© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. And welcome to the Neo Performance Materials Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Mr. Alex Caldwell, Corporate Secretary. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good day, everyone. Today's call is being recorded. A replay will be available starting tomorrow in the Investor Center on our website located at neomaterials.com.On today's call, we have Neo's President and CEO, Constantine Karayannopoulos. Also on the call is Rahim Suleman, Neo's Chief Financial Officer, who will provide detail regarding the company's fourth quarter performance. Then we will open the call to questions from analysts.Please note that some of the information you will hear during today's presentation and discussion will consist of forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding revenue, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, product volumes, gross margin, other income and expense measures, ROCE, cash returns and future business outlook. Actual results or trends could differ materially from those discussed today. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in Neo's most recent financial filings, which were filed on SEDAR earlier today and are also available on our website. Neo assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information, which speak as of their respective dates.Financial amounts presented today will be in U.S. dollars. Non-IFRS financial measures will be used during this conference call. Further information regarding Neo's use of non-IFRS financial measures is available in Neo's Q4 2020 earnings press release, which was released earlier today and is available on SEDAR and on our website.Let me now turn the call over to Constantine for opening remarks.
Thanks, Alex, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to spend my time this morning providing some context on our strategic initiatives as well as where we're going. But first, I'm pleased to share with you some highlights of Neo's fourth quarter and full year results.Neo reported sales of $110 million during the fourth quarter and adjusted net income of $9.6 million or $0.25 per share. We reported adjusted EBITDA of $12.3 million. And our top line performance represented a substantial recovery relative to our performance at the start of the global pandemic.Neo's focus in 2020 was to protect our core business in the face of that global pandemic as well as to set the stage for growth, and we return to more normalized operations, and we continue to advance into new applications and markets.In spite of 2020's many challenges, both for us as well as our customers, I'm pleased to report that Neo finished the year in great shape. Volumes and revenues accelerated their growth in the quarter, indicating a strong recovery in our key magnetic and catalytic applications. Our facilities around the world are operating at near full capacity and have exceeded health and safety targets. We entered 2021 with product demand continuing to show upward momentum. And we are beginning to advance strategic initiatives aimed at accelerating the company's long-term growth.As the global pandemic continues, we're all maintaining a heightened sense of caution. Favorable news related to COVID vaccines give us hope that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Yet, we're still concerned with the possibility of renewed lockdowns in many parts of the world. For example, case counts continued to trend unfavorably in Brazil, Central Europe and India. Just last week, Paris returned to lockdown mode.The operational challenges associated with the pandemic have also proven to be a moving target. Fortunately, our operations have managed through recent supply chain shortfalls, overtax shipping ports and surge in demand. This is to say nothing of our most important and continuing mission, keeping our employees and their families as safe as possible from the virus.Despite these challenges, Neo was able to deliver one of our best quarters in years, one that was driven primarily by volume growth. The key for us has been maintaining flexibility and open lines and communication with all of our plants and customers. With multiple manufacturing facilities located across 3 different continents, our global footprint was critical in enabling us to continue supplying customers with the right products where and when they needed them and with the exceptionally high quality for which we are known.On this point, I'd like to give a shout-out to our Chemicals & Oxides team, which recently received the Top Supplier Quality award by the Environmental Catalyst, subsidiary of a major global automobile manufacturer in Japan. That award for superior product quality came in the middle of the global pandemic. And that says a lot about our team's resourcefulness, dedication and commitment to excellence.As we enter 2021, I'm very encouraged by organic growth trends I see across our core business. In fact, the very positive volume and pricing trends for the Chemicals & Oxides and the Magnequench business units that we saw in the fourth quarter continued into the first quarter of 2021, which closes next week. When we announce our first quarter results in mid-May, we expect that they will exceed current analyst consensus estimates of $84.9 million in revenue and $9.9 million in EBITDA and will also be significantly higher than our fourth quarter 2020 results we announced today.Now given the continued uncertainty we face this year with the pandemic and other factors, such as rare earth pricing, geopolitical development, the list goes on, I think it is prudent to introduce some caution to go along with our optimism that these trends will continue for the balance of this year. That said, I'm excited about a number of near- and midterm growth opportunities where I see us positioned to deliver innovative advanced materials that are needed by new and more sustainable technology.Capitalizing on these growth opportunities will take critical focus, discipline and resolve. To help us get there, our global team is tapping into Neo's entrepreneurial roots and culture, while relying on our decades experience in this business. In a relatively short period of time, we have made very good progress in methodically executing our strategic priorities for growth. This is perhaps illustrated by the launch and successful commercialization of several new products this year -- this past year, rather. These include high-performance precision Neo magnets for use in electric vehicle cooling water pump motors, seat and trunk motors, laptop and tablet fan motors, and a host of consumer products, from vacuum cleaners to massage guns.Our Magnequench magnetic powders are now being used in the traction motor and generator of one major automakers, second global hybrid car platform, a larger volume global model. Our highly engineered powders are manufactured into hot deformed rare earth permanent magnets by Daido Electronics in Japan. And what is amazing is that these magnets can perform in a vehicle drivetrain system while containing 0 heavy rare earth