Renesas Electronics Corp
TSE:6723

Watchlist Manager
Renesas Electronics Corp Logo
Renesas Electronics Corp
TSE:6723
Watchlist
Price: 2 070.5 JPY -2.82% Market Closed
Market Cap: 3.9T JPY

Q1-2025 Earnings Call

AI Summary
Earnings Call on Apr 24, 2025

Revenue & Margins: Q1 revenue was JPY 351.8 billion with a gross margin of 56.7% and operating profit of JPY 83.8 billion. Results showed modest growth, but Q2 guidance is cautious.

Guidance Cut: Q2 revenue guidance reduced by a mid-single-digit percentage point due to tariff uncertainties and a conservative outlook.

Tariff Uncertainties: Management highlighted ongoing uncertainty from tariffs, leading to both downside risk and potential upside, but the direct impact is expected to be limited; the larger risk is a potential decline in demand volume.

Inventory & Channel: Inventory levels have been carefully managed and are close to target; channel inventory declined as sell-through outpaced sell-in in Q1, with further reductions expected in Q2.

IIoT & Industrial Strength: IIoT, especially non-automotive MCU, showed robust demand, contributing to positive sequential growth.

Automotive & AI: Automotive segment faces demand uncertainty, but China and upcoming product launches are bright spots; AI/data center business is growing but still less than 5% of total revenue.

Cost Reductions: Cost-cutting initiatives are making steady progress, including a change in depreciation policy that reduces costs, with further benefits expected in the second half.

Tariff Impact & Guidance

Management acknowledged significant uncertainty from tariffs, causing them to reduce Q2 guidance by a mid-single-digit percentage point as a precaution. While direct effects are expected to be limited, there is concern about indirect impacts such as reduced demand volume and changes in supply chain dynamics. The approach to guidance was characterized as conservative and somewhat psychological, given the lack of clarity on the situation.

Inventory Management

Inventory, both in-house and channel, has been well managed and is now close to target levels. Sell-through exceeded expectations in Q1, leading to a reduction in channel inventory. The company plans to keep inventories lean going into Q2 to support short-term demand amid uncertainty, but will maintain enough buffer to capture short lead-time orders.

Segment Performance

IIoT was a standout area with strong non-automotive MCU demand and robust booking trends. Industrial automation and factory automation demand is steady, though management remains cautious about major new capital investments. Automotive faces mixed dynamics: China remains strong, especially in EV, ADAS, and powertrain, and new generations of automotive MCUs are launching, but global demand remains uncertain.

Cost Control & Efficiency

The company reported progress in cost reduction initiatives, including operational efficiencies and a change in depreciation policy that will reduce expenses. These actions contributed to improved gross and operating margins in Q1. Management expects the benefits of cost reduction to become more visible in the second half of the year.

AI & Data Center Growth

The AI and data center business is showing robust growth and is expected to continue its momentum. However, it remains a small portion of total company revenue (less than 5%), so while the growth is strategic, it is not yet a major driver of overall results.

Strategic Investments & Platform Launch

Despite near-term cost focus, management stressed the importance of continuing investments, especially in digital automation, R&D, and new platforms like Renesas 365, which is slated for a full launch next year. The new platform is differentiated by automated, deeply integrated data connections. Management sees further opportunity in both organic development and possible future acquisitions, particularly in PLM and advanced simulation.

Macro & Customer Behavior

Customer demand trends varied by region and product. China’s economic stimulus and consumer replacement cycles are supporting near-term consumer electronics demand, while European and Japanese automotive customers are shifting to newer platforms. However, broader macro uncertainty is causing customers (especially in automotive) to take a cautious, wait-and-see approach.

