© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Methanex Corporation Q4 2021 Earnings Call. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Ms. Sarah Herriott. Please go ahead, Ms. Herriott.
Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our Fourth Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call. Our 2021 fourth quarter news release, management's discussion and analysis and financial statements can be accessed from the Reports tab of the Investor Relations page on our website at methanex.com. I would like to remind our listeners that our comments and answers to your questions today may contain forward-looking information. This information, by its nature, is subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause the stated outcome to differ materially from the actual outcome. Certain material factors or assumptions were applied in drawing the conclusions or making the forecast or projections, which are included in the forward-looking information. Please refer to our fourth quarter 2021 MD&A and to our 2020 annual report for more information. I would also like to caution our listeners that any projections provided today regarding Methanex's future financial performance are effective as of today's date. It is our policy not to comment on or update this guidance between quarters. For clarification, any references to revenue, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, cash flow or income made in today's remarks reflect our 63.1% economic interest in the Atlas facility and our 50% economic interest in the Egypt facility. In addition, we report our adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income to exclude the mark-to-market impact on share-based compensation and the impact of certain items associated with specific identified events. These items are non-GAAP measures that do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP, and therefore, unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We report these non-GAAP measures in this way to make them a better measure of underlying operating performance, and we encourage analysts covering the company to report their estimates in this matter. I would now like to turn the call over to Methanex's President and CEO, Mr. John Floren, for his comments and question-and-answer period.
Thanks, Sarah. Good morning, and all the best in 2022. We hope that everyone is continuing to stay safe and healthy. Today, we will review our outstanding fourth quarter and full year 2021 results, provide an overview of the methanol markets, discuss our operational results and share our near-term outlook. We will then open the call up for questions. Turning to our financial results. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we reported our highest quarterly adjusted EBITDA in the company's history of $340 million and a record adjusted net income of $185 million or $2.43 per share. Our exceptional fourth quarter results were primarily due to higher realized prices and higher produced sales volume, highlighting significant leverage to methanol prices. For the full year of 2021, our financial results were significantly stronger compared to 2020 due to higher realized methanol prices. We reported our highest annual adjusted EBITDA of $1.1 billion and robust adjusted net income of $460 million or $6.03 per share. We are extremely pleased with our record financial results this past year following a very challenging 2020. I'm proud of how our global team operated given the ongoing uncertainty of COVID-19 pandemic. Our exceptional safety performance, coupled with high plant reliability and strong prices, enabled us to deliver outstanding financial results for our shareholders. Now turning to the methanol market. We estimate that global methanol demand in 2021 increased by approximately 5% to 86 million tonnes compared to 2020. This increase was driven by strong recovery in demand for traditional chemical applications from increased manufacturing activity. Energy-related demand also rebounded, but was slightly offset by lower demand from methanol-to-olefins or MTO production. We estimate that the global methanol demand decreased by approximately 2% in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter. Traditional demand growth in the fourth quarter was offset by lower demand for MTO producers due to planned outages and the continued impact from China's government-mandated industrial operating rate restrictions. The methanol industry ran at a lower operating rate in 2021 due to various planned and unplanned outage. The run-up in energy prices in 2021 impacted feedstock costs and availability, which made it difficult for production to increase back to pre-COVID levels. In the fourth quarter, there were several plant outages, particularly in Iran, due to natural gas restrictions, and in China, where natural gas and coal were diverted to meet seasonal power demand. Methanol prices fluctuated during the fourth quarter. Prices increased early in the quarter due to tight supply and rising energy prices before moderating later in the quarter. Our average realized price increased $55 per tonne in the fourth quarter to $445 per tonne compared to the third quarter of 2021. Entering the fourth quarter, energy prices, particularly coal and natural gas prices, increased significantly, which moved the cost curve higher. In December and into the first quarter of 2022, we have seen coal prices moderate to around RMB 900 per tonne as a result of intervention in coal production in China by the Chinese government. The result has been that the industry cost curve, which continues to be set in China, decreased to approximately $350 per tonne at coal price of RMB 900 per tonne. Although still robust, our February posted prices were lower in Asia Pacific and flat in North America and China at $480, $619 and $430 per tonne, respectively. Our European contract price is set quarterly, and we increased our first quarter 2022 prices by EUR 15 per tonne to EUR 599 per tonne. Our fourth quarter discount rate was higher compared to our guidance for 2021. As a result of tight market conditions during the fourth quarter, we saw meaningful price premiums compared to China pricing in all markets. For Asia Pacific, where prices were $50 to $100 higher than China, we have traditionally used one posted price to the entire region, which includes China, and this resulted in a significantly higher discount for