Grid Dynamics Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:GDYN

Watchlist Manager
Grid Dynamics Holdings Inc Logo
Grid Dynamics Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:GDYN
Watchlist
Price: 9.49 USD -1.76% Market Closed
Market Cap: 804.8m USD

Q2-2025 Earnings Call

AI Summary
Earnings Call on Jul 31, 2025

Record Revenue: Grid Dynamics delivered record Q2 revenue of $101.1 million, up 21.7% year-over-year, near the midpoint of guidance.

AI-Driven Growth: AI and data now drive 23% of organic growth, nearly tripling the growth rate of the overall business.

Margin Pressures: Gross margin and EBITDA margins declined sequentially due to FX headwinds and investments in engineering talent.

Full-Year Outlook Maintained: Management reaffirmed full-year revenue guidance of $415–$435 million, despite macro uncertainty and customer spending caution in traditional IT services.

Strong AI Pipeline: The company highlighted a robust pipeline in AI and data, with most enterprise clients prioritizing innovation spend over legacy transformation.

Acquisitions Add Value: Recent acquisitions like JUXT and Mobile Computing have strengthened vertical expertise and contributed to growth.

Strategic Investment: Management emphasized continued investment in AI talent and platforms even while optimizing costs elsewhere.

AI Strategy & Adoption

Grid Dynamics is executing an AI-first strategy, embedding AI throughout its offerings and operations. AI and data-related projects now account for 23% of organic growth, with this segment growing almost three times faster than the rest of the business. The company is seeing accelerating enterprise demand for AI-native partners and is positioning itself as a leader in AI adoption for Fortune 1000 clients.

Financial Performance & Guidance

The company posted record revenue for the quarter and year-over-year growth of 21.7%, in line with guidance. However, gross margin and EBITDA margin declined sequentially due to currency headwinds, increased engineering headcount, and costs tied to fixed price contracts. Grid Dynamics maintained its full-year revenue outlook of $415 million to $435 million, signaling confidence in ongoing demand for innovation projects.

Vertical & Customer Dynamics

Retail remains the largest vertical, but saw a sequential revenue decline due to softness in home improvement clients. Financial services delivered strong year-over-year growth, supported by acquisitions and fintech demand, while TMT and other verticals also contributed. The company is intentionally rationalizing its customer base, focusing on enterprise clients and winding down smaller, non-strategic accounts.

Acquisitions & Partnerships

Recent acquisitions, particularly JUXT and Mobile Computing, have deepened Grid Dynamics' expertise in banking, financial services, and U.S. enterprise accounts. Partnerships contributed 17.9% of Q2 revenue, with growing traction beyond hyperscalers. The company is also engaging with major tech and hardware partners to expand its capabilities and market reach.

Talent & Workforce Evolution

Grid Dynamics is focusing on senior, highly skilled engineers to support its AI-centric model. The India team has become a key hub for platform engineering, and the internship program is generating strong talent pipelines. Management highlighted ongoing investments in employee training for AI and context engineering, and emphasized the importance of human oversight alongside AI tools.

Margin & Cost Management

Gross margins and EBITDA margins fell sequentially due to FX volatility, increased investment in engineering talent, and the timing of fixed price contract costs. Management is balancing disciplined cost optimization in traditional areas with aggressive investment in AI platforms and talent, aiming to drive long-term revenue per employee and differentiated capabilities.

Client Pipeline & Demand Trends

The pipeline for AI and data-related projects is robust, with project conversion rates increasing. Traditional IT spending is under pressure, but innovation and AI projects are prioritized by clients. Management expects the AI-driven business momentum to continue, while acknowledging that moving from the low to high end of guidance will require continued pipeline conversion.

Revenue
$101.1 million
Change: Up 21.7% YoY.
Guidance: $103–$105 million for Q3; $415–$435 million for full year.
Gross Profit
$34.5 million
No Additional Information
Gross Margin
34.1%
Change: Down from 36.8% QoQ and down from 35.6% YoY.
EBITDA
$12.7 million
Change: Down from $14.6 million QoQ; up from $11.7 million YoY.
Guidance: $12–$13 million for Q3.
EBITDA Margin
12.6%
Change: Down from 14.5% QoQ; down from 14.1% YoY.
Net Income
$5.3 million
Change: Up from $2.9 million QoQ; up from loss of $0.8 million YoY.
EPS
$0.06 per share (diluted)
Change: Up from $0.03 QoQ; up from loss of $0.01 YoY.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$336.8 million
Change: Up from $325.5 million last quarter.
Headcount
5,013
Change: Up from 4,926 last quarter; up from 3,961 YoY.
Top 10 Customers Revenue Contribution
57.3%
Change: Up from 57% YoY.
Retail Vertical Revenue Contribution
29.2%
Change: Up 10.4% YoY; down 6.2% QoQ.
Finance Vertical Revenue Contribution
25.1%
Change: Up 1.4% QoQ; doubled YoY.
TMT Vertical Revenue Contribution
24.9%
Change: Up 6.7% QoQ; up 8.4% YoY.
CPG and Manufacturing Vertical Revenue Contribution
10.5%
Change: Flat QoQ; up 7.7% YoY.
Other Verticals Revenue Contribution
7.8%
Change: Up 10.1% QoQ; up 4.6% YoY.
Healthcare and Pharma Revenue Contribution
2.5%
No Additional Information
Customer Count
194
Change: Down from 204 QoQ and 208 YoY.
Revenue
$101.1 million
Change: Up 21.7% YoY.
Guidance: $103–$105 million for Q3; $415–$435 million for full year.
Gross Profit
$34.5 million
No Additional Information
Gross Margin
34.1%
Change: Down from 36.8% QoQ and down from 35.6% YoY.
EBITDA
$12.7 million
Change: Down from $14.6 million QoQ; up from $11.7 million YoY.
Guidance: $12–$13 million for Q3.
EBITDA Margin
12.6%
Change: Down from 14.5% QoQ; down from 14.1% YoY.
Net Income
$5.3 million
Change: Up from $2.9 million QoQ; up from loss of $0.8 million YoY.
EPS
$0.06 per share (diluted)
Change: Up from $0.03 QoQ; up from loss of $0.01 YoY.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$336.8 million
Change: Up from $325.5 million last quarter.
Headcount
5,013
Change: Up from 4,926 last quarter; up from 3,961 YoY.
Top 10 Customers Revenue Contribution
57.3%
Change: Up from 57% YoY.
Retail Vertical Revenue Contribution
29.2%
Change: Up 10.4% YoY; down 6.2% QoQ.
Finance Vertical Revenue Contribution
25.1%
Change: Up 1.4% QoQ; doubled YoY.
TMT Vertical Revenue Contribution
24.9%
Change: Up 6.7% QoQ; up 8.4% YoY.
CPG and Manufacturing Vertical Revenue Contribution
10.5%
Change: Flat QoQ; up 7.7% YoY.
Other Verticals Revenue Contribution
7.8%
Change: Up 10.1% QoQ; up 4.6% YoY.
Healthcare and Pharma Revenue Contribution
2.5%
No Additional Information
Customer Count
194
Change: Down from 204 QoQ and 208 YoY.

