
just
on
mortgage
spreads,
your
commentary
indicates
that
it
was
obviously
quite
tight
in
Q4
2021,
but
we're
now,
obviously,
in
an environment of
higher
volatility and
uncertainty
in
the
markets.
Could
this
actually
be
a
positive
for
your
mortgage
spreads
overall?
J
Jason Ellis
I
guess,
traditionally,
we've
seen
volatility
in
the
market
result
in
higher
mortgage
coupons
relative
to
other
fixed
income
benchmarks.
We
haven't – I guess,
well,
we've
seen
rates
move
up
in
the
mortgage
market
a
couple
of
times
in
the last
couple of
weeks
against
a
backdrop
where
we've
seen
actually
a
bit
of
a
retreat
in
the
risk-free
rate
in
the
form
of
five-year
Government of
Canada
bonds.
So,
I
guess,
in
the
very,
very
recent
past,
there
has
been
a
little
bit
of
a
widening,
but
we
also
see
the
spread
on
NHA
MBS
pools
widening
over
the
same
time.
So
I
don't
know
yet
whether
or
not
we're
going
to see
the
kind
of
wide
spreads
we
enjoyed,
say,
post
something
like
a
global
financial
crisis.
The
reality
is,
I
think,
as
we
come
out
of
COVID,
there's
still
a
tremendous
amount
of
liquidity
and
capital
in
the
financial
space,
which
I
think
will
still
keep
lenders
relatively
aggressive
in
terms
of
their
mortgage
coupons.
So
I
guess
if
it's
not
too
short
for
a
short
answer or
too
late
for
a
short
answer,
I
think
these
things
are
going
to
–
if
I had
to
guess,
balance
each
other
out.
I
don't
anticipate
any
significant
widening
on
the
backdrop
of
any
volatility
[indiscernible]
(00:30:29).
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
I
have
never
found
any
particular
luck
in
trying
to
predict
where
mortgage
or
mortgage
spreads
go.
I
mean,
it
tends
to
be
I
think,
just
in
general, there is --
and
there's
a
lot
of
liquidity
around,
they tend
to
be
tight
when
there's a
lot of
competition
from
the D-SIBs
which
they
all
have
big
balance
sheets and
lots
of
money.
They
tend
to
– tends
to
be
competitive.
And
I
think
that's
what
we're
seeing
now.
Probably
see
it
for
a
while.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Okay.
Understood.
Are
you
seeing
the
banks
as
they
reopen
their
branches?
Are
you
see
them
take
back
any
market
share
within
the
mortgage
broker
channel
or
otherwise?
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Well,
I
think
they
recovered
a
lot
more
quickly
at
the
branch
level,
just
generally
through
their
mortgage
sales
force.
I
wouldn't
say
there's
a
shift
in
or
out
of
the
mortgage
broker
channel.
I
mean,
our
model
typically
is
we
just
put
on
volume
so
that
when
we
do
get
wider
spreads,
it's
very
operationally
efficient
right
to
the
bottom
line.
So,
in
many
ways,
what
we're
doing, we're
seeing
some
stronger
volumes,
stronger
MUA,
stronger
Commercial
that
will
start
to
support
the
income
over
time.
Certainly
doing
the
securitization
where
we
take
income
over
time
is
good
for
the
long
term --
long-term
health
of
the
company.
G
Graham Ryding
Analyst, TD Securities, Inc.
Okay.
That's
it
for
me.
Thank
you.
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Thanks,
Graham.
Operator
Next
question
will
be
from
James
Gloyn at
National
Bank
Financial.
Please
go
ahead.
J
Jaeme Gloyn
Analyst, National Bank Financial, Inc.
Yeah.
Thanks.
So,
first
question,
similar
vein
is
that
last name
from
Graham.
Just
in
terms
of
the
Canadian
national
resale
market,
it seems
like
dollar
value
of homes
sales
is
still
positive
year-over-year
over
the
last
few
months,
which
should
indicate
that
originations
remain
strong.
So,
they're
kind
of flat
to
maybe
down
is
the
way
I'm
interpreting
your
guidance.
Does
that
suggest
there's
some
market
share
giveback?
Or
is
there
some
mix
impacts
that
we're
not
seeing
beneath
the
surface
when
you
give
this
outlook
for
Q1
2022?
J
Jason Ellis
Yeah.
I mean,
I
guess
the
macro
picture
in
terms
of
mortgage
broker
channel
share
of
the
overall
market,
it's
tough
to
say.
There's
not
a
lot
of
really
clear
visibility
on
that,
but
I
don't
think
that
I'm
seeing
any
material
change
in
the
broker
share
the
overall
market.
In
terms
of
First
National's
share
within
the
broker
channel,
don't
anticipate
any
deterioration
in
that
this
year.
I
will
concede
that
in
2020,
for
a
couple
of
quarters,
we
had
remarkable
share
probably
sort
of
a
short
peak,
the
highest
we've
seen
in
a
long,
long
time,
and
that
has
returned
to
normal,
but
that
has
happened
gradually
over
the
last
four
to
six
quarters.
So
I
don't
anticipate
any
material
change
in
our
share
in
the
channel
or
the
broker
channel
in
the
entire
market.
J
Jaeme Gloyn
Analyst, National Bank Financial, Inc.
Okay.
Fair
enough.
Shifting
to
the
Commercial
outlook.
And
just
want
to dig
in
to
the
commentary
that
the
growth
still
looks
robust
given
the
pipeline.
So
when
we
think
about
the
Commercial
book
originations in
multi-unit
and
Commercial
was
just
under
CAD
10 billion,
would
that
outlook
be
more
near
term
for
like
Q1,
Q2,
where
we
maybe
had
some
softer
numbers
in
the
multi-unit
Commercial
space
in
Q1
2021?
Or
does
that
sort
of
apply
to
the
full
year
and
running
off
this
really
strong
Q4
print
in
the
Commercial
book
for
originations?
J
Jason Ellis
I'd
say
that
we
are
probably
expecting
at
the
best
of
our
ability
to
predict
at
a
relatively
comparable
year
in
Commercial
originations.
Obviously,
like
you
indicate,
came
off
a
very
strong
fourth
quarter.
But
as
we
indicated
in
the
comments,
the
pipeline
is
robust,
and
there's
nothing
to
suggest
that
we
would
have
any
material
change
in
that.