elements. This is an advanced materials innovation, which was considered next to impossible only a few short years ago. We achieved this target in time for the 2020 model year, and we continue to improve on the performance of this technology.One area of perhaps unexpected growth for our magnetic powders was in the production of high-toric magnets used in precision motors for industrial robots. Our magnetic powders are helping semiconductor manufacturers expand their production capacity. This is a handsomely growing business for us, by the way, which is perhaps not surprising given the intense effort being made around the world to increase the production of these chips.In our Chemicals & Oxide division, we developed a new line of high-purity nanostructured dysprosium oxide for use in dielectric formulations that help further shrink the size of multilayer surrounding capacitor chips produced in Japan and Korea. There can be anywhere from 500 to 1,000 of these chips in a single smartphone. More than 1 trillion are made each year for a wide variety of electronic systems.In addition, our very busy and effective research and development teams are continuing to make progress on the development of a new family of innovative rare earth-based materials that demonstrate a wide range of performance characteristics, including superior catalytic fire retardant and antiviral properties. The potential applications for these new materials are very exciting.And our view of growth encompasses more than the deep R&D pipeline and close development partnerships with our customers. For example, with our recent venture into magnet manufacturing through Magnequench, we leveraged the years of experience in making high-quality, high-performance magnetic powders into producing compression molded magnets. The extension of the powder business into magnet manufacturing has been remarkably efficient, and the results have surpassed our expectations.Although the finished magnet side of our business is still relatively small, we've exhibited growth of 28% year-over-year in the quarter. It also has expanded from its core electronics market focus into fully qualified magnets for demanding automotive motor applications. These tend to be larger magnets integrated in more complex, moderate assemblies. It's early signs of success of what we seek in our expanded approach to growth. We will continue to evaluate and look for capabilities that leverage our existing expertise, and when combined, will allow both our existing operations and new application areas to grow.Today, more than half of our Magnequench business is directly related to the automotive sector. This was a deliberate shift which focused more than -- which we focused on more than a decade ago in order to diversify our customer base away from its primary focus on electronics at the time. And please don't take me wrong. PS5s, smartphones and laptops and tablets are all great markets for our business. Now, however, with concrete steps being taken by both industry and governmental bodies to encourage the rapid growth of electric and electrified vehicle manufacturing, the Magnequench and C&O businesses are poised for new areas around growth.One primary area where we see demand rising rapidly is Europe, and I've talked about this before. Forecast for EV production and demand in the EU continue to be revised upward. More importantly, public and private sector investment is flowing in increasingly large numbers. Tens of billions of euros have reportedly been committed to the electric mobility sector alone, focusing in particular on securing supply chains and establishing manufacturing capacity for resilient drivetrain and battery supply chain. OEMs have been making major announcements on a seemingly daily basis as to how they will proceed on their own path towards electrification. Needless to say, growing demand for the critical materials needed by these platforms represents a massive opportunity for companies that can reliably supply them.With our decades of experience in producing high-quality, customized rare earth materials and the only rare earth production facility in Europe, Neo is positioned at the right time, the right place and with the right expertise. We'll continue to capitalize on opportunities for growth and innovation, for new clean air and clean water products. And we will design a supply chain to operate synergistically with our customers. With increased customer pull for these products in the Europe, the continent is the primary geographic focus for our growth strategy.Neo's Magnequench division has been operating in magnet markets for almost 40 years, and the Chemical & Oxide division in rare earth markets for almost 30. Our plants in Estonia have been operating for decades more. Over that time, we've seen a number of commodity cycles and supply-demand imbalances that have contributed to some very volatile dynamic and unpredictable pricing environment. Even those investors who're not intimately familiar with our industry are likely familiar with the mass of rare earth pricing spike during the 2010-2012 period. Of course, our customers remember well what happened with rare earth prices back then.While there's some similarities in today's market, there are also aspects of the current pricing environment that are different. For one, pricing volatility in 2010-2012 was largely driven by Chinese government policy, rare earth export quotas, to be exact. Today, higher prices are largely demand-driven and are more related particularly to specific rare earths, namely the magnetic rare earths, neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium. These have all seen strong upward movement in pricing over the past 6 months. And while pricing was relatively modest through much of 2019 and 2020, an inflection point was hit last year in the third quarter due to concerns, monsoon season flooding in Southern China as well as the more recent coup in Myanmar, which is a major source of supply for rare earth concentrates in China -- through China.Neo experienced no supply disruptions. But these events did exacerbate supply imbalances due to the growth in demand, fueled by recovering manufacturing sector, pent-up consumer demand and supply chain restocking. We prefer to stay out of the prediction game on how rare earth pricing evolves. And objectively, these magnetic materials are currently trading at the high end of the range seen in recent years. But we do not see panic in the market the way we did back in 2011. Our customers have a better appreciation for the potential price fluctuations of rare earths. They also have a strong confidence in the industry to bring additional supply to ensure a sustainable market. After all, to large industry suppliers, Lynas of Australia and MP Materials of California, reportedly produced more than 50,000 metric tonnes of rare earth raw materials and separated products last year. These supplies did not exist during the 2010-2012 time frame.Neo typically passes along our raw material costs on a regularly adjusted pricing formula in a customized specialty materials command a value-added