the product we sold in China. In 2022, we have introduced a separate posted pricing for China, or the CPCP, and do not expect similar volatility in our future discount rate as a result of these large pricing differentials between China and other Asia Pacific markets. We mentioned on our Q3 quarterly call that we provide updated guidance on our discount rate to posted methanol prices. In 2022, we expect to see higher discount rates of approximately 20% on average compared to our prior 17% guidance, as we are experiencing a more competitive environment. We do not expect a higher discount to impact our overall realized price for methanol, as we sell -- as we make our pricing decisions -- are made with a view on supply and demand fundamentals and the global cost curve at any given point in time. Overall, the methanol markets remain strong. We continue to see strong traditional derivative demand, and we expect higher operating rates from the MTO sector in Q1. Today, the MTO industry is operating at approximately 80% rates. We continue to be optimistic about new methanol demand.In 2021, a number of analysis were made by container ship operators for orders of dual fuel vessels. We estimate in the next 3 to 4 years that there'll be over 35 dual fuel vessels on the water -- sorry, 55 dual fuel vessels on the water, including 19 of our own ships. The annual demand from these dual fuel vessels will be approximately 1 million tonnes per year, assuming they run on methanol 100% of the time. Now turning to our operational results. Our production levels were significantly higher in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter due to higher gas availability in Chile and New Zealand and record production at our Geismar facilities. In New Zealand, our production levels were higher in the fourth quarter following the completion of the short-term commercial arrangement we made to idle one plant and to make natural gas available to support the New Zealand electricity market. Since then, we've operated both Motunui plants. We estimate that our 2020 production in New Zealand to be approximately 1.5 million tonnes from the 2 Motunui plants. In Geismar, both our plants ran at full operating rates during the fourth quarter, resulting in record quarterly production for those plants. With the completion of the second low-cost debottlenecking project at G2, the Geismar facility's annual operating capacity has increased by 10% to 2.2 million tonnes. In Trinidad, our Atlas production in the fourth quarter continued to be strong and was similar to the third quarter. We continue to have discussions around opportunities for longer-term gas supply for our assets. In Chile, production levels were higher in the fourth quarter, as we restarted Chile IV in October. We expect to operate both plants during the southern hemisphere summer months to the end of April 2022. We estimate that the production in Chile for 2022 of approximately 1 million tonnes. In Egypt, production levels were slightly lower in the fourth quarter due to operating constraints. And in Medicine Hat, production for the fourth quarter was similar to the third quarter. Our 2022 production is forecasted to be approximately 7 million equity tonnes, although actual production may vary by quarter based on gas availability, planned maintenance outages, extended unplanned outages and anticipated events. Now turning to our balance sheet. We ended the fourth quarter in a strong financial position with $932 million in cash and $900 million of undrawn backup liquidity, which meets our goal of having cash on hand for the remaining G3 capital cost spend. We previously announced a strategic shift in partnership with Mitsui O.S.K. Limited, or MOL, with proceeds of approximately $145 million. We have received all regulatory approvals for the transaction and expect it to close during the first quarter of 2022. Turning to our capital allocation priorities. Our capital allocation priorities remain the same. We will use the cash we generate to maintain our business, pursue value-accretive growth opportunities and continue our strong track record of returning excess cash to shareholders. Construction on our high advantage G3 project is progressing to plan and is well-positioned to be completed on time and on budget by the end of 2023 or early 2024. All major equipment items are now on site, which reduces the risk of supply chain issues or inflation. Our capital cost estimate for the project is $1.25 billion to $1.35 billion, and we spent approximately $508 million to the end of 2021. We expect approximately $750 million to $850 million of remaining capital costs before capitalized interest. We continue to anticipate to spend approximately $100 million per quarter, understanding that the timing of expenditures may fluctuate period to period. In the fourth quarter, we spent less than the $100 million due to the timing of expenditures related to the project. With our strong liquidity position and cash flow generation, we are well-positioned to fund the Geismar 3 project from cash on hand. In addition to completing our G3 projects, we plan to focus on increasing our production by securing additional economic natural gas for our existing assets. Excess cash will continue to be returned to shareholders with a preference for using flexible share buybacks. In the fourth quarter, we returned $68 million to shareholders through our share repurchase program and regular dividend. Now turning to the outlook for the first quarter. Based on our current posted prices for the first 2 months of the first quarter and notably higher forecasted sales of produced product versus the fourth quarter of 2021, we expect the first quarter 2022 EBITDA to be similar to the fourth quarter of 2021. Methanol market fundamentals remain strong, and we are confident in our ability to generate meaningful cash flow at current methanol prices. In 2022, we remain focused on managing safely through the global pandemic, continue to progress our advantaged G3 projects safely and on budget, operating our plants safely and reliably, delivering secure and reliable supply to our customers and enhancing our strong financial position and financial flexibility. We are well positioned to continue delivering significant value to shareholders over the medium to long term. We will now be happy to answer any questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Jacob Bout with CIBC.