Quarters
can
vary
though,
especially
with
the
Commercial
mortgages,
where
large
deals
can
sort
of
swing
principal
volumes
from
one
quarter to
the
next.
But
generally
speaking,
I'd
say
that
year-over-year
should
not
be
materially
different.
J
Jaeme Gloyn
Analyst, National Bank Financial, Inc.
Okay.
Great.
Thank
you.
Going
back
to
single-family.
Just
want to
get
a
sense
as
to
how
refinance
activity
has
trended
recently,
especially,
as
we're
starting
to
see
mortgage
rates
back
up.
Is
there
– is
that
refinance
activity
still
high
as
maybe
some
borrowers
are
pulling
forward
some
of
their
decision-making
to
get
ahead
of
rising
rates?
Or
what
are
you
seeing
in
terms
of
that
trend?
And
how
do
you expect
that
to
flow
through
in
2022?
J
Jason Ellis
Yes.
So,
I
would
say,
over
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
we've
probably
seen
the
tail
end
of
that
as
we've
had
a
couple
of
announcements
of
fixed
rates
going
up.
We've
seen
a
rush
in
terms
of
pre-approval
volumes
and
things
like
that
as
borrowers
look
to
get
in
and
refinance
existing
properties.
But
I
would
say
as
we
move
through
2022,
the
incident
of
refinance,
the
advantage
of
refinancing
to
borrowers
will
lessen.
And
I
think
that,
that
will
have
a
favorable
impact
on
the
First
National
in
terms
of
a
reduced
prepayment
speed
on
the
existing
portfolio.
I
view
that,
generally
speaking,
all else
being
equal,
as
a
bit
of
a
tailwind
for
2022.
So,
as
rates
do
go
up,
I
do
expect
to
see
prepayment
speeds
lower,
which
means
less
deterioration
of
our
principal
in
our
securitization
pools,
which
should
be
supportive
for
NIM
and
create
more
renewal
opportunities
as
mortgages
come
up
for
maturity.
So,
I
would
say,
generally
speaking,
prepayment
speeds
lower,
which
is
constructive
for
us.
J
Jaeme Gloyn
Analyst, National Bank Financial, Inc.
Okay.
Great.
Last
thing,
if
I
may,
as
I
look
at
placement
fee
revenues
as
a
percentage
of
mortgages
originated
and
sold
to
institutional
investors,
about
a
10, 11
basis
points
step
down
quarter-over-quarter,
I
would
assume
some
mix
is driving
that
as Commercial
was
less
of
a
component
of
mortgages
sold.
But
maybe
you
can
frame
this
quarter's
performance
in
terms
of
the
forward
guidance
or
any
outlook?
Is
this a
quarter
that's
reflective
of
what
we
should
expect
going
forward. Obviously,
this
can
move
around
quite
a
bit.
But
how
would
you
characterize
this
quarter
relative
to
a
"normal
quarter"?
R
Robert Inglis
Jaeme,
it's
Rob. I'll
[ph]
speak (00:37:52)
to
that
a
little
bit.
So,
in
2020,
we
had
a
huge
write-off
in
the
first
quarter
on
hedging,
because
we
had
a
pipeline
that
government
[ph]
kind
of (00:38:04)
bonds
went
down.
So,
when
we
sold
those
mortgages
that
actually
did
close
from
those
commitments
in
Q4,
let's
say,
there
was
a
huge
placement
fees
on
that
stuff.
We've
written
off
sort
of
the
bad
stuff
and
it
was --
the
par
was
low
when
we
sort of made
extremely
large
gains
there.
In
2021, it's
almost
the
opposite,
spreads
tightened
in,
those
mortgages
that
we
had
to
place
on
a
capital
markets
basis
were
that
much
tighter.
So,
when
you
compare
those
two
quarters,
I
think that's
what you're
seeing
is
that
that margin
compression
and a
little
bit
was
the
Commercial
side.
[indiscernible]
(00:38:41)
everything
that
we
do,
that's
10
year
pretty
well.
So,
less
Commercial
and
a
tighter
spread
will
–
placement
fee
will
make
it actually a
little
bit
better.
But
basically,
I
think
it's
that's
sort
of
a
capital
markets
change from
2020-2021
that
you're
seeing.
J
Jaeme Gloyn
Analyst, National Bank Financial, Inc.
Okay.
Thank you
very
much.
Operator
Thank
you.
[Operator Instructions]
And
your
next
question
will
be
from
Etienne Ricard
at
BMO Capital
Markets. Please
go
ahead.
E
Etienne Ricard
Analyst, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Canada)
Thank
you,
and
good
morning.
On
securitization
margins,
what
benefits
are
you
expecting
relative
to
Q4
levels
as
prepayments,
indemnities
normalize
in
the
rising
mortgage
rate
environment?
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
I
think
we're
going
to benefit
by
three
ways
as
prepayment
speeds
slow,
Etienne.
First,
as
I
mentioned
a
moment
ago,
obviously,
principal
balances
will
be
more
stable
and
the
amount
securitized
will
grow
along
with
originations
and
more
of
a
lockstep
as
we
might
expect.
So,
obviously,
higher
principal
will
result
in
higher
NIM.
Secondly,
through
2020
and
periods
of
2021,
we
did
go
through
periods
where
the
indemnity
prepayment
penalty
payable
to
the
MBS investor
was,
in
fact,
higher
than
the
prepayment
penalty
received
from
the
borrower
on
the
mortgages
which
created
an
additional
drag
on
NIM.
And
finally,
because
of
the
exceptionally
high
prepayment
speeds,
the
principal
paying
out
faster
than
modeled,
Rob
was
required
to
reverse
some
of
the
capitalized
acquisition
expenses
associated
with
those
securitized
mortgages,
which
created
a
third
drag
on
NIM.
So,
while
I
probably
will
stop
short
of
trying
to
put
a
dollar
value
on
those
things
now,
as
prepayment
speeds
normalize,
I
think
that it
will
definitely
be,
all
else
being
equal,
a
meaningful
tailwind
to
NIM
over
the
course
of
2022.
E
Etienne Ricard
Analyst, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Canada)
Okay.
Great.
On
Excalibur,
could
you
provide
an
update
on
the
rollout
of
this
program?
And should
we
think
about
Excalibur
in
the CAD 1
billion
to
CAD 3
billion
range
in
terms
of
origination
activity?
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Yeah. And
so
Excalibur
continues
to
be
a
tremendous
success.
