© 2024 Alpha Spread Limited. All Rights Reserved.
www.alphaspread.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on www.alphaspread.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. In no event shall Alpha Spread Limited be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on www.alphaspread.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, www.alphaspread.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Intrinsic Value is all-important and is the only logical way to evaluate the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses.
Dear ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the First Quarter Results 2024 Analyst Conference Call for FUCHS SE. This conference will be recorded. [Operator Instructions]. May I now hand over to Lutz Ackermann, Head of Investor Relations at FUCHS SE, who will start the meeting today. Please go ahead.
Yes. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. This is Lutz Ackermann speaking. I wish you a very warm welcome to today's conference call on the Q1 figures which we released this morning. With me on the call today is Isabelle Adelt, our CFO. And as always, Isabelle will run you through the presentation, which is then followed by a Q&A session. All the documents you can find on the IR section of our home page since 7 a.m. this morning. Having said this, I would like to hand over to Isabelle. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Lutz. A warm welcome from my side as well to the presentation of our Q1 results. As Lutz said, all information were uploaded this morning, but we would like to take the opportunity to give you a little more insight on how we started into the year. So, if you look at our highlights section, I think what we can say is that we had a good start into the year according to our expectations, and that the good trend we saw in the second half of the year 2023 continued. As already indicated in the call, we had a couple of weeks ago, our guidance and there with our expectations were based on flat pricing compared to the end of last year. And this is what you see reflected in the Q1 numbers now. We have a little lower sales. This was expected, given we have a little bit of a, let's say, cyclicity within the quarters in our business due to the relatively lower pricing compared to the first quarter of 2023. Plus, we saw a little bit of headwind from currency effects. What exactly that was we will talk about later in this call. At the same time, our EBIT is up year-over-year, driven by all regions. So, if you recall our calls we had in last year, the message was usually driven by the EMEA region, but now we really see all regions back to strength with some low lights and highlights, we will run through the regions later in this call. But this, for me, is an absolute positive that we see, that the entire world is driving those results now. And those two numbers taken together result in another step up in margin compared to the last quarter last year as well as compared to Q1 2023. Free cash flow, given that we put in place a quite thorough working capital management program in 2023 is now back to, let's say, the normal pattern you see in the FUCHS business. So, we have the usual net working capital build up in Q1 and Q2, and then a lower working capital sequentially in Q3, Q4 again. This is due to the fact, especially compared to last year that we significantly reduced our payables and inventories last year, and now we are back to a more normal pattern. All of that taken together and say a good start, healthy starting to the new year. We see the good trends continuing. And this is, I think, not surprisingly, while we confirm the outlook we cited mid of March for the full year 2024. Before I start with the numbers, I'd like to come to a highlight of an acquisition we did that was announced just a couple of weeks ago. So, we signed a binding offer to acquire the LUBCON Group, a German-based, family-owned company headquartered close to Frankfurt, who is specialized in the grease segment. We're really happy that after negotiating a little bit, we were able to close that deal given that this is really fitting to our focus we have in the niche in the Specialty Products segment and LUBCON set is focused on greases, but in a little bit different segments than we are usually exposed to such as paper, cloth, rail, a little bit more pharma and stuff like this. And we really believe that we can leverage our global footprint to have a similar success story as we've seen for Nye in the past. So, this for me, is one of the absolute highlights we had in the first quarter or now in the beginning of the second quarter. Together, I think you've already signed a strategic partnership with the Mercedes-Benz spare parts segment to really join forces there. So, I think from a strategic point of view, from a positioning point of view, some steps we have taken in the right direction. And now, given we are on our Q1 results call back to the numbers. As I said, our sales development slightly below prior year. But luckily, this is not a volume effect, but a mix of price and FX. Of course, a little bit down on prior year. But if you compare that to the Q1 performances in previous years, we can still see a solid growth, and this is nothing that causes worry from our point of view, but completely as expected in terms of lower pricing compared to Q1 2023. At the same