` HILS (Hill & Smith Holdings PLC) vs CGS (Castings PLC) Comparison - Alpha Spread

HILS
vs
CGS

Over the past 12 months, HILS has outperformed CGS, delivering a return of -10% compared to the CGS's 20% drop.

Valuation Comparison

HILS Intrinsic Value
2 146.13 GBX
Undervaluation 18%
Intrinsic Value
Price
CGS Intrinsic Value
305.17 GBX
Undervaluation 7%
Intrinsic Value
Price
Company Last Price Intrinsic Value DCF Value Relative Value Wall St Target
Hill & Smith Holdings PLC
LSE:HILS
1 758 GBX
Castings PLC
LSE:CGS
283 GBX

Financials Comparison

Growth Over Time
HILS vs CGS

HILS
CGS
Add Stock
Revenue
www.alphaspread.com
Company LTM Historical Growth Growth Streak % Positive Years Max Drawdown Volatility Forecasted Growth
3 Years 5 Years 10 Years 1 Year 3 Years
Hill & Smith Holdings PLC
Revenue
Castings PLC
Revenue

All metrics are calculated based on data from the last 10 years.

Profitability Comparison

Free Cash Flow
HILS vs CGS

HILS
CGS
Add Stock
Free Cash Flow
www.alphaspread.com
Company LTM Average Historical Growth FCF Margin Conversion
3 Years 5 Years 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
Hill & Smith Holdings PLC
LSE:HILS
Castings PLC
LSE:CGS
What is Free Cash Flow?

Gross Margin

HILS
40%
CGS
15.5%

Operating Margin

HILS
15.6%
CGS
2.7%

Net Margin

HILS
8.9%
CGS
2.4%

FCF Margin

HILS
12%
CGS
-0.5%

ROE

HILS
17%
CGS
3.2%

ROA

HILS
10.1%
CGS
2.4%

ROIC

HILS
16.7%
CGS
3.1%

ROCE

HILS
22%
CGS
3.5%

Stocks Performance

Stocks Performance
HILS vs CGS

Loading

Performance Gap
HILS vs CGS

Loading
HILS
CGS
Difference
www.alphaspread.com

Performance By Year
HILS vs CGS

Loading
HILS
CGS
Add Stock
Unlock Full Access to Alpha Spread
Create Free Account