Earnings Call Transcript

Transcript
from 0
Operator

Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Grid Dynamics Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. I'm Cary Savas, Director of Branding and Communications. [Operator Instructions] Joining us on the call today are CEO, Leonard Livschitz; CFO, Anil Doradla; CEO, Eugene Steinberg; COO, Yury Gryzlov; and SVP Americas, Vasily Sizov.

Following the prepared remarks, we will open the call to your questions. Please note that today's conference call is being recorded. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements. This includes our business and financial outlook and the answers to some of your questions. Such statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties as described in the company's earnings release and other filings with the SEC.

During this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP measures of our performance. to non-GAAP financial reconciliations and supplemental financial information are provided in the earnings press release and the 8-K filed with the SEC. You can find all the information I just described in the Investor Relations section of our website.

I'll now turn the call over to Leonard, our CEO.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

Thank you, Cary. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'm delighted to report another record quarter in revenue. Our second quarter revenue of $101 million was another all-time high, driven by the continued growth in our engineering billing headcount.

More importantly, we're witnessing a strong pipeline of opportunities across industry verticals. I will talk more about it in my prepared remarks. Grid Dynamics is aligning every aspect of its business with an AI-first approach. This includes infusing AI into go-to-market strategies, service offering, delivery and talent management. We're doing that while preserving and expanding our core assets around high-caliber technology, consulting and engineering services.

While traditional programs face increased crude innovation-centric initiatives are being prioritized from a spending perspective. Enterprises are actively seeking AI-native partners capable of driving and leading adoption within the enterprise environment. Furthermore, traditional functional structure within large enterprises are also lacking the adaptability needed for efficient cross-functional decision-making regarding AI implementations encompassing both technology and business aspects. This is precisely where Grid Dynamics plays a crucial role in powering organizations to accelerate AI adoption at an enterprise scale.

I'm happy to report that the first half of 2025 AI and data was 23% of the company's overall organic growth. The AI and data practice is growing almost 3x faster than our overall organic business. I'm excited to see the growth in pipeline of opportunities as we enter the quarter with accelerated business momentum. This is the basis for our positive business outlook, even though macroeconomic uncertainties persist.

I'm also pleased to report on the progress with our recent acquisitions. JUXT has significantly elevated our industry expertise in banking and financial services. attracting considerable interest from global banking based in the United States. In the second quarter, a U.S.-based global bank continued to be a top 10 customer. And that was the reason the financial services vertical remained our second once.

Mobile Computing has enhanced our follow-on capabilities and the acquisition efforts, successfully integrating engineering teams to support our U.S. enterprise accounts. Our partnership influence revenues reached 17.9% of the total revenue in Q2 2021, and we continue to experience increased traction with all higher scales, not only with Google.

In our European business, we begin implementing a marginal B2B digital search solution built on Microsoft Azure for one of the largest worldwide brewing companies. We also have launched expert agents and a Tier 1 investment bank to perform index called quality and security reviews as a part of the software development life cycle.

Our India expansion continues to be a strategic highlight. India is now among our 2 top countries by the headcount and has emerged as a hub for multi agent multimodal platform engineering, demonstrating a strong talent attraction and upscale. Our internship program also saw strong momentum with over 16,000 applicants and high placement rates into the billable roles.

Across the majority of our customers, there is a profound impact of AI on the way they are planning their future initiatives and programs. Customers now expect a flavoring of AI across all of their service offerings given traditionals. We firmly believe the workforce pyramid of the IT industry space and shifting to our senior talent in AI-centric agents.

As you know, Grid Dynamics workforce pyramid is more weighted towards senior more experienced engineers and compares to our peers in industry. Our alignment in the workforce, along with the technology-centric DNA, positions us well as enterprises and brace air. Given the critical role of I would like to emphasize Grid Dynamic's unique market position.

It's important for investors to remember that our company's core values have built upon a strong foundation in data and data platforms as well as expertise in large-scale data engineering for Fortune 1000 enterprises.

I will now turn the call over to Eugene Steinberg, our CTO, to elaborate on the important topic of you, Eugene?

E
Eugene Steinberg
executive

Thank you, Leonard. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm delighted to share how Grid Dynamics is actively returning for an AI-first future. where AI capabilities are embedded in every aspect of our operations and service delivery from the ground up rather than added as an operation.

We are methodically building on a strong foundation of educator data MDI experience. We are expanding our key AI capabilities and strategic partnerships. We are delivering production-ready solutions with proven ROI for enterprise clients. We are innovating with major customers and building considerable experience across Agentic AI platforms and solutions and AI plus software delivery life cycle.