time, we were able to increase our EBIT of the quarter. It was the best Q1, and a huge number of years. I think last time we had such a good result, at least I was not with a group, but I think EUR 107 million in 1 quarter, especially given the cyclicity you see in our business in terms of earnings usually, this is an extremely good result. And with contributions of all the regions, I will run through who contributed and what went really well in a couple of minutes. To shed a little bit more light on how organic growth in terms of added or a little bit decline in terms of sales and currency impacts are distributed. You can see that in terms of sales, it's more or less split into half. So, the organic decline is pricing driven exclusively. And then we have kind of a negative impact surprisingly from currency again, since the Euro is relatively strong, plus as far as what we see is that due to the high inflation environment, we have a relatively big impact considering the size of the country from Argentina, but this is only due to the high inflation accounting application we see here, and this is contributing quite a bit to the negative currency development. But all in all, I'd say a perfectly healthy P&L we are looking at. So, I think a very similar picture to what we've seen in the last year. A slight decline in sales, but at the same time, a step up in terms of profit and in terms of margin. If you compare the gross margin, we were able to have now compared to prior year, it's a step-up of almost 3 percentage points, and slightly above previous quarter as well. I think this is where we really see all of the good price management of our salespeople as well as operational excellence programs coming into effect. At the same time, we were able to manage our other functional costs in a really good manner despite the high inflation we saw or still saw last year, our functional cost increased by EUR 3 million only, which is under proportionate. And this is why compared to last year, we were able to increase our EBIT by 4% to a margin of 12.2% in the first quarter, which is 1.2 percentage points above prior year and a good step towards reaching our midterm margin target of 15% EBIT margin again. Then below EBIT, leading over to our free cash flow. I think CapEx is in line with our expectations. We still stand by our promise that we say CapEx at the same amount as we have depreciation, which is roughly EUR 80 million a year. Last year, we had EUR 20 million exactly. Now, there is a little phasing in there, but I think nothing substantial. Biggest change compared to last year is the net working capital development. But I think the message I already gave on the first slide, this is the more normal pattern that we see a slight net working capital build up in Q1 and Q2, and then have the count effect in quarter 3 and quarter 4. And this is what we are expecting in this year as well. This is why EUR 15 million is in line with what we expected. And this is why we confirm our guidance in terms of free cash flow as well. Now, let's take a look into the regions. As said, what I really like looking into this is that we have good contributions from all regions last time. EMEA is continuing the strong performance we saw last year. So, I think sales down a little more than on group average, which is due to the fact that most of the price declines were driven by our price variation clauses. And especially in Germany, we have comparatively higher share of the variation closer than in the rest of the group. But apart from that, the single contracts were managed really well. And when you look at the margin, we were able to hold on to higher prices compared to how the raw material costs developed, because at the same time, sales were down 7%, EBIT was up by 8%, with big contributions from, let's say, all companies in the regions, all countries. So, it's really hard to just pick one to stress. But I wanted to make a really positive mentioning for contributions. It would be the U.K. and Poland, which last year were our countries #4 and 5 after the big 3 contributors, and they really continue their good performance they showed last year in this year. The Asia-Pacific region majorly driven by China, obviously, is making a recovery as well. And there, once again, it shows how effective our operating model and our decentralized structure is. We see China getting back to old strength and continuing the really good performance we saw in Q3 and Q4 last year after they recovered from the COVID restriction. India did a really nice step-up compared to last year as well. The rest of the region had a relatively weaker start into the year, but I would say, after a very strong year last year where they compensated is partially for the Chinese development, and some impacts like, for example, a little slower agricultural development in Australia. Nothing to worry about and in line with our expectations, what we planned for. And we can now see that China is taking the lead again in that return after last year, where it was the rest of the region. So really good performance, sales down less than in the rest of the world, and our EBIT up majorly contributed by China and by India. Last but not least, our Americas region. And here, we see a very nice development after rather flattish last year again. With, I would say, good contributions from especially the Northern American