As
I
mentioned
in
my
comments,
we
did
expand
out
to
Vancouver
this
year,
and
we'll
continue
to
cautiously
add
other
geographic
locations
as
we
can.
I
would
say
that
it
is
definitely
growing.
Our
Excalibur
program
grew
– Rob,
do
we
have
a
sense
of
sort
of
the
growth
of
Excalibur
year-over-year?
Perhaps
as
much
as...
R
Robert Inglis
Yeah.
It
was
sort
of
like
maybe
not
100%
growth,
doubling,
but
in
that sort
of
magnitude,
really,
great
growth.
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Yeah.
So
I
don't
think,
at
this
point,
we're
splitting
it
out
in
terms
of
our
origination
volumes,
but
it
continues
to
be
a
source
of
growth
in
origination
for
us,
but
a
cautious
growth
at
that
as
things
have
generally
been
for
First
National.
E
Etienne Ricard
Analyst, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Canada)
Understood.
On
the
regular
dividend,
the
payout
appears
to
be
trending
a
bit
above
the
60%
to
70%
target
range
that
we
have
talked
previously.
Are
you
comfortable
in
potentially
raising
this
target
range
going
forward?
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
I
think
we
addressed
this
maybe
on
the
recent
call.
We
have
a
lot
of
debate
internally
whether
60%
to
70%
is
the
appropriate
number
or
whether
70%
to
80%
should
be
a
higher
number.
I
don't
think
the
board
is
uncomfortable
with
necessarily
a
higher
number.
In
some
ways,
we've
done
specials
for
the
last
five
years.
And
I
think,
to
some
extent,
that
certainly
has
reflected
the
cautiousness
that
we've
had.
I
would
think
–
I
think
you
could
certainly make
the
case
that
if
you're
doing,
it's
about
five
years
in
a
row,
maybe
the
payout
ratio
is
not
inappropriate.
So
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
an
issue
if
the
–
or
concern
if
the
payout
ratio
gets
up
over
70%.
E
Etienne Ricard
Analyst, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Canada)
Thank
you
very
much.
Operator
Thank
you.
And
your
last
question
will
be
from
Geoff
Kwan
at
RBC
Capital
Markets.
Please
go
ahead.
G
Geoffrey Kwan
Analyst, RBC Dominion Securities, Inc.
Hi.
Good
morning.
Just
going
back
to
the
residential
side,
you
talked
about
obviously
some
of
the
cooling
activity
off
of
elevated
levels.
I'm
curious
where
you're
seeing
it,
whether
or not
it's
by
region,
urban
versus
rural,
by
housing
type,
by
homebuyer
type
or
any
other
way
that
you
analyze
the
market?
J
Jason Ellis
No.
Hi,
Geoff.
It's
Jason.
No,
I
would
say
off
the
top,
I
don't
have
any
glaring
evidence
that
there's
anything
significant
in
terms
of
a
shift
in
geography
or
borrower
type.
I
guess,
based
on
my
comments
earlier,
if
I
went
back
and
looked,
I
would
say,
in
terms
of
loan
purpose,
we
may
see
a
slightly
elevated
percentage
of
refinance
activity
relative
to
purchase
activity,
but
I
don't
have
that
in
front
of
me.
Otherwise,
I'd
say
at
the
margin,
anecdotally,
we've
had
some
favorable
numbers
in
our
Calgary
office
suggesting
that
Alberta
is who's
sort
of
long
suffered
in
the
housing
market
relative
to
the
rest
of
the
country
has
had
done
maybe
at
the
margin
relatively
better
in comparison.
But
no,
nothing
stands
out
as
noteworthy.
G
Geoffrey Kwan
Analyst, RBC Dominion Securities, Inc.
Okay.
And
then
on
the
Excalibur
product,
more
broadly
in
the
Alt-A
market,
I
think
there's
been
kind of
one
to
two
rate
increases
from some
of
the
players
in
that
part
of
the
market
so
far
this
year.
I
know
you
tend
to
target
more
like
the
higher
end
of
the
Alt-A
part
of
the
market.
But
just
wondering
if
you've
looked
to
implement
some
rate
increases
this
year?
And
if
so,
what
might
have
been
the
blended
rate
increase
that
you've
put
through?
J
Jason Ellis
Yeah.
No.
The
Excalibur
rate,
the
Alt-A
mortgage
coupons
generally
in
the
market
proved
to
be
very
sticky
throughout
the
pandemic
with
a
slow
and
steady
squeeze
on
the
margin
between
the
typical
Alt-A
coupon
and
whatever
your
underlying
benchmark
was,
whether
it was
swaps
or
Canada's.
But
we
have
moved
rates
up
recently,
both
on
the
prime
and
on
the
Alt-A
side.
So,
in
terms
of
magnitude,
the
mortgage
coupons
haven't
moved
up
as
much
as
our
cost
of
funds
has.
So,
we
have
not
recovered
the
margin
to
where
it
was.
But
in
terms
of
the
actual
blended
rate,
I
would
say,
our
lowest
coupon
in
the
Alt-A
program
through
much
of the
pandemic
was
in
the
context
of CAD
2.79
plus
the
lender
fee.
I
think
it's
probably
25
basis
points
higher
now,
but
I'd
be
honest
with
you,
Geoff,
I'd
have
to
double
check
on
that,
but
that
sounds
about
the
right
order
of
magnitude.
G
Geoffrey Kwan
Analyst, RBC Dominion Securities, Inc.
Okay.
And
just my
last
question
was
on
your
positive
outlook
on
the
Commercial
originations
for
the
year,
how
would
you
describe
the
competitive
environment
today?
And
then
also
within
your
view
for
the
year,
like
what
parts
within
[ph]
Commercial
multi-unit
residential
(00:47:06) do
you
see
that
strength
coming
from?
J
Jason Ellis
Well, fortunately,
we've
developed
an
expertise
in
the
CMHC
multifamily
side.
And
some
of
the
largest
developers
and
owners
come
to
us
for
that
expertise.
As
we
see
CMHC
roll
out
its
new
affordable
program.
Fortunately,
we're
well-positioned
to
offer
good
advice
and
continue
to,
I
think,
grow
our
leading
position
on
CMHC
multifamily.
So
I
do
see
opportunity
for
growth
in
the
CMHC
multifamily
side.
But
perhaps
more
significantly,
last
year,
we
launched
our
core
conventional
program
on
the
Commercial
side
of
the
business
with
some
very
strong
institutional
investor
support.