The investments we made are using positive results, many of which I'll discuss today. Grid Dynamic's whole AI framework is based on 4 foundational pillars. Let me walk you through each. First, Power business transformation. We are delivering immediate and measurable impacts from our engagements in the areas of customer engagement, enterprise operations and manufacturing. Connusational commerce is redefining customer engagement by driving hyper personalized customer experiences.

Our solutions have become a key empty point for many new client relationships in retail and CPG industries. From there, we often expand to build conversational commerce capabilities. Our efforts routinely yield conversion improvements of over 5%. This success leads to a full-on engagement per average 3 the initial project value as clients expand the AI adoption across additional business units.

We have specialized domain solutions for many sub-verticals that have been particularly differentiating. Take out of part search, for example, our part search capabilities have established dynamics as a preferred partner for most leading auto-parts retailers. This over 150 AI search specialists deployed across customer projects, we are demonstrating our ability to grow with an existing accounts while delivering measurable business impact.

Agentic AI significantly enhanced efficiency for a major financial services company by automating insurgent processes in facilitating data driving decisions. Previously, the cost of covering through vast number of Tier 3 customers was prohibitive for digital sales. Our B2B customers 60 agents now conduct exhaustive research aggregating client data from diverse sources such as CRM, contract databases and spreadsheets.

These detailed profiles integrate automated risk colors powers in sites and intelligent recommendations informed by prior interactions, ultimately leading to improved customer retention and business growth. This initiative is expected to free up about 20% of seller capacity, allowing for high-touch approach with more clients and the curated time to revenue.

The vendor manufacturing sector, we implemented the remaining Q4 life prediction system for a leading industrial equipment manufacturer, which enhances maintenance planning and reduces unplanned downtime. We have also delivered facility modeling with [indiscernible] generation for a global technology company, optimizing manufacturing processes and improving production efficiency.

The right for physical AI is fundamentally transforming the industrial robotic landscape, leading to the replacement of legacy robotic platforms with modern enabled solutions. We collaborate with innovative perform providers such as Randle Boats, enhancing care offerings with advanced BI components for inspection, welding and preceding manufacturing applications. This represents a new and promising care team for our company.

Second, AI and agentic platforms. We partner with large enterprises to develop in-house bespoke agentic AI platforms. For instance, we are collaborating with a leading global payment technology company and a multinational beverage giant to consult comprehensively at less. These platforms empower our clients to create a full spectrum of agents both local and high growth within a secure, scalable environment.

They offer an expanding CapEx system of tools for agents to access enterprise data and systems. This platform for strategy enables us to see substantial expansion opportunities by building AI solutions and top of the platforms we developed. Third, AI first -- as enterprises embraced AI-first mentality, the entire approach to the software development life cycle as DLC is shipping.

Last month, we introduced our proprietary AI-centeric dynamics I mentor engagement model, and we are driving strong adoption of faster deal hematologists across the dynamics. What is particularly exciting is that this enables our expansion into previously unaccessible market segment.

Labor-intensive legacy modernization projects that additionally require large volume of relatively low skilled labors are now within our reach. This represents a significant market expansion opportunity as we can now compete for projects that were previously economically unfeasible.

For example, we are migrating 16,000 data processing jobs for a global technology leader using a small specialized team equipped with first DLC tooling. The Alcodis has dramatically improved our presales and client acquisition. We now create hyper quality pot of concerts and produces in hours, not weeks, significantly boosting conversion rates and shoring sales cycles.

For example, by a leading specialty pet retailer requested a computer vision solution to automate fish counting in acquirents previously acquiring manual fees transferees our AI development team delivered a working prototype the next day. And finally, fourth, Grid Dynamics beyond client-facing complications, we are leveraging AI to transform our own internal operations. Our in-house Agentic AI platform is transforming and automating early aspects of our operations, including knowledge management, talent sourcing, project management, contracting use and functions.

AI is fundamental to driving our client business forward. Our continued commitment to the AI-first future is and I am excited about the I will now turn the call over to our SVP of Americas to discuss some notable project highlights from the quarter.

Y
Yury Gryzlov
executive

Thank you, Jim. Good afternoon, everyone. I am pleased to highlight some important accomplishments from the quarter that illustrate the value of our work. For a leading global technology company, we modernize their data processing infrastructure by migrating Spark and Scala workflows from a legacy scheduling system to a next-generation cloud platform.

We developed a comprehensive data validation framework to ensure data consistency, optimize compute resource usage and created reusable templates that accelerate future migrations to continuized environments. This initiative significantly improves platform stability and performance. reduced operational risks and established the foundation for scalable, efficient development of future data-driven capabilities.

Another example -- we partnered with a leading multinational technology company to develop hermetic C++ 2 shades for their ML portfolio. This foundational initiative established a highly reproducible, reliable and efficient C+ Plaza build environment across their machine learning programs. Our team led the strategic architectural shift to a fully hermetic C++ build system, delivering a tenfold improvement in build reliability a 25% reduction in operational costs and significant developer velocity gains for complex CPU and GPU accelerated workloads.

We are developing an AI platform for a leading home improvement retailer, serving as the foundation for generative PI tools that assist customers with how to guidance and product inquiries already in production, the spiritual assistance offers project inspiration, design concepts, product comparisons and expert recommendations for both do-it-yourself and professional users.

The solution is expected to drive significant improvements in conversion rates and average order value, particularly in maintenance and repair and aesthetic upgrades. For one of the top fintech companies, we developed a spectrum of a initiatives to showcase advancements across domains a multi-agent marketplace validates Temporal as a scalable execution platform for complex multi-agent interactions, offering robust observability and reliability.

The travel desk agent creates stateful agents with advanced memory components that generates personalized long-term itineraries overcoming context limitations through self task execution. Another AI-based solution leverages public reviews to accurately categorize miscoded merchants identifying system is used and potentially increasing revenue through corrected interchange fees. Thank you.