sphere. So, we see really nice development in Canada despite, let's say, some import disruptions in Mexico due to new legislations and, let's say, some hiccups of the local government to make sure other companies can still import a really good performance in Mexico too. And I would say especially to mention really good performance of our specialty division, 9 namely in the Americas. But I think as already stated in our last call, let's say, the general, the bread and butter business in Americas is still relatively slower given that the economy is currently still in a little bit of wait-and-see mode to see how the elections in November will turn out since very different stimulus for the industry are expected depending on who will win those selections. South America is slightly below prior year. So, this is mainly due to the difficult macroeconomic situation all over the region, but particularly in Argentina, I already mentioned that a little earlier. There's a high inflation environment. where the new government now really, would say, challenging exchange rates. And this is what we see in the results. But luckily for us, South America is not such a big part of the region, given that Mexico is accounted for in our Northern American results. So overall, we could still show a really nice step-up in terms of EBIT in this region, too. Looking at our net liquidity. I think nothing out of the ordinary earnings after tax directly contributed with a negative effect of the net working capital build up, but still, we are in a net cash position despite spending EUR 33 million on our share buyback program in that quarter. So, still perfectly healthy liquidity situation and a perfectly healthy balance sheet. To remind you once again of the net working capital development. This is what I already mentioned earlier. If you look at how high the level was beginning of last year still. This is now back to, would say a little more normal development compared to prior year, given the elevated levels in especially '22 and '23 due to the high pricing effects we had on our raw materials, but due to shortage of materials and a little bit more safety stock for some of the rare materials as well. Now we are back to what I already mentioned, our target level of between 21% to 22%, and we expect to see this more normal pattern of the increase in the first half of the year, and then decrease in the second half of the year. I already mentioned pricing. And what we see here is, I would say, a very mixed picture. So, we saw a slight decline in some of our material groups in the first half of the first quarter. But then we saw especially Group 1 and Group 2 stabilizing, Group 3 very different indicators and relatively stable environment for additive packages, other raw materials, too. This is why looking into this year -- and even I would say this is a bit more challenging than still a couple of weeks ago to predict where raw material pricing is going since, especially in the Group 1 and Group 2. We see that prices started to firm up and we somehow reach bottom already. So, this is something we will monitor quite closely because it could obviously have an impact on our pricing. And having said all this, we are still very confident to reiterate the outlook we stated on March 12, namely EUR 3.6 billion worth in revenue with an EBIT of EUR 430 million, both of which would be all-time high in the history of the FUCHS Group. With a solid free cash flow, a little bit above our midterm guidance and another step up in one of our major KPIs for our management, the FVA. So overall, we are looking positively into the future, and thank the guidance we put out a couple of weeks ago, still valid for this year since we had a good start into 2024. Then to end my presentation on a high note, we would like to share a save the date with you. We are planning to have another Capital Market Day of this year on December 5th. So, please save the date. More details with the location will be announced quite soon, together with the registration. We just wanted to make sure you have that in your diaries. And hopefully, a lot of you will be able to join us on that day. Having said this, I come to the end of my presentation of our Q1 results, and I would like to open the floor for questions now.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. We will now take the first question from the line of Riya Kotecha from Bank of America.
This is Riya Kotecha speaking. I've got two questions, please. My first one is on group volumes that appears to have been flat in 1Q relative to the full year guide that assumes a pickup in volumes? And then also last year, where you had volumes that were down. Has that been to your expectations so far? And is there an element of seasonality in this with sequential volumes expected to be better? And to what extent do you have color on 2Q development so far? My second question is on M&A. And maybe you can speak about the synergies that you typically realize from M&A such as LUBCON acquisition, what that translates to in terms of a percentage of sales maybe drawing on the Nye example. And related to that, agree supplier based in Frankfurt would seem like a logical target. So why has this deal maybe not happened before? Has the outlook for the leases changed or become more positive? Or is it really a family ownership timing change that explains the timing of this deal?