Revenue
JPY 351.8 billion
Change: 1.2% revenue growth.
Guidance: JPY 302.0 billion for Q2.
Gross Margin
56.7%
Guidance: 55.0% for Q2.
Operating Profit
JPY 83.8 billion
No Additional Information
Operating Profit Margin
27.9%
Guidance: 25% for Q2.
Net Profit
JPY 73.3 billion
No Additional Information
EBITDA
JPY 103.5 billion
No Additional Information
Q2 Revenue Guidance Change
mid-single-digit percentage point reduction
No Additional Information
Depreciation Cost Reduction
JPY 3.1 billion benefit in Q1
No Additional Information
Revenue
JPY 351.8 billion
Change: 1.2% revenue growth.
Guidance: JPY 302.0 billion for Q2.
Gross Margin
56.7%
Guidance: 55.0% for Q2.
Operating Profit
JPY 83.8 billion
No Additional Information
Operating Profit Margin
27.9%
Guidance: 25% for Q2.
Net Profit
JPY 73.3 billion
No Additional Information
EBITDA
JPY 103.5 billion
No Additional Information
Q2 Revenue Guidance Change
mid-single-digit percentage point reduction
No Additional Information
Depreciation Cost Reduction
JPY 3.1 billion benefit in Q1
No Additional Information

Earnings Call Transcript

Transcript
from 0
Operator

Thank you for making time out of your busy schedule today to join us at Renesas Electronics Corporation for the First Quarter of FY '25. [Operator Instructions]

Speakers today are Mr. Hidetoshi Shibata, President and CEO; and Shuhei Shinkai [indiscernible] and CFO. [indiscernible]. Before Shibata, Mr. Shinkai will explain the first quarter financial results, which will be followed the question-and-answer session. The entire presentation is scheduled to last 60 minutes. The presentation material is uploaded on the IR section of the company's website. Mr. Shibata, the floor is yours. Please unmute yourself.

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

[Interpreted] Good morning, everyone. This is Shibata speaking. Providing guidance for the second quarter. The tariff impact is still uncertain. So we have worked logically reflected impact [indiscernible] in the guidance. However, having said that, given uncertainties, we do see abstract view about the upside opportunity in downside risk. So we did reflect some [ haircut ] but there is no logical background behind that, but it was [ technological ] haircut.

Talking about the market view roughly speaking. It's like repeating myself, but there are both positives and the negatives [indiscernible] business. I think there will be some conservatism for many in a wait-and-see mode. Our Industrial, it seems that no material change has taken place. The inventory correction was nearly completed in Q1 and we observed some very gradual recovery. But looking at the future, there are still uncertainties running over the tariff impact.

Notably speaking, some disruptions on the segment closer to consumers like home appliances, PC, while there could some impact on the demand before the impact of the tariff maybe in Q1 or Q2. And regarding data center and AI, that's a trend that has not changed. So steady growth is on the horizon, especially for the second half [indiscernible] generation upgrade, I think, will progress.

And for mobile, a modest upside could be expected. And for [indiscernible] 28 nano, I think it will be outside of China. So for the second half, while we have seen some positive news, our expectation was getting elevated. While of course at this point, so we cannot foresee the exact impact of the [indiscernible]. So over the short term, while there could be some disruption but we do not want to be disrupted by that.

Also, we positioned this year as the year of the change and also with the tariff situation, a lot of the certainties [indiscernible] for the business. Also, IoT is something that we need to be ready for. So we need to really focus on the medium- to longer-term initiatives. So from that perspective, [indiscernible] with the organic opportunities, we will focus on looking at investment opportunities with a mid- to long-term perspective, especially in such an environment that we stand today.

For Q1 results and the guidance for Q2, I would like to hand over to Mr. Shinkai and he will give you the presentation on the numbers. Mr. Shinkai, please.

S
Shuhei Shinkai
executive

[indiscernible] I would like to go over the first set of results based on the presentation period. Please turn to Page 4.

[indiscernible] for the revenue, it's JPY 351.8 billion. For the gross margin was 56.7%. Operating profit was JPY [ 83.8 ] million. [indiscernible] was 27.9%. For the profit was 73.3 billion. EBITDA was JPY 103.5 million. Currency was JPY 155 against the dollar and JPY 161 against the euro. Compared to [indiscernible] was smaller. It ended up as a 1.2% revenue growth.

Next page, please. [indiscernible] gross margin and operating margin. On the revenue, it was negative 2.1% [indiscernible] in the forecast. The FX impact of high sales grew net-net positive. Excluding the effect was negative. And so small upside, but the enhancement [indiscernible]. For the fireal estate revenue, excluding the the FX, forecast [indiscernible] at actual was 1.0% increase, as I said earlier.

And for IIOT, compared to the forecast, it was positive. But definitely, it was negative against the forecast. The rises because we surprised the shipment so that the inventory will not increase too much from unethical or AI and home appliances had some upside on that led to a positive growth. For gross margin, it was was due 2.7%.