With that, let me turn the call to Anil, who will talk about our financials.

A
Anil Doradla
executive

Thanks, Vasily. Good afternoon, everyone. We recorded the second quarter revenue of $101.1 million, slightly higher than the midpoint of our $100 million to $102 million guidance. On a year-over-year basis, this represents a growth of 21.7%. Excluding the impact of our recent acquisitions, the year-over-year growth was 6.3%, both on a quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year basis, there were roughly 73 bps and 40 bps of FX-related tailwinds, respectively.

Non-GAAP EBITDA came in at $12.7 million, within our guidance range of $12.5 million to $13.5 million in the second quarter of 2025, negative impacts on our cost from FX fluctuations both on a quarterly and year-over-year basis. As you know, over the past months, the U.S. dollar has weakened against most of the currencies. Grid Dynamics is exposed to currency basket across Europe, Latin America and India.

We have a natural hedge against some of these currencies and the net impact of it was approximately $1.4 million. Looking at the performance of our verticals. Retail remained our largest vertical, contributing 29.2% of total revenues for the second quarter of 2025. Revenues in this vertical grew 10.4% year-over-year, primarily driven by demand from our existing specialty retail customers and new customer engagements.

On a sequential basis, however, revenues declined by 6.2%, largely from home improvement customers. We finance vertical accounted for 25.1% of total revenues in the quarter and remained our second largest vertical. Revenues grew 1.4% sequentially and doubled year-over-year. The substantial year-over-year growth was primarily driven by increased demand from our fintech customers, a lot of with contributions from our 2024 acquisitions that brought in Global Banking customers.

TMT accounted for 24.9% of total revenues for the quarter, with a growth of 6.7% quarter-over-quarter and 8.4% compared to the same period last year largest growth driver was increased demand from our technology customers. Turning to the remaining verticals. CPG and manufacturing represented 10.5% of quarterly revenues while revenues remained flat in absolute value sequentially, it increased 7.7% year-over-year, primarily due to contributions from our recent acquisition.

Other vertical contributed 7.8% of total revenues, reflecting sequential growth of 10.1% and 4.6% increase compared to the second quarter of 2024. The year-on-year increase primarily came from customers tied to agriculture, marketplace and service providers and verticals. And finally, the Heath Care and Pharma made up 2.5% of our revenues for the quarter. We ended the second quarter with a total headcount of 5,013, up from 4,926 employees in the first quarter and up from 3,961 in the second quarter of 2024.

At the end of the second quarter of 2025 our total U.S. headcount was 359 or 7.2% on the company's total headcount versus 8.8% in the year ago quarter. Our non-U.S. headcount located in Europe, Americas and India was 4,624 or 92.8%. In the second quarter, revenues from our top line and Top 10 customers were 37.5% and 57.3%, respectively, versus 38.5% and 57% in the same period a year ago, respectively.

During the second quarter, we had a total of 194 customers down from 204 in the first quarter of 2025 and 208 in the year ago quarter, the decline in the number of customers was primarily driven by our continued efforts to rationalize our portfolio of nonstrategic customers.

Moving to the income statement. Our GAAP gross profit during the quarter was $34.5 million, or 34.1% compared to $37 million or 36.8% in the first quarter and $29.6 million or 35.6% in the year ago quarter. On a non-GAAP basis, our gross profit was $35.1 million or 34.7% compared to $37.6 million or 37.4% in the first quarter of 2025, and up from $30.1 million or 36.2% in the year ago quarter.

On a sequential basis, the decline in the gross margin was largely from FX headwinds, increased engineering headcount to support future growth and timing of costs related to some fixed price contracts. Non-GAAP EBITDA during the second quarter that excluded interest income, expense provision from income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, restructuring, expenses related to geographic reorganization and transaction and other related costs was $12.7 million or 12.6% on of revenues, down from $14.6 million or 14.5% of revenues in the first quarter 2025 and up from $11.7 million or 14.1% in the year ago quarter.

Sequential decline in EBITDA was largely due to the decline in gross profit and FX segments. The increase on a year-over-year basis was largely due to higher revenues, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses in FX fluctuations.

Our GAAP net income in the second quarter was $5.3 million or $0.06 per share based on a diluted share count of 86.4 million shares compared to the first quarter, net income of $2.9 million or $0.03 per share based on a diluted share count 87.8 million and a net loss of $0.8 million or $0.01 per share based on 7.6 million diluted shares in the year ago quarter.

On a non-GAAP basis, in the second quarter, our non-GAAP net income was $8.3 million or $0.10 per share based on 86.4 million diluted shares compared to the first quarter non-GAAP net income of $10 million or $0.11 per share based on 87.8 million diluted shares and $8.5 million or $0.11 per share based on 77.9 million diluted shares in the year ago quarter.

On June 30, 2025, our cash and cash equivalent was $336.8 million, up from $325.5 million on March 31, 2025. Now coming to the guidance. Over the past couple of quarters, the majority of our enterprise clients across industry verticals have taken a certain degree of caution with traditional digital transformation spending. This is something we've seen across our customer base. The said, innovation and projects, our client priorities from a spending point of view and Grid Dynamics has been one of the key beneficiaries of this trend.

Coming to the third quarter guidance, we expect revenues to be in the range of $103 million to $105 million. We expect our recent acquisitions contributing approximately 12% of the revenues. We expect our third quarter non-GAAP EBITDA to be in the range of $12 million to $13 million. For the third quarter of 2025, we expect lease share count to be in the range of 84 million to 85 million and our diluted share count to be in the range of 87 million to 89 million.

We are maintaining our full year revenue outlook of $415 million to $435 million, all of this despite an estimated low double-digit annual percentage reduced revenue from cautionary spending on traditional business, which we projected early in the year and it was affected by uncertainty with the macro environment.