premium on top of the underlying commodity price. The raw material pass-through is often priced on a 1-quarter lag. As such, our fourth quarter 2020 results largely reflect third quarter market prices, and Rahim will provide an overview of the lead lag implications for our Magnequench and C&O businesses.Given that we're not a mining company, we're always working to improve the diversity of our raw material sources in order to power and secure our growth. This is why we were especially pleased to announce jointly with Energy Fuels Resources, a new rare earth materials supply chain project starting with byproduct mineral sands in the United State. This U.S. to Europe supply chain is pretty unique, environmentally oriented and highly capital-efficient. First, the Chemours company produces monazite as a byproduct of mineral sands in the Southeastern United States. Colorado-based Energy Fuels then processes the monazite at its White Mesa facility in Utah. There, using available capacity, it extracts naturally occurring uranium for use of nuclear power generation from the monazite as well as produces a mixed rare carbonate to our specifications. This material is an ideal feedstock for our rare earth separation operations at Silmet. Neo receives this carbonate in Silmet, our existing European processing plant in Estonia, to produce value-added rare earth materials, especially environmental catalyst precursors and magnetic rare earths. We're proud to operate Europe's only existing rare earth separations facility in Estonia. This is a highly strategic asset.I want to note how rapidly and effectively the team at Energy Fuels moved from concept to reality in this effort. Mark Chalmers, the CEO, and his excellent team there are well versed in chemical processing and separation technologies. But this new process presented some unique challenges. They tackled this effort extraordinarily quickly and very effectively. In doing so, they have opened up new possibilities and growth opportunities for both Neo and Energy Fuels.Looking forward, we expect this collaboration to help Neo expand the production of separated rare earth products in Europe, improve the resiliency of European manufacturing and enable greater supply of rare earths for the continent's rapidly growing EV manufacturing base. The supply chain is highly capital-efficient. It utilizes byproduct material from existing mining operations. The mixed rare earths are extracted using existing available capacity of skill, while in parallel generating uranium credits. Neo utilizes available processing capacity in Estonia and by getting our plant to run at 100% capacity there, we will produce more rare earth materials in Europe just as Europe's demand is increasing.The capital costs of implementing this phase of the Energy Fuels-Neo supply chain is extraordinarily low. It is also an excellent example of how to build new critical material supply chains in a manner that respects environmental values and advances the model of a circular economy. The phased start from this new supply chain will complement material, but we now receive in Estonia from a highly valued supplier, Solikamsk Magnesium Works in Russia. Solikamsk has been a trusted supplier and partner for our European operations for more than 30 years and are currently running at maximum capacity. Solikamsk just celebrated its 85th anniversary in business earlier this month. That's an exceptional achievement, and I would like to congratulate the entire Solikamsk's team for more than 8 decades of successful operation. Neo looks forward to many more years and decades of cooperation with our friends and colleagues there.If the global economy continues to evolve into a more circular economy, the sourcing of raw materials required by new technologies and environmentally focused applications, such as EV, becomes a matter -- a material concern to companies, like ours, as well as to our customers and their customers. In fact, several of them have asked that we continually evaluate our procurement practices to incorporate as much recycled material as possible.For Neo, helping to build a more circular economy is driven both by our customers' desires as well by our approach to manufacturing our advanced materials. For example, our Magnequench division uses recycled rare earths to supply magnetic powders and magnets for one of the world's largest manufacturers of smartphones. You may have seen the announcements -- their announcements, rather. This allows the manufacturer to be something that no other major phone manufacturer has been able to do, at least to our knowledge, rely on recycled material for the rare earth magnets in their phones.From a conservation and net emissions perspective, if the best source of material is a recycled loop, then the second best source is a byproduct. And many of the raw material inputs we use are derived from byproduct waste streams. For example, we produce high-purity rare metals such as gallium, indium, beryllium, niobium and tantalum from both scrap and recycled feed materials. The rare earth concentrate supply to Neo by Solikamsk is a byproduct of magnesium and titanium production operations. The mix rare earth carbonate we receive from Energy Fuels in Utah is made from a byproduct of other mining operations.Neo is continuing focus on promoting ESG values and practices as a natural extension of our business model. To further enhance the sustainability of what we make and how we make it, we conducted external third-party reviews by EcoVadis, a well-known reviewer in this field in 2019 and 2020, at 4 of our largest production facilities. Each received a silver medal in terms of its performance. And at present, 5 of our facilities, representing more than 90% of our revenues, are going through the EcoVadis process. We see this initiative as important -- as very important in helping us shape our environmental, social and governance strategies going forward.Last, while I typically refrain from commenting on capital markets, it is important to note that our largest shareholder successfully completed 2 private secondary offerings in recent months. In coordination, we have made a concerted effort of reengaging new and historic shareholders.In conclusion, let me say that we feel very fortunate to be at the epicenter of critical materials discourse -- or rather at the epicenter of the critical materials discourse, right on the cusp of a global energy transformation. Through the hard work and discipline of our employees around the world, we've been able to weather this pandemic so far and strategically position the company for new growth. As the global economy begins to return to a new normal, governments around the world are also spending trillions of dollars in highly focused efforts to stimulate economies, restart and create jobs, and move the world onto a more sustainable and ecologically sound footing. As I see it, those macro trends all point to very healthy growth opportunities for Neo and our customers, both organic and strategic. We will pursue those opportunities aggressively.And with that, let me turn the call over to Rahim.