The key factors of the operational cost of decrease on utilization and better product mix. A production cost benefit was 7% benefit. There were multiple reasons. The production of fixed cost savings was higher than plan. Specifically, the repair cost and [indiscernible] costs were improved, and we were easy to enjoy the benefit of reducing those and also [indiscernible] and we try to consume less electricity, which also benefited on the cost side.

And also the accounting impact was not fully in operated. For the inventory, we were not be able to oversee the rebound from that. And there are also multiple cost improvement that led to this positive growth. Improved [indiscernible] rate increased [indiscernible] utilization rate was slightly higher than the plan, but that led to a better gross margin.

For operating profit margin, compared to forecast, it was better by 3.1%. The operating margin increased increased and also compared to the the planned cost reduction has [indiscernible]. And for development delay or the R&D OpEx was lower. Q-on-Q, [indiscernible] the revenue excluding the FX, it was negative 2.9% that was revenue was posted [ 41% ]. Well for gross margin, it was 1.9% growth. Q-on-Q, the utilization rate increase about -- those were the reasons.

And for the Q-on-Q, I would like to make one additional comment regarding the depreciation cost. On FY '25, with the production of equipment [indiscernible], there would be the change in the life cycle of the equipment and also who using the equipment but we assess that. But to better reflect the reality, we [indiscernible] and with now the depreciation period was revised again.

Previously, on depreciation period was over 5 years, but this was extended to 8 years. Onward, this will be implemented, and we will not reflect us in a retrospective manner. So the impact is a reduction of depreciation cost by JPY 3.1 billion from this this quarter.

On the operating income margin, but OpEx increased Q-o-Q. We made efforts for cost control, but in Q4 of 24, there was no one-off at that led to cost reduction also Q-on-Q, the cost increase. And by segment, for automotive, the operating margin in perform, that was a one-off factor, which was the receiving the development cost Q-on-Q basis, the operating margin went down for 2 there was the one-off factors in Q1, when we put the reserve of the litigation fee also on Q-o-Q compared to the revenue growth, the operating margin did not grow as much.

The next page, please. This is showing quarterly revenue trends. Please refer to the on the far right for the 1Q results Overall, we had a decrease 12% year-on-year and plus 5.5% Q-on-Q. However, exchange impact excluded, we had minus 6.8% year-on-year. You can see the breakdown by segment below. Please go to the next slide. And these are showing financial numbers and their trend for your reference. Please go to the next slide. And this is the inventory status. We have our own in-house inventory and sales channel inventory, starting with the top right. This is showing the in-house inventory.

In first quarter, Q-on-Q, both actual amounts and DOI both decreased. DOI was decreased by 2 days. For die bank, we mainly received replenishment from the foundries for smartphones and AI servers, digital power, die bank, were mainly replenished. On the other hand, the consumption of finished goods and also the appreciation of the yen at the end of the quarter resulted in a decrease in the actual amount.

As for the second quarter, the production plans are expected to remain largely unchanged and inventory levels are expected to remain roughly flat. We want to support short-term demand. So we don't want to limit inventory too much. This has been the policy, and we will continue with this policy.

And the bottom right is showing channel inventory. You can see in the first quarter, sell-through was higher than expected, mainly due to IIoT and overall channel inventory was reduced more than expected, both actual amounts and WOI decreased Q-on-Q. For automobile, channel inventory decreased but mainly for Japanese companies sell-through increased more than our expectations. And as a result, the WOI increased slightly.

This goes back to what I said about reduced shipment when I explained about the revenues. As for IIoT, sell-through increased from our expectation and as a result, channel inventory decreased steadily. In the second quarter, in the base case, we plan to reduce channel inventory for both automotive and IoT. The intention here is to keep inventory lean due to the large uncertainties. And as for the upside, we will cover upside from the in-house inventory.

And in order to assess the impact of tariffs, as Shibata mentioned at the outset, we are being rather conservative in our views particularly on the sell-in side, we have been conservative. On the other hand, for the sell-through in the second quarter, we assume that sell-through will be greater than sell-in, resulting in a decrease in channel inventory and WOI. However, there are still some uncertainties with respect to sell-through. So if the situation turns downside, both inventory and WOI will be higher than expected in the second quarter.