In spite of these events, we continue winning innovation with projects and grow overall revenue. As Leonard pointed out, roughly 23% of our business is tied to AI and data, this momentum around AI business is growing, and we expect this to be higher in the quarters to come. That concludes my prepared remarks. We are ready to take questions.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Thank you, Anil. [Operator Instructions] First up is Mayank Tandon of Needham.

M
Mayank Tandon
analyst

I wanted to just maybe focus a little bit more on the pipeline and the pace of deal conversion. And if you could just talk about -- as you look at the guidance for the rest of the year, and let's take the midpoint, for example, how much of the revenue would you say is in the bag under contract?

And how much do you actually still have to go out and win? Just kind of give us a sense of your confidence level in terms of getting to your guidance range.

A
Anil Doradla
executive

So maybe, Bernard, if you want, I can kick off and then we can add. Yes. So Mayank, look, last quarter, there was this question, right? When we talked about $415 million to $435 million. And what we talked about is when you look at the low end of our guidance, that will be reached by some of the working time benefits that we see.

And we still maintain that. There is obviously organic growth. So if you look at the low end of our guidance, for example, if you model something to the effect of high single digits for the full year in organic growth and we maintain this momentum of about 12% from our acquisitions that gets you to the low end of the guidance, which is a good place to be.

Now we also said that there is -- there are 2 things that are happening. There are other new pipeline business, which I'm sure Leonard and the team will talk about. But there's other opportunities that are there. As you go from the low end of the guidance to the high end of the guidance, obviously, there is a little bit more on expectations on the acquisitions. So with that, I'll pass it on.

M
Mayank Tandon
analyst

Should I continue? Or...

A
Anil Doradla
executive

Yes, yes, go ahead, continue on.

M
Mayank Tandon
analyst

Okay. I guess my follow-up question would be around just so the key underlying drivers of the model. So how should we think about the pricing climate? How much more leverage do you have on utilization? And what are your hiring plans just given some of the demand trends you talked about. So if you could just touch on those 3 metrics, that would be helpful from a margin standpoint.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

Let me take it because Anil is not in the room, and that's connection itself. So first of all, let me finish the first part of your question. So -- the pipeline is very robust. We have a little bit of a conservative point of view because if you remember, when we were last time in the earnings call, we were talking about very good -- and indeed, there was a very optimistic part of the growth, but we want to be cautious because we don't know.

Then a lot of that happen next couple of months. And even though we finished the quarter had a solid record number. Still, it was not to the full expect. The pipeline, which was created in Q2 is extremely good. again, jumping forward, the July numbers player, but I don't want to jinx it again, but we look optimistic for the second half of the year quite a bit because the convergence of the projects, especially related to any kind of data and AI platforms is growing fast.

We're talking about 3x more than regulate business, but reality is almost all the customers across our universe are taken on the business associated either with a innovative project or with a substantial migration. And we're talking about not just POCs or quite good projects some hyperscaler with it as well. So when we look at the -- how much in the net versus how much is a bit of a stretch. And you mentioned to you that the low end to getting from low end to the midrange or require quite a bit of effort.

And at this point, we just stay in the range, and I think we'll have much better view by the end of the quarter. But right now, we're very optimistic is. At the same time, coming back to your second part, how we structured the pricing around the business associated with it. There are several aspects -- so first of all, we won't talk about our So when we are engaged with the technology innovated projects, as you can imagine, the price were fall because clients are trying to reach the goal of their internal value add to the business and to also the cost system. So there's a little bit of a competition for the talent.

And as you know, is quite well positioned. Now -- on the traditional business, there are various factors. We see a lot more pressure right now from the clients to scale the business with disparity the cost structure, the price structure being is different. So as you see, we continue to grow our headcount but it's not -- it's highly more proportional at least at this point to what we were when we were purely driven by the European engineering. Also with this global follow-the-sun model, we're signing the deals across various regions, particularly in Europe and in LatAm, which again has a different pricing model. So very hard to kind of create a common dynamic informed sectors.

But we see the vector is solid. We went through negotiations, most of all for this year. But there are some time negotiations for 2026. But very importantly, we're also addressing that with the weakening U.S. dollar some of the value factors for the European engineering cannot be addressed by purely time materials. So see our pads -- and now the game work is becoming very, very much into the into the solution base and that kind of gives us more positive attributes to how we build the business.

But overall, to summarize it, we embed heavily on our AI data business to grow, and it's a fantastic positioning where we are today with our technology capable. If you want to clarification, I'll do more, but I tried to cover a very growth base in 1 answer.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Next up is Puneet Jain of JPMorgan.

P
Puneet Jain
analyst

I wanted to ask about how like, Eugene, I think you talked about like how AI is changing the nature of work, specifically in this traditional SBLC cycle. But can you talk about like need for training or hiring employees differently. And it feels like your high experience within your workforce could be helpful, but I'd like to know your thoughts like I'd like to hear like how you think you might have to hire or train employees different as it prepared with animators the changes to traditional SBLC.

E
Eugene Steinberg
executive

Yes. Thank you, Puneet. Great question. And this is not something which we started to do just today, right? We started to do it quite some time ago preparing for future. And as we already said, we've always been a little bit of hiring on our talent, making a strong preference to the more senior, more capable, more, I would say, broad engineers. And in the new AI software development life cycle, the engineers who are working on the actual projects supported by the EEI agents, which are actually writing code and making modification to the code base, we are, I think, at the judges, right?

And the deep experience of engineered help to determine the nerve suggestions, which are made by the agent is good or bad suggestion. And this is where we see a lot of value, which is coming from more senior engineers. And at the same time, we invested quite a bit in the I would say, make engineers who grown with agents from the very beginning of their careers and we very natively coming out of our internship already armed with the understanding of these sales.