Thanks, Constantine, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin my commentary about the results of the fourth quarter, let me first acknowledge the point that Constantine made earlier. The COVID-19 dynamic has been impactful to families and societies over the world for a rather extended period of time now and will continue in various parts of the world here in 2021. Today, I'm going to talk about the robust recovery that Neo has seen in many of its end markets. But we don't need any of the commentary to be insensitive to those families and regions, where recovery is still a little more fragile or a little more distant.It is interesting and challenging to summarize our full year results. From Neo's performance perspective, the full year feels very much like 2 very different worlds. Today, I will focus my commentary on our operating performance over the past quarter, as it doesn't seem particularly relevant to speak about the year in totality given the dramatic impact of COVID-19, particularly in Q2 and Q3 of 2020. I'll spread the comparisons out to the prior year, which was a pre-COVID environment, and to this past third quarter to get a sense of the sequential changes in the momentum of growth. Of course, all information to review full year results and full year comparisons to the prior year are available in the company's MD&A and financial statement documents.Our fourth quarter results reflected strong recoveries across most of our major markets. As we discussed on our last call, we began to observe signs of a turnaround in the third quarter. And this positive momentum continued through year-end and into the start of 2021. The main driver of our performance in the fourth quarter was increased product volume. This was a combination of higher volumes required to support increased activity as well as the supply chain rebuilding inventories ahead of anticipated continued growth. This has been true across our automotive, health care, general industrial and consumer electronics sectors. And we have seen less growth or recovery in our aerospace industry, affecting both volume and price. And this is one of the reasons why our rare metals business has significantly underperformed.During the fourth quarter, we reported a consolidated $110.4 million in revenue compared to $94.6 million in the prior year period and $77 million in the third quarter. We reported net income of $2.4 million or $0.06 per share. And our adjusted net income was $9.6 million or $0.25 per share in the fourth quarter of 2020. We reported adjusted EBITDA of $12.3 million compared to $12.5 million in the prior year period and just $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2020. We will jump to the business unit performance in a moment, but it is worth noting here that Magnequench and C&O combined to show a 30% improvement in adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2020 over the fourth quarter of 2019. However, this improvement was offset by charges in the Rare Metals segment, that we will walk through in a few moments.There have been many positives experienced during this recovery. On the automotive front, passenger sales have accelerated from the lows in the first half of 2020. And while the industry will take time to return to previous vehicle sales levels, there are significant improvements as we enter 2021. There has been additional demand and higher prices for many of our rare earth element products, particularly the magnetic applications that drive higher energy efficiencies, new technologies, and those that are significant enablers to the electrification of automobiles.Jumping to a detailed review of each business. Let's start with Magnequench. Volumes from Magnequench were 1,626 metric tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to 1,387 metric tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 17% over the prior year. This compares to 1,095 metric tonnes in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of almost 50%. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of Magnequench was $11.4 million compared to $9.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 19%. And compared to the third quarter of 2020, the increase in adjusted EBITDA is greater than 100% or more than double.Shipments for Magnequench powders were very strong in the quarter, continuing the trend that started late in Q3 and which continued throughout Q4. The strength was near ubiquitous across all major geographies and end-use applications. Automotive applications led the strong recovery and accounted for more than 60% of total sales volumes. The growth in automotive set the pace and nearly every other application followed suit. New and emerging magnetic technologies continued to gain momentum at replacing larger, heavier motors across the automotive platform, consumer goods, factory automation and health care, all showing signs of resiliency. The exception here were some older legacy applications, such as hard disk drives, which continued to become a smaller and smaller piece of the portfolio.We believe that the increase in product volume is driven by both finished goods consumption, and to a lesser extent, through rebuilding inventory levels throughout the supply chain. Many of our customers seek to replenish their on-site inventory in order to provide flexibility to respond to recent dynamic orders, including preparing for future increased demand. Thus far into 2021, many of these volume trends have remained in place, and we anticipate the trend for strong shipments in inventory building to continue in the first quarter of '21.Another bright spot in Magnequench continues to be the improvement in our compression molded magnet business. As Constantine mentioned, our magnet volume improved by nearly 30% in the fourth quarter over the prior year. We are seeing growth across all the traditional magnet applications, including box fans, laptops, server racks and increasingly popular gaming applications. Notably, we have also commissioned new capacity and are now qualified and in production with our first automotive magnets. We are pleased with the success and the continuation of expanding our portfolio of solutions to address growing market segments.Let's turn to our Chemicals & Oxide business or C&O. Revenues for C&O were $48.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to $33.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 44% over the prior year. This compares to $36 million in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of 34%. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter for C&O was $7.1 million compared to $4.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 61%. And compared to the third quarter of 2020, the increase in adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter is greater than 80%.Similar to Magnequench, Chemicals & Oxides benefited from the continued recovery across the automotive space. Our auto-catalyst business started to see momentum during the third quarter, and this momentum continued across all regions throughout the fourth quarter. Part of this strength is related to customers rebuilding stock. But the above market C&O recovery trend was also supported by C&O winning increased market share in both its existing applications as well as in newly launched applications showing growth despite the pandemic. In fact, overall, auto-catalyst volumes for the year were similar to prior year despite the general slowdown in automotive production over the year.Within our rare earth separation business, Constantine mentioned the key demand trends that are affecting the most valuable rare earth elements, the magnetic elements. As mentioned earlier, increased demand for these magnetic elements and the unique powerful rare magnets they enable is being driven by key global trends in energy efficiency, in the electrification of automobiles and in the trend for smaller, lighter and more powerful motors, among others. These trends are not going away. And as we move toward a world surrounded by more technology, with a key emphasis on environmental considerations.Despite constantly increasing demand requirement for these elements, pricing of these elements has traditionally showed levels of volatility. The spot price of some of these elements are up in the 50% -- 20% to 50% range as compared to the end of the Q3. And with the continued dynamics in the first quarter of the year, which Constantine mentioned, we have seen market spot prices for these elements continued to increase an additional 20% to 50% since the start of this year. Accordingly, from a lead lag perspective, C&O is currently benefiting from the increased selling prices with having lower cost inventory on hand. There was some benefit of this in the fourth quarter, but the majority of the benefit will be seen later, as the rapid price increases occurred later in the quarter and in the first quarter of '21.Conversely, this also means that Neo will have higher working capital requirements in this environment, both in terms of accounts receivable and inventory, particularly as Neo is now buying higher cost raw materials at these higher costs. Neo has adequate cash balances to manage this increase in working capital, and we started to see at the end of Q4 and into Q1 '21.Lastly, in Rare Metals. The difficult demand trend that began in the second and third quarters of 2020 remained throughout the year. Our view of the aerospace market has not shifted, in which we anticipate that 2021 will likely be a challenging year for this business. While replacement aircraft will still be required, growth is largely an open question for the industry at this point.Revenues for Rare Metals were $12.