John, I wanted to maybe just start off, just dig in a bit more on what's going on in China. So -- what was the percentage of sales that you shift to China? And was the mix higher in fourth quarter specifically? And how do you see this mix playing out for the next couple of years?
Yes. No big difference, Jacob, to previous quarters.
And what would that -- what would that numerically be? How much are you are selling...
I have to get to that number. I don't have it right in front of me, so I don't want to quote you a wrong number. But it's around 20% to 25%, something like that, but I'll get you the exact number.
Okay. And then as far as your guidance for the discount rate, kind of cut out there a bit. So you're saying that the discount rate will be 20% higher or will be 20% in 2022?
Yes. We're forecasting our discount rate to be 20% in 2022, not 20% higher, but 20% from the posted prices on average.
The next question is from Hassan Ahmed with Alembic Global Advisors.
John, question around Europe. Obviously, we all know and are seeing what's happening with the natural gas pricing situation over there, egregiously high levels. Obviously, tension continues between Russia and Ukraine. So it seems that no relief in sight in terms of gas prices. So what are you guys hearing in terms of capacity over there? How do you think that plays out at least as far as 2022 goes?
Yes. So obviously, there's capacity offline in Europe because of the higher energy complex that they've been experiencing. The tensions between NATO and Russia are certainly not helping the situation. There's lots of back and forth on what happens to the pipeline. I really -- I'm not in a position to make a call on that or hopefully things cool down and we don't have any outbreak of any hostilities, but we'll see. As far as what we're seeing pricing -- sorry, volume is coming from really the Atlanta basin, mainly North America to backfill the product that we're not being produced in Europe. It's hard to know when the gas price will be placed to allow methanol production to restart, I guess it's a factor in methanol price as well. But I think our current view is earliest in the summer of this year.
Understood. And a question now on supply-demand fundamentals as they pertain to 2022. I mean, obviously, Q4 was a bit of a noisy quarter in terms of demand. You guys talked about sequentially demand being down 2%, but obviously, there were supply chain constraint issues. Obviously, the European issue that we were talking about earlier. But now as you look at 2022, higher crude oil prices with a bias to the upside, I would imagine inventory level is relatively low. Supply chain constraints slowly sort of getting sorted out. So in terms of 2022 demand growth, should we expect demand growth to be well above normal levels? And how would that compare to what you're seeing in terms of supply growth for 2022?
Well, there's not many supply growth, Hassan, in -- in the year. I mean, there may be some additional products coming out of Iran depending on how they operate, how much gas they get, the technical issues that they've been dealing with, sanctions, a lot of gray area there. So we're not expecting any significantly increased supply during the year. Now having said that, we just talked about Europe, that could come back on. But we're looking to have pretty well what we saw in the fourth quarter continue into the first quarter, what we're seeing ongoing unplanned outages again with some of the larger clients that have recently come up. So I think supply is going to continue to be a challenge in 2022, especially in a high energy environment. I think like -- I mentioned, MTO rebounded in the quarter. We expect traditional demand to continue to grow at GDP rates, so whatever numbers you're using there, and then depending on the pandemic, it looks like early signs, things are getting somewhat back to normal in some parts of the world. We expect the fuel demand to bounce back, and that's still the laggard. The fuel demand is still, whether it be MTBE or biodiesel or others, has been a bit of a laggard during -- because people just aren't driving as much because of some of the shutdowns and the pandemic restrictions. So overall, we see -- without a severe demand shock event that we're not anticipating, a pretty robust supply-demand balance, which should lead to pretty decent pricing for methanol during 2022.
Extremely helpful, John.
The next question is from Ben Isaacson with Scotiabank.
Can you just touch on the dual control energy policy in China? I understand that as it relates to methanol plants, we have seen operating rates going lower. I wasn't clear if that was for the Olympics or for the Lunar New Year. Do you see that continuing throughout 2022? And could that lead to capacity shutdowns?
Well, we've seen this ongoing not only with methanol, but with other industrial production, mainly in the east part of China. Shutting down because of pollution and because using the energy for other applications, heating and electricity and more production coming in Inner Mongolia. That trend has been going on, we expect that to continue. When coal prices got to RMB 2,000 in the fourth quarter, obviously, it didn't make economic sense to make methanol even at $450 pricing, so we saw production shutdown at that time. And as you know, traditionally, in the winter, natural gas is used more for heating than for making chemicals like methanol. So I'd say right now, production rates in China are higher than we saw in the fourth quarter, when we saw severe pressure because of high coal prices and high natural gas prices, and we would expect them to be somewhat higher in the summer months as gas is available for making methanol from natural gas and to not use as much for heating. So we would expect methanol production in China to be a little higher in the summer months than what we saw in Q4.