Our platform, which we are developing technology called game. It's a combination of the technology. It's not only about porting right, it's all through the whole cycle of development. starting from requirement understanding and doing and ending with deployment and testing conversation and production. It's all supported by the different kinds of AI agents. And engineers, seniors engineers and AI engineers are supervising those agents and them and guiding them to And of course, our review training program is preparing is engineers with like the traditional set prompt engineering, but right now, it's more like a context engineering like a little bit new term in the industry, which to help those agents to be successful and to drive on further. So that's a short-term business.

P
Puneet Jain
analyst

That context engineering this year we've been here impact a lot of the is. No, I appreciate the response. And obviously, like from investor standpoint, like we take a lot of questions on the reasons for slower growth in broader IT services, like whether it's macro, whether it's AI, let me ask that question -- this is like you have, like, say, verticals, say, for example, financial services, which has been doing great. And then verticals like retail, health care, CPG, not as great.

So are there any differences in AI adoption across these verticals? Or would you see like that growth difference across those verticals is purely like a function of macro or sector-specific challenges.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

So Puneet, I'll let talk about more specific. I think it's a very fundamental question. There's no slow down on AI adoption across all the verticals. What happened is in certain verticals, we're gaining momentum because the existing business, the traditional business, the cloud migration, new platforms and software development continues to expand while they adopt AI.

And the AI platform, their own homegrown platform to use our partnership, there's a lot of stopes going on. We even started getting some press from participation reduction in physical area. So we're really at the cutting edge of all the. There are some other verticals where the traditional business has been somewhere more. And obviously, because the retail and CPG was a substantial part of our business, and there are some traditional large legacy business, which has participation in Not mentioning all these promotions around the tariff strategies they're slowing down on a traditional software development, infrastructure and expense all the stuff. They continue to invest into AI front.

But what -- if you noticed Anil brought in some flavor talking about what could have been at that business will be slow down, it will be way above the upper range of the guidance. but it wasn't. And what we see right now is the redeployment of resources in a more traditional conservative fuels, which the, I would say, potential expansion is very limited where the other more aggressive expansion combined with the traditional So the bottom line conclusion AI growth supports very dynamic growth wholeheartedly. We have more than 1 platform. We have internal platform in external the world. We participate in many activities, which actually take decent does. So that's muted current business in terms of the more traditional areas start dragging a little bit down and is driven by those matters.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Next up is Brian Bergin of TD Cowen.

B
Bryan Bergin
analyst

I wanted to ask on the AI-powered engagement model. Can you talk about the early client testing and reception to that model? And how are you thinking about how fast JUXT ultimately gets adopted in your business. So what I'm specifically curious about it as it gets adopted by more, what's the impact going to be on the financial profile of the business as we think about growth and gross margin? .

U
Unknown Executive

All right. Maybe let me answer these questions. Thank you, Brian, for the question. So I would say first that we definitely see increasing demand for new types of engagements and AI-powered engagements. So this definitely should fuel future growth. So that's the first statement.

As for the particularly gain implementation. So as Eugene mentioned, it's a very comprehensive a holistic approach and how you approach the software and development life cycle by embracing those processes, technical tools, team composition and also the new commercial model. As a matter of fact, right now, we already apply certain aspects of this new platform at selected customers.

Primarily the easiest thing for us is basically to bring this platform in process to fixed-price engagements, which basically doesn't require the customer to rethink the EMO process on how they engage us. So from that perspective, we already see benefits by reducing -- primarily reducing the time line, which allows us to be more competitive also on the pricing side, right?

As for the full-fledged game implementation, including the commercial, we are in the phase of fine-tuning this whole model because it's truly innovative things. So DMOs are not ready to be a learning curve for them and it will be a learning experience for us to fine-tune that. But the good thing is that we are talking to actually, 2 out of our top 15 customers right now started starting piloting this model as soon as we make it as the process as smooth as possible to go into production.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

Margin portion. I think what at is kind of a foundational father of the model. So in running Americas, gives them a bit of upper hand with others. And when I was in Chicago the conference, first kind of briefly mentioned the ideas and turn that we're not alone. But what's important is the proven how much business we generate -- but what's more important, how they officially becomes to require a premium.

I would not talk about directly gross margin. I was talking -- I would refer to the profit margin as we grow. And you can really translate it back because it includes the partial ownership of the people, the platforms are proving pulling the conceptual business basically become a technology consultant to the client, understanding their business flavor of those verticals.

So we're trying to prove -- there are interesting points which you guys were touching us from the beginning of AI. Well, the engineers will disappear and how the new world is going to work. What is going to do to us, and this is going to be very important if we scale this program properly. It will substantially increase revenue per person. And why would it be is because we can use our top talent is just growing, but obviously never enough, right?

I mean, you see some of the notable big companies growing with 8-digit 9-digit numbers, right, into the people. Now for us, since they have such a good going up reinforce the clients to see what's important to that. And what's important to them is not only individual talents, but having a partnership with Grid Dynamics which makes measurable results. And those 2 clients, which was mentioned, we are far along the way.

And the reason they realize why it's important is because the pace of innovation substantially increases for the time and surpass their ability internally to conceptualize the business. So we're innovative, deploying and analyzing business at the same time. And the key point of that today, actually, if you look at the cross of the game offering and gain the data platforms because without a reliable and logical dedicated data platform on the client side of the business will be risky because the conversion may not be as valuable for the business.

So I would look at the revenue per person as we scale our company rather than fuel the margin, which obviously will be addressed by increasing margins.

B
Bryan Bergin
analyst

Okay. Okay. Makes sense. I also follow up just in the near term, the -- we'll talk about near-term margin and just understanding demand is choppy, you do have -- you've increased head count against how are you balancing keeping quality bench for a growth recovery and potentially investing around kind of nonbillable R&D right now versus kind of optimizing cost structure. Can you just talk about that dynamic in the near term, specific to '25.