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to $21.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, a decrease of 44% from prior year. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter for Rare Metals was a loss of $3.3 million compared to positive adjusted EBITDA of $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019.Volumes in aerospace are likely to be continually challenged in 2021, as they were in the latter half of 2020. However, the lower volume levels were not the primary cause of the significant loss in Q4 '20. The Rare Metals division also took a $3.3 million charge related to the lower of cost or market adjustments on inventory in the quarter. This relates to having purchased higher cost inventory earlier in the year and then being negatively impacted by lower demand and lower prices at the end of the year. Selling prices fell about 15% to 20% for some products within the Rare Metals group in the second half of 2020, which we believe is highly correlated with weaker demand from the industry. New raw material purchase costs reflect this lower market price generally. So there's a somewhat corresponding change in overall production economics. However, we had to take a significant charge in Q4 2020 relating to the historical inventory balances that were already on hand and purchased at higher cost levels. We anticipate the slower industry performance will continue to be a challenge for Rare Metals in early '21. However, this sizable $3.3 million LCM charge should not be a recurring item, notwithstanding that pricing and cost can always change over time.Despite these near-term headwinds, our commercial and technical teams continue to develop new applications exploring new end markets and are evaluating significant operational improvements. This includes evaluating new sources of feedstock, such as recycling and scrap material feeds across the Rare Metals business. We have also been utilizing the slower production times for both required maintenance and evaluating growth and efficiency projects. While the aerospace industry has not experienced the same type of recovery as the automotive industry and others, our customers have communicated that there will be demand in 2021, and we think of entering the year with a cautious approach.With respect to the consolidated results, one would notice that our SG&A expense came in higher for the year and higher in Q4 as compared to prior periods. While it sounds a little counterintuitive given the numerous cost savings plans that were put in place and executed during the year, we would note that SG&A expense was also impacted by higher valuation charges related to our legacy long-term incentive plans. These onetime valuation adjustments were triggered due to our largest shareholder no longer maintaining majority control, which we achieved through the 2 secondary offerings in December 2020 and February '21. There were also unusual costs incurred to execute the secondary offerings as well as costs associated with senior management changes made earlier in the year. In terms of normal recurring SG&A costs, legal defense fees were elevated during the 3-month and full year periods as we continued to incur costs to defend ourselves in these matters.As for the financial position, we continued to have a very strong financial position with $72 million in cash balances. We generated operating cash flow of $10 million during the year. And although tempered, we continued to make $7.3 million in capital investments in our business, including expanding magnet-making capabilities. We maintained our dividend in the year, and we returned $11.3 million to Neo shareholders throughout the year. We also repurchased $3.1 million of shares through our NCIB program. As mentioned earlier, we anticipate that we will be investing in working capital in early 2021 with higher rare earth prices generally, but with the $72 million in cash and very little debt and a history of cash flow generation, we are comfortable and confident that we can make the necessary investments to continue to grow our business.With that, Amy, operator, please open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Yuri Lynk with Canaccord Genuity.
Constantine, great, great quarter. Just with the higher rare earth prices, does -- when does it start to hurt Magnequench and its ability to displace heavy earth, heavier materials that are usually less expensive? Are you at that point? Is it something you need to worry about in terms of potentially impacting volumes as we go forward here?
Thanks, Yuri. I'm not sure I fully understand the question. Are you referring to heavy rare earths being replaced by the MQ3-type magnets that powder is going through? Or the typical replacement gain in the industries between Neo magnets and different types of magnets? So I'm...
Exactly, yes. Yes. More -- like especially against ferrite?
Yes, yes. Clearly, ferrite is an inexpensive material and makes lower cost magnets, but ferrite, historically, has not -- cannot achieve the type of performance that the Neo magnets can. I mean, I mentioned the high torque precision motors are going to industrial robots. And these are right across the board: automotive, appliance as well as semiconductor foundries. You can't get there with ferrites. Or if size and weight is at a premium as well as performance, precision are at a premium, then you really don't have the option to go to ferrite.However, as I said, you were covering us back in 2011, and I did say that I think the industry is running the risk if -- with the pricing of our materials, we are providing a strong incentive to very smart people, very smart engineering in very big projects to design rare based technologies out of the end applications. And in 2011, we clearly got into that stage. We're not there yet. Again, I don't think there are any hard and fast rules. However, I still claim that there's a little bit of room for neodymium and praseodymium prices, perhaps a little less so for dysprosium and terbium prices to continue to rise. But I don't -- as I said in my comments, I don't see the panic that I saw in 2011 were driven by the concern of keeping plants operating because of the export restrictions, people were just paying crazy pricing. I just don't see that.I think the industry has learned its lesson. I think the regulators in the largest market, in the largest production base in the industries in China have learned their lesson. I don't expect to see the type of crazy prices like we saw in 2011. But again, I don't have a crystal ball though. But I do see a greater degree of discipline in the market, which also is being affected by the fact that Lynas and MP Materials are large producers supplying both raw materials and separated products into this business. So the industry structure and dynamic is very different than 2011. And I also don't see sort of arbitrary bureaucratic interference to control either supply or prices.So I'm a bit more optimistic. I still think that in a nutshell, and if you let me talk, I'll keep going for hours here, which I promise not to do. But I don't see the same dynamic as 2011. Yes, there are concerns. Yes, there's a bit of pain. But keep in mind that Magnequench adjust its prices. Most of our business is on a quarterly price-adjustment formula. Some of our businesses are monthly formula. Other is on 6-month formula and the like. However, we can pass our price increases through. And to the degree that Magnequench continues to be almost -- nothing is completely indispensable, but they're close to being there. I think we will have the ability to pass the price increases on. We don't like it. We don't want to do it. In fact, the more expensive the magnets and the motors with these magnets get, the less competitive they are to alternative technologies, and that's an envelope that I think the industry as a whole should be smart not to push too far. But on balance, what I see over the next few months, at least within our ability to forecast our business, I'm not too concerned about the overall competitiveness of the industry.