That's great. And then just for my follow-up. Last quarter on the call, you said that you were looking to accelerate the buyback, and you mentioned you have 5% out there now, and you saw another 3% or 4% was possible in 2022. Do you still hold that view now that methanol prices have moderated or has your view shifted?
Yes, moderated from an extremely high level. So if we could take these current methanol prices for the next 20 years, we'd all be very happy. But I think we can move significantly down pricing where we are and still complete the buyback by the end of April as our current view, so we did accelerate it. If you look at the filings around the third week of December, we increased quite substantially the amount we're buying. And that's because of the strong fourth quarter we had, and we anticipated strong first quarter. So -- we have enough cash on the balance sheet now to complete G3. We'll get the MOL proceeds. So to me, excess cash, which we're generating a ton of now, will go back to shareholders through regular dividend, and our preference is share buybacks, and we can. As we look to complete the current bid, probably by around the AGM time, end of April, we have the ability to put a second bid up to 10% of the public loan. So that would be our plan with everything that we know today.
The next question is from Nelson Ng with RBC Capital Markets.
Just for Q4, can you just talk a bit about the inventory build? Was the production increase so large that you weren't able to sell everything? Or was it shipping constraints, timing? And should we presume that the inventory -- there would be an inventory reversal in Q1?
Yes. I think my remarks kind of hinted at that. We have -- if you look at 5 or 4 of the last 5 quarters, we have what we call produced inventory build. So the amount of produced inventory in our inventories of about 1.2 million, 1.3 million tonnes has increased for the last 5 quarters, and that's not abnormal. You can go back over the last 5, 10 years and quarter-to-quarter, it doesn't actually ever match. The amount of inventory that we produce is sold because of the way our 5 fold layers work and the accounting rule. So yes, you would expect a reversal at some point, more produced inventory being sold than what we produce. So in Q1, we're anticipating to have another really strong quarter of production, and we expect to sell more produced molecules than we did in Q4, which is leading to a similar EBITDA at a lower price deck. So that's how we are forecasting it. It may not work out exactly like that, but generally, that's what we're expecting in Q1.
Okay. That's good color. And then just a follow-up on Europe. So like in terms of the -- I guess, what's happening in Ukraine, like what are your -- what are your methanol customers doing in Europe? Are they stockpiling? Are they -- like, are they essentially paying higher prices to stockpile to kind of mitigate the risk of any -- any issues in terms of supply?
No. Actually, we're seeing pretty low inventory levels in Europe. If you watch the spot markets in the last week, they've kind of spiked here, and why is that? We understand one of our competitors had the delay in one of their ships coming to Rotterdam, so they're out buying in the spot. And there's steel blending happening in Africa now, so there's a company out there buying spot methanol molecules and then -- are they blending it with other gas components or blending it in Africa, we're not exactly sure, but they're buying methanol for blending in Africa because of the high energy complex. Those 2 events of -- then price -- spot prices have increased quite significantly in the last week in Europe, which tells me inventories are pretty low. And as I've always said, the liquidity in both the North American and European markets is very low. And when you get a spike in demand like we've seen in the last week to 10 days, the price reacts quite quickly. So I don't think any of our customers have been stockpiling methanol at these prices.
The next question is from Laurence Alexander with Jefferies.
Can you -- if we roll up the fuel blending demand in Africa and China, the industrial boiler trends in China, the marine demand. And then also, any kind of ripple effects you're seeing from -- sort of the ways decarbonization initiatives are rippling through to methanol demand. If you look at the next 3, 5 years, do you see the growth algorithm for methanol being noticeably different from the historical, either faster or slower? Can you just talk a little bit about how you see that, what the trend growth for methanol is going to be depending on whatever the GDP levels are?