A
Anil Doradla
executive

As you would expect -- I'm asking, Brian, because this is exactly what we're doing day in and day out right now. So it's something very interesting that we are doing within the company. There are 2 very important things that I'm working on. One as I pointed out is there is a certain degree of financial discipline that we have to embark upon right, in the short term to ensure that as a public company we have to just work on.

But there's another mandate that Leonard has given me, which is we have to double down and invest into future technologies, into future platforms and future personnel. So there are 2 parts of my whole kind of balancing app, so to speak. The focus that we're looking at is we are creating specialized pools of labor that are targeting certain specific technologies, and I'm sure the group here, they can talk a lot more whether it is a hyperscaler, whether there's some AI specific things.

We've developed internal platforms. So there's a lot of activity going on, on the tooling side to build these accelerators and platforms on the AI side. While we're doing that, we're taking a very closer look at our utilization bench on our more traditional side of business. And from that point of view, obviously, we're ensuring that we are a little bit more cost optimized.

So that's how we're working on it. And actually, if you look at from Q2 to Q3, some of my increased costs is because of investments in some of these engineering talent.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

So Brian, let me be very blunt because Anil was trying to be a little bit This is my absolute concrete determination we will need to be the top leaders in AI implementation offering to the clients. I know as Anil mentioned the public company need to do a single up, and we're doing it up. But we're doing the cleanup only to open up more capabilities. As far as I'm concerned, as you know, how remain stock has deteriorated for whatever reason you guys decided to consider to me, it's like I don't want to go back to where I was 3 months ago. I want to go 5x more than I was 3 months ago.

And the reason is the value we add to the system is going to be disproportional to everything we've done until the digital transformation with the cloud migration and public cloud to go up and we're actively participating by codeveloping the key products with our major partners. So answer your question, we will do the housekeeping, and I know we'll have to make sure that we don't do it randomly.

But I have a huge line strategy with technology organization. The development of the delivery capabilities following the sun, we have here on the table next time we'll hear also from some Indian representative there. But we have to make sure that in the U.S. and Europe, we're going to have a bespoke application platform.

And as of today, we want a major program actually will look out as well. So you will not hear for me for a quarter or 2 that we're going to be cautious -- we're going to be aggressive, intelligent and you will hold us back when things have become a little bit more -- but the way how we've been doing it for the last 18 months, even going through the liberation and all the other macro parts and run through ups and downs it would not reflect our determination in the modern AI, Agentic AI, physical AI the solution practices, we're going to be a goal.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Next up is Maggie Nolan of William Blair.

U
Unknown Analyst

This is Matt on for Maggie. Congrats on the quarter. I wanted to ask about the partner program and the impressive growth there. What's your outlook for partner growth into the second half of the year? Can that continue to accelerate? And I guess where are you seeing the most new traction today amongst partners outside of Google and the hyperscaler is it primarily those hypers?

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

All right. So you kind of accelerated that question. So that was my agenda for the next quarter. We're going to bring you ahead of the global partnerships to get very specific details on the partnership program because the model of an so operated today for Grid Dynamics is the focus on innovation, customer partnerships and a wide distribution of the game market.

So regions AI technology, internal platforms and a scaling partnership. So you asked a question where are we beyond hypers? First of all, hyperscalers is also in -- there are no longer hyperscaler is traditionally fighting for the space on the spending dollars on the cloud platforms only.

They're very actively participating on merging the platforms they built with the IT tile. Second part is we are also important with the Colossus guys, the major players, which enable the foundational capabilities like NVIDIA world because you need to have another layer without the physical layers with our capabilities -- it's hard to scale. But we are public with We are participating in a revolutionary way of changing the industrialization and again, industrialization is very important.

We're building aging tools and aging factors within the clients and partnering with their own teams as well with third parties, which are bringing AI tools. Now forget the fact is that some of the very, very innovative creative ideas come from the myriad of the new form AI, I was calling it some of those cargos getting capitalization were agreed today. This is where I love the world people throw money and then something works, right?

But these guys are brilliant and our job, Eugene job and some of the key people and the team job is to select the ones actually make sense. Now I don't want to issues It's great that you guys have so much money. But for us, we need to select the winners. So the three ways that the hyperscales in new models the big players who are bringing their own home own models as our customers.

We're enjoying efforts with partners and their own sale helping them to build the solution. And that's on one which is kind of exploding it's the industrialization point of the world with the fiscal year.

E
Eugene Steinberg
executive

Just want to add on the large traditional private sellers world talking from the European perspective, with the use traction, for example, with oil price, we are a little bit later compared to the U.S., but definitely, I see the traction right now. And it's high expect to both our more traditional search capabilities and comparison well around that. And on the other side, that Agentic AI platforms as well. So that's definitely a big portion of what we are doing right now. And I know reported the numbers, right, that we between got from partnerships in terms of the revenue.

U
Unknown Analyst

Great color. Can I follow up with a question on client count. I think obviously declined quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year, I think, primarily due to the rationalization of your portfolio. How long is that going to take a meal? And when do you expect we can see stabilization in that line item?

A
Anil Doradla
executive

So Matt, very good question. If you see over a pattern of several quarters, this has been kind of marginally going down. So if you look at it, there are a couple of parts with. The first part is that most of the decline comes from our acquisition-related clients. We've had 6 acquisitions in the past several years. And many of them have smaller clients.

And our whole focus is to look at the world through the lens of whether they are an enterprise customer or commercial customers. Our focus tends to be more on the enterprise, which is where we manage the program. We have more focus, whereas the commercial side of it could be just a cost plus as we had through some of our acquisitions or some of the smaller ones.

So at this stage, what we do is that as those projects roll off, many at times, we don't invest back in -- there are some cases from quarter-to-quarter. Some of our enterprise customers are also falling off, but that's not a very big portion of it. And we do have a little bit of a flavor of when we even come through the partnerships. There are some clients that try out work with us through the hyperscalers, and there's a little bit of an infant mortality there as they're pausing into the next round. So when I the way we define, we have a little bit of a structure at close towards defining what a client is.