Thanks for your question, Riya. Happy to elaborate on that. So, as you indicated correctly, our volume assumption for the full year is that volumes will be up. And this is what we see as a general guidance definitely. So, we saw volumes up in January and February. What we see right now is what's say, just the seasonality effect due to Easter being a little earlier this year. So, we had a couple of days we missed in March compared to last year where Easter was completely in April. And this is according to our expectations. And I would reiterate that we still expect volumes to be up overall this year. So, this is really pure seasonality due to Easter being end of March, thus less working days and more vacation days in March compared to the year before. But apart from that, we saw really good developments in terms of volume as well, and this is what we now see starting into Q2 as well. Talking about the LUBCON acquisition. The easier one is about deal timing. Well, as I stated on my slide, LUBCON is a family run business. So of course, we would have been interested to acquire them earlier as well. But it's always a matter of timing if and when the family wants to sell. And I think for them, it's now the current owner is ins mid-50s. They don't have a successor, and they were looking for a new owner. I think asked a lot of times before new natural owner is then potentially another at least family backed business. This is why they approached us when they were thinking of selling. The former owner will now join the FUCHS Group as one of our segment managers to make sure we can scale that successfully, which for us is a really good thing as well, because he knows the business inside out. He has built it up successfully over the last couple of decades. And this comes to the second part of your question. So of course, I mean, the deal is not closed yet. We signed it a couple of days back. It's now basically with the antitrust authorities to approve the deal. We do not expect any issues there, and then expect to have the closing some win in Q3 once all the approvals hopefully came through. And then, of course, this is now the time for us to really look into their segments, into their customer base into more detail and then come up with a thorough plan. But as we said, very similar to the Nye acquisition, what we expect is not really synergies in terms of taking costs out, that synergies in terms of leveraging their product portfolio and our global strength in terms of sales and operations to really have their product portfolio, their customer access and their approval, especially in industries we formerly have not been in to leverage that on a global scale, too.
We will now take the next question from the line of Isha Sharma from Stifel.
I just have 2, please. In the EMEA and Africa region, we saw a sequential margin decline. Was it driven mainly by price adjustments? And related to that is where in the current environment of rising raw material costs, could you remind us of the time lag that you might need to pass on these higher costs? And should we expect already some pricing based on what you already see? Or do you have some more buffer that is, do we see more price increases on the cost side before you can actually pass on the cost?
Yes. Thanks for your question, Isha. So, what we usually compare is a year-over-year development when we look at the regions, given that we have some seasonality in there. Some customers rather buy, for example, at year-end, some then rather to the front. So, what we see in EMEA is more, I would say, an improvement year-over-year than comparing Q4 to Q1. So, there's no special effect in there, as I would say just a sequential step up compared to Q1 2023. And I think given the strong performance, EMEA had this year and what reiterated in our guidance for them, it would be a really good achievement to reach basically the same results this year, given that we expect compared to full year last year, a slight decline in overall pricing. So, lower top line, which means obviously, for the entire year margin will be up. If we can, we reiterate the same abort we saw last year, which we are very hopeful we can do and indicators shown in the right direction. But I think for us, very positive development in the EMEA region.To talk about price increases. So, I think this is still too early because indicators we see in our raw material basket, they are still pointing in different directions, and we have diversity of developments there. So usually, once we decide to increase prices or lower prices for that matter, pass-through rate. So, the lag effect so-called would be roughly 12 weeks usually before it hits our P&L. But this is true for both directions, on the way up and on the way down.
Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Konstantin Wiechert from Baader-Helvea.
I think in the last quarter, you mentioned also Italy and Spain, a very positive contributor. I was just wondering how those developed in the first quarter and maybe also some words on Germany, and what you see into the second quarter that elsewhere. Maybe also with regards to especially the OEM sector and what you see there for EMEA for the rest of the year? And then just maybe to add again on the previous question about the margin. I think sales were up sequentially, but then the margin was down. So, was this maybe due to a product mix? Or is this now really how -- maybe the question is how volumes developed also there sequentially? Maybe that was the higher volumes but lower margins? Or what was really the driver there, again, just to clarify this.