Yes, a couple of variables, a couple of factors. Obviously, GDP mentioned, that will drive the traditional chemical. A higher energy complex traditionally has been more demand for methanol, whether it's clean burning fuels or other fuels like we're seeing in Africa. Depending on your outlook for oil and other energy -- part of energy complex, a higher complex that we're seeing today will drive additional demand than what we've traditionally seen in the last few years in a lower oil environment. Obviously, the ships are brand new. We're running our ships on methanol, and a lot of people are now ordering ships. I mentioned up to 55 ships that they all ran on methanol 100% of the time. There would be 1 million tonnes just there in the next 3 to 4 years. We're continuing to see adoption in China for methanol to replace coal in boilers and kilns, methanol as a cooking fuel. Geely continues to have these 2 large trials with 25,000 taxis, M100 engines. And the more that the world looks to decarbonize, methanol is part of that solution, whether it be from natural gas or remind you, our G3 facility will be 50% less CO2 emitting than a traditional methanol plant. And we all know we can produce green methanol. We've done it in Iceland. We've done it using renewable natural gas at our Geismar facility, and we can do more of that. So I think there is a future for methanol as part of the solution to go to a lower carbon economy globally. But right now, the economics are such that it's hard to get any traction from the consumer side, but I think that will change over time. And yes, so I think in a higher energy environment in a world moving to low carbon, demand for those applications will only continue to increase. I think the wildcard is always going to be, at least, for this medium term, the MTO. The MTO operating rates. It's 50 million tonnes of demand today and large demand, one of these plants can use 1.8 million tonnes. So a couple of them decide to shut down for whatever reason, it does have an immediate impact on the supply-demand balance. So our view still is, they'll run. They're running at 80% today. They ran through the pandemic except for the fourth quarter when methanol prices got really high in China in the 85% to 90%. And beyond the Bohai plant that's coming up in the middle part of this year, another 1.8 million tons of demand. We don't expect any more MTO today. Now, if you have a view of a higher oil price and higher naphtha prices in the future, that could change. But that's certainly not in our planning, Laurence.
And then are you seeing the decarbonization push starting to have an impact on approvals of methanol new projects? Are there either designs or are there regions that will be out of favor if decarbonization pushes, becomes a more serious and widespread policy?
Yes. Not today, but I think there's 2 developments there that could impact that. Obviously, an increased carbon tax environment. Canada has talked about going to $150 to $180 a tonne. Well, that obviously would impact potential investments for carbon-based emitting plants like methanol from natural gas. Remind you, coal-based methanol produces 5x to 7x the amount of carbon as a natural gas base -- base plant. And I think the other thing that's being talked about are duties at borders for imported products that are being produced from high emitting carbon production. So I think those talks are early days, I don't expect something to be developed in the next little while. But I think it's going to make it harder for companies maybe to build plants that emit carbon for CO2 because of potential taxes, as well as access to capital. The number of firms that have said they're not going to lend money or do business at high emitters of CO2, so I think we're early days here. But certainly, the trends are there. And I think it's not easier to build methanol plant from natural gas or coal today than it was 3 or 4 years ago, and it wasn't easy 3 or 4 years ago.
The next question is from Matthew Blair with Tudor, Pickering, Holt.
On the plans of expansion at Geismar, can you talk about where you're marketing these volumes? Are they staying in the domestic market? Or are they exported to Asia? And how does the incremental margin on this 10% compared to the legacy Geismar production?
You should see it about the same. I mean, depending on the price of gas, we saw spot price to gas spike up here and now down, so we're thinking $3 to $4 gas would be the range in that area for the mid-term. So if that's true, then it's about the same cost structure for the additional debottlenecking as we have for our existing. And again, we optimize all the time where we go with our methanol, but any increments we're sending -- looking to target Asia, but in this environment where we've seen our competitors have production issues, we've seen the European situation with production shutdown because of high-cost feedstock and product being diverted from North America, so there's more opportunity for us to keep it closer to home. So that's only good for us.
Sounds good. And then any insight to what's going on in Iran? I know it's an opaque market even -- even for you, but there's been a lot of reports on natural gas shortages of methanol plants to run it, either 50% utilization or even fully shut down. So are you -- do you have any extra insights you can provide there? And is that something that's affecting global methanol supply and demand?
Yes. So we've seen this before. Again, this is not new, and it's only getting operated as the sanctions continue to go on longer and longer. So whether it be equipment or availability of technical expertise or catalyst or gas or -- it's not, in our view, under a severe sanctions environment that we're -- that Iran is facing, couldn't get any better until the sanctions are resolved, and they can get free access to capital to build out their gas infrastructure and get catalysts and people and equipment, et cetera. So we don't expect it to improve until we see a change on the sanctions, and I have no specific information on what's going to happen there either. So we continue to see Iran exporting some products. And in the past, in the winter time, we have seen the phenomena where plants do not operate as strongly because of gas diversion, and it appears that's what's going on again this year.
The next question is from Joel Jackson with BMO Capital Markets.
John, because of the discount rate, if you go back over many, many years, the discount rate goes up and down. But typically, Methanex is realizing -- realized price. That's a very narrow and consistent premium over spot prices. And it can change a bit, but it's pretty consistent. So I think -- is that what we should think about that? It's going to be exactly like that? And maybe as your contracts change, you have higher discount rates maybe in some of them, but how you said posted prices might also change. You may end up grossing up posted prices with deeper discount. Does that make sense, I'm saying?