[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Mark Neville with Scotiabank.
Constantine, I guess I have some bigger picture type questions on the production agreements with Energy Fuels. I apologize, I may not sequence them properly, but I'll give it a shot. So I guess, Neo and Energy Fuels, you're -- and I guess there's other industry parties you mentioned, Lynas and MP Materials, effectively trying to create a vertically integrated supply chain that doesn't exist outside of China. I guess my first question, I guess do you think the market is big enough and they're growing fast enough to potentially support multiple vertically integrated players? And maybe the better question is, is there a significant first-mover advantage to whoever can do it?
Great question, Mark. The -- first of all, Lynas has been part of the industry and its supply chains for almost a decade. So the Lynas production is really not new. Molycorp -- sorry, MP Materials -- the old habits die hard, I apologize. MP Materials has been doing this for over a year now. And of course, all the mineral concentrates, all the bastnaesite concentrates go to China currently. But when they start separating in California, that will change, of course. At that point, which I expect over the next 1 to 2 years, we might see perhaps a slight oversupply by today's standards. But when I also see the demand growing, both inside and outside of China, primarily driven by EVs, I'm -- Mark, I'm not too concerned. I think the world will need a lot more supply of rare earths in order to get to where the planners and the major industrial players want to get to. So that doesn't keep me up at night.On the other hand, finally, Neo and Energy Fuels. Our deal is very small, it's disciplined, it's highly capital-efficient, and it's very low cost. This is -- when I keep harping to the point where it gets tired hearing at times, I'm sure, about the extremely low capital efficiency -- or high capital efficiency, low capital intensity of our project, it's -- we followed, if you want to think about it that way, a very Chinese model of putting this project together. Byproduct economics at the mining resource extraction step, just like Baotou Steel has been doing for 3 decades in inner Mongolia, taking the byproduct from iron ore, where the mining costs are essentially paid for by a different operations if you end up with the rare earth concentrates in your tailings. Similarly, Chemours in Georgia have been stockpiling the monazite for years because the primary mining operation recovers zircon and ilmenite for titanium production.So you start with a very low -- I don't want to call it 0, nothing at 0, but very low-cost mining operation at the front end. Then the rare earths and the byproduct uranium are extracted by Energy Fuels using available capacity, and there's lots more available capacity there. And finally, this product is going into our Silmet facility, which over the last year or so has been operating at about 75% capacity simply because we couldn't get any more material by our current suppliers there. So this is the combination of very, very low mining costs. We're utilizing available capacity where you don't really need to spend any capital of any significance and then driving plants to operate at higher throughput really provides very powerful economics.What happens when we take this to the next stage with Chemours, Energy Fuels and Neo, clearly, we will have to spend some more capital. But the fundamental operating costs that involve 0 or close to 0 mining costs, using available capital equipment in Energy Fuels to provide probably the lowest cost material out there will continue. In fact, the bulk of the operating cost is transportation more than processing. So in a nutshell, Mark, again, I don't think there's -- I'm not concerned about creating an oversupply outside of China. And what I would add, as Rahim said and I said earlier, what we see now in a pricing environment for rare earths, primarily for magnetic rare earths, that is very, very much demand-driven as opposed to what happened 10 years ago, which was a supply restricted pricing behavior. So as long as the demand continues, as long as the world needs more EVs, better, more efficient EVs with longer ranges, I think really neodymium, praseodymium magnets provide the ideal solution to that. So I tend to be a bit more bullish about EV growth and its effect on the industry than I have been with pretty, well, most other applications over the last 30 years.
Got it. And maybe if I can ask a follow-up question then, Constantine. And just -- I'll apologize because it's a bit of a long one, but I want to get it all in. But there's, I guess -- I'm just curious sort of where you think -- or how you think sort of Neo best fits sort of in the supply chain outside of China? Is it selling separated rare earths? Is it sort of downstream magnets and magnetic materials. So maybe another Magnequench-type facility in Europe? And sort of, I guess, your views on how important it is to be vertically integrated or to own the feedstock?And I guess the flip-side, talk about the know-how and the risk involved, and others moving downstream, not Neo, but the others, in terms of figuring out the separation, mono -- or manipulation, getting qualified with customers? How long that takes? And just -- maybe just trying to understand the barriers to entry that are around your business. Again, I apologize for the length, but yes.