Please go to the next slide. This is showing utilization rate and on the left-hand side is the utilization rate. In the first quarter, we had a slight increase in the utilization rate from forecast. And from the second quarter and beyond, we expect overall utilization rate to be flat from the first quarter. Depending on the factories, there may be increased production. However, some others are slightly reducing their utilization rates due to holidays. So overall, we expect the rates to be flat.

As for the capital expenditures, we continue to see the same trend. We will have a lot of capital expenditures outside of production. But from this fiscal year, we have been imposing stronger control over from the point of cost and cash management.

In the next slide, this is the Q2 forecast. Please refer to the dark blue column in the middle. The midpoint forecast is JPY 302.0 billion; gross margin, 55.0%; operating profit margin of 25% exchange rate assumption is JPY 142 to the dollar. This is a JPY 12 higher Q-on-Q and JPY 156 to the euro, which is JPY 5 increase from Q-on-Q.

I would like to give additional information on the revenue. midpoint forecast is JPY 302.0 billion. As you can see on the right-hand side, this is minus 15.8% year-on-year and minus 2.2% Q-on-Q. This Q-on-Q minus 2.2%. And the breakdown to the device revenue, the appreciation of the yen will be minus 7.0%. So on the second line, you can see increase by 4.8%, excluding exchange impact.

On the other hand, Altium impact results in minus 0.5%. So device revenue, excluding the FX impact is plus 5.3%, as you see on Line 3. And so this 5.3% increase Q-on-Q is broken down as follows: Automotive is slight increase. On the other hand, I mainly contributes to this plus 5.3% increase. And as for the impact of Altium, minus 0.5%. This is due to a technical reason. In the first quarter, new sales recognition standards have been introduced because this shift took place midway through the first quarter.

The timing or rather the periods for which these new standards are applied longer in the second quarter than in the first quarter, and this results in the revenue numbers. And the gross margin of 55.0%, this is minus 175 basis points. Q-on-Q, and this is mainly due to exchange impact and increase in manufacturing costs, 1/3 are coming from the exchange impact and 2/3 from the manufacturing costs.

We have an increase in utilities both in unit price and usage volume resulting in increased costs and also repair cost and project costs to optimize the production footprint. This contributes to the increase. We've continued our efforts to reduce costs. But looking at Q-on-Q numbers, operation-related cost increase and project-related cost increase were bigger than cost reduction.

As for the 25% operating profit margin, this is 215 basis points Q-on-Q. Major reasons are the exchange impact and the decrease in the gross profit margin. And also we have factored in R&D expense increase. This is mainly SoC for automotive. Generation 5, our car R&D increase contributes to the increase in R&D, for example, hiring more people in India and procurement. So overall cost increases. So that's the forecast for 2Q.

And I would like to also provide an explanation on the appendix slides. Please go to Page 16. This is the non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliation second from the right, the nonrecurring items appear to be large, there is JPY 18.1 billion, and this is onetime costs related to structural reform, business sales, goodwill related the write-off RIF and other structural reform-related costs as well as provision for litigation costs are included in these onetime items.

Please go to Page 18. This is the highlights. And Altium PMI, as part of this effort, although small in scale, now Altium acquired a company called Part Analytics and for the divestiture of RF business I talked about goodwill in relation to the sale of business and the fixed asset impairment. This comes from this divestiture of RF business in the embedded world, Renesas 365 has been launched. This concludes my explanation. Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you for the presentation. Now we'd like to go into Q&A session. Mr. Shibata, please turn on camera. [Operator Instructions] So the first question is from Mr. Takayama from Goldman Sachs.

D
Daiki Takayama
analyst

I have 2 questions. First, [indiscernible] mentioned use of comment that there was some modest haircut to the guidance. What is the magnitude of that? And what exactly do you mean by that? I guess this will be subject to the tariff. What would be the direct impact in the indirect impact to your business? I would assume the direct impact will be small. But the tariffs mean less volume for your -- to a certain extent, the supply chain sharing will be done with the tariff? So can you explain the actual impact to there?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Yes. So [indiscernible] is what I said in my comments. It's like a midstream growth percentage point here [indiscernible]. On our operation, we fixed the currency because otherwise, we won't make it difficult to manage the business. So with the fixed currency basis, we can round it down. So there's no logic behind that. It's very emotional and psychological.