I
think
a
re-diversification
of
our
Commercial
business
by
expanding
our
conventional
lending
activity
has
been
a
real
source
of
growth,
and
I
think
that
we
can
continue
to
look
forward
to
more
of
that
next
year.
So
I'd
say,
as
a
split,
we'll
probably
see
conventional
grow
in
relative
terms
to
CMHC
multifamily,
but
I
still
think
there's
room
for
our
multifamily
to
grow
from
where
it
is
now.
G
Geoffrey Kwan
Analyst, RBC Dominion Securities, Inc.
Okay.
Great.
Thank
you.
Operator
Thank you.
And
at
this
time,
I
would
like
to
turn
the
call
back
over
to
Mr.
Smith
for
closing
comments.
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Thanks,
operator.
As
there
are
no
further
questions,
we
look
forward
to
reporting
our
first
quarter
results
this
spring.
Thanks
for
taking
part
in
our
call
and
have
a
good
day.
Operator
Thank
you,
sir.
Ladies
and
gentlemen...
S
Stephen J. R. Smith
Thank
you.
Operator
...this
does
indeed
conclude
your
conference
call.
Once
again,
thank
you
for
attending,
and
we
ask
that
you
please
disconnect
your
lines.
Good morning, and welcome to First National's Fourth Quarter Analyst Call. This call is being recorded on Wednesday, March 2, 2022. At this time, all callers are in a listen-only mode. Later, we'll conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be provided at that time on how to queue up.
Now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Stephen Smith, Executive Chairman of the Board of First National. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our call and thank you for participating. Before we begin, I will remind you that our remarks and answers may contain forward-looking information about future events or the company's future performance. This information is subject to risks and uncertainties and should be considered in conjunction with the risk factors detailed in our MD&A.
Joining me today are Jason Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Rob Inglis, Chief Financial Officer. As you all know, Jason succeeded me in the role of CEO in January, as I became the company's Executive Chairman. At that time, Jason also joined our board of directors. This planned and natural succession sets us up well for the future.
Jason is a proven leader whose experience with First National began in 2004, most recently served as our President and Chief Operating Officer with broad operational responsibilities. Jason is well-known among our business partners, well-respected by his colleagues and will maintain First National's long-term focus on providing competitive mortgage products and good service supported by enabling technology. I look forward to working with Jason closely in my new role.
Now on to annual and quarterly business. We finished the year with a record MUA of CAD 123.9 billion, 4% higher than 2020. Change of CAD 5.2 billion is large and represents new investments in a sizable number of single-family homes, multi-unit, and Commercial properties across Canada.
We never forget that we're lending to homeowners across the country, and our service level to brokers and borrowers alike are important to us. Like other lenders, we've been challenged by the furious pace of demand over the past 18 months, but our single-family and Commercial teams have worked very hard to convert opportunity into business, and they have done just that as First National set new annual production records in 2021.
In this regard, 2021 did not turn out entirely as expected. A year ago, on this call, we told you that residential originations would be at least in line with the record set in 2020 as the combination of our built-in advantage over traditional bank origination channels and the stimulative effect of low interest rates brings more business our way. And the originations were more than just in line.
For all of 2021, single-family originations grew 22% over 2020's record to land at CAD 23.4 billion, while Commercial origination was 7% higher at CAD 9.7 billion, also setting a new record. That said, we started to see the toward peace of homebuying moderate a bit in the fourth quarter after the extremes of 2020. As you may recall, the impact of a resurgent economy ignited demand for credit and effectively eliminated the normal market seasonality in Q4 of last year.
We knew demand at these [indiscernible] (00:04:00) levels would be temporary [ph] and advised if such (00:04:02) on our last analyst call, when we offered a residential origination might be as much as 25% below Q4 2020's elevated levels. In reality, 2021 Q4 single-family production was lower by 10%, so a better outcome than we expected, but a demonstration of the market slowing down nonetheless.
For our Commercial segment, fourth quarter originations of CAD 3 billion were 12% higher than a year ago. We expected them to be strong, but with an incredible push in the month of December, we're able to surpass CAD 3 billion advanced in a single quarter, a new high watermark.
Demand for conventional mortgages picked up this augmented, our already strong insured volumes. Mortgage renewal volumes in both segments were as expected, single-family renewals were CAD 1.5 billion in Q4, 10% lower than a year ago, reflecting lower available renewal opportunities and decisions by borrowers to refinance rather than renew to take advantage of the low interest rate environment.
Commercial renewals were CAD 902 million, 62% higher than a year ago. Overall, we put more business on the books in 2021 and it was solidly profitable, but not as profitable as the mortgages in 2020, when spreads were exceptionally wide, because of economic uncertainty at the time of the early stages of the pandemic and also reduce competition.
Going from a year of exceptionally wide spreads to a year when strong competition meant spreads tightened to the narrowest they've been in about 14 years that reduced operating profit as measured by Pre-Fair Market Value Income.
Regardless, 2021 earnings were more than sufficient to support the common share dividend, which we increased last June to an annualized rate of CAD 2.35 per share. As you know, we also paid a special dividend of CAD 1.25 in December, our fifth special in the past five years. All in, National – First National declared CAD 210.9 million in common share dividends or CAD 3.52 per share inclusive of the special. That represents a growth rate of 42% from 2020.
We're proud to note that with steady business growth year-after-year, First National has increased common share dividend 14 times since our IPO. Rewarding those who purchased shares at the beginning in 2006 with a cumulative total of CAD 1.6 billion of dividends and distributions of CAD 29.32 per share. And people will recall that the issue price was CAD 10.
Inclusive of share appreciation, total cumulative return to IPO investors was 609% from 2006 to the end of 2021. [ph] When we think (00:07:40) about our dividend ratio, the board typically removes gains and losses and account changes in fair value of financial instruments. These gains and losses are reflective of the current bond market that are non-indicative of what we consider core earnings which are distributable to shareholders. Without these changes and the special dividend, our core payout ratio for all of 2021 was 85% compared to 50% in 2020. Our business model is efficient. This is clearly demonstrated in the management of the company's after-tax, pre-fair market value return on shareholders' equity, which was a healthy 39% in 2021.
I'll now ask Rob to give his financial report before Jason reviews our outlook. Rob?