If I do not get a dollar revenue in the quarter, and I just don't call them a client. Although there might be an MSA, there might be something out there. And within the 12-week month period, if they come back again, they're not a new client, so to speak. So a client can go now 3 quarters later, they come back, they're not a new client for me, they're within that 12 months, right? So we have a little bit of a strict approach towards this.

So I think you will continue seeing some of these things. At the end of the day, we can look at our top 30, top 40 customers that going to draw most of the value. Some of these smaller clients over time have come in the top 30 for us, but do expect at least in the near term, to see a trend like that.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

Let me just conclude that part of a very important message. As you go to see Grid Dynamics we believe that AI implementation in various forms will remain to be the key business. And there will be a huge value with a proper combination of the platform and the service providers. And I would say the classical form service consult very strong technology flavor with the number that Brian mentioned about how you manage it. We look at some of decline from the tail, and we don't invest into that relationship, too, because we feel they don't have capabilities to become a viable player in the near future. It doesn't mean way just tell you to divide.

But if they don't fit in the model of the new AI era, and we try hard to convince them there. You just don't have that priority from our focus. So you will see that some of the clients will grow exponentially because it's a meeting of the minds. We've done the clients in the segment are being paid as we go forward.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Next up is Surinder Thind of Jefferies.

U
Unknown Analyst

Picture question here. Let as you look forward to all of the changes that you guys are making in the transformation, what is the scenario that you're actually solving for meaning what is the level of AI capability? Are you planning for a scenario where 50% of software development and 75% is done by AI.

Like what are the kind of the framework what you're moving towards? Well, first of all, so the development is not the only area of well, as an example, right, that's a conceptual idea of the environment that -- because one of the things that's happening is changes have to be very rapidly, right?

And so if you're solving for something here and X, but by the time you get to X were it why you're going to be based on the constant evolution. How are you thinking about the evolution of the firm over the next 3 to 5 years?

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

Yes. So the evolution will take more than 3 quarters. This is going to -- it's a combination of adoption of the technologies, capabilities of the distributed systems and ability to generate the value of each individual in each individual case. 50% -- it's just a number. 30-50 -- and so enrollment, but please -- in my opinion, again, it's a small percentage of the change. There's a change of creating the value for the business and just trying to improve the quote.

I think that human touch will continue to be a big part of all the key decisions, but it's going to be in a different form. Now writing the code is all as well. And I think Eugene can comment more on that. There is ability to understand the deployment of the systems reverse compatibility of the systems.

Security to manage and control the future expansion of the systems. And we will have to nails on each of that separate. And the low how is going to take way more. It will take way lower than 50%. It's going to go substantially a large percentage of the co-development. As we continue to monitor and tend on the capabilities the progression will take a much longer time than some of those people want to make sure they have instant conversion.

So the people, the humans who are probably trained and assistants will have to define with ability to -- what is the future? Otherwise, you're going to move with -- we will have to say that we're in target, which is not a good solution because you continue to invest in something which is going to be aged in 6 months.

So to summarize that, on the basic coding level, value way more than 50%. On a system management integration, data compliance is going to be lower, but the effect tends to be proven on that analytical part of the system is going to be a combination of people and projects. And just another point, when people are talking about tests -- some of them will be 100% tasked by the agents. And when we're talking about the total system implementation, the percent you do well.

So I think it would be a good segue that Eugene, you can make comments.

E
Eugene Steinberg
executive

Yes, of course. And I understand that currently, in the matter for the examples of white coding, we're hanging full-fledged Facebook anybody who really kind of performing production bonding projects understand that building a prototype and putting something in production under old physician reticles in very different things.

And what we absorbed in our business is that I'm in charge of presales, for example, as a company. And our reserve is completely transformed by us. We are able to turn really very good prototypes and pilots very, very quickly to the customers. But then we are going into the real thing and implementation of the scalable systems, implementation of the system underload in secure environment with deployment and scaling requirements which are needed for production is completely in body.

And even the most sophisticated AI agents are very quickly losing their contracts and starting to the site. And they still need a lot of the human supervision and human design and thinking and the activity behind them to very simple like they are smart, they are smart, but as -- and this is why we are still kind of in -- we're still.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

You opened the quarter is trying for action.

U
Unknown Executive

We had multiple conversations on the topic. And 1 color I wanted to add is that AI has different flavors that it's in different stages of adoption because things like, for example, copies still an engineer write the code, but AI suggest to things, it will be widely adopted. Maybe if it's not 100%, maybe 95% or whatever, more kind of dependent actually on the security protocol within the customer, whether they want to be exposed to external the list. But this thing is like it's a done -- so what Eugene was talking about is more of agent-based I coding, and that's kind of the more complex topic, which will have for the kind of adoption curve for sure.

C
Cary Savas
executive

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Q&A session of our call today. I will now turn it over to Leonard Livschitz for closing comments.

L
Leonard Livschitz
executive

As we conclude our second quarter earnings call, I want to leave you with 3 key takeaways. Number one, Grid Dynamics AI-first strategy is driving our growth. The AI and data initiatives now account for a quarter organic revenue in the first half of 2025 growing nearly 3x faster than our overall organic business.

Number two, AI is fundamental to driving our clients' business forward. Enterprises are seeking AI native partners with the expertise to lead AI adoption at scale. This is the dynamic strength. Our expanded pipeline aligns with enterprise investments. And finally, Red Dynamics is built for sustained differentiation. We have a proven track record of emerging stronger through industry transitions. Based on reaccelerating client demand, we are confident in our outlook and our ability to empower Fortune 1000 enterprises and their AI journey. We're excited about the path ahead and the value we're creating. I look forward to giving you an update on the next earnings call.

Earnings Call Recording
Other Earnings Calls