Yes. Well, it's a loaded question, so I apologize ahead of time for probably giving you an answer that's too long, too. Listen, we -- I've said this before, but Neo will do what our customers need us to do. So right now, and as I said in the third quarter call back in November, our customers are really trying to convince us to establish additional rare earth production capacity in Estonia as well as start doing more in the downstream part of that supply chain into rare earth metals, rare earth alloys and rare earth magnetic powders and magnets. Now it's one thing to -- for our customers to be pulling us in that direction as well as the regulators and the policymakers in Europe, but it's a completely different proposition for us to want to do it and be willing to make the investment. I mean, at the end of the day, we will do whatever the customer -- our customers want us to do as long as we can make money doing it, right? But you need to go hand and hand.So this is sort of the phase of the evaluation we are at in order to be looking at all of these opportunities. So in the fullness of time, ideally, Silmet will be a bigger facility, perhaps 2x bigger, 3x, maybe separating heavy rare earths as long as the right supply arrangements can be secured. So I do see doing more in Europe. It remains to be seen how far down our already existing internal supply chain from rare earths all the way to magnets where we will go. But we're looking at all the opportunities. We will be not only opportunistic, but also long-term greedy. I mean we need to provide a proper return on capital for our investments as well as a sustainable long-term ROCE, which is, in the industry, it's not all that easy, especially when you are competing against large companies that dominate the space, especially in China. I think there's room for cooperation with exploration companies around the world. There's room for a lot more to do with our friends at Energy Fuels.And there is, of course, room to afford the supply chains to cooperate even with some of our Chinese competitors or other folks who are going down that supply chain. At the end of the day, when you look at the macro picture related to supply chains, this is a conclusion that you don't only reach for rare earths, but the world will need to produce a lot more rare earths if we're going to achieve decarbonization and 100 million of EVs produced per year by 2030, 2035, whatever the target is. So you need a massive increase in the supply of rare earths and the downstream products around the world. You will also need a lot more copper, a lot more cobalt, a lot more lithium and all that, other -- and all those other resource type materials that are critical for the production of EVs.So I'm looking at this as a massive opportunity, and we will take it as far down as we need to for -- to keep our customers happy, but also by making sure that we will be making money while doing this. So sorry, I hope I wasn't too evasive, Mark. But we will do what makes sense for our customers and for our shareholders.
Your next question comes from the line of Frederic Bastien with Raymond James.
Constantine, I appreciate that you're only a few weeks into your supply agreement with Energy Fuels, but could you give us a sense of how things are going? And as you look forward, what are the potential pitfalls that you need to be mindful of?
Pitfalls? You really want to hit on the negative side right off the bat, Frederic, right? Well, that's a fair question. Right now, honestly, the -- one of the biggest problems we're facing, not just us, but all supply chains, is logistics problems. It's tough to get containers to move between production and jurisdictions and -- where the demand is, delays in shipping, congested ports. If you're shipping -- or if you're receiving anything through the port of Long Beach in California, you're probably adding 2 to 3 weeks, if you're lucky to your times. So the more immediate challenge is as supply chains are sort of digesting, going from severe limitations during COVID and then exploding into a growth pattern that we haven't seen in a while, macro economists, at least from what I've been reading, tend to be very bullish for 2021 and GDP growth, all of that will put a lot of stress on supply chains and especially logistics.In terms of the rest of the challenges that the Energy Fuels-Neo arrangement will face, I'm really not too concerned. I mean, we've been working with -- the 2 companies have been working together since last spring. And even though we managed to put this in an extraordinarily fast way, as I said in my comments, Energy Fuels has extremely capable and smart chemists and chemical engineers, just like we do. So we've been dealing with the technical problems all along. But Energy Fuels now has received a large quantity of monazite from Chemours, and they're in the process of turning it into finished uranium and mixed rare earth carbonate to ship to Silmet. So we're going through that. So I do expect the first full container shipments to start either by the end of the second quarter or shortly into the third. And it's all going according to plan. I'm not seeing any extraordinary difficulties out there. And simply because both companies, both Neo and Energy Fuels, we've been doing this sort of thing for a long time.So it's not like we're taking a walk on the wild side here, Frederic. It's the stuff that we do every day. We're just doing it in a new way that -- and again, this is -- as I mentioned earlier, this is not something that keeps me up at night. So I don't really see anything insurmountable in terms of what Energy Fuels is or what we're trying to do.
That's great to hear, Constantine. I didn't mean to rain on your parade here. The question -- the next question I have relates to -- I mean you mentioned that you potentially see the Silmet facility potentially doubling, even tripling in size with respect to its capacity. At which point would you start making that decision to increase the capacity? And the related question is that, how expensive or how capital intensive is it to expand the manufacturing capabilities there?
Yes. Again, another good question, Frederic. We will -- clearly, from a demand point of view, we see the opportunity to expand Silmet by a factor of 2, 3, 4. The European policymakers have made it very clear to us that they consider rare earth production in Europe and rare earth magnetic materials and magnet production in Europe to be of critical importance. And for the newly formed European Raw Materials Alliance, an EU-sponsored body, the 2 highest priorities are rare earth and rare earth magnet production in Europe. So that is one of the fundamental reasons why I'm pretty bullish about Silmet. And I did say that it's a very strategic asset since it's the only rare earth production site in Europe, which means that the skill set is there, the institutional memory is there, the capabilities are there. And whenever you try to install new capital equipment and install capacity, it's a lot less costly to do so on an incremental basis, adding to the existing infrastructure as opposed to a greenfield expansion. So I would see the opportunity to at least double Silmet.Now that will depend on Energy Fuels' ability to secure additional monazite streams to increase its capacity, to increase its output of rare -- mixed rare earth carbonate. It will depend on Solikamsk Magnesium Works being able to squeeze out a few more tonnes on the raw material that have been supplied to us for the last 30 years, plus, depending on whether we decide to go into heavies -- heavy rare earths, it will depend on our ability to identify enough producers or emerging producers in South America, in Australia, elsewhere. And keep in mind that the Energy Fuels suite of rare earths in that stream that we're getting does have significantly elevated heavies, but right now, Silmet does not separate those.But -- so we'll have to take into account the availability of raw materials. The capital cost, I would expect, for example, to double Silmet from 2,500, 2,800 tonnes a year REO, which should be something in the -- again, don't hold me to this, but notionally, in the $50 million perhaps as much as $100 million. But I would expect to be lower -- we are closer to the lower end. So these are not decisions that we take lightly. We need to ensure that the return will be there, the appropriate return will be there for the capital that we will invest.
Your next question comes from the line of Mac Whale with Cormark Securities.