Yeah. Thank you, Stephen, and good morning, everyone. As you just heard, the final half of 2021 reflected what we consider a reset from the market extremes of 2020. This has not only affected mortgage volumes, but also mortgage spreads. Together with our decision to increase securitization to drive future net interest margin, this muted the positive impact of MUA growth on revenue and profitability metrics.
Looking deeper, 2021 growth in MUA was 4% year-over-year, while revenue was up 1% to a new record of CAD 1.39 billion. This growth was achieved on higher origination in spite of accelerated single-family mortgage prepayment activity which affected both profitability of securitization and the overall MUA. In the interest of time and because this is our quarterly call, I will now speak specifically to Q4 results. Beginning with MUA, it grew at 5% annualized in the quarter, while revenue was down about 12%, or CAD 48 million to CAD 339 million.
There are a few moving parts to this story, and I'll start with the largest one. We responded to the market environment by shifting volumes to our securitization programs which will benefit First National in future periods but really penalize 2020 results, particularly in Q4.
Q4 placement fees decreased 32% or about CAD 32 million. This is largely a function of slower residential origination in the quarter and the company's decision to securitize more of its insured Commercial segment volumes.
Overall, residential origination volume was down, comparing fourth quarter, by about 12%, and the portion of the sold institutions was lower by about 19%. As spreads returned to pre-pandemic levels, mortgage volumes sold at a funded basis attracted lower per unit placement fees, and overall residential placement fees were lower by about 30%.
For our Commercial segment, like the previous quarters in 2021, we shifted the most profitable form of Commercial origination, that is the 10-year term insured mortgages from institutional placement to securitization In the fourth quarter, the company allocated about CAD 200 million more of its 10-year insured origination to securitization than it did in 2020. This shift represented about CAD 8.5 million change year-over-year in placement fees for this segment. The shift was driven by a CMHC program that increased the CMB allocation for issuers who lend 10-year money to support CMHC's affordability mandate.
First National's volume in this area were strong, we'd like to securitize a larger percentage of this product to create future margin for our securitization program at the expense of onetime placement fees. While painful in the short run, this strategy creates value for First National in the form of income over the next 10 years. A good trade-off for a business that has an advantage for the long-term. The company decided to use the enhanced CMB allocation to its fullest as CMH (sic) [CMHC] (00:11:57) programs are always subject to change.
The fourth quarter gains on deferred placement fee revenue were 65% or CAD 5.7 million lower than the prior year, again, a result of narrower spreads and our decision to directly securitize more of our multi-unit mortgage origination. There were partial offsets to these declines. Mortgage investment income was up 14% year-over-year in Q4 or by about CAD 2.2 million as we held more mortgages on our balance sheet prior to securitization and earn more interest revenue.
In addition, we experienced a 7% year-over-year growth in mortgage servicing income in the quarter, an increase of CAD 3.4 million. This reflected administration revenue from growth in MUA and third-party underwriting. While positive, the pace of growth was lower compared to earlier quarters, another sign of the market moderation after the extremes of 2020.
From revenue we move now to expenses. Year-over-year, broker fees decreased by 13% in Q4, reflecting lower origination for third-party investors as I noted before and discussing placement fees. On a per unit basis, broker fee expenses were marginally higher, particularly as the company paid out loyalty-based rewards that reflected the entire 2021 record year. Our expense base was also higher in 2021 than in 2020 on increase in staffing.
Frankly, we were understaffed in 2020, having not anticipated such a substantial and abrupt increase in mortgage demand. First National residential and Commercial teams worked a lot of extra hours to get through the increased workload, but this was not sustainable for our people. Accordingly, in 2021, we built up the capacity to handle higher volumes with a 30% increase in FTE, primarily within residential underwriting departments, our own and for our third-party business.
With higher head count, year-over-year salary and benefit expenses increased 21% in the quarter. This included Commercial underwriting compensation, which is tied to volumes. However, these wages grew in similar fashion by about 20%. That's at generally all salaries and benefits increased by this rate across the whole company. Q4 interest expense was CAD 13.3 million compared to about CAD 10.3 million a year ago due to increased use of our loan facilities to fund the mortgages accumulated prior to securitization.
And moving on, the Q4, Pre-Fair Market Value income of CAD 57.2 million was 40% lower year-over-year, reflecting revenue expense drivers. We remain solidly profitable as we have since the year of the IPO. Q4 net income was CAD 42 million or CAD 0.69 per share. For all of 2021, First National earned CAD 194.6 million or about CAD 3.20 per share.
One final item of note and that is our capital expenditures. First National reinvest each year in our leading technology as well as our office space. Typically, our annual capital expenditures are in the neighborhood of CAD 7 million. But in 2021, they increased to CAD 32 million as we moved our Toronto office. First National's new head office consists of over 130,000 square feet at 16 York Street in Toronto. The building was designed to exceed LEED platinum and WELL Building Institute guidelines for environmental and workplace excellence and will accommodate our needs for years to come.
With that expenditure behind us, you can expect capital expenditures to return to traditional levels in 2022.
Now, over to Jason.
Thanks, Rob, and thank you, Stephen, for your kind words of introduction earlier. I'm honored to have the opportunity to lead First National and very grateful to Stephen for having served as a mentor. I'm glad I can still look to his counsel as First National's Executive Chairman.
Stephen and Moray built a great team and an effective business model. I think we can continue to leverage those fundamentals and accomplish what they achieved in the past, continuous improvement and performance that rewards all stakeholders.
As you heard, the last two quarters of 2021 represented a reset from the extremes we experienced in 2020. As we look ahead to 2022, despite starting the first quarter with another COVID lockdown, there has been considerable momentum in the economy. We know that the Bank of Canada increased the overnight rate, 25 basis points just as our conference call started today with strong inflationary forces at play, markets are signaling multiple rate hikes this year, which is a further signal of a return to a more normal economic condition.
With new mortgages locked in at historically low rates and interest rates likely to rise over the next 12 months, it is unlikely First National will see the kind of mortgage prepayment activity we experienced last year, which was a headwind for 2021 profitability.
Turning to our immediate business outlook, we expect Q1 residential production will be lower than last year's first quarter, itself and exceptionally strong period, when originations were almost CAD 4.4 billion. We base this expectation on signs of slowing origination as housing inventories fall and mortgage rates rise, but also just the fact that Q1 last year was so unusually active. Based on our pipeline, we expect Commercial origination to remain strong in 2022. But as always, volumes will vary by quarter. It's important to remember that we are resetting to the norm, not to a depressed state. According to the last Bank of Canada forecast, GDP is expected to grow around 4% this year and 3.5% next year. We will also see the positive influences of immigration on the types of housing we finance. And for the long-term, the demand/supply imbalance and housing stock will most definitely require more capital for construction, another activity First National finances.
