Great Panther Mining Ltd
TSX:GPR
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
| US |
|
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
N/A
N/A
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
|
|
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Great Panther Silver Limited's First Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] The conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]I would now like to turn the call over to Alex Heath, Director of Investor Relations.
Thank you, Espie. Hello, everyone, and thank you for taking the time to participate in our call today. Joining me today are James Bannantine, President and CEO; and Jim Zadra, Chief Financial Officer.Before we begin, I'd like to mention that some of the commentary on today's call contains forward-looking statements. You should be cautioned that actual results and future events may differ from those noted in today's presentation. The commentary also refers to various non-GAAP measures, definitions and reconciliations that are included in the company's MD&A for the quarter ended March 31, 2018. All dollar amounts expressed in this presentation and the associated financial statements and MD&A are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.I'd like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay later today. Replay information and the presentation slides accompanying this conference call and webcast will be available on our website at greatpanther.com.I'll now turn the call over to James Bannantine.
Thank you, Alex, and welcome, everyone. On our call today, I'll start with a snapshot of our first quarter highlights, then we'll follow up with an overview of our operational and financial results, discuss our outlook for 2018 and finally conclude with questions and answers. Our highlights for the quarter are as follows. I believe we've made great progress on our economic and technical studies in respect to the restart of our Coricancha project in Peru, and we plan to publish the technical report for that project some time before the end this quarter, second quarter. To recap, Coricancha is a past producing mine with the potential of adding approximately 3 million silver equivalent ounces per year of production to our production profile, based on its historic production. This would represent, obviously, almost a 75% increase in our current annual production, so it's a very exciting growth opportunity for us. In Mexico, our operations performed in line with our annual guidance during the quarter, which saw improvements in many measures. Silver equivalent ounces was up 41% and revenues were up 38% over the same quarter last year. We also saw our all-in sustaining cost decline by 37% compared to last year. Many of you will recall that Topia's milling operations were suspended in the first quarter of 2017 to facilitate plant upgrades and the addition of a new tailing handling facility, and this was the key factor in the improved results, with Topia running full speed this year -- this quarter this year. Our balance sheet remain strong, ended the quarter with $60.9 million in cash and short-term deposits and $67.1 million in net working capital. As usual, we remain debt-free. Given our capital position and our team in place, we are well positioned to pursue additional growth opportunities in addition to Coricancha. In this regard, we remain focused on adding another mine or advanced-stage projects in the Americas. Since announcing the NI 43-101 compliant resource in December, we have done a lot of work in advancing our technical evaluations in support of a restart at Coricancha. As many of you recall, Coricancha has a fully permitted plant, which means that the CapEx associated with a restart is expected to be relatively modest. Most of the work expected will be development and rehabilitation of the mine, and it's expected to have a fairly reasonable and quick timeline.As I noted earlier, based on past production results, Coricancha has the potential to increase Great Panther's silver equivalent production by 75% or 3 million silver equivalent ounces. It will also provide us with an important base of operations in Peru, which is viewed as the leading mining jurisdiction in the Americas. On the operational front, our mines performed in line with our guidance for 2018. We expanded our silver equivalent ounce production by 41% compared to the first quarter of last year when the Topia plants was suspended for plant upgrades. We remain significantly leveraged to precious metals, with 44% of our current production in revenue terms from silver, 44% from gold and 12% from lead and zinc. Our percentage of gold production has increased as our gold at San Ignacio mine contributed a higher proportion of tonnage to the Guanajuato Mining Complex. Financial highlights for the first quarter of 2018 included a 38% increase in revenue. We were breakeven on the net income and EPS lines as a result of our approach of expensing all Coricancha project and care and maintenance costs prior to a formal decision to restart. We are also expensing all development and drilling at Guanajuato Mine Complex. Consolidated cash cost per payable silver ounce was $5.39, up from $3.54 in the first quarter of 2017, but within our 2018 guidance of $5 to $6.50. All-in sustaining cost per payable silver ounce in Q1 decreased to $12.33 compared to $19.55 last year and was slightly better than our 2018 guidance of $12.50 to $14.50. Last year's figure did include the cost of the plant upgrade at Topia despite the suspension of its production. Our cash position and net working capital increased to $60.9 million, to $67.1 million, respectively. And we continue to have no debt on our balance sheet. This represents more than enough capital to bring Coricancha into production and provides us capital to pursue other growth opportunities within the Americas. Turning now to our operations. Metal production from the Guanajuato Mine Complex, or GMC, was approximately 695,000 ounce -- silver equivalent ounces, which represented a 4% decrease over the previous year. This was attributed to lower tonnes milled and lower silver grades, partially offset by improved gold grades. Cash cost for the Guanajuato Mining Complex was $4.28 per payable silver ounce, up from $2.48 during Q1 of 2017. The increase was mainly attributable to higher mining cost per tonne and the strengthening of the Mexican peso. All-in sustaining cost increased to $9.01 per payable silver ounce from $7.59 last year, reflecting the higher cash cost and increased exploration development expenditures. At Topia, metal production was approximately 336,000 silver equivalent ounces, including approximately 186,000 ounces of silver. As I noted, Topia's milling operations were suspended during the entirety of Q1 2017 to accommodate plant upgrades and the addition of a dry tailings handling facility. Production is now reflecting normal operating parameters for Topia, which is performing in line with our expectations for 2018 guidance and beyond. For the first quarter at Topia, cash cost was $7.48, while all-in sustaining cost was $8.27 per payable silver ounce. I'd now like to hand the call over to Jim Zadra to discuss our financial summary for the first quarter.