And regarding the [indiscernible], as you pointed out, the direct impact would not be that material. And for indirect impact, of course, within the supply chain, Well, there could be some share of margin. But more than that, I think the impact may be greater on volume. Of course, it depends on the products and depends on the future outlook. But generally speaking, if the product is priced at JPY 3 billion and if we price like 25% normally, the volume will come down. So I would expect the volume decline as the indirect impact of the tariff.

D
Daiki Takayama
analyst

Also, to confirm, you mentioned [indiscernible] this level of expectation as revenue, and you reduced that outlook by mid-single-digit percentage point? Is that right?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Yes, that is correct.

D
Daiki Takayama
analyst

My second question is I want to unsatiated for different businesses. [indiscernible] are increasing your market share, so the mix and as mobile upside, I think those are the 3 key factors. From Q2, I expect the trend to continue as you're expected Q1, as you look forward to the second half. Are you seeing some signs of weakness?

U
Unknown Executive

I would try to not to mislead you, but this is about the second half. So from Q3 onwards. Well, it's really difficult to see the future, but at this point trying to see our business growth, but we do see some positive data. For example, in Q1 in Q4. compared to the earnings -- if you ask, are we more optimistic or pacific, we are slightly more optimistic. And I'm repeating myself again, but I do to the trip. At this point, it's difficult to first let the impact on the volume. So that factor needs to be discounted. But looking at the specific factors in the second half, we do see some positive signs of trend.

D
Daiki Takayama
analyst

You are mentioning that from Q3 onward, but in your Q2 guidance, you have mentioned about the past menu going up 5% in effect. You mentioned that it's mostly from IIoT or non out of business. Also, is this upside coming from the different factor?

U
Unknown Executive

Yes, for Q2 the demand will not go up substantially by different factors. But as I said earlier, in Q1, the channel inventory has been nearly pretty corrected. And with that, looking at the underlying demand, we will be shipping reflecting the underlying demand. So our son should grow to a certain extent. And still through may be more stabilized or maybe just a slight pickup from the trough. So that's how we see the trend. So the end demand may be weak. But I feel as to positive or negative, we see some positive growth. And then we are selling because the inventory correction has been completed, so they should come.

Operator

Next, UBS Securities, Mr. Yasui.

K
Kenji Yasui
analyst

This is Yasui from UBS. I have 2 questions. The first question, the negative factors seems to be around being said that, within the expectations of tariff impact, if you have any positive upside. For example, anything on the supply chain or for data centers, we are seeing significant changes. So perhaps you want to capture the data center demand ahead of others? So at this time, is there any factors for you to think that demand may be stronger for some businesses? Do you foresee any positive factors at this time? That's my first question.

And the second question, the automotive impact, I believe, is something you mentioned. -- and companies that can be on the offenses now taking the approach of wait and see. So I would like to ask about the demand situation given that automotive demand is uncertain. Have you seen any differences in behavior amongst your customers? Are they more active in introducing new platforms? So have you seen any strategic change among your customers? Those are my questions.

U
Unknown Executive

Thank you. Regarding your first question, needless to say, this is not something structural or sustained. But looking at the recent situation, for example, PC home appliances, at least our expectation, perhaps 2Q will have a slight decrease from the first quarter. However, these are areas that will be maintained at relatively high levels. China's economic stimulus measures, the government giving out subsidies for replacement with new products or because of the 90-day pause on tariffs, maybe companies want to make and sell products during this provisionary period. So I think there is a mix of both reasons.

So areas closer to consumers, like the PC, consumer devices and home appliances. These are the business areas that in the near term may have an upside and maybe they will remain at a relatively higher level or even have an upside. So that's the image. As for Automotive segment, towards the second half of the year. As I said in the beginning, there is a topic of Gen 4 of our car, but this is small, but the launch of 28-nano MCU launch will be bigger. There are 2 reasons.

The first one is that China clients, China customers continue to be quite robust, and they continue to adopt this into their new platforms. For EV, we have the powertrain the component chips for ADAS we are seeing greater adoption in these areas. So of course, in the short term, VV, PHV, which is better, there may be some ups and downs, but the momentum is there. We expect a strong and robust launch mainly in China, in EV, ADAS and powertrain. So these are the possible areas. And the other factor is Japan, Europe, these are the central regions.