Yes, absolutely. I mean, the realized price is what really counts. That's what drives our earnings. So realized price in methanol and how much we produce. Those are the 2 major things that drive our earnings that we had an outstanding quarter in the fourth quarter. We're going to have another one in Q1. So there's a lot of noise around discounts. And hopefully, the guidance I provided today will allow analysts to use a number that, hopefully, we don't see the big miss like we saw in Q4. It's a bit frustrating to have a record quarter and solid EBITDA and have a miss like that. So I think when we set prices, we don't look into this. While we look at the discount as far as the posted price, but it's the net price that we think about. And then that price depending on whether it's a balanced market or a tight market, you set that price to have the marginal cost producer run to keep the world balanced. And that obviously changes regularly depending on feedstock price and freight. So that's how we set prices. We talk to our customers, what they're seeing, and inventory levels come into it and a lot of things and factors. So it's not really the discount, but should be the attention. It should be how much are we realizing each and every quarter for our methanol, and at $440 a tonne or $420 a tonne which is kind of where we are today, we generate a ton of cash, and we'll send that cash back to shareholders through share buybacks and complete Q3. So those are the things we're focused on. And hopefully, this discount issue will go away until we have to think about revising it up or down in the future. But if you think of our guidance on this, it doesn't change on more than every number of years, so I think we're comfortable where we are today. And if we do have a change, I think with the change to the Chinese posted price, we'll also take some of the noise out. I mean, it's a good news story when the rest of Asia trades up to $100 higher than China. Traditionally, it's been 20% to 30%. So for us, it's a good news story. So I think making another posted price just for China, where I think spot prices have the biggest influence of any region in the world because it's a fairly large spot market, will help take some of the noise out of our discount as well.
And if I think about production for 2022. So -- are you expect -- 2 part here. Are you expecting a normal number of turnaround in '22, maybe you can compare it to happen in '21? And then are you expecting every production facility to have higher production in '22 than '21?
Yes. So given the guidance of 7 million tonnes of equity tonnes approximately, I guided to 2 to 3 turnarounds per year. Obviously, based on my guidance for Q1 production, you should expect a turnaround in Q1, which is fantastic because we're getting -- generating a very high realized price for methanol, so all the produced products will be sold at very good pricing. And we tend to time our turnarounds with weather in certain places or gas availability. So no change to that guidance, Joel. And we're going to have another strong year for production based on our current forecast.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Steve Hansen with Raymond James.
John, on the discount rate issue, you've delved into it in some degree here, but I'm just going to try and be a little bit more pointed on the North American market specifically, because I think I understand how the new China contract will help. I'm just trying to understand the pricing decisions a little bit more. If I'm looking at your latest posting here, it's a flat roll. You still appear to be posting at a very large premium versus the spot market, somewhere in the range of 35% to 40% above the spot. So should we view that as a strength of the company and your ability to try and extract better economics out of the current tightness in the market? To me, it strikes me as a bit of an advantage you have. But I'm just trying to understand how and why that posting would be at such lofty levels relative to even the 20% discount rate you've referred to? I know they're not directly related, but they certainly have a correlation.
I think it's a good point, Steve, that the discount rates are not equal throughout the world, right? So there's competitive factors. We've seen a lot of production come on in the Atlantic Basin in the last years. And obviously, people want to keep their molecules as close to home as possible. So to think that it's 20% all over the world would be the wrong assumption. It's higher in the Atlantic Basin, in Asia as an example.But when we look at individual region pricing decisions, the supply-demand balance, the tightness of the market, input from customers about what they're seeing, what their demand is going to be like, they all coming into play. And I'd say, again, just to emphasize, the spot markets in Europe and North America are extremely thin, like they almost trade very, very few molecules. Maybe 1,000 tonnes, 3,000 tonnes a week, more in Europe. Recently, as I mentioned, because of those factors -- and North America is very thinly traded, so it really doesn't have as much -- the spot price in those regions don't have much of an influence on our pricing decisions. Where it has an influence is in China. China is still a very large spot market, and the spot market there does have an influence on what we decide to post for China. So nothing much has changed. It's just that the regional differentials used to be based on trade from China and for reasons of tight supply and displacements on the supply side from countries that have sanctions or now are not producing methanol, that's widened out, which is really good for our business, but bad for our discount. So we've tried to clarify that today. And hopefully, as we report our Q1 results, so you'll see that through our results.