Yes. So, thanks for your question, Konstantin. I think generally, the EMEA region developed very positive in all countries again. So, what I said, if I had to pick the 2 best-performing countries, both are U.K. and Poland. But if we see, especially in terms of EBIT, we had a step-up of 8% again. And as you can see throughout the entire region more or less. In all the countries we stressed last year, made the Italy, Spain or Sweden, which was really good. Germany too. We see a very good development, especially in terms of profitability. In terms of margin, as said, we usually compare the quarter this year compared to the quarter last year. Since it's a little tricky with some countries having different seasonality, some customer groups having different seasonalities. So really nothing to worry about in EMEA from my point of view. We had an exceptional year last year. We are planning to repeat this year. And what we really focus on is mainly sequential margin improvement over the respective quarters the year before, and this is what, from our current expectation, we will see throughout the rest of the year. Looking at the German business, I think it was your second question. The development we see is a really nice development across all sectors. If you recall last year, I think OEM was relatively stronger than the industry business, given they still had a little bit of a backlog due to the chip shortage the year before. What we see now is really good contribution, let's say, all of our business segments, again, since the general sentiment, the industry is picking up a little bit. Although I think what we have to stress, I mean, Germany, when you look at the European economy overall is still a little bit of the problem child, let's put it like this in terms of growth expectations, in terms of economic output. This is, of course, in terms of growth rates, a little bit of what we see as well. But I would say, overall, nothing to worry about and demand of all of our customer groups. So, really nice with a really good order book and a really good pipeline we see to date.
We will now take the next question from the line of Martin Roediger from Kepler Cheuvreux.
I have 3 questions, if I may. Firstly, assuming you reach your EBIT guidance of EUR 430 million this year, what makes you confident that EBIT growth will accelerate from 4% growth this year to 16% growth next year, which is required if you want to achieve your midterm target of EUR 500 million in 2025. The second question is on your admin costs in Q1. You mentioned digitalization expenses as a reason for that. Assuming that these digitalization expenses continue, is it fair to say that this EUR 15 million Europe burden you had in Q1 is a good run rate also for the quarters to come? And third question is on the -- it's a hyperinflation of some countries such as Argentina, but there might be also some others in the world. Some other companies try to compensate this hyperinflation effect with price hikes. Would that be an option for you as well?
Yes. Thanks for your question, Martin. So, I think in terms of EBIT growth and EBIT acceleration, I think we pretty much stand by the statement we did in our call on March 12. So, what we currently see is still a little bit of hesitation in some regions of the world. I'll come to that in a minute, whilst in 2025, when you currently look at estimates from the World Bank or the big institutions is expected to be rather bullish yet. And we always said to reach our guidance of EUR 500 million, of course, we need a little bit of tailwind from what we always call a more normal economic environment. So, what would be the major growth drivers is, I would say, really a more -- even more stable Europe than what we see now. But I would say, utmost and biggest contributor for sure will be the U.S., given that we currently have this wait-and-see mode for, I would say, what is our base business due to the uncertainty in the market with the upcoming election. And if you compare the growth rates that are estimated for this year to next year, and we can take our fair share of this, we are very confident if that materializes that we can do the EUR 500 million by end of next year. Talking about our admin costs. So, I think when we talk about digitalization, I think one of the biggest projects we are planning to do, as you always the S/4HANA implementation. As already stated, I think, in one of the earlier calls, all of the costs we will have there are baked into our midterm guidance for this year as well as for next year already, as well as in the midterm margin assumption. To give you, I would say, a total guidance in terms of run rate, I mean, there are so many different influence factors that go in there would be a little too easy, but just moving that to digitalization. But I think what we know is that we will see a little bit higher cost for digitalization given we have the S4 implementation as well as the group-wide program, FUCHS goes digital, where we developed some new business models for the future. So, this is planned for and this is expected. So, this is something we would see sustainably going forward. And then your question regarding hyperinflation. Luckily, the only country we have like fully consolidated within our group, where we have to do hyperinflation accounting is Argentina. All of the other companies where this is applicable, are equity shareholdings, we do have, especially in Turkey. So, it only comes into our equity results. You've seen that in the last 2 years that we had to take quite a bit out there, too. Given the size of Argentina, we have not yet at least clicked into any measures of somehow matching that, given that it's a relatively small operation for us, majorly sales operations only. But we, of course, need to see how that develops and then take it from there.
We will now take the next question from the line of Michael Schaefer from ODDO BHF.