We are seeing Tier 1 customers and their platforms evolving their generations of their platforms. And partially, this will result in a net increase and replacement from 40-nano. So 28 nano will replace the 40-nano in an increasing manner. The new platforms will be launched and -- this gives us somewhat of certainty. This is certainly a positive factor ultimately, the final demand, we are not sure China's OEMs compared to them, there is greater uncertainties with respect to the demand. Those are largely the factors that I can share with you now.

K
Kenji Yasui
analyst

I have something to supplement regarding data centers. Data centers are certainly garnering attention. an auto assembly perhaps they are struggling a little bit. So in relation to the supply, maybe this is lagging behind. Will this have any impact on the demand? Have you seen any increase or decrease?

U
Unknown Executive

Our AI business in terms of growth has been strong. but it only accounts for less than 5% of the total company's revenues. So whether it's big enough to shift company's posture, it is not. But in terms of growth, we do expect the growth to continue to be robust. The reason I say this are because of course, I will not go into individual customers or details. But business related to power. This is an endeavor. This is a difficult business. just because a company is an established supplier, they will not be called upon and they will not be able to increase their sales. This is not how things go in this business.

Given the situation the generations that is currently being mass produced the next and the ones to be launched in the second half in terms of the platforms that are expected. Of course, we are working on many trials. And so far, we have been able to avoid any troubles, there are so 2 companies or 3 companies are now fighting over the power socket business. or maybe segmenting. But overall, we are positioned relatively in a very strong position.

So coming from this first quarter to the second quarter, we see steady growth. And furthermore, from the second quarter to third quarter and beyond, of course, these are future quarters. So it's perhaps better not to have any predictions or estimates in terms of figures, but we do expect steady growth as Sean has just now indicated, the troubles that you refer to these small mishaps whether they are headwinds or tailwinds for us for us, there are tailwinds.

Operator

Ms. Mikio Hirakawa from BofA Securities, please unmute yourself and ask your questions.

M
Mikio Hirakawa
analyst

In the business earnings call, is that including teaming positively in contest reduction is making good progress. And at this point, uncertainty in uncertain environment. Can you conclude the appropriate? And what's your progress at the end of Q1. That's my first question. Yes. We'll ask Mr. Shinkai to take that question.

S
Shuhei Shinkai
executive

Yes, regarding the cost reduction plan and in the progress the industry but we want to impact the operating margin percentage point. In today's earnings call, I mentioned that the impact of the change in the accounting policy, but changing the depreciation expenses is not within if you interpret, we should expect a 6 percentage point improvement approximately on the operating margin. And overall, the impact is no more low ended toward the end of the year.

Also in Q1, Q2 improvement only to modest some may actually not be even be visible because it's very modest. But the cost reduction program over is progressing slightly above the plan in the second half. We will continue to make efforts making real the benefit to the cost reduction for grain the second half.

M
Mikio Hirakawa
analyst

I see. My second question is on starting up mostly [indiscernible] by deposit. And we made the case that's a lot in the market that we to engage in the turnaround of speed, I think, is a constraint in the market behavioral speed situation?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

To add to Mr. Shinkai's as previous comment before answering that question. Now the cost reduction effort is making steady progress. So as Mr. Shinkai said, we are seeing good progress. But as one, we are also keen to make investments. And this is because there will be a short-term impact on returns and the impact on the economy and the demand.

But this event that we are observing today. many countries were wake up comes because to date, for many years, earlier were talks about the global trade being changed in the local economy impart getting to different blocks. But it's quite a nice we, ourselves and also many of the markets are am I dismissing that. But I think with this recent event, many companies in the countries have been awaited not just ourselves, like China also benefited from being part of the supply chain for China, this will be a bigger break up old also how business is run by the competitors and the clients may fundamentally change.

Also having said that, in order for us to survive and not to be a company that's needed to needs to be addressed with the mid- to long-term perspective. we're utilizing the power of digital, we need to accelerate investment because at automotive we see some change in the market share of the in microcontrollers. Chinese players are fairly rapidly increasing their presence. And so as a countermeasure, we would like to be active in investment. And that we will be looking at the operation but we will not just pursue improvement in operating margin and also more focus and emphasis on investing the future opportunities.