Our priorities in this new normal environment begin with offering a full range of mortgage solutions for customers across both business lines. This year sets up well as we launch the CMHC MLI Select product this month in our Commercial division. This is a new way of financing much needed affordable housing. In Residential, work will continue in promoting our Excalibur product, including in Western Canada, the subject of our expansion in 2021.
These and other activities will feed into our priorities which is to grow MUA, the source of most of our earnings. To do this, we are very focused on providing great service to our mortgage broker partners and our customers as they shop the competitive market for mortgages. It's not possible to predict competitive intensity, but we know borrowers always have a choice which is why service is critically important.
True to past practice, we will continue to invest in our technology to enhance service on both sides of our business and, wherever possible, improve efficiency. This year, we're going to automate additional aspects of residential administration, and we're working on a new servicing portal for Commercial borrowers. As always, we will maintain a conservative risk profile, investing in the most creditworthy mortgages in the country.
In summary, we believe our decisions in 2021 positioned First National for long-term success. We added almost 370 talented people to support our business volumes and sustain our reputation for good customer service. We sacrificed immediate Commercial segment placement fees, but created 10 years of future securitization net interest margins by electing to securitize about CAD 2 billion of 10-year multi-unit residential mortgages. That's about CAD 1 billion more than in 2020.
Of course, by growing our mortgages under administration in 2021, we can look forward to generating income and cash flows from our now CAD 33 billion portfolio of mortgages pledged under securitization and CAD 88 billion servicing portfolio. I'll conclude with a thank you to all First National employees for their hard work in 2021, our mortgage broker partners for their business during these unusual times, and our clients for their continued trust.
That concludes our formal remarks, and now, we would be pleased to take your questions. Operator, over to you.
Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] And your first question will be from Nik Priebe at CIBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Okay. Thanks. I was just trying to square the tighter mortgage spread environment with the higher net interest margin achieved on the securitization portfolio in Q4. It looks like net interest income was up something like over 10% sequentially despite securitized mortgage principal being virtually flat. Was there anything unique driving that margin expansion in the quarter?
No. I noticed in some of the notes that you guys posted yesterday evening after our earnings announcement that that was, in fact, the case sequentially, I guess, as a measurement of NIM over the securitized mortgages. I would say that there's a CAD 33 billion portfolio, and, I guess, it just may be that there may have been some older pools running off combined with whatever was going on. I'd have to look at it more closely.
I'd say, though, very clearly the trend is current margins between mortgage coupons and NHA MBS coupons are compressed relative to both the entire book and what we would have seen historically over time. So I will look a little bit more closely at that, but I would say the trend is likely to see a tightening in the overall NIM on the securitization book if the prevailing spread market prevails.
Understood. Okay. And then, on the expense side, I think you had alluded in your prepared remarks to the growth in salaries and benefits expense. Given the investment, the pretty substantial investment made in your team over the past year, do you expect the pace of hiring to taper as we enter 2022?
Most definitely. I'd say that, over the course of the pandemic, we have definitely been chasing full employment. As I'm sure you're aware, it's a very tight labor market generally. And in particular, I think, in the mortgage industry as all of our competitors have been growing at quite quick paces and been hiring quite aggressively. But to answer the question, yes, I think that we definitely should see a moderation. We've surrendered in the near-term a little bit of operational leverage. But I think once we get settled into our new [indiscernible] (00:24:04) and all of our new employees become increasingly effective, that we should be able to claw back some of that operational leverage we've enjoyed over the years.
Okay. And then just one follow-up to that. In the fourth quarter, I think the expense was close to CAD 50 million. Was there anything one-time in nature in Q4 or is that, like, true-ups with respect to year-end bonuses or is that a pretty good run rate for 2022?
I'll let Rob address that one. But I think there may be a little bit of an extra bump in the fourth quarter with year-end true-ups.
Yeah. We paid, Jason, too much money and that reflected badly on me now. We accrue every month and there will be bonuses probably that exceed our accrual for sure, but not a lot like we're pretty good at accruing those moneys. So I think it's just – typically, it's going to be the run rate. I think we really ramped up a lot of our operations, a lot of hiring over the course of the fall. The biggest number there always is the Commercial underwriting team, and they had a record quarter. They had CAD 3 billion of origination. So they're – and they're going to be paid a lot of a commission in that quarter. So that probably is the only other reason why it's higher. And maybe it's a little bit higher than the typical run rate, to be honest. Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. All right. Thanks very much. That's it for me.
Thank you. Next question will be from Graham Ryding at TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Looking at your securitization volumes for the year, I think it was up year-over-year in part due to that increased CMB access around the affordability like Commercial real estate. So, I'm just wondering, should we expect that? I guess, portion of your business to increase? Does that look like sustainable and it's CAD 13 billion roughly, like is that a reasonable outlook for securitization volumes in terms of capacity?
Hey, Graham. I think it's fair to say that we are definitely mature users of CMHC's securitization programs, and our expectation would be to leverage those programs to their fullest extent. As you indicate, the allocation protocol for the 10 years CMB program does afford preferred allocation for affordable multifamily pools, which fortunately, First National is an area of expertise. We're probably are most certainly the market leader in originating that type of product.
So, I expect that, yes, we would fully leverage the traditional CAD 9 billion limit of total MBS allocation. And on top of that, additional affordable pools, which do not count against the CAD 9 billion limit. I think somewhere in the context of CAD 12 billion is a reasonable expectation in terms of total issuance.
Okay. Great. And does that include any of the other securitization activity that you do outside of the real CMB and NHA MBS at CAD 12 billion...?
Yeah, that'll – yeah, that – sorry, that'll include amounts into ABCP conduits. But those balances tend to go up relatively. I mean, I guess it's net or total amount sold in. Are you thinking about net or total amount?
Total amount.
Total amount? Yes. So, I would say, CAD 12 billion to CAD 13 billion total securitization activity for the year, Rob?
Yeah, that makes sense. I think we've really maximized the capacity in 2021. So, hopefully, the 2022 is same thing.
Got it. Okay. That's helpful. So, obviously, it sounds like you're anticipating or you're seeing some slowdown in single-family originations on the back of higher interest and mortgage rates. What sort of decline in activity are you seeing so far in 2022 year-to-date?