Okay. Very helpful. And just one follow-up. I know you've already been pretty clear on your capital allocation policies here going forward in preference towards the buyback. I'm just wondering that on the margin, whether or not you feel there's going to be a need, whether it's this year or some time down in the future to start thinking about investing in some of the lower carbon alternatives, I suppose, in methanol. I don't like the words blue and green necessarily, but there's been a number of projects announced on sort of the green methanol front in recent years. There's obviously a broader push towards lower carbon molecules. You've got a small investment in Iceland that we all know about. I'm just thinking about over the next 5 years, do you feel like there will be a need for Methanex to start going down that road and investing in some of the transition, or else, maybe call it lower carbon ammonia -- or lower carbon methanol over time?
Yeah, lots of announcements by a lot of people, but no money being spent and no [Indiscernible] expertise and an idea is an idea, and you can announce whatever you want, but not a lot of things happening. As far as what we are, I mean, I think what we have in Geismar is really a good first step. I mean, we can make renewable -- sorry, renewable methanol using renewable natural gas. Obviously, we paid $40 MMBtu for that gas, so the price you need is over $1,000 in methanol. But we can increase that quite easily. So -- we're also have a team that's looking at all of these different green technologies. And when you cut through the noise, they're all basically the same, taking some resource of hydrogen, some concentrated CO2 and making methanol, which is exactly what we've done in Iceland. And that's a small plant, as you know, 4,000 tonnes, we can't even sell that at premium prices. So I think it will develop. I don't know how fast. I think we're ready to invest, if it makes sense. But the order of magnitude of these investments versus the Geismar is much smaller. You're talking 25,000-tonne plant, 50,000-tonne plant, so you're talking a fraction of what we're spending in Geismar. So if it makes sense, there's a market, we can sign up customers that are willing to pay a price that allows us to get our normal return of 13%. You can expect us to invest somewhat in the technology. But in the short term, I think Geismar making -- from a renewable natural gas mix, the most sense. And companies like Meyer have been very public in saying that they want to run their ships using so-called green methanol. I mentioned the price of the green methanol is around $1,000 a tonne, so we're prepared to supply. We'll see if we can get something commercial that makes sense for both parties, but we certainly don't have anything like that today. Just to answer your question on capital allocation, nothing's changed. We don't anticipate spending any significant capital over the medium term beyond our completion of our Geismar 3 project and that we're going to focus on getting more gas for our idle facilities in Trinidad and New Zealand and get Chile back to full rates. That will be our major focus, and we can get a lot more production in those areas with a fraction of the capital of the new build. And we're going to return all excess cash to shareholders through -- our preference is the NCIB share buyback, but the regular dividend is something we'll continue to look at. We've looked at it historically and in the future, we'll look at it around our AGM time, which is the end of April. And I think there is -- we shouldn't be -- I'm not saying that we're going to get it back to where it was pre-pandemic, but I think there's room to look at it as well, as we come close to the AGM this year.
The next question is from Cherilyn Radbourne with TD Securities.
And with respect to Geismar 3, I appreciate that all the major equipment is on site, which gives the company good protection from supply chain issues or inflation. But I'm curious how you would say that those issues are impacting the replacement cost of capacity, which I believe, used to be in the range of $1,100 a tonne plus for projects in the Gulf.
Yes. So the last 2 projects that have been completed which is the coke methanol plant and the nat gasoline plant were around $2 billion plus for 1.7 million tonnes, so in order with what the price that you've said. .The 3 big components of building a plant are equipment, which is made up of steel and metals, et cetera, engineering and then labor. So the equipment side of it is probably 20% to 25%. So whatever inflation you want to use for that portion of the overall capital cost, that's what it will increase by. And certainly, we're today not seeing a lot of activity in the Gulf Coast for new projects, and I think that's helpful when we're building G3 because labor availability is quite good and the productivity is quite good. We've got 800 to 900 people on-site and moving forward quite nicely. But if there is a ramp-up in activity, I think fab shops and people making equipment, but would increase their prices. And if they're experiencing higher raw material costs that we've all seen, then they're -- it's going to be passed on to the people that are buying the equipment. So it's about 20% to 25% of a new build is based on equipment. Now engineering, really haven't seen a lot of inflation in engineering, but that doesn't mean we won't in the future.
Okay. That's helpful. And then how, if at all, has supply chain congestion at ports impacted Methanex's or the industry's ability to supply customers on time? And has a shortage of shipping capacity been helpful to Methanex in attracting backhaul traffic to help to offset the higher cost in bunker fuel?