And switching to your next question about [ full speed ]. We are actually in the middle of dealing with that. So at this point, there are not many things that I can talk about. That one direction as early May, after the Holy Week, then will be the earnings announcement from [indiscernible] and the 10-Q submission. So I think that will be 1 on for. So we will be looking at that. and hoping that we can make some progress. But we are currently working on this issue was in the next 2 weeks or so, this should make some progress. Also, I'd love to ask for your patience for another couple of weeks.

And are we going to be involved in the management of Wolfspeed? At this point, my answer is no. With a perspective, the SIC demand in the EV takeup and also with the change in the geopolitical situation, I think a lot of things will be changing also we are open to what we are going to do over the long run. But at this point, we are not going to roll up is please to deeply get involved in the turnaround of speed. So at this point, we have no intention of doing that.

Operator

Next, Daiwa Securities, Mr. Okawa. Please unmute and ask your questions.

J
Junji Okawa
analyst

I am Okawa from Daiwa Securities. I have 2 questions. The first one, IIoT segment. There may be some overlap, but the second quarter forecast, just IIoT, it's a 10% growth Q-on-Q. But you have industry infrastructure and IoT. If you break down by these different areas, what are the growth respectively, the Texas Instruments had an announcement this morning, and they were quite aggressive for the Industrial business, but I didn't get that from this presentation. So I was wondering if there are any differences? So that's my first question.

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

So industry, this term is always difficult. What do we mean by industry? And I think depending on the answer, we mean different things. So industry automation, factory automation, the so-called these things, the hard core industrial, then if we only look at that, I don't think this is going to have a very strong performance and the end demand is moderate. But as I said before, the inventory reduction is now completed. So in terms of sell-in from us, we expect growth in the second quarter.

However, given the current situation, investments into factories are unlikely -- there may be some semiconductor factories to be constructed in the U.S. but elsewhere, we cannot expect much at least that's my thinking. And in terms of industry, normally, we may refer to energy -- or in our case, we have home appliances or we call them smart appliance. So all these things may or may not be included. It depends on the categorization, how you look at it. But as I said before, Sequentially, Q-on-Q, there may be some ups and downs, but the underlying trend remains strong. But perhaps this area may also be impacted by China-related factors and some last-minute demand or rush demand whether these things continue in the second half or not, we have to be cautious in observing.

But at least for the Q1 and 2Q, we think that this remains quite robust as a data point that I can share with you MCU for nonautomotive segment. This is mainly for industrial, and this is used in broad-based markets. For this business, looking at the current booking trends so far, it's very robust. And in terms of the 4 product group segmentation, it is the strongest, actually, of the 4. So if TI is saying that this area is strong, then that's the same for us. We are strong given the current situations it's unlikely that huge investments will be made into the industrial area. So we should reserve a cautious view on this.

J
Junji Okawa
analyst

The second question regarding the software, the new platform between Renesas and Altium, what has been your views so far has been the reaction and other companies are also making investments into the software area. Is there any area that you'd like to strengthen going forward? Is there any area that is currently lacking? Is that why R&D expenses are going to increase?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Well, we've only just showcased this. So the full scale launch will be next year. So it's still early to talk about it. Having said that, at a glance, what you see on the screen and in videos, you may feel that there may be similar products out there. What is decisively different is that in the background, all the data is connected. In the past, there have been similar things, similar products available, but interpreting data or data being connected to something else or the validation, the verification, all of these things were done manually by human.

What we've showcased is that everything is connected data is all linked and everything is automated and that is the fundamental difference. So at least technology-wise, the launch and the preparations have been going steadily and I myself, I'm very much looking forward to the launch. The remaining challenge is what to be put on top of this, I call them ingredients. So what devices, what solutions can be on board. And this requires a substantial effort. So we need to be on top of that. to ensure success. The technology that goes into the platform, there's no doubt about it. I am very confident about what's to be placed on top of this platform is going to be a significant challenge for us.

So Okawa-san and others I hope you will have a critical eye on this. So what is lacking today? Largely, there are 2 things. function-wise, some of the functions are already there, but for PLM, product life cycle management, this is where we are still lacking. And this is an area that needs to be addressed. Of course, we are working in an organic manner, but perhaps at some point in the future bolt-on something like an acquisition may be necessary.