Well. We're definitely seeing some moderation in the commitment pipeline. I wouldn't characterize it as a material shift, but definitely seeing some slowing. But what we do – what I would say is that as prices continue to rise in terms of dollar value, I would say, less of a change year-over-year than there is in unit transactions. But I would say single-digit kind of changes year-over-year.
Okay.
Percentage wise.
Understood. Okay. And then my last question just on mortgage spreads, your commentary indicates that it was obviously quite tight in Q4 2021, but we're now, obviously, in an environment of higher volatility and uncertainty in the markets. Could this actually be a positive for your mortgage spreads overall?
I guess, traditionally, we've seen volatility in the market result in higher mortgage coupons relative to other fixed income benchmarks. We haven't – I guess, well, we've seen rates move up in the mortgage market a couple of times in the last couple of weeks against a backdrop where we've seen actually a bit of a retreat in the risk-free rate in the form of five-year Government of Canada bonds. So, I guess, in the very, very recent past, there has been a little bit of a widening, but we also see the spread on NHA MBS pools widening over the same time. So I don't know yet whether or not we're going to see the kind of wide spreads we enjoyed, say, post something like a global financial crisis.
The reality is, I think, as we come out of COVID, there's still a tremendous amount of liquidity and capital in the financial space, which I think will still keep lenders relatively aggressive in terms of their mortgage coupons. So I guess if it's not too short for a short answer or too late for a short answer, I think these things are going to – if I had to guess, balance each other out. I don't anticipate any significant widening on the backdrop of any volatility [indiscernible] (00:30:29).
I have never found any particular luck in trying to predict where mortgage or mortgage spreads go. I mean, it tends to be I think, just in general, there is -- and there's a lot of liquidity around, they tend to be tight when there's a lot of competition from the D-SIBs which they all have big balance sheets and lots of money. They tend to – tends to be competitive. And I think that's what we're seeing now. Probably see it for a while.
Okay. Understood. Are you seeing the banks as they reopen their branches? Are you see them take back any market share within the mortgage broker channel or otherwise?
Well, I think they recovered a lot more quickly at the branch level, just generally through their mortgage sales force. I wouldn't say there's a shift in or out of the mortgage broker channel. I mean, our model typically is we just put on volume so that when we do get wider spreads, it's very operationally efficient right to the bottom line. So, in many ways, what we're doing, we're seeing some stronger volumes, stronger MUA, stronger Commercial that will start to support the income over time. Certainly doing the securitization where we take income over time is good for the long term -- long-term health of the company.
Okay. That's it for me. Thank you.
Thanks, Graham.
Next question will be from James Gloyn at National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks. So, first question, similar vein is that last name from Graham. Just in terms of the Canadian national resale market, it seems like dollar value of homes sales is still positive year-over-year over the last few months, which should indicate that originations remain strong. So, they're kind of flat to maybe down is the way I'm interpreting your guidance. Does that suggest there's some market share giveback? Or is there some mix impacts that we're not seeing beneath the surface when you give this outlook for Q1 2022?
Yeah. I mean, I guess the macro picture in terms of mortgage broker channel share of the overall market, it's tough to say. There's not a lot of really clear visibility on that, but I don't think that I'm seeing any material change in the broker share the overall market. In terms of First National's share within the broker channel, don't anticipate any deterioration in that this year.
I will concede that in 2020, for a couple of quarters, we had remarkable share probably sort of a short peak, the highest we've seen in a long, long time, and that has returned to normal, but that has happened gradually over the last four to six quarters. So I don't anticipate any material change in our share in the channel or the broker channel in the entire market.
Okay. Fair enough. Shifting to the Commercial outlook. And just want to dig in to the commentary that the growth still looks robust given the pipeline. So when we think about the Commercial book originations in multi-unit and Commercial was just under CAD 10 billion, would that outlook be more near term for like Q1, Q2, where we maybe had some softer numbers in the multi-unit Commercial space in Q1 2021? Or does that sort of apply to the full year and running off this really strong Q4 print in the Commercial book for originations?
I'd say that we are probably expecting at the best of our ability to predict at a relatively comparable year in Commercial originations. Obviously, like you indicate, came off a very strong fourth quarter. But as we indicated in the comments, the pipeline is robust, and there's nothing to suggest that we would have any material change in that. Quarters can vary though, especially with the Commercial mortgages, where large deals can sort of swing principal volumes from one quarter to the next. But generally speaking, I'd say that year-over-year should not be materially different.
Okay. Great. Thank you. Going back to single-family. Just want to get a sense as to how refinance activity has trended recently, especially, as we're starting to see mortgage rates back up. Is there – is that refinance activity still high as maybe some borrowers are pulling forward some of their decision-making to get ahead of rising rates? Or what are you seeing in terms of that trend? And how do you expect that to flow through in 2022?
Yes. So, I would say, over the last couple of weeks, we've probably seen the tail end of that as we've had a couple of announcements of fixed rates going up. We've seen a rush in terms of pre-approval volumes and things like that as borrowers look to get in and refinance existing properties. But I would say as we move through 2022, the incident of refinance, the advantage of refinancing to borrowers will lessen. And I think that, that will have a favorable impact on the First National in terms of a reduced prepayment speed on the existing portfolio.
I view that, generally speaking, all else being equal, as a bit of a tailwind for 2022. So, as rates do go up, I do expect to see prepayment speeds lower, which means less deterioration of our principal in our securitization pools, which should be supportive for NIM and create more renewal opportunities as mortgages come up for maturity. So, I would say, generally speaking, prepayment speeds lower, which is constructive for us.
Okay. Great. Last thing, if I may, as I look at placement fee revenues as a percentage of mortgages originated and sold to institutional investors, about a 10, 11 basis points step down quarter-over-quarter, I would assume some mix is driving that as Commercial was less of a component of mortgages sold. But maybe you can frame this quarter's performance in terms of the forward guidance or any outlook? Is this a quarter that's reflective of what we should expect going forward. Obviously, this can move around quite a bit. But how would you characterize this quarter relative to a "normal quarter"?
Jaeme, it's Rob. I'll [ph] speak (00:37:52) to that a little bit. So, in 2020, we had a huge write-off in the first quarter on hedging, because we had a pipeline that government [ph] kind of (00:38:04) bonds went down. So, when we sold those mortgages that actually did close from those commitments in Q4, let's say, there was a huge placement fees on that stuff. We've written off sort of the bad stuff and it was -- the par was low when we sort of made extremely large gains there.