Thanks, Jim, and welcome to all who joined us on the call today. As noted, revenues increased 38% to $17 million compared to Q1 of 2017 as a function of the higher metal production. It's more than offset lower silver prices, which would have otherwise reduced our revenues. Production cost increased to $11.8 million. The increase is mainly a direct function of the higher metal production and sales, but we also experienced higher mining costs on a per-unit basis due to the mining of narrower veins at the GMC and from higher-cost production from the Topia Mine, and finally, the results of the impact of a stronger Mexican peso. As a result, mine operating earnings were down, but our operations in Mexico still generated a healthy $5.2 million of mine operating earnings before noncash items. G&A expenses were up a modest 3%. And exploration, evaluation and development expenses, or EE&D, increased to $3.3 million compared to $2 million in Q1 of last year. The increase in the EE&D is primarily a function of the Coricancha project cost. As mentioned, we continue to expense all Coricancha costs in advance of a production decision.Primarily as a result of expense in Coricancha and other EE&D cost, we were breakeven in terms of net income and earnings per share. Despite the breakeven net income, our cash and net working capital positions improved to $60.9 million and $67.1 million as our operations in Mexico generated sufficient cash flow to fund the advancement of Coricancha and our head office cost. With no debt, we continue to maintain a strong balance sheet to put towards growth initiatives to enhance shareholder value.I will now turn the call back to our President and CEO, Jim Bannantine.
Jim?
Well, it appears we may have lost Jim on the call, who is dialing in from a different location. I'll conclude. This was a steady quarter for...
Sorry, Jim, I'm here. Sorry. Had it on mute. I would just like to summarize that this quarter was a steady quarter for us and puts us on pace with our production and cash cost guidance for 2018. Our mines are operating efficiently, and we expect to achieve production in 2018 of between 4 million and 4.1 million silver equivalent ounces. Cash costs are expected to be between $5 and $6.50 with all-in sustaining cost per payable silver ounce between $12.50 and $14.50. Coricancha is an important growth catalyst for Great Panther, and we are excited about the upcoming release of the results of our technical and economic study later this quarter. As noted, the Coricancha Mine has the potential to significantly increase Great Panther Silver equivalent production based on historical production. It also provides Great Panther with the base from which to expand within Peru and South America. Beyond Coricancha, we are also focused in evaluating further acquisition opportunities to enhance shareholder value. With over $60 million in cash and no debt, our focus in 2018 will be on leveraging our strong team to evaluate near-term production and development projects for potential M&A transaction. Priority targets will be silver and precious metal-dominant projects that are either in production or in advanced stage of development in mining-friendly jurisdictions within the Americas and at scale that makes a meaningful impact on our -- to our production and resource profile and are accretive on key per share financial metrics. So with that, I'd like to open the call for any questions.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Mark Reichman with NOBLE Capital Markets.
Cost per silver equivalent ounce, we're at the low end of the company's full year guidance; while all-in sustaining cost, we're actually modestly below the low end of guidance. So how do you see those numbers trending throughout the year? And were those numbers for the first quarter, were those kind of in-line? I mean, were you kind of expecting that?
Mark, we are pretty much right on guidance. We had a little bit of sustaining CapEx that was delayed from the first quarter into a little bit later in the year, so we expect to be on guidance for the rest of the year.
Okay. And then I think the exploration, evaluation and development expense related to Coricancha were kind of expected to be between $4 million to $5 million, as I recall, for '18. And I was just curious as whether those are still good numbers. And how much of that was spent in the first quarter?
They are still good guidance, Mark. And the first quarter was kind of pro rata to the year. Stay tuned for the study that will come out this quarter. And hopefully, the study would be -- could involve some project-based expenses, but that would be beyond care and maintenance.