Yes. So this is our key competitive advantage, secure, reliable supply to customers. That's why we have to deal with the very best customers in the world. I mean, the investments we've made in our own shipping and terminals over the last 25 years paid dividends during the pandemic environment. We experienced 0 shipping issues. All of our customers got their product when they wanted it and the quantities they wanted it and the quality they wanted it.The only area that we could even think of was in the Shanghai area, because of pandemic, the amount of pilots that were available was less than historical, which maybe led to a week delay on some of our vessels. But in the order of magnitude, we experienced delays like that on a regular basis in different parts of the world. So the investments we made were certainly need for reasons of secure reliable supply and in the environment we experienced really paid off in spades. As well, our backhaul continues to be a good part of what we do and helps with our overall freight costs. And we're making new arrangements all the time with different parties, and about 1/3 of what we carry today on our ships is not methanol. So I think there's room to grow that in the right environment, but I think that's an outstanding achievement by our Waterfront Shipping team to grow it and to keep our costs much better than our competitors. We don't understand any of our competitors that are doing that kind of backhaul if any, on a regular basis, so it gives us another key competitive advantage.
The next question is from John Roberts with UBS.
It sounds like you have a line of sight to the first million tonnes of demand from the marine market. Is it linear after that, because it's limited by a rate of ships being replaced in number of ports that have methanol storage and so forth? Or do you think it accelerates after that first million? And do you think ammonia, at some point, becomes competitive here, and maybe impacts the growth rate of methanol for marine?
Yes. So it has accelerated. I mean, we've had our own ships and now there are orders for 55. So that's accelerated significantly during 2021, and we would expect as people look at the relative advantages of different fuels to reprice existing fuels. I mean, the big advantage of methanol is it's dual fuel capability with the same engine. There are other things that are being looked at, including LNG and ammonia, but everything I've read, everything that our experts have read, methanol has a clear advantage over some of the other fuels. It doesn't mean those other fuels won't get adopted as well, because I don't think it's just going to be one product that dominates, but based on the choices that large companies that know a lot about shipping, like Meyer is making, they view methanol as a preferable fuel. Everything else being equal. So I don't know, John, how the adoption is going to go, but I think we've seen it accelerate in '21, and we expect it to continue to accelerate as companies order new ships.
The last question is from Chris Shaw with Monness, Crespi, Hardt.
I think you alluded to some of the answers on my questions in Steve's portion, but just on understanding the discount. So if everything was sort of equal, nothing had changed and you had introduced the Chinese contract price, we would have expected the, I guess, guidance on the discount rates of the decrease, right? Is that the right way to think of it?
No. What I said -- I think if you listened to my remarks, we saw significant increased competitive activity in the Atlantic Basin, which led to a widening of discounts. So when we put all the pieces together based on our forecast, we expect in 2022 to have about a 20% discount.
Right. But just mechanically, introducing a Chinese contract price should have cut the discount if nothing else changed. Is that right?
Yes. Assuming nothing else changed, but we negotiate our contracts at the end of the year, and now we have all of our contracts negotiated in place, and we total up all the numbers by very smart people. It looks like it's going to be about a 20% discount, and that's the guidance you should follow.
All right. That's what I was trying to figure out. And then to your point, just before about the increased competition. Explain -- it seems a little discordant with the idea that it's a tight supply and demand market, pricing is really strong, but you're seeing this really strong competitive market. What am I -- what's the disconnect there?
Well, it's regional, right, Chris? So you've got a lot of new production come up in the Atlantic basin, mainly in the United States. And both suppliers want to sell as much as they can in the United States and closer markets. And obviously, the incumbents like us are not going to just walk away from markets we've had for a long time, so you get a little bit of rivalry and that's settled out now. And we -- the competitors know where they're selling their product in the United States and elsewhere, and that's what's going on. So we've seen this before when new plants start up. But the discount is, again, not the focus. The focus should be on the realized price of methanol. And this quarter and last quarter, these are outstanding realized prices. Anywhere over $400 a tonne, we're really happy.
Great. Congrats on the quarter.
Okay. We're pleased to have shared our record financial results with you today. We have continued to demonstrate the strength of our business models with the ongoing pandemic and our competitive advantage of delivering secure and reliable supply to our customers. We believe that the long-term outlook for methanol is excellent. Methanol is a key chemical building block and is used to produce a variety of everyday consumer and industrial items, and is also used in a growing number of clean burning and economic alternative energy applications. We generate meaningful cash flow across a wide range of methanol prices. Our capital allocation priorities remain the same. We use the cash we generate to maintain our business, pursue value-accretive growth opportunities, continue our strong track record of returning excess cash to shareholders. We will continue to execute on our strategy to deliver significant value to our shareholders over the medium to long term. Thank you for joining us today, and we'll speak with you in April, and thank you for the interest in our company.
Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.