With Neo historically being really close to the customer in terms of its product design as your materials are giving them so much of their capabilities in the product, how far are you along in those relationships when you're looking at Europe, in European operations? Are you already well advanced in the development of actual products using your materials? Or is that something that will take a year or something of that length?
Thanks, Mac. Good question again. Europe has been a big market for both Magnequench and C&O, of course, rare metals, that's -- it's a primary market as well. So the relationships are very close. A lot of the product design and development historically has been done with -- together with our European customers. And when you look at the folks that we supply, they're all global names, Tier 1s and OEMs. And in fact, we supply them in Europe, and the Umicores and the Johnson Mattheys and the BASFs of this world for C&O as well as the Bosch, Brose, Siemens, Grundfos, Schaeffler of this world, for Magnequench are all headquartered in Europe, but they're all global players. So we supply Umicore in Europe, in Belgium, in Poland. We supply them in Wellington, Ontario. We supply them in the States. We supply them in India, in Korea, in Japan, and in China.So when we work closely with our customers, it's not always with a European focus in mind because these applications are global. And in turn, they supply OEMs -- their customers on a very global basis. However, what is going on in Europe right now is unique because you have an extraordinary confluence of regulatory incentives as well as industrial priorities coming together in a way that I haven't seen in a while, and that's another reason why I'm pretty bullish about Europe. So the conversation we're having is mostly with customers of ours that have been customers for over a decade. With Bosch, for example, we make magnets for them, we make magnetic powders for some of their other magnet suppliers. So the conversation we're having around EV-related expansion is all within the same context. So we're not reinventing the wheel radically.Now Magnequench will have to sort of expand its capabilities in the magnetic space in order -- if we go in that direction of larger-centered EV magnets, but it's not like doing something that we've never done before. We are probably the world's premier magnetic and magnetic materials technology experts. So the route to making the right magnets for -- in question around the EV supply chains is not a terribly big or risky leap.In terms of the timing, I think it's going to take longer, I think, to come up with the right economic/return formula in discussions with industrial and government partners in Europe as opposed to figure out the technology. So I'm pretty optimistic that given the level of discussions that we've had so far and the planned discussions for the next few months, I would expect that we should be making a decision by the end of the year which way -- which direction is going to go. So yes, it's not an overnight phenomenon, but I think it will take probably 2021 and 2022 to put the actual industrial infrastructure in place, so -- and be in production, sort of 2023 type of time frame. But we're not there yet. We still have a lot of work to do. And as I said, most of that work is at the front. And the challenges right now are not -- the serious challenges are not the technical challenges, the serious challenge is finding the right way to go into this and do so with -- while achieving an appropriate return on our capital.
Okay. Okay. So it sounds as if like it's not a situation where it's cannibalistic, like demand in Europe, if it's from the same customers with very similar products you've already been building with them. It's not a situation where it will be cannibalistic to your operations in Asia and out of China because they're saying, "Look, don't send us stuff from China. If we're going to grow, it better be domestic." So there's -- so it's growing in addition, and they just don't want that necessarily to come from the sources that they're currently getting. Is that fair?
Correct. Yes. Yes, I'll talk on that. It's -- the growth that we see in Europe is totally additive to everything else that we're doing. And it's incremental, even though it could be big, but it's still highly synergistic with what we're doing and totally additive to what we're doing.
Okay. I understand. And then my second question, just maybe to Rahim. I'm just looking -- I'm wondering about the write-downs. I'm just -- I went back and read, like, in the Rare Metals segment in Q4 '19, you wrote about less inventory in the system. And then in Q1, noted the majority of the historical raw materials have been used in production, with only a small amount remaining. So what's happened here? Is that the balance of 2020, it got worse? Or is there a mix issue? Or I would have been -- I would have thought you would have had even cheaper purchase inventory.
No. I think you raised a really good point, Mac. And you hate to tie something to COVID, but it really is. What had happened here is we were running down inventory in the back of 2019. And in the first half of 2020, we were using kind of a lot of our older inventory and running it down, too. When we needed to kind of restock inventory, I would say, through 2020, our suppliers were having COVID supply chain issues. So we ended up with, let's say, extraordinarily high purchase of inventory, kind of just at the end of Q3 type time frame. And then the -- so we were purchasing an extraordinary large amount of inventory because we had no sense of regularity of shipment. And then unfortunately, the price of -- the finished good price really fell off in Q4, October, November, December.So rather -- I will not say unfortunate. I mean there's dynamics that are tied to COVID. True that our purchasing at the end of the year is probably higher than it should have been given the environment. Those are a number of things that are associated with the root cause and some of the corrective actions that we're going to put in place. But a lot of it was rather unique circumstance around COVID.
Okay. And just to follow up on that. Do you think by the end of this year, that if you were in a stable volume environment, right? Let's just say things don't get worse, but in the rare metals, they're kind of hovering where they are, could -- you've taken the write-down, you might be pretty lean in your inventory, could we actually see by, I don't know, Q4 or something, a pretty good improvement in margin at Rare Metals? Is that possible on flat volumes?
Yes. Look, I think it depends on what we define as pretty good. If we're defining it against 2020, then the answer is absolutely. If we're defining it against historical periods, I would say that I don't quite see an EBITDA profile that looked like kind of some of the historical periods in the past. So I mean both of those are kind of lower EBITDAs than we would be targeting for that business. So I guess whichever metric we give you, is going to be lower than our expectation, but certainly better than 2020, but perhaps not recovering yet in terms of absolute dollars to the numbers that we would have had in 2017 -- I don't know '17 or '18. Like, we're on the path.
And there are no further questions in queue at this time. This concludes the question-and-answer session for today as well as today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Thank you, operator. Thanks, everybody.
Thanks, Amy. Thank you, operator.