Fantastic. And then just last question for me. When you look at silver equivalent ounces produced versus sold, and you look at the percentage, the delta between this quarter and last quarter, is this just a timing difference between provisional and final sales? Or is it related to inventory considerations? In other words, silver equivalent ounces production was, I think, was -- I guess, sold was down 6.4% relative to the fourth quarter, but produce was only down like 3.2%. So I was just curious as to whether that's just a timing consideration or whether your -- whether the inventory considerations play into that. The percentage number [indiscernible]...
Yes, production is the key number, Mark. The sales are a bit lumpy, depending on timing of shipments.
And we'll take our next question from Jake Sekelsky with Roth Capital Partners.
It looks like costs were a bit higher this quarter to GMC, and it sounds like this may have had to do with just simple mine sequencing. But can you guys just speak to that a little bit? I mean, have you expected to moderate over the next few quarters as you move on in the mine plan?
Jake, costs are up a bit. They're up a bit in Guanajuato. They're actually down a bit in Topia, but up a bit in Guanajuato, given the nature of the ore body and the width of the vein and ore-to-waste ratio that we're encountering. So it's a little bit -- we've been handling a little more waste, and that's the source of the cost increase. But you can also -- you also will notice what's happened to the Mexican peso. The Mexican peso was around 18 for the whole first quarter average. So that's down from where it was last year.
Sure. And then just secondly, can you walk me through the next steps of Coricancha once the updated study is out? And just kind of the timeline that you guys have in your head in as far as the production decision about there.
Yes. So we'll publish the study. And like we said, this quarter, not too long from now. That study is, as we've talked about before, will involve engineering, will involve some preliminary activities leading to production activities on the mine. So it'll be, as we've also said before, we'd expect to start activities this year, with the main ramp up being next year. Jim, anything else that I've overlooked on the cost questions?
No, I think you've covered it quite well, Jim.
And we'll take our next question from Heiko Ihle with H.C. Wainwright.
It's Heiko. Let me just congratulate you guys on decreasing your all-in sustaining cost for silver equivalent ounce by 15% from Q1 '17, by 4% from Q4. I thought that was quite impressive. Sort of basing on the first question you guys were asked with the all-in sustaining costs, I mean, you've only spent $0.3 million out of the $2.5 million to $3.5 million guidance for the year. You want to just sort of walk us through the quarter-by-quarter spend that you're seeing? Is it Q2-, Q3-heavy, given the long holiday season? Or when should we expect to see that? I mean, I had a little bit of a higher number in my model, that's the only reason why I'm asking.
I don't really think it's -- with all due respect, Heiko, I don't think it's material. We are very conservative and pretty much expensed most everything, including our development cost, and put most of our CapEx into sustaining CapEx. So the timing of that is a little bit, it's not linear quarter-to-quarter. But the CapEx for the year should be on our guidance, that $2.5 million to $3 million. And you should see a catch up in this from the low number in the first quarter in the next couple of quarters.
I wasn't trying to be difficult. I was just trying to see when you would see -- when you see it rather than if it's...
Yes, so it'll definitely be during the course of this year. And I think, like I said, I would think the weight of it would be in the next couple of quarters, we should be back on a linear path by the third quarter.
Fair enough. You've added about $8 million to cash and equivalents during the quarter. I mean, you went to $36.8 million to $44.6 million, and you had the short-term deposits decline by about $4 million and you decreased the trade receivables by about $4 million. I mean, in short, you just have a much bigger cash balance. Are you doing this for Coricancha or am I just reading way too much into this with suppliers just paying their bills as the year started and those types of things?
Jim, you want to take that one?
Sure. Heiko, in terms of the cash and the short-term deposits, it's really just what the mix happens to be at the end of the quarter. And the short-term deposits are all sort of greater than 90 days. So if we happen to have more of our cash in those short-term deposits, they get classified there versus the cash balance. So we tend to look -- in terms of cash, we tend to look at both balances together. And when you look at in that basis, as I think you've noted, that the net cash has increased. The receivables, too, as Jim mentioned earlier -- the sales tend to be lumpy. And it's -- that's also a factor with the receivables. So we could have situations where there's a large receivable that comes in prior to the end of the quarter, that could shift that balance quite significantly. I don't think there's anything there specifically related to Coricancha that's affecting those balances. Because the spend on Coricancha is pretty even and it's been pretty measured to date. So I hope that addresses your questions.