In 2021, it's almost the opposite, spreads tightened in, those mortgages that we had to place on a capital markets basis were that much tighter. So, when you compare those two quarters, I think that's what you're seeing is that that margin compression and a little bit was the Commercial side. [indiscernible] (00:38:41) everything that we do, that's 10 year pretty well. So, less Commercial and a tighter spread will – placement fee will make it actually a little bit better. But basically, I think it's that's sort of a capital markets change from 2020-2021 that you're seeing.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your next question will be from Etienne Ricard at BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and good morning. On securitization margins, what benefits are you expecting relative to Q4 levels as prepayments, indemnities normalize in the rising mortgage rate environment?
I think we're going to benefit by three ways as prepayment speeds slow, Etienne. First, as I mentioned a moment ago, obviously, principal balances will be more stable and the amount securitized will grow along with originations and more of a lockstep as we might expect. So, obviously, higher principal will result in higher NIM. Secondly, through 2020 and periods of 2021, we did go through periods where the indemnity prepayment penalty payable to the MBS investor was, in fact, higher than the prepayment penalty received from the borrower on the mortgages which created an additional drag on NIM.
And finally, because of the exceptionally high prepayment speeds, the principal paying out faster than modeled, Rob was required to reverse some of the capitalized acquisition expenses associated with those securitized mortgages, which created a third drag on NIM. So, while I probably will stop short of trying to put a dollar value on those things now, as prepayment speeds normalize, I think that it will definitely be, all else being equal, a meaningful tailwind to NIM over the course of 2022.
Okay. Great. On Excalibur, could you provide an update on the rollout of this program? And should we think about Excalibur in the CAD 1 billion to CAD 3 billion range in terms of origination activity?
Yeah. And so Excalibur continues to be a tremendous success. As I mentioned in my comments, we did expand out to Vancouver this year, and we'll continue to cautiously add other geographic locations as we can. I would say that it is definitely growing. Our Excalibur program grew – Rob, do we have a sense of sort of the growth of Excalibur year-over-year? Perhaps as much as...
Yeah. It was sort of like maybe not 100% growth, doubling, but in that sort of magnitude, really, great growth.
Yeah. So I don't think, at this point, we're splitting it out in terms of our origination volumes, but it continues to be a source of growth in origination for us, but a cautious growth at that as things have generally been for First National.
Understood. On the regular dividend, the payout appears to be trending a bit above the 60% to 70% target range that we have talked previously. Are you comfortable in potentially raising this target range going forward?
I think we addressed this maybe on the recent call. We have a lot of debate internally whether 60% to 70% is the appropriate number or whether 70% to 80% should be a higher number. I don't think the board is uncomfortable with necessarily a higher number. In some ways, we've done specials for the last five years. And I think, to some extent, that certainly has reflected the cautiousness that we've had. I would think – I think you could certainly make the case that if you're doing, it's about five years in a row, maybe the payout ratio is not inappropriate. So I don't think we're going to have an issue if the – or concern if the payout ratio gets up over 70%.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. And your last question will be from Geoff Kwan at RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning. Just going back to the residential side, you talked about obviously some of the cooling activity off of elevated levels. I'm curious where you're seeing it, whether or not it's by region, urban versus rural, by housing type, by homebuyer type or any other way that you analyze the market?
No. Hi, Geoff. It's Jason. No, I would say off the top, I don't have any glaring evidence that there's anything significant in terms of a shift in geography or borrower type. I guess, based on my comments earlier, if I went back and looked, I would say, in terms of loan purpose, we may see a slightly elevated percentage of refinance activity relative to purchase activity, but I don't have that in front of me.
Otherwise, I'd say at the margin, anecdotally, we've had some favorable numbers in our Calgary office suggesting that Alberta is who's sort of long suffered in the housing market relative to the rest of the country has had done maybe at the margin relatively better in comparison. But no, nothing stands out as noteworthy.
Okay. And then on the Excalibur product, more broadly in the Alt-A market, I think there's been kind of one to two rate increases from some of the players in that part of the market so far this year. I know you tend to target more like the higher end of the Alt-A part of the market. But just wondering if you've looked to implement some rate increases this year? And if so, what might have been the blended rate increase that you've put through?
Yeah. No. The Excalibur rate, the Alt-A mortgage coupons generally in the market proved to be very sticky throughout the pandemic with a slow and steady squeeze on the margin between the typical Alt-A coupon and whatever your underlying benchmark was, whether it was swaps or Canada's. But we have moved rates up recently, both on the prime and on the Alt-A side.
So, in terms of magnitude, the mortgage coupons haven't moved up as much as our cost of funds has. So, we have not recovered the margin to where it was. But in terms of the actual blended rate, I would say, our lowest coupon in the Alt-A program through much of the pandemic was in the context of CAD 2.79 plus the lender fee. I think it's probably 25 basis points higher now, but I'd be honest with you, Geoff, I'd have to double check on that, but that sounds about the right order of magnitude.
Okay. And just my last question was on your positive outlook on the Commercial originations for the year, how would you describe the competitive environment today? And then also within your view for the year, like what parts within [ph] Commercial multi-unit residential (00:47:06) do you see that strength coming from?
Well, fortunately, we've developed an expertise in the CMHC multifamily side. And some of the largest developers and owners come to us for that expertise. As we see CMHC roll out its new affordable program. Fortunately, we're well-positioned to offer good advice and continue to, I think, grow our leading position on CMHC multifamily. So I do see opportunity for growth in the CMHC multifamily side.
But perhaps more significantly, last year, we launched our core conventional program on the Commercial side of the business with some very strong institutional investor support. I think a re-diversification of our Commercial business by expanding our conventional lending activity has been a real source of growth, and I think that we can continue to look forward to more of that next year. So I'd say, as a split, we'll probably see conventional grow in relative terms to CMHC multifamily, but I still think there's room for our multifamily to grow from where it is now.
Okay. Great. Thank you.
Thank you. And at this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Smith for closing comments.
Thanks, operator. As there are no further questions, we look forward to reporting our first quarter results this spring. Thanks for taking part in our call and have a good day.
Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen...
Thank you.
...this does indeed conclude your conference call. Once again, thank you for attending, and we ask that you please disconnect your lines.