There's nothing concrete that we are currently considering. This is something we've been talking since before we may need something in the future. is for the broad-based market for broader audience. Last year, when we made the announcement back in February, we are going to reach a broader audience. but that will not be sufficient. We also need to go after the enterprise segment to customers. In order to attract them, we may need to come up with something to attract these customers, maybe very sophisticated simulations or design capabilities may be required to do so.

So are we going to acquire them through partnerships or through other means? This is another thing to consider. But for now, we've just made this announcement of Renesas 365. So towards the launch next year, we will continue to thoroughly work on the implementation. That is our absolute priority.

Operator

The next question is from Mr. Fujiwara from Citigroup.

T
Takero Fujiwara
analyst

This is Fujiwara from Citigroup. I have 2 questions. My first question is for the Altium business. How we are starting to see the utilization of the group and including yourselves or the impact on that tariff? How is the putting going to be had within the supply chain? What is your view, Mr. Shibata? How will that go?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Over the short run, what I was saying that they will try to make sure that the tariff offer in [indiscernible] the component suppliers, but the prices can be raised as they will not be able to bear the burden of the driver. So how is the burden going to be shared within the supply chain. Well, from that point, it's a very difficult question to answer.

I'm hoping that the impact will not be material.

But in reality, reason could be -- what is going to be the strong factor in price setting is the competitive landscape of the suppliers. Also some will say, I will take the tariff burden and we will lower the price. That is going to be the biggest determining factor. So with the tariff the demand in the volume outlook is uncertain. And if there is impact on the ASP, then the situation is going to be very challenging. Also with a good way, we will try to get the understanding of the client to overcome the stats, but also at this point.

T
Takero Fujiwara
analyst

I see. My second question is a little bit more short sighted. Looking at the inventory level, the in-house inventory is now close to the target level, and I think that that's been the case for 3 consecutive quarters. Also with uncertainties to linger demand no inventory. Do you consider the in-house inventory further? And also or your cost factory, can you give us the update on your [indiscernible] plan?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Regarding the in-house inventory, we should not be proud about this but we've been able to well manage the inventory. So at this point, we do not feel the need to make changes here. But if we were to work out some change. If the demand shrificantly, that will mean that the spike up. So we will try to manage that and control that will take countermeasures.

But as we have seen in the peers' results today, and they have been saying that like that, we have a lot of short-term -- short lead time orders. We do not want to lose this opportunity. So we will have some robust level of die. So when there is a immediate request, we will be able to cater to that. So at this point, we do not want to reduce the OI from this level. And for the plant, the demand is very uncertain. So we have not set any deadline. And we are maintaining a very extreme conservative view remains unchanged.

T
Takero Fujiwara
analyst

I have a follow-up question regarding your plan. Also, you have taken a pause in taking up the operation. Are there any impairment risk on Cofo?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

Well, at this point, for Cofo plant, we have not decided to announcements permanently or decided not to start the operation. So looking into the future, the power demand will definitely grow also for the products that need to be manufactured in Cofo, not just over the short term, but over the next few years, we are working on the development. So I think the biggest uncertainty is how long is this posed going to last? But in the future, we continue to maintain a view of operating on this plant. So at this point, we do not rather need to make a big impairment.

Operator

Thank you very much. We are almost time to wrap up. So this concludes the Q&A session. Lastly, Shibata will give some remarks. Mr. Shibata, please?

H
Hidetoshi Shibata
executive

So certainly, things are uncertain. And how to respond to these uncertainties, it's different among companies, industries, the client industries. So situations vary depending on who you are. Given these circumstances, we are being a bit more conservative than usual, given the recent developments. And what is more important, I believe this is a wake-up call. So taking this as a trigger, something we have thought about.

But going forward, we will be more grounded and focused on improving our long-term competitiveness. That should be our focus. Situations change rapidly. So as we've done before, if needed, we will communicate to you and share information with the relevant stakeholders. We ask for your continued dialogue with us. Thank you very much.

Operator

This concludes Renesas Electronics 2025 First Quarter Earnings Call. Thank you very much for joining us today.

Earnings Call Recording
Other Earnings Calls