I just would add a little more color to your question, Heiko, as well, just to not lose the forest for the trees. We are, with our existing operations, cash flow positive. And we're applying that cash right now mainly to the development of Coricancha. But our strategy and our corporate profile and story is a profitable or a cash flow positive existing operation with a big growth project that inorganic for the company and then looking for another project on top of that.
And we'll take our next question from Bhakti Pavani with Euro Pacific Capital.
I had a question related to Coricancha. I know you guys are expecting to put out a technical study in Q2. But internally, do you have a projected timeline as to when you would like to bring Coricancha online?
In principle, Bhakti, next year. It's kind of the same answer to the previous question. We'd start preparing things this year and ramp it up next year.
And with regards to once you have the technical study out, do you guys intend to conduct further exploration program or updating the result estimate before bringing it online?
Could you say again, Bhakti?
I said do you guys intend to conduct any additional exploration program at Coricancha before bringing it online or updating the result estimate?
The nature of the project there and the nature of the mine is we're going to be much more efficient with additional explorations from inside the mine. So it's going to be much more efficient for us to develop it, get in there. And then once we're -- we've got the development open again and the mine is opened up, then we start to drill from there. So I think the drilling would be in parallel with the restart as opposed to before a restart.
Okay, that's fair. The MD&A stated about the legacy tailings, that the company has changed the reimbursement plan. Could you maybe provide some additional color with regards to that?
The company has changed the...
The scheduling of the reconnection work with regards to legacy tailings at Coricancha.
Oh, at Coricancha, okay, yes, at Coricancha, yes. So we're -- in Coricancha, we're working with approving government on a couple of things. One is what's called the modified closure plan, which was put in place by Nyrstar and we're continuing -- the previous owner, and we're continuing with the work on that, which involves both the relocation of the legacy tailings facilities as well as the rehandling of the old waste dumps. So those permitting updates from the old plant to the new plant are a work in progress in Peru right now with approving government. And we'll advance those in parallel with our decision on the restart.
Okay. I'm just kind of curious, the expense with regards to reclamation is still the obligation of Nyrstar, correct?
Yes, that's correct. And we are in fact being fully reimbursed for that.
Okay, perfect. With regards to increasing production, at this point, once the Coricancha Mine comes online, hopefully next year, the production will grow. But at the existing mine, GMC and Topia, do you anticipate or do you expect any production growth from those mines over the next year?
No, you remember the Guanajuato resource update that we published at the end of January showed a nice increase in our resources there. We expect to keep mining at roughly the same rate, but we now have a longer life in front of us with the new resource statement that we did there. So I would say Guanajuato's annual production rate should be more or less the same. I do believe, and you can see Topia is now running well, growing a bit, I think there could be some growth opportunity at Topia.
But you don't intend to increase production capacity at either of the mines, correct?
No, in terms of changing the plants? No, no. We've got excess -- a little bit of excess capacity at the plant at both of those mines. It's more driven by how much the mine can make, given the narrow-vein nature of the mines. And so we're -- the constraint is the mines at each place, not the plant.Okay. Any other questions, operator?
[Operator Instructions] And we'll take our next question from Mark Reichman with NOBLE Capital Markets.
Just looking out even beyond Coricancha to some of your exploration projects. I thought El Horcon was kind of interesting just because it could share some of the infrastructure at Guanajuato. And I was just wondering if you can maybe provide an update in how you're thinking about that project.
Yes. Thanks, Mark. El Horcon is not a near-term production candidate for us. It's got potential, but we're analyzing that. We're actually doing some trade-off analysis on that. If you look at El Cordon -- El Horcon's grades and mineralogy, it would involve some modification to the plant circuit at Guanajuato. So we've got to do technical analysis of that before we would include that as a near-term potential producer.
Is that something that you could, like, sell at some point or JV? Or is it just...
Yes, it could be. Yes.
Okay. And then secondly on the -- I think there were some additional corporate development expense this quarter. And I was just wondering, was that related to targeting kind of third-party acquisitions? Or was that related to some of the projects that you have ongoing?
The former, Mark. We're -- like we say, we're looking for projects, and that involves -- there's a cost to that.
At this time, there are no more phone questions.
Okay. Thank you, operator. And in closing then, I'd like to say that I'm pleased with the performance of our mines and encouraged with the advancement of Coricancha this quarter. I believe, with the team that we have in place and our capital position, both cash and balance sheet, we're well positioned to grow our company. I'd like to thank you for your participation in our call today, and on behalf of everyone here at Great Panther, I look forward to sharing our progress with you in the next quarter. And please stay tuned for the Coricancha technical study later this quarter.
Thank you, Mr. Bannantine. That concludes Great Panther's First Quarter 2018 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. Goodbye.