Thanks for taking my two questions. On the one hand, I'd like to come back on the volume side. Isabelle, you said, well, starting from rather flattish volumes first quarter, you expect an acceleration, i.e. making a volume growth for the full year. I wonder whether you can shed some more light on the regions, how we should differentiate between the respective regions, because it looks like that EMEA was also rather flattish year-over-year in the first quarter? And what are the drivers for the volume recovery in the respective regions. So, this would be the first question. Second is you said that March was a bit, let's say, curtailed by Easter holidays. So, I wonder whether you can talk about how April is performing so far and whether we should, in general, in 2024, expect typical seasonality also at FUCHS, i.e., Q3 marking the strongest quarter of the year.
Sure. Thanks for your questions, Michael. So, I think -- I mean, in terms of volume, we saw a very good development across all regions. But yes, I mean, of course, I mean, we have to be -- have to be fair towards seasonality. So overall, we expect the same seasonality we have every year at FUCHS. So, we're basically quarters ramping up and then Q4 being a little bit weaker. This is what we've seen over the last years. And this is according to our expectations right now, what we would see in 2024 as well. In terms of volumes, I think this is a very similar pattern for most of the regions. So, what we saw is a really nice pickup in volumes in January and February, and this is what we expect to see continuing in March and April, taken together according to our visibility as well. I mean, what we have to take into account is that last year, March was a very strong month for us in terms of volume. We already knew that this could not be repeated, especially due to Easter holidays in Europe, but we now see basically this volume moving over wily just order delivery into April. So, I think end of Q2, both 2 quarters taken together, we will see this volume growth we guided for beginning of the year.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. We will now take the next question from the line of Lars Vom-Cleff from Deutsche Bank.
Three quick ones, if I may. You talked about the contracts that include price variation classes. Is it still around about 25% of all of your contracts, or has this percentage figure changed recently?
No, this is still roughly the same number. But of course, let's say, with very -- let's say, different exposures in the different regions. I can imagine, usually the customers, we do have those kind of contracts, we are the big OEM customers because we need some kind of, let's say, agreement on how we increase prices, customers such as Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and so on. And this is why we have a relatively higher exposure to price variation clauses in the EMEA region, and a relatively lower exposure in America and Asia, but overall, the 25% is still the number you can calculate with.
Perfect. And then I think I remember you once said or you said in the '23 call, that a 100 basis point gross margin improvement should be possible this year. Would input prices increasing a little bit or tending to increase a bit more? Would you repeat that statement? Is that still in the cards, 100 basis points?
You're talking about gross margin?
Yes, gross margin.
Okay. I mean, we really have to see how pricing turns out, I would say. I mean, last year, especially, so if you look at the step-up now we had in Q1, that was already pretty solid with a roughly 3 percentage points. We are aiming to get back to all strengths definitely. But I think the major influencing factor will be how pricing turns out obviously. So, what we've seen is that the raw material pricing, some groups already somehow hit bottom and are starting to form up. So, I think this -- and then taken together whether we will need to have price increases in the market or not will be the major determining factor where we will end up with.
Okay. Understood. Great. And then lastly, with the free cash flow now reaching a more normalized level again. You also always picture your net working capital to sales ratio, and your range of 21% to 22%. And I think you also mentioned once that you are trying to come or even undershoot this guidance or this range. Do you still think that this should be possible with increasing input prices also inflating your inventory level? Or the question is, is it in your hands? Or does it to a larger segment also depend on input price inflation?
I would say, answer is both, yes. So of course, it always is in our hand to diligently manage our working capital. I think you're referring to our discussion we had during one of the road shows we did together. So of course, we will now start to look diligently given that we were able to reduce our working capital to below 22% in 2023, whether there are other levers we can pull, but this is yet to be determined. There's for sure something that we can do, and all we can or we will do. But of course, the moment prices start to increase, the working capital level will go up as an equation of sales to pure mathematics, given that we need to buy basically material at a higher cost. And if you look at the lag effect of 12 weeks until it hits our P&L, of course, you will see the same lag effect in our working capital as well. This is a normal pattern we always see when prices go up or down.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions].
So, if there are no further questions, we would conclude the conference call today. The next conference call will take place on July 30 when we are about to report on the half year's numbers. Until then, have a good day, and speak soon